服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6310|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ( v+ g/ {! z: u; j$ i2 narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider . ?* B" W4 S. O* S4 `5 H; ]8 yBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 4 V8 b5 u/ U0 Z1 U: }1 z9 Qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( V1 @* a5 l* k/ D/ d# uAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,- V8 l c. p: ~+ x' m 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of% }$ y9 n5 D! k7 q Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ N7 |1 M# o. S% O hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among$ T. v% \+ ?) _4 n: m' j each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 8 T7 x/ x4 m# t0 K6 {! I0 S9 K2 `and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ y" A" z. }, k' q3 p harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are9 Q1 S. d8 N, ]4 L descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and) }2 X6 r' w9 _3 G( l( | forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I* l9 p; V6 [/ D# Z) L, c G was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great1 N3 o8 e S: F" T+ X- ^; H4 H impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 k3 d( L/ d0 P B( u and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 Y- q2 H3 V4 v q1 i! a) o has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment1 F- o. `0 ~" m* m& r5 F of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that/ j7 @, n$ ^9 z R' G1 w" r no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * r/ z L$ p7 I- j: X; Yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, N; B- m1 t+ b" E% ? sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 4 t/ p$ B, W$ Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# Q$ S0 i. V8 v0 D to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is $ r# w$ l) a, ]6 M4 f$ e"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, % G6 B* V+ x; @. a7 ^+ {/ s! hthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ D: W. x% A) g! K, B2 k still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 0 \& E3 ~9 V5 S"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make4 S! D0 n) ?! y5 Y0 z, `! T3 P+ R, \; U money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ! O; [0 N; |$ ?, c6 \ ^a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & t- X# M8 a' z; Q8 I% _parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across# ~+ ~, C- ]: c6 @+ H the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ; e$ u9 ^+ L1 F& n4 Kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for/ C3 K+ e5 z) [- L, \7 Y, W0 J1 b development.

Hutongs * g% R; v; B+ w, x2 _5 ?( Z) K+ f$ `2 {in the old days were residential area where people actually lived. l7 R1 [. n, ^2 O( @, g there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) S: [8 N) \% O# k( u+ l9 k7 ~ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ; M" i) v$ f& b3 M, n( }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you : Y! U0 Y1 Z K! N$ p1 r: ~will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- t+ E! s) s9 F5 |8 o n+ B Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ) I, c9 f- c7 [( q, B% pto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used+ R) v5 ]$ ~: t0 K7 V to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 1 D/ u$ ~% P4 S8 y8 p! Z# xsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically& {5 |$ {: M# g* I unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to / I2 L0 y6 H9 H2 Clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, + T" S; g2 P; ihutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the9 F2 \2 [6 z$ o$ B$ K6 W+ K! H balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 q$ C: S; ~$ E2 g& i0 o3 q( s! C project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ) l1 _* f/ N6 J, {; E8 Erenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& V( o4 f2 d5 }% K+ L; X Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ o! ?& Q% G- u& Y" k2 N people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be0 L9 ~) [) r9 ~, S& p2 d torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 2 Q4 l" a6 _; h( ?. e1 Imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".+ Z, z- r* _7 h) z+ C, D" h Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are - a' b+ ]; f' M5 x! T6 I- ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 3 z" b& W$ \: j& C1 o7 [non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ! c$ Q" j/ r8 C. \! D: d, ?6 f Y- Qof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these # h. m% ]( _ j: n! CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those4 ^0 w3 K* A" @8 B9 x people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they $ D/ r1 R- ^* b' I9 ^may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 2 ~9 w# I4 V" a- W' Q9 W4 [of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before7 @& n1 r2 G5 @; d1 _ c" R. C! f "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ P+ D2 U. ?) @' }7 C% i# xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . C7 j4 o, v5 ]5 c8 M; v6 oapartments are the way to go? No.3 g" D& z6 V6 f7 V! D7 L9 Q, a 3 z) f3 M+ y* k# H, \7 X& e k* z/ e1 M4 b) t+ l Q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 4 _2 l3 y0 u$ Wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ s8 X" S, ~% X+ S1 `" ^ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; n1 w2 i5 v/ T/ v8 B& U, X no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 8 z" f; x5 s- ?; ~1 afast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ }! N, j! a; U7 p% Y S0 H9 \ resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, b8 J) ^9 Y0 U9 q2 X Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ( d& x- L9 d! A. f2 Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-23 05:11 , Processed in 0.113412 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部