服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6687|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its $ \% x% @1 {2 C4 Z0 F# darchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 l. H1 D( o1 s+ |# h" g" G5 ~Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # p; `* F/ s+ Y* T- gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ a0 p. v3 K4 o% |; O According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 M# P. b8 s7 }9 b- U 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of& m# U l! ?9 N$ z, r4 E Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within , \& }" [1 q: Q, ^hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among; \, l4 I% p! ?5 i each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 N t# x& C+ {) |/ ^ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is $ ^3 X( R( W3 A% w% P* ?3 s% D( yharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 8 K' o7 q* G+ c) O! ^! ~0 l/ f1 }descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . W7 n* R0 Z: k9 z. uforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I6 L# `5 u, X2 u" {. m( e. x was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great, M/ [% u1 ~# U+ B1 u impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 5 e/ E* \' w$ [/ e5 |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong . u( p( ~# b5 L# S' V$ ]. e: thas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ! T4 e6 x' ~; w' c/ Jof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that2 }+ O" W8 Y' o: ?7 B( H no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are. z. P" |$ o# F7 q only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a * l" x6 b# x h0 k; G- S2 Bsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government " }9 @2 A. o9 ~want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move + w! V3 d1 o1 A; K0 I' Dto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& W8 t& i3 t6 J. z "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,; a7 U8 ^5 ]- k. l this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are f: O/ L+ S& u5 Rstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to " ~* f" G3 u- j1 x' ~7 r3 v0 j0 S"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make; @0 A1 ?- @ ~ }( B) s0 M4 } money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 8 I0 [2 H1 ?4 ]: y( L ?a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a, O4 y: I: k* n# ~. t2 s" z" [ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across9 r( V2 _0 V9 g! y \ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & r3 j/ i* Y( B& C* N, Vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 |4 c" r% M. \# K( Z- B development.

Hutongs , m7 h6 G$ K+ M! B: t1 a$ A! @6 T$ |in the old days were residential area where people actually lived % \& f7 m( T; H6 ]$ g- Uthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 a7 P; n5 N9 T: H& |7 { in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not) L1 G' x( B* N* c0 a. R- G- _- { have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you- q- D5 m2 {, p! V* m2 | will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 6 C6 Z; D# }* D$ Q2 QFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; q [+ k$ p( q- p* I# m, E to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 5 l5 m" i' c) j1 I& b3 L7 j; O" e4 Sto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses l' i1 k4 S! @/ X% [/ p% Y! W0 X: tsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) k; f' L5 V6 i; S* h unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 l4 E% l+ H+ ? i. i live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 8 _' ^8 e+ c% I$ D" v, ]hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the % T- u) N' i& ?6 \. nbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( H$ T1 J, `; g- Y1 Iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be: O4 G% G% o6 Q renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 5 F' H$ f9 r$ U7 ^% ?Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% c% `% L; }" w; s/ y; v9 ? people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be5 O, h3 i8 N" ^3 n3 n) n4 |: Y torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished$ X) N( X. O5 X& e' |/ w memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 1 o% |4 f" A7 E& u$ ]( WNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, w- |% D1 `5 G2 ^( \1 D0 R' A5 K aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially6 [, _/ G1 @& o# r* R r non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image7 r) N: L' A2 o( `3 v# L of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ( W- h9 V P3 E: L, OHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 3 F8 |5 @- b+ {* M' ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they& a0 R6 D. k- M may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 ~: M: h% N4 ]9 {$ ~2 [7 Y8 W7 T+ U of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ' [+ J: [# g, K. s, q8 p. S+ q c"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all" F8 v3 }/ ^! B: o people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 [. i7 A$ X7 W- i0 _ apartments are the way to go? No. 2 D2 r8 C# b# L9 I) m: E 5 @8 H7 ~6 P2 D% W9 X$ J# M $ S( j) h6 E3 L$ L4 t$ E

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the7 H- U3 q3 i$ I( T situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this0 r+ v- t7 B3 L& x0 i8 `+ O; ~ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 P/ o, Q: R8 F4 E9 G9 zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so: F# ~/ s6 T5 B) _8 X6 h* j fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant , I5 n" [" R# A; {7 J* Z: aresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ! [1 ]- I; e& F& LBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' H8 \- m x5 I) @- w. iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-10 01:43 , Processed in 0.130043 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部