服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6352|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its& d, m7 A$ { A ?; n architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 d: P# n- \6 L Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian". i# i# A+ K! S( h8 s* s7 u; Z' t city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 }& F4 k- U3 P+ \2 g According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,0 N. S, v- X% ` t i- L 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of$ T7 l$ u2 g" I+ H7 N! | Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within7 S; {3 q' W- _ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among' X; P* G6 L5 P5 G* x1 z6 ^8 v9 y each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera . |# ^7 q+ ?( U0 k3 l7 q7 P2 B/ Cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is / h }' j' ]( N( \& Jharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ T+ u5 t( ]* M- b descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and# m1 w5 ]3 N0 p, [, i9 Y( X, M+ x forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I$ n5 }- M7 A, i, {( i was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great" y$ |7 h6 a( K7 J# Z3 i& Y( C8 i impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ' F$ _9 D# U0 S% ?# Dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong # k% |) \( q; q1 Z. h# ahas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment: h; f* s7 ~! V/ E of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that " S+ O7 a7 d8 W: Y0 Hno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are {2 L' ~( v, b2 ~$ u4 M only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a . V, c6 ]) c7 h) E' L1 [7 v2 M3 dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , F; Z7 ~ M( G6 t$ b4 U; q, i& Hwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move% N W+ f. ~ C1 O* l# D; H to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , U3 J H* S {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,% c. b9 l1 l# G. L% ?- D) d, { this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 5 F/ j5 l# \8 k$ a/ N+ D/ ^still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to9 }) h. k- h( m( }8 r "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make + a! b E5 z+ g. I) f: {! Fmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 b I0 w2 F& v a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 6 O% y4 w' K# W7 [7 Tparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % S: ~8 I3 _! T0 ~: Ethe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural + g5 R, J* r; |" p- R. ?importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for2 L' ~# B0 H5 b7 m development.

Hutongs 3 }. q9 ? m! din the old days were residential area where people actually lived , W& D8 x& n! s6 uthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions$ v1 m1 ~7 T- O2 C5 L3 N in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not7 C4 {: \* s9 D& H# ]) s" v$ h/ M i have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you - F; L3 R3 Q5 R) Bwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 7 u, [ G2 S+ _6 u7 J( \* @$ r& w3 _Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 7 m+ X! `7 b0 g: h. q3 sto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used % ^6 T" ?& l: R* q @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; N# M+ e/ ?$ l2 e0 ]1 Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically Z. o: J( C$ A2 Runfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to: G& l A6 w% f* i z: R" _) Z live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, g$ @7 e) |( Y1 ~, O hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the/ a+ \2 r' t8 K% K( d( K( u6 w balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 2 l! H# O# L' \, @8 Z' O5 Sproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ' ~& G M$ G z% }/ Xrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 4 \# b9 c0 l+ X/ B7 b; I' {Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 1 l2 w+ g# b+ L. k' Y/ ^people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be* S4 B( `. d! V torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished9 I* m% q h5 G. o2 u memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; z( I5 M/ V/ b* L+ G/ f Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are & D3 ?1 R. {9 o; valigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially * c0 t: t8 a$ M' k% p6 G8 knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image - p& L! a* V9 q `: K8 |6 iof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 s; C5 T) G1 Y Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those / {+ Z8 M, ]6 }0 A- epeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ; M9 {* m4 x9 T! @8 ]" h) S4 q2 @may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some% j8 R9 z1 L# } of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- B: c4 |6 }. S* ?3 ] "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all, I- Q+ W+ {, e people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, ~4 \$ \9 v* e/ R' E! ~6 l# I apartments are the way to go? No. : @( M) G* }, W3 r, ~# T* i; _% R ) X- I7 p. h* ^6 r& b- I- a7 h & D- I, f* v B I

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the5 R& \0 l& p# {" ~/ t# h9 \ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this: u* U. D$ `1 @ _+ T 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 7 ~0 U: Z1 D' nno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& \/ z5 b2 x% }- g0 R fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant . g0 H& i ]- P% Y+ E3 a8 i9 l0 I) Kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 4 B: x! x* K; S% d0 XBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is4 P9 i- V% m% u. {1 f3 t- p unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-2 00:17 , Processed in 0.119896 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部