服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6229|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its . D/ w' p. W4 f( M/ Tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 \" E1 t- n& r1 Q Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"9 M2 a1 H2 [8 ?% }: [8 E/ J) g( E city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. C4 S% y" X1 SAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . l! p; d) f& h3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of s/ h# }' U9 c9 e1 HManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 1 f- C* R" X5 H/ x! y; qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( t. f5 n7 |: Q) X& N" P each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera) w3 x! W+ o# S) t, D: h and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ C4 {& }" z/ m! ` harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are0 _% [1 b7 k' H0 O+ A descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and% u$ K8 Y0 P4 I2 l( K" D. q) M forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I5 K: h0 O/ b; |9 ~ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great " A; J* K0 [# a& F& c8 wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,, h! w1 |. C7 d" w, A0 T3 L" L and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong0 H9 ?4 E0 b5 i# L2 ]9 w has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment; J b( x- |# G+ N; b/ b& {" v of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 8 H' l" J8 p* ^& B' p" uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are2 Q+ S4 T; n# i8 y. K only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ' T; O# F' h7 B9 D1 r8 K- e7 ssort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 5 `) Y d# ^0 T+ o9 L4 j( V1 nwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move* G4 T& j$ ]+ o9 J. |, z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 3 R5 k6 U8 k, H$ ]0 K) M) G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 7 B% [5 x$ T$ n7 b' Rthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are0 L0 H1 v- S$ B6 ` still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to : M. L7 j3 g7 x, ^5 W: `"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 8 r% W! u2 O/ r4 qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was5 u0 q. O% r" ]. C6 G \ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 4 j: v/ D* E6 M0 {9 B# ]/ Nparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 8 L9 X0 h6 m: h8 gthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 8 |$ Q4 O/ p; R5 M/ @, }5 himportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ! t2 B- \ V4 j& @! S9 Zdevelopment.

Hutongs F5 s& }2 U7 A in the old days were residential area where people actually lived' T- }/ y5 K# k* \! t" P' T# }5 Z there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions( Y) q% ?" d' l6 R6 K) ~+ i in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not& N: F9 \- I( e# s have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& W3 J( t! _6 O0 Q) s9 N will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 3 u/ R+ O) ?8 C9 i) bFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date : Z& V) e. ~( q$ b& Ato support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used * Z. p, T2 u' Z, Oto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses . _2 w; R9 _8 [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically + J# f, U2 \4 M2 r. A" t$ Munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to; c: K2 B! p5 Z; R4 O+ J live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! `5 R# ^; ^- Q2 z0 R1 \. Q) m hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the/ i9 P! A* }6 Q6 [0 z balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the : _7 k( P. s0 pproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. l. z! S1 T' [ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- g7 n6 ^ A+ s Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how! C! b1 `* h4 d4 n people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be" r# L- F* B8 W2 a+ B& g5 `4 i torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " P% \8 t4 `, Y. {. z8 Omemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".) O3 H& V1 ]% D% ~9 N5 @ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, |5 {- _' u6 G$ N8 ^ aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 5 Q. I9 x- N) v+ C" D ~! r5 Dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" m0 T2 E8 E- S% X; a$ y of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these + `* ]* U6 u0 C, }/ g# k) N! W1 D1 ?Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 2 H6 ]+ J* O0 v" q2 Rpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 6 D, Y4 f5 s4 E, Z jmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some " _+ B, I2 S/ E8 bof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 _% N7 |* e8 i& Z "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ a" L5 Z, A0 i/ o7 f( |people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise& ` `3 ~. o i: \ apartments are the way to go? No. 6 G, ~2 {! e% R' c _% K. F3 Y( |3 [2 Q& T : \% y4 ~* V7 D+ k) A3 ]8 X# z

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the4 @2 Y8 z5 s1 g/ x+ r/ Z situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 l5 C# K9 Q' u; J% P# ^5 T 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % {- } E. j. d# Y3 t- Pno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so' h) ]% o! g' h5 j: U4 y9 Z; c fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant% B3 O7 C* P* |7 O' ?& }4 K3 P9 J resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 7 ?& t- @: [* \' {' H8 k1 YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 7 h7 S( O, d9 E9 P/ a# n8 Dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-11-26 22:53 , Processed in 0.128424 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部