UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 H. K) d- @8 h8 j3 i9 y. u; Z% j
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
3 A9 o* Z( W6 G8 rBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
5 V% |% p4 S& w4 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
6 y& A: J/ l' b) s4 b( W: T1 i! DAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
. Y4 y+ P% @" V0 S5 ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
: @2 |/ x* b/ u, k8 h: @! o# X1 _Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within0 u6 p0 O4 J9 d, o
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
2 |3 @* J+ r: z6 J, }! {each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
$ w% D- A$ q% N/ cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 H4 y3 B( }8 V5 q4 s( r2 Q
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
5 L+ M! L- y& Adescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 Y, M; ?! t9 K: y
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I: J: c6 y8 \( i1 h3 L
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ D+ g9 V# R0 y
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
5 m) `. K( V! S' t, F4 ?! aand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
6 t# p& K# ]' T% P( Fhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
. Y: c3 V3 t6 Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 h' X0 i7 g( i# e
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are* R1 _0 [2 j1 }% k4 j
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 k0 y7 x! e- @# g
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
$ q- O( `- B1 K7 U: ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
+ ^/ \4 D+ E' p2 Y/ Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
5 x0 `: J' T$ b& O5 g4 R% }3 F( }"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
$ b h8 N5 F( j7 k- v) wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' J: ^& H+ i: Z& [! H# |* ~
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
# B3 F1 W+ b( U* Q1 J"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
" i' K" K% _; ^- Omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
+ o) M4 P7 i a0 w5 v) W8 Z% K( I1 Xa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
& G) }+ ~- `0 f5 j. w- zparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
) M% P6 D5 M8 e% b1 [8 tthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
2 j Y" W3 I. r3 C! G8 Yimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
0 _' ]8 |2 s& Z" u L& jdevelopment.
Hutongs2 f9 Q2 d3 n6 P- g2 i
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ ~ i2 A& Z0 D# v4 {
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
, \' T( |# u% m5 @ B) E) n$ ~' iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 k: H8 z/ q5 [* O' |! A
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 W" Y4 r; O( L4 O
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.5 @$ m3 W/ ]' ^& v, H; L
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
7 p }! r% ~9 e5 \( Oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
1 B7 i3 W* P) T6 U, dto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 Z* l. V; h' @/ Y. w" o
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically `# O7 {- L; d+ e
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
- m9 q$ t4 q$ N) l5 i/ ^% M4 R- ^live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' a) _) e0 w2 P4 P
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
$ y1 ?% ^1 F; ^" @! g, T) ]$ Wbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the& ~- O& S* i$ ]* c, e' c9 R' {- P
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 s4 Z, M) S3 z* m( o8 x! A
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ d# S+ ]) h% g8 v7 ]
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how1 i# \5 ^) ?0 }, L% `
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
G9 ]" Z: E! Y' }( atorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished' v, R4 p, v& |) r8 h& v, u W5 X
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
# M4 W- K( d4 \- o' ]$ x. pNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
7 R" a2 K" V \7 K" a, z0 Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
. B) X( {, e" anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
3 L# B6 s& `- P1 r7 A! e" j& uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these: c; D3 [: ]9 d( `0 q. M/ r0 ?9 L
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
" q& o- ] |, j j5 Zpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
$ f$ O/ l) s9 @1 ?may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
, f/ D+ \1 {: {; s; @of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
; i8 e" E, M, _$ D: D0 P$ B"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all- R$ p; e2 @2 o( [( f
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" ^: q; F$ v+ n9 o0 f7 t8 L
apartments are the way to go? No.9 X# ?/ k0 E6 p l
. L2 w9 Z1 n" K - `6 f; O2 `- Q8 e/ [0 V! l5 @/ r
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
8 y8 U, b7 R0 w& B% Rsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, t8 q- T: d; @
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
& u& i# l$ c% A7 k2 J, R3 Zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so: P' g( y( ^, F
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
! J+ J. Z/ ~; h: X9 Z3 Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. O! C1 O" J S, B
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
; g7 s2 }" U# ^unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|