UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
+ l8 t; z, x" t- m, oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
; e q) f# i( qBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
( W3 a8 f" ]# k, o, ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
5 y3 {, z% U$ AAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) s( f8 ^4 k. a0 X6 ^7 `
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: T. B: z; j- @3 D0 A9 T
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
2 ^4 Q! i9 Q0 }, |2 N, Jhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 ^& P8 i' E) T
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 n P7 y2 j; i, S5 T6 L; q
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
/ ~, X! F/ E5 _7 k, j+ J/ nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
5 ]" z5 z8 `. x# E! F- Udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and( O6 L" H" d4 V; J- c
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I! z5 {8 W# T# T7 r2 O
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! N7 ^( _! W6 k
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
- k! W3 I( B u5 Iand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
! j7 H: j' K! ^1 B9 i, Phas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
1 D: S/ x4 p# O2 k: D) e" A# C Wof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
8 u8 n; w3 O6 J* J4 |& Qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( n+ ?) }' @) Z# s( U( j
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a2 Z5 V0 w) k- f/ B
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' H4 P0 Z( r# j7 x' j
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
% k( k5 T1 [; y1 e/ D" cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
, K! c) L6 o& n! R6 [. m+ q/ a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
0 w! T: r& g& i6 othis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! i z# `! y, Z, _
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; C) ]# w! |6 G) F! V
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& N% t/ e& ^& s2 d3 o% A
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
% F" ]; o! {3 Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
; ^" @0 @, R# }: Vparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across: q$ I) W& P; I' \8 }
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
3 v3 G: l; T! kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for X( M1 c+ h" G& P5 Y5 Z; R1 I
development.
Hutongs" Y4 x" I3 {: |( n
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived) ? {; x% j/ S. `+ S3 T& I# C4 J( C
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
! I/ u) {1 _" o% ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( F5 _& D$ G) U4 \2 q, J- q% K' T
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
7 i1 r2 s9 M2 l" H3 Y( Mwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
) o% ~, y8 \( X6 P+ {+ SFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
1 k) p, `) \/ a# Ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
/ ]8 m9 S" K' v( F( r! q8 |to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses& N" h: R! h5 }) l1 |0 u
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
: ^* k; S- ^ ~4 p( Z0 uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to: ]( ]7 @+ l! {' a1 m: B- P2 Z
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. T) k/ J4 ^+ d+ {' _
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the3 V \. J4 h+ ^, M7 X* b
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
; n# J7 Y) i& w" o# Rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 d! j$ Q$ f' [+ ?/ L) b O' q
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong; h) A# D8 `' J! x# }
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how6 [8 O; q* D5 y# K
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be, j7 J: R: W1 _& V, X4 R" n
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
) M$ I \8 D# b0 i3 z9 J/ {memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 x" b2 I6 w5 y% V: z
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& _, E5 w8 i8 h) y& Z' @
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 E6 Z8 T' O# `/ h
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 p9 d4 F# |! ]3 A
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- \* z7 u$ v4 B6 }
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those/ F+ {! r& w0 |* J9 O# y0 T
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
9 Z0 x# M4 Z& L2 G$ o, Smay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some A2 t9 z0 E7 F, t& c
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
, C9 u7 v4 H& |" M8 h"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all( v. C, @& v; m" p; V
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
0 v' v; o }3 japartments are the way to go? No.
' `, v, |6 Y: a& { @$ v ( }4 f2 z6 c( [
) T, ~' F/ u2 I# D, e7 N# I
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
7 Q6 V6 a! M% ?4 @situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this. i8 R( [7 h9 Z7 p- p- r
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make9 c2 D' ?, b) R$ X; X
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
# p5 d+ v0 U; U0 F6 afast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
3 V5 N% f( w" F# q! Z7 O3 Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 v% x$ Q6 l5 u. S. T0 Z9 Z# `9 J
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
$ @3 r9 h& N7 Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|