服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6623|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its, C+ ?3 f" ] s architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 `/ y) ~$ D, I5 W1 WBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"( i; l( M2 t( |" t city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 t" M; u) O7 E5 o' R0 J# Z According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; |+ w" E4 P8 K% H4 i" y 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ |* G- Q0 U+ H r. g+ p4 B3 y Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within! K# K/ m. C$ I6 T. p1 L hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 2 ]0 M: C ^- O! Aeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " p: C+ m; N* M5 w) ^# fand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 3 L. C. E! V" p5 i# \+ g2 }- @harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are" F+ B$ r' m/ V descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 I3 E! [7 J |$ S7 X3 |% i# G' d forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 4 i. _$ q. r5 ^& ~3 r6 L8 r Pwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great/ |) V. f" @2 X* \( q, I# ~) `, ? impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,( i* Z3 z; e D, a- t& T and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong9 N* D* E! R' j4 D has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% ^1 T! @/ j2 N of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 7 L8 R0 c3 P. W* S: ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 8 D. Z; { X" E0 [7 }* v5 }only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 6 Y0 V& k/ g. H" Osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 0 V# o. n9 t4 @ D; Lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move7 [7 W! D. P$ v1 N to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& M9 X* A( r' n4 g( N+ r/ s "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, - R: J8 A. M) S' T, v. B" nthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are , D2 P+ V1 K- G% q! O8 `still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 [2 n* G8 V" L; _. F3 _ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make $ y1 W6 B9 K% e' W& m3 i ~' zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was% M$ x# |+ T% c) m0 }( V8 A. r0 r a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ! V/ K1 X1 _ c4 u) w, m2 k2 hparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' e/ p8 k% n* g& e the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural : D0 y' m, I! [6 Bimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! f2 c6 t: V4 u. H' s% S4 o development.

Hutongs 7 I; p8 F9 s' vin the old days were residential area where people actually lived ! l1 k1 y. o. a( Q; A8 ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 5 Z0 _$ E/ E1 Cin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not & Q1 l# Y3 O/ W7 @1 v- C1 mhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you : s7 K6 M4 u% Y# J* swill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ {3 _$ k8 f9 l# z Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date6 Y8 c+ M. `6 e to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / m4 o: U6 ] F) X2 Jto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses " o. {2 [2 g' msupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 Z% }; Q, k3 ?unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" ~/ b% `1 S7 g9 o3 q live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 g l/ M+ ]/ ?" V: x, e! a hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 1 O# ^- `% [& |: D$ l0 \balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the : K1 F) V# \, |1 {project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ @2 K' Y6 I( t4 I renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong * D* D& P% l k* GMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 8 Q& b' {8 f- y- _people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be6 V% p \! E3 F* \: E9 C torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# C- \! ]2 C/ H+ a memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ V3 d: ^$ @5 Z# A1 \6 jNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are , S {2 t; l Y5 \ galigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, J1 B: R e( @, Q9 `. Q1 A non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image: i" |% O9 o9 x, ?( b+ t of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ( W7 T+ q: E; O5 wHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those + o7 N$ ]6 F' h5 z4 \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ' K- R5 Z% e2 H6 ^8 O) Kmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" K, x8 H, ^* g) P# w: i of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 4 u/ x7 O& f* j3 H0 x/ O0 a, Z5 }# P: C"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 }1 N- ~8 O2 [, Cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise & F9 D( r. i1 d5 F5 z9 b- Dapartments are the way to go? No. ( [9 \( t% g' Q9 I . ~9 Z! m c2 y _# B( w/ {; ]

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& F+ p! F3 e4 ?8 y situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 2 T. k4 c: |& B% F; X! t2 _'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make + f; m, \, _5 n9 Z2 j+ u+ u4 tno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so , H4 l! _0 E u* J1 Q) Q' C. @fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 2 x! P' ?; N) `resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless2 w8 E" _4 e! S$ e: ]/ L9 \ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* I9 }: J1 M2 P0 O" G9 d& h3 O unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-1 21:53 , Processed in 0.118488 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部