UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its) H$ Q/ v0 H l
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; d& n; ^7 T% z/ ?! ^6 ]
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"% P0 E" \: [' u6 q j; A
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
. ^8 o4 O% x7 l- `! aAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,1 u" m% x+ i; r. |
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
( X: r4 B9 E; Y* w+ K+ g7 Z& CManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
, @9 J! I# W% [5 U ~- t6 ~hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among/ Y! E% }* C3 e- m! V
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera q/ {6 k9 R) R" h2 G9 b
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is. g+ B( }+ X5 _. n: o, J B
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' ]; _0 ] G. C* o" g
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and2 a* i9 L% P7 G- i1 d
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I' r' P" u! K1 D) B1 D7 W0 t
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
7 E0 X/ r: ^+ B; M5 M& |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
0 w% j/ j' O( oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- }! V+ b4 p; C' d+ N% z6 a; z
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
2 M3 Z7 f1 L. H+ \4 @of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
$ N8 Q' X! T* b" c' K" Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
" A6 B }9 E1 m4 D# d8 ^2 ^/ @only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
5 M, Q; f4 m, b7 psort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
0 S. `) s6 h' P9 ~# ~- swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move( \# I- U, i# D
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
* ]: N7 Q( B5 } O: [/ P7 O"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. |- O$ h8 c" b+ v3 Z
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
/ h. m. C$ [* Gstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to. d+ h1 n- Q. l1 r- _- a8 j# ]% d
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
! q+ a2 M6 y) p& }( {" D5 S5 o) Kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was( f2 n7 U1 C3 a: c1 L
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
/ O, L" w2 a5 y. y3 M* } Y# Hparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
. Q& i* }' p, W+ ?: dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural2 m1 n9 y* B, w1 ?
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
5 E5 G+ C5 T9 h1 N5 s. \development.
Hutongs
4 T0 D) g- W: m( j( ?, s$ D$ \/ Xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
1 X1 B% c+ \3 b& l2 [, T7 vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions1 F) Y8 m# _/ C1 k
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
9 K3 l3 C1 j2 w' q' ~have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 N' ]8 q& h" T# B% jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ L/ ?. ?, a2 O7 i, c
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
" L* L2 ^& V8 k4 i1 d' |; kto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
2 R* o u# l6 Yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
) o9 v$ T2 f" z7 t+ h# Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' n2 J0 v) r. H( ]
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to# z4 n# _# e$ K7 E- u7 D
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
* }8 y4 B' r) j( B1 B: p% p5 I8 o1 |; Shutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the$ Q6 L0 w7 I1 G; I4 z: l
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
( N) h4 C0 \7 K0 U+ zproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
2 W; j) C8 ~3 W; `: Frenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
" n3 E. ^) W$ K3 X+ DMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
" m' x& e" ?7 U4 q% V% X" Jpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
7 ~9 f7 @/ O! c0 e3 W% T0 ftorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
p# L5 T% \9 h x% M2 \memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". V- g4 b! I/ z2 `2 Z$ J* j
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( {; K3 u- `# W
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
. k! g& l5 n) D( j- [ Dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image# L7 |; q8 f7 P1 R, g: u( E
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% c" u$ }' c1 y( n; e! {: `$ v! K
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those9 l2 P' V0 W) R: @' a
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they% H8 A, |" g3 a7 X E8 \& m3 m
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
, Y: \& S+ [7 \9 b. lof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
# b# p& f* S% o" f' a) }" t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 U$ m n7 e8 I+ ~/ H; i
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* h& r. B% d5 j" \3 \
apartments are the way to go? No.
% c, i- E$ l' v: }8 _9 r. b : ]# \. k/ w5 W$ b0 ^
% O% p4 z s" Q r
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the; C9 S9 F9 }2 I9 I/ d0 Y$ M, f
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this- {: P. n! ?* a$ t' t5 t9 Z
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; V9 e3 Y- b% ?! i/ W0 g6 G4 V3 H9 j- M
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
5 o, n% o1 Q/ C- ?1 D7 ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) z7 L2 _ \( Z: @resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless$ b8 A/ a$ K+ U! h) N8 x' P
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
) }; m6 W, B9 |# \! runlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|