UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its# d2 a% d6 E( j4 G' f9 |" B, M
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider' T, V- a0 W! l/ o; H# J8 N
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
1 B" X7 V+ l+ o. G Rcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
) ~; L9 I" l4 s) M8 s& I; FAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 K: z6 y& n' l* E: }; g
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
4 e3 O( ^: V/ t% k9 `* MManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within+ t! ^7 i: E S8 u
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 x3 ]/ A+ f/ A
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
# J8 e5 V1 _& y4 a& m) Rand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
/ v. o4 A$ X x) [! w7 vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are1 Q6 H0 N" Y2 _0 Z! W& R
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and$ x* `! i$ \* e( v
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
0 ]+ U, q' s: f) P1 cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
) q5 |7 f5 @% [. dimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 D$ Z* I1 d& J9 C- P
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong) p# z% P' [. W7 S
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
- G6 M9 k- ] s+ g' {of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that+ m9 k; N. P- R. ?) @
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
* H* f7 D2 S/ Z2 C# ~; B0 N3 {only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
9 r4 {- b( G2 J, H" y0 {- q; `sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& V" c+ c9 i9 b# I2 }1 q
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
( n- @* y2 X8 \- pto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is1 a2 Z2 m, w' {. M
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,, B5 ~. c& x# R
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are% ~) a# }6 q( @ I. J2 S
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
$ K& Z! c/ h& o5 i2 }+ j4 u"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
5 e2 I1 {- k6 r) s" L# {! Vmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
- _ h |& G# v1 i% ?" ^" `a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ ^9 X) D1 ^' w. ]: x4 w
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 N) ?1 Y# L* W" D4 {
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
4 i5 S& N7 G7 Y" L. Pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
! [& M9 t/ a2 F5 G0 qdevelopment.
Hutongs
7 P4 Z/ a9 U2 @, F5 Yin the old days were residential area where people actually lived3 N9 ~2 ?9 @$ _' r! q9 J
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions. g" l6 B+ V, L f
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
/ B1 j! w r! c6 |3 Bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( p+ H5 E5 i. f7 f% l1 A
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
* P% l' x. Z5 \4 i( p* SFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 R; p8 N7 L/ U8 w
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
' N# m7 a) A& ~9 u( j' lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 X0 @ O% B$ Y; `& ^; A$ d b1 t9 {
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
. u7 U* l4 T' q( o# Z& c' I6 Yunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
2 l& H$ X8 }$ a; `, {live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
5 e; G! ^+ K2 q1 I5 o: V4 U8 Whutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the. ?% C$ D! ^) ^
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
+ E. b/ v/ K! N) _+ z. L/ U. Cproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be* v- h6 S s/ \5 S
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
0 z' f' l6 i6 C* ]: i- w( {Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
# Z. R' h; P% t+ mpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
9 v {; B5 |3 \7 a+ B! _torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
8 u! s$ Y- y7 f7 T& [. a1 ?7 t# S5 Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"., N; F8 k; }2 n w* D- O, |
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
/ f ^& X- J7 E% u8 [# g7 t5 w! @aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
+ h! \3 {& b* E3 ~non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 w: s! D, d/ l. }( J% v; {) O0 }+ S) Y# \
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
6 i% K0 t1 T" G( a7 F. ~' EHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
]4 I5 p. G4 z6 d7 Q: S& Ipeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) J/ i- P9 }8 ]. ?2 O; `4 y
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
8 P# Y+ {- l# Nof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
" @4 J& e* s! h4 k, ?"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all3 W! i7 r8 r5 P
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
1 b/ \2 e. [/ @# Aapartments are the way to go? No.
# ?% O- k1 t) s 3 K) x) J6 P7 l& X
' f; G" N( l$ [1 B7 \
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
8 x0 w- U* u: X! p+ u. g2 wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
3 w: c( ]" R# R1 o) _( Y/ [, j i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
4 h) c! x a/ k2 ]/ L9 Sno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ~3 ^+ _% v) ^# a: e2 W$ l9 h
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant; g/ a7 X, N4 w: H) V1 V
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
* u* s$ D8 v4 v3 OBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is. C& B. q* z) ?
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|