|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6164|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its" V7 V3 [) V9 T% @2 v architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider % e l7 ?6 Z7 Q% T* G3 ?Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + i6 o% b0 Q" a9 \city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.# N, \) B% \2 G$ f According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ! P" U6 q& v# \0 t3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ y$ r- T5 M& }% ~ Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within* H! \4 {1 s# Z Q+ z, a2 v/ V+ F8 k hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among % p3 I; k- i z9 D9 Yeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 G( s) G; l" v& g% q" F and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ( S$ m+ D6 A8 n2 fharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' g. A. U, A0 y$ t m. c1 h descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and C; X K; s/ g4 R, r& c+ y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' I( a8 v, C5 Nwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great * |( Q: Y1 t$ l. ]. Y$ Kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,2 w, [- @- B4 y6 u3 \; y; a and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' J& g+ o H1 w* |; p/ D has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% O9 w7 M, f+ ^. a of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ' M8 m2 {, S2 L9 Bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( T9 Q- O# v# o ]( K* }. N+ n B$ I only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a3 S* A# i6 V' P9 E- y0 ] sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government + y+ @0 j$ ~( f, Awant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" w! m% ?5 Y& t! q6 b* }7 ^ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is: P4 [6 G# ^: I: _/ m* e "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, # Y1 R: r( j8 Jthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; h+ @5 L4 T& T$ [$ O8 l still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to* U' D& [& }9 r2 M0 j "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 a) U3 Y2 l- h. X- x R( _! h$ l money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was . ]& `& A8 X, X# Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ; S7 j' n* ~. ?parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across : f8 ~# p+ ?2 S) }0 d4 pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; Q1 I; F; v$ t7 j) ^% E# Bimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for$ t0 Z# F9 k. {# a+ e+ S development.

Hutongs ; F- s/ H# m' l7 @ Q8 Win the old days were residential area where people actually lived1 J& R8 z+ \. n" C there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions * l- e+ T$ \9 @5 B# jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ; T) X' z5 Q5 C) ?; chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' l. f3 H. J# j! Z* twill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs." @5 E5 ^+ E M, v5 A2 L% z4 N Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date & M- H* r- u6 h/ k3 t7 pto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used& ?( r4 o/ m/ k7 a to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses$ S) R4 }5 R4 `* H* L h1 ~" l) c support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically3 F( g; Y* T1 i7 l3 c; i unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 S6 @) }# f% B! j6 M! c live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,& D' {" P6 D6 G( V. K hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the , g7 K' K# X1 Z' _+ p. _" Kbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the / F5 B$ L- D/ s9 }project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be * W" q, ?+ O5 }# D& orenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 4 J9 a$ u6 J" kMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how* @ p9 Y* w! Z! T L people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 ?! |! z- A$ Y9 l# N. I torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished , y% K( L7 R% D: F e$ F8 P2 Amemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 1 S8 }1 _- ?% c$ A, {) c. a) p8 MNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 R5 U* ^$ |9 a aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially- l2 F9 I6 z- v/ ?( a" r% v non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image : d9 ?1 |0 K. b; R O3 P6 S e' J- Bof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these & D0 I5 c8 ^5 L- j% L3 mHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those / H* N5 l8 {, M* h }+ ^& }people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they& `' i" h9 C& E( X8 f5 o' x may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 7 f2 x+ c' w2 D/ x @- p. l5 _of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before " W9 C) f' N/ E"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all - f3 {8 A- @6 \/ F( f3 q% Cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" D" E7 L3 g6 q apartments are the way to go? No.7 W k9 R% T- ~, z 4 E g0 O4 d) _; Z 3 W# |/ i+ a ~4 G& s4 I' n

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the$ w, j& x. J/ e situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this + `2 e) a3 N# w3 i8 X0 ^$ O+ }'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make7 g, `8 T# q8 |( U" G no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so % ?- u7 J, G/ Y5 i5 V+ Y gfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant- S) ^4 Z: ~4 x3 B. i- \' E2 C resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % o/ z, |; d, J# U, e6 h. GBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ r. E* D" i* B6 Q6 L2 I& `unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-18 15:37 , Processed in 1.168805 second(s), 5 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部