UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
9 p* A4 `, y: n1 ]0 uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider D* W7 T4 F1 p l% ?, j
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
( F3 E% `2 I$ Z/ Bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
0 }7 X) C: F, r( n5 GAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
8 i" J, n/ F) P9 l3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of f Q. q- |4 x, r) z- D
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
/ X+ y& l& c) c1 @hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
1 [: o4 R# Q1 _$ X# D* x5 M. Zeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ u& t6 @* Q: Z( y; ]
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is U3 j% P* n, }6 _" h
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are _8 b1 a4 V2 @% b2 \
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 E0 Q/ E; E7 p
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I* E, [# p7 D+ _" o3 b4 J
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 s* \9 v, e w# `& m" L
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 _+ q2 @' a B: u! v
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
& l/ X% q8 Z5 T$ b, ^/ J x; Chas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment: }8 m! p, T- D3 y7 T# K# \
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
6 n9 e+ K& [' |" c+ R/ Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are$ ?! M' t6 O. ?8 L2 z% @5 P4 M5 Y
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
: V7 T" i5 m2 }sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 |7 Y# b1 _( G8 u9 r/ h. W
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move& y/ C; L, g( j$ F
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& ]! W1 \6 W# h* i* a% O. G' G& L
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 ~# y {. j) p( w0 C
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) Q' N: @ A$ R- G& E0 q
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 v# Y8 m: A" g5 J+ w
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& S6 Q. J& B6 k
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ O8 K9 q8 O# P& a$ J
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ v2 Y, D8 N+ o2 ^8 H
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
* d7 d) d+ Q! r( h1 xthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
& R7 z% I. \) H+ k1 W6 p. iimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
6 i" K1 x0 B U/ _development.
Hutongs
3 q5 }1 u( u; s2 E1 W0 @in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ O* G: G D' q# y" l p/ p+ U4 F
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ U0 }* ~1 b' K7 e/ n' s
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 \# Y r [; n/ ^( ~' {
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
- H: m/ \7 V5 ~) i, g: pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.) S, G/ h2 e: {+ \$ R, ~
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; j* w2 o; { G! ~
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ N1 p9 j: }9 C6 Y, M8 ~4 x( p
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 ]) [$ g: x; |% p1 b
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
7 D( h. f3 H5 E/ y: [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" s$ H4 G8 p; J: i! x
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ l( b7 B* L0 j
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
. I0 s0 h8 B U0 {6 h, W3 u7 ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
2 c4 z: S( ~+ ]8 T C1 Yproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be5 b2 I- S! I) f: [4 w b2 ~" m4 Y
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 b# w4 Q3 w. U2 n
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( h) q( o! X) o1 Y4 E% z- a& J9 I
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: e4 V+ R! C) B6 J
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
7 L4 f$ o! ] c' R3 Amemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
* x6 w+ }( q" A1 f, ~; UNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( T( W4 Z4 q H! ~2 U9 R
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
) ^7 X8 H1 O' I) E( Lnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
2 j& f. R9 }7 D! j& f. Xof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these& I. W) S' @, T- r4 P1 x/ D
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 Q1 Q' C' a. D
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they# E6 ?( ^2 Z% i5 ]9 ^3 V
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
6 E2 u9 i1 p( D! T2 @% Hof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before+ }: E/ @& G$ q& H
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all& U) _2 b. \. ]. U( D
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
& K1 T, s7 ~# q7 ~: j% Eapartments are the way to go? No.. o- F0 U. q, M9 I: r( }
0 F) R& @! Y# W U! D v9 t 5 h+ _# F ?6 ?! l: i2 Y- g' L1 J3 m
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
& Q' O* l7 i1 |8 C9 [( j1 i) d0 vsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
5 r2 U: N8 C3 k# M# G; N! w( W, f, q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" I2 G: E4 _9 h( r
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so# p7 m! i8 H2 U( |2 ]
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, W1 @, ~/ O: e
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
) q3 w# Q# S8 D$ _0 cBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 O% H, e# F( X" K/ G
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|