服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6513|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its * M6 \1 @6 N% T$ Y% Garchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider% R& U; h2 V @! |1 u2 e- M l4 G Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ( H- B8 _: h( I! S3 s% ?city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.0 `2 B+ w8 l; L! z' \ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,2 @/ h7 V0 H) h6 I: E5 q3 Q" h, x 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 E& Y+ H8 f- T6 O: EManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 0 ~0 x" p2 J @2 A9 B* {hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among) t3 {0 d4 X7 V( \' M/ G each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera, Y% Y9 U3 |, V2 O and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is4 @+ \! n g! M/ w harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ; U9 @0 `4 S% J) ^5 I( q1 ?descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 l; D6 N# w/ {+ ?; x C1 z% ` forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I/ V! {! Y8 w8 r" ? was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great" k7 c ?: | P. j5 _ impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,. w& n% h( b9 ^9 G2 X$ [$ G and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong - l9 f2 l& B G+ Y, ^has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment) J, l* |+ R) ^2 x3 V, W" ^ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ) g1 {' X( {5 N2 H8 e4 o; Jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are # c8 M( _4 u( ^' `5 W9 d- ronly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a( Q% R( L: ?, i8 l! \5 ? sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government2 I% }' P I$ m want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move5 }7 A/ c7 @* U4 c7 o0 A" d% } to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is* j0 L$ E# u+ [. g7 Z6 v "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 7 s3 f \! ]" e% r4 Wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ A' q4 s0 ]; D, p6 s% o still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ! H1 g4 Y$ G- O) l2 w6 ]& S# @"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 1 s. ~9 Z. j9 k0 _6 Gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: a9 Y" P4 f/ { a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a * o) h) m( [- w' t$ q7 n0 ?parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across / t" Z# r7 ?6 Uthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural8 E- P) q0 J$ P* R2 g7 Q importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 1 K; i }# V/ |; xdevelopment.

Hutongs0 }3 `: y/ I4 X in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 h: {- \2 \1 M! S8 Bthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions* X7 @" R Z3 V7 Q4 h# A5 X- w in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not % e8 I7 \; v v- B! chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you; ^1 v8 m5 e$ M will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ c. l# L- z/ Z8 z/ _6 d+ d Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 C6 f- y4 y3 M to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used \! x# M: b! N7 I/ U9 H* k to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 9 f+ J- C3 N2 P" p" w4 d/ Hsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically }# ]5 M w$ L* x1 n% V3 R; N( i* ounfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to + [9 X: U) S! N+ clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 0 b- ?+ ^; }6 h4 \' F) ^& Khutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the % B# b) a* M5 z, f5 s& s! ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the, k0 e, H8 Q1 P1 |- j w7 S5 Z project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be , c1 A4 d7 r+ W" K& Vrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ W+ t9 F0 Q. n H+ w4 F! @ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how4 T- D9 o* _$ ?7 i' J people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be5 [5 I4 h5 ~+ @4 a( ^ torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished) z7 G* g6 h8 X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".7 S- V2 Z2 k$ ~ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are6 ^0 M: I4 Q$ K+ ^' ?7 y: ? aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially% J4 p6 f' h- v- E7 _" t# a3 v non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image! L8 y+ q {- E! V! |# g of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 1 E1 X; C6 B( I! m, v0 eHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& b2 m5 l0 g- P$ h- B+ }) U$ C people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 5 ^% ]- |& m1 emay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some `9 u* N( }' vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 G6 ?; _5 |9 U "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ' `1 @( X, w0 lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise - x. L( ^) j- [8 h3 f" r* d1 Oapartments are the way to go? No." v( A0 c. \, u6 f0 o# Y! v * y* O, {% L6 q! ^ ; \% Z5 S0 [+ g" Z0 F

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the( K( d2 J2 S9 N: Y+ `. i2 D situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( m" g0 C0 J9 `; k'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ! G3 b# p! N0 O8 n: \; j& Ino money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so p v. n1 L7 I( Y1 E+ [ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' H& W4 X, ]6 I4 z' Cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ( C) p: w0 J/ pBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is4 N4 q& z7 ^7 H9 [5 |" U$ M. I unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-19 21:23 , Processed in 0.133752 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部