服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6683|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! X% D0 r& B4 t/ y. J. U architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ' d( S7 t4 Q; cBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 3 q& |7 p8 V3 E. T" R. Pcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.' J5 B8 s1 y y+ k; g According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,$ s3 b1 o/ n& x i9 x 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ' p, ^7 [+ I) X/ G. wManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 5 w$ M# t: z% q6 x6 B9 X( Fhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" l. l5 O4 {$ }. ]$ V' ?3 g each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera : {- w5 F5 z4 T) Oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ _% h! y, s+ v3 K0 M6 R harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! F) Z& Y8 e9 idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and # m8 l* x$ T1 h' t! hforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 4 Z r( c/ [. _- k. uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great1 S7 g" \* S; y! m: C/ Q7 Q+ e impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, * j" P# q `3 R5 l7 pand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong( J2 i3 f, d5 u) t9 J* E has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ^* ?, k& ~0 f' b. X# K of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / D f* r7 N4 S7 Bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 7 ]: e5 i& j2 ^5 ?: H5 X) ionly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ( I' ^5 Z6 l1 u- c4 ?sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government : G! P! j3 r2 B+ d: h4 E2 Z4 Zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 1 i- a6 M3 l( G2 \: I3 ~to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is" ~! f' `5 @# D& D% I7 l9 y "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# U% J6 H4 ^; Z this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are: |% D6 Z9 B1 R+ [8 |! \, e still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% p# I Y2 `8 b$ q5 B "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 O% b7 Y, y/ R; Q% o) E" ^money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was3 P! \) d# r$ Q. U2 p" b9 f( ]% i a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a; [+ }3 w6 d& f, w parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across o; x, ?: `# s6 othe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural2 D# S6 N+ N% V6 J' Z importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) P* U7 q7 H" p7 x( {6 M development.

Hutongs 8 u9 ?7 h( p+ Q" K% `$ Bin the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ B$ |' ~3 R" @$ Xthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions( f5 p# Y8 p; e- ]- C. K in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 6 K% Z9 |: [% phave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' q I* b# P f \' I @! F, v will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ! W) e) }' W: ?9 B: S- YFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date : x% V& k4 x% xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used* h, W/ K6 K- q3 e, F to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 w* S# Y7 O9 I) Gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically* [, a4 X$ R+ i2 ^ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 \5 t- }: | K4 {! T3 @live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 5 g, C7 x( d& j6 }5 W! nhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the" b6 Y& T0 Z* [3 p7 ~) _5 @ E0 z1 s balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the & Z% S4 Z" o8 ]project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ; U. X4 @1 e# n+ Erenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) ?7 u" ~& }: o8 L. s Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how , F% I- {3 E7 X3 f6 H! Wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be5 D6 u3 I( e5 u: |8 V/ `/ u torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished; @ s8 [3 ]4 l! ? memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". % p) T6 G6 M) X) C2 K1 X7 INothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, ^$ C7 Y( C+ @5 y/ F6 H( Q aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: I; ]6 L1 C- I1 m non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image4 U. y+ i1 j" V0 | of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these4 B/ a. H( d) B" p0 v Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those/ Y, u- F4 y% Z q4 a# h6 l }# T6 A) D people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they * \ B* F6 p( h" Jmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ( C' J, x* n+ _' M; iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before * t( _5 O3 f+ w"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all7 U4 L) p t# H K. `$ v0 z people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, \ [2 x5 U+ P& G apartments are the way to go? No.* e* l8 b0 [4 f 7 @. Q6 `% C/ R; i" Q; t0 |) f 1 F3 [) E2 O& e' |" w0 O

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the % y. m) `5 Q9 q9 \situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this + t! C8 |3 _/ }1 j$ w/ J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make }4 t9 e! S( X8 C2 z4 q, @ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so+ Z- R( j7 z/ Z |+ q' b fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ! y+ X: O( _8 J5 \+ O' _resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless" @" T! P, B" u/ L9 T3 m Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is& }" ~. ] T1 g3 a$ _ unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-9 19:35 , Processed in 0.123150 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部