UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
( X8 }) r/ f, |: _" F+ _, karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. k" U E$ d/ g) T
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 n, f+ j) o4 X6 N! `+ w5 Z
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
1 u) A8 r% \. B* `& MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
& }- O! a0 m- B, z N& I3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
! J, M) g' I, cManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
+ `7 ]2 i& d( Z/ Z5 ~% k/ ^hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
3 F) x! h6 b0 m4 W+ Meach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! u$ k, k0 w8 N! j
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is. P+ y/ K7 s! y
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are" q; I' Y+ c7 C5 F# ~/ p9 k( A& Z
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
6 g7 ]0 u" S, Hforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I* D% y; {4 S8 \0 h" G( ?# H
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
/ A Z& _- O7 E) gimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,' [9 E1 p' _+ k. w6 W
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
I! p- \1 a& Z" P4 thas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment3 E3 m- M( F( J. _- k
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 ]: A( I6 J1 U. r' E$ B5 g
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
) k/ c% E' I {6 eonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a4 z( W. y" q- A. @! C
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government. c) K8 ?& C' C: T
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move) Y3 `, M: ?) E$ w7 C3 Q
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is/ V/ d1 ~$ F* x; C6 i4 U
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
2 i7 w+ Y+ F& y! othis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 A* j& e+ W7 ]" _% _/ Q
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 y, ` k! |- G: h" Q: v
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
9 G1 q2 T% d7 I5 M/ pmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
2 h1 m0 I/ ?2 Z6 W! w% q* H- m& q9 na beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a6 } `& x. a, m" p% C j+ g
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
7 s; X9 [4 @0 n% e' f8 Qthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 o7 b7 L7 r5 S& k
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
+ G S' Y0 g+ }' Wdevelopment.
Hutongs7 D% u) Q8 O0 P( X( }; E; {+ q
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ l) _+ C/ L" o7 H
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
; h# ]- }: o- l7 N: ~in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
$ w9 B. S) r' m% Z/ ^have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you* M8 u/ l: O8 q
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
: e" ~) g2 B- V! A) m$ D2 ?Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
% x$ V9 |* F: a" |5 [( ^* q, _to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
t9 ~' j3 d+ U" n8 k$ N+ b4 F% jto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses! P8 P6 T0 f* C2 L( f
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
" `" H2 {% \% x" y3 O! L/ k5 V ?unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
) o! E$ m8 q) B0 u+ [live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,6 j# s, V$ i" `' x3 O1 p
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
5 J( f9 Y1 x5 P6 Cbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
. W; ^. Y# j8 H2 M; Y2 U2 _( iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be: U9 U, E/ d; i& F2 V8 b+ d2 Q
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong4 c. K e8 Z, Q! P
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
. f7 ?' o; C* S3 k" X& f' T5 fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
9 e0 g2 E! X( itorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
1 e% Z' y" ]/ U: m0 i1 Jmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".9 Y2 w5 @6 ]) Q: w/ M
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are8 ~( p/ `8 P# \* O; N7 Z |
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially% b- T7 K6 C/ n4 o6 N7 `( n
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
& U; w, [1 r9 G. k6 k( C1 N8 _of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these6 F" Y' t) A7 j
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
* K6 e5 ^8 {1 \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 v& q" h# z; D7 D! R7 L- R2 N( O
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some6 u% z) L( d2 |6 K0 I' Q
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before9 }% h! x5 P: o3 D" t
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) T7 M0 a$ k8 z! f
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
Q6 G$ T# g1 F1 {7 Z( h8 h8 ]apartments are the way to go? No.% P. A* ~ P7 S C: |9 k2 m
1 F/ y( I/ L7 D7 k x
# g1 d/ Y. K2 L6 U h) D) f
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the; K* l8 b8 S7 N
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
& q* Y/ M9 L+ L6 q$ r'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make& W6 j, _6 A4 i5 c
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% m" {, W, D, b7 m3 _. v
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant0 T2 N# y% K0 R Q$ w
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
' o1 \9 g0 X/ vBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, l, v1 b: y, _: j
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|