UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
7 @; P+ ~2 e8 I1 c3 Yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider+ B" }7 e& p2 ?) J* X/ H2 j
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
5 l( [- g5 b% Mcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.( y3 V0 c y" O( x7 c5 N. | v
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) ?0 a; Q% }: [% m2 n- j
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of2 C* c, B2 d1 {! E& d) f: X
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
/ b a1 n% C1 Z; whutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among# z; G4 [1 O% X) y# \+ R8 l/ q1 |
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
$ s1 O- T g# o8 S$ Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 k/ s' x2 B* o! N0 w. y6 Sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% }0 p5 c" C5 c% ^; n2 E7 b5 G
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and8 l S" K4 d' ]( g6 }5 J
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
. [6 ^) B+ P. awas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 y c1 o7 [6 h! ~! b, _
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 p4 C* [9 z& }) Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 M0 f* T0 ^' {& k# r+ b
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment9 r* b$ G* g, O6 |
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 G# b2 V9 T4 Z' _* ]
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are3 a0 S& r5 ~7 x! c+ g
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
9 M& w( y y* F# M2 vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- ^: e( v8 \/ }1 l$ W6 C
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move) C1 @/ f$ |: ]* X& L- Z
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is# O7 }& n5 D4 X B' S
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) U2 R7 s. F0 G) Y! M) g3 m% K" y- F
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
0 ~* o$ m; D" v! U. Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
; I( R, d4 c8 s) f8 h"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make1 i* N: z2 q0 q$ q( I9 o* m
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
0 R( X- w5 p& b7 _4 {8 N9 ha beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
& d9 `* R+ p: U S5 [+ sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
9 \8 w! |8 e/ L7 B' o+ L& Dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
, O. A5 t9 o; B4 I+ G B' Y" Z0 U) d! cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
' q! \7 h8 I7 I( u8 c. i/ xdevelopment.
Hutongs) i3 u3 T# r, c) }7 M! p
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived. a5 }; n( b a. q4 D. c' J: ]
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
, @, u9 G6 P2 d% U4 ?" f. Fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
0 \ F/ K; N' g; _* X- w& xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
6 ^/ `2 C" H1 P& e( M+ m3 d( S# L( _will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
. m+ s! `' W) |4 c JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 A- _" u J! C7 a, |: c" F3 k7 N
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 F" E/ R9 M$ K7 o5 V' }
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
, {+ L/ E- y- x( D% g l7 Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
# F J p. Z3 g6 F* j: K- }unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ p; b6 i% z* c# \# x1 J; t1 a
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' ^+ G% O( g4 q! o/ T
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the9 E8 n8 X0 v: T4 L3 g; H
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
. B, \* l+ ~! @2 [ Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
) w& }5 w/ Y! I" v7 v6 Zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( c4 @/ _! D D1 R3 q
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
) R- R& F9 J7 O: Y% D* U+ K Epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
0 M/ {8 x% u0 d. B* Itorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
# H: Y: k/ {7 j# Vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
% q- \- r6 c$ m2 k0 v& R6 H6 W/ n+ cNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
4 m* h( ?; w7 }. baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. \/ R/ \ ]/ c
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image: o' e: i* p7 Z- K
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these& L* b' r( o) n! B( N# ~
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 X4 o) `3 C/ |6 i
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they% M' K5 x* L2 l8 T9 t% `
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
0 t# J! w9 U9 P+ b' L. Q0 _of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
5 v% ^4 Y" P% m, T; R; ~2 G"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) S, s9 `9 t% L2 P( e p4 t, ?
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise% R6 C% |. J: X4 U$ X# e: V' y: [( Y. d
apartments are the way to go? No.& E- M( z" \! B7 ~
! m. a7 L9 g/ U0 w2 H: l+ ]6 J% }
1 I; n0 p- E- b! b
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the& S+ i- h6 P+ [% q4 i# F4 i
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 O& g" B: |+ d. `# W
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make% A9 E1 B$ ?. b# Q Y8 [
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 h o8 {3 |$ |3 o) ~# C
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
: q8 D8 Z8 ?% v4 w2 ?1 L6 D; t7 `resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
8 r6 g3 g. R7 U2 ?; T4 }5 `Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is s- S) d, ^& Y7 M/ m8 n! \" Y+ A: ?
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|