UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
$ i$ g7 @7 ^8 ]: i; U" C3 G5 r3 Larchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider% M: |1 n3 I- w. C- B8 i ]* b
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
S6 T+ ?' O. b! u( t. Y6 @+ Lcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
) L2 z+ V% B/ L$ o) n5 T* ~According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 O: V; w2 r, j; y" M3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
: t7 p& b" o$ M _Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within" u7 \0 ` R; g
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: v% x2 s+ C+ w5 a6 Z* }
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
4 }" E) S" F; O0 n. u% band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
2 [' Y' b- L; Y+ Iharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
) Q. ?5 G g) j1 j; s3 \descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 A9 k7 ^8 r* z2 f! y
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
5 O3 j8 h& a' J$ F7 P' {was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
* r9 W7 g! h% j: o: v6 vimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,( ~& X3 Q' |1 Q" w5 J
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- I1 F4 V( G1 x) M0 S% G- l
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment0 m0 b0 v0 Y c# I
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
$ `# k# x) ?* B9 i: h$ Dno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are+ Q# M/ ?, G& N0 k7 ], T& T
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, G: r$ @* b3 y1 N
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
" i4 ~0 R2 Z1 }" m, u9 }$ ^want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
0 j9 l c6 {$ G* T" G5 W" @to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is% u1 {! S, s9 X
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
9 ~3 D8 V8 Y0 x# E( l9 Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
6 l) r3 T3 G- ]+ V8 ^- {5 Gstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; ~+ N6 N' A# L3 B0 `' P
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
8 f* F7 ^: e3 G( Emoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was8 V" a# n6 l: U8 l1 S
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a' g6 ~. z! y6 m, Q
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ c" {9 `- Y% E( w
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
: i: s- P6 @( L: g- F3 n vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
/ m# ]- y" V; T* c! ~development.
Hutongs! l8 A* n5 Q9 B g: |) h f+ S
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 r5 [! N7 c5 f% }9 Q- b
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 Q$ r# d6 a9 W D7 I l1 m8 V
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
" _# y4 ]3 f2 H) V |have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you w \- b3 H) p! O
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
9 L. ?& b* V' I; Y8 z$ o, hFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
4 D0 T* s0 M+ oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. |# M1 { x G E6 o x
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
- T8 ]8 ]: t5 D2 nsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically, ]* Q. C$ Z! @6 ^# O8 q% h0 n
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
, L+ x, v, G+ flive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,* K0 ~5 |) ~9 i( E3 D2 @% W( T5 b
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the u, D2 m. e" `1 V9 ]; `* K; ~
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
+ `/ @. v q# lproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
% m/ k0 R! U. a, e; L: Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- L4 B" d% p- d
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) Q/ a) H( k* g( ?" X: Y2 |
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
5 v& ]& o4 K7 ]2 x7 S* w9 storn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished4 t1 |" g. J( n* v$ I5 U7 R, @
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
; g6 j. g; e v) U6 I4 f# NNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
) S! ]) |% M8 |& t1 [3 ~1 l) F! daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
7 w3 Z( Q' \4 O3 E2 Y0 B9 Vnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 N( N ]2 x/ X% L) j
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
8 s o8 x2 b( I# tHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
. A8 i0 o* y6 ~- B8 }' ]people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
7 ?+ T8 R9 {+ Q+ @may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
' p- t* m: q* i- t& Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before' l* \( ~0 d6 ?2 M
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
2 Z# n$ N7 j) ]4 ]: Gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, f9 H+ j9 W5 {6 |# n5 D7 D* h
apartments are the way to go? No.9 X8 g* ^9 A( ^- f O
$ Z7 |) u+ K! r. J' L! n" B
$ N! E5 \2 A* N* t
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
+ P; k' w. l9 m, b1 Y: psituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 P! M6 t- q4 T4 ]6 d0 `/ x
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make2 y- a( s& N4 S
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so* R k5 v% ]( F% d8 P$ Y
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
v$ K' j1 p# `3 o6 h- g7 v5 [resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless1 h' M4 |3 A+ O( Z v
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
; P" K% I5 {3 s! Gunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|