UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its% l/ ~ V. i: ?/ I
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
* X8 F/ w, a5 aBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"/ i6 B7 F* |% g3 E, J9 g5 X# [! r/ f
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.2 ?% w3 V: S7 E$ x* h% O% Y
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,4 F9 `- a: r1 {: n5 ^! s5 Z' o2 h
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
+ u0 X! s* a7 b" [" T7 ~; M, h; AManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
2 j% V+ O" A8 [3 C8 dhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
; O% T ~( \# U( b9 X! |9 ~& ceach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera. B% L+ v/ u8 F* A$ c% s
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
) C! j. u! N/ yharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
. Z) r" J# z) x/ l8 {, vdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
' x# O0 n7 ?( Q' l) l; tforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
4 J2 p3 G$ D" l9 `was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 G% v# t+ @; m/ O. k( s
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
8 A7 X7 F& p% c+ [and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong/ L9 d9 D3 s0 D, ] R: K
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
2 c' t0 g1 b0 _3 i/ i9 l7 wof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
* j! R$ S+ c2 H1 k) |+ Gno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are! F" H( L& L5 `* @
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a+ ^/ m5 e% a/ W& [2 i/ v& A
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government) C% t, F+ n: u4 U8 u
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
' b9 Z) N( Y7 M: c* M) i$ G q8 Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
/ J3 q Z& \! R9 f# k. o* t"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
& b2 r5 m: A0 r8 x6 \* {. sthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
2 G* h: P: e9 \still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to {# C4 A5 S/ v$ ]# \
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
$ j r$ l. V" s2 { rmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
- Q! t% P K+ C+ [! Ka beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a) L. g1 Q4 Q+ W
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across+ I- q- K( s) t
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
/ A% x: n- {! u2 dimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 O: V& J5 @ w! w
development.
Hutongs# |" \: p( D1 f! b& ~1 V
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
/ |! n' w/ d: X2 H) Hthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
* v$ I/ C# M& Din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 c: ~# ~8 ^/ X! h
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 ^! d$ b$ _) y& i4 Bwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.% \/ f3 e6 ^% B: R
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
$ ^& Q6 @6 C$ v3 D _. Z) I @5 Ato support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
! i% o' z1 Z5 a0 Z: |% yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
( Y) U5 ^3 k3 g! s$ f% jsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 P0 `$ S9 a' R C6 l! s
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to# B Z. n( L( j/ i
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 v) p9 Q1 C& C W" F6 m( o! T
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the% R- `# G" Z0 D- G8 W
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the. G8 n3 W9 @$ G9 o
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be) c& o( ? `6 E5 N/ E% t6 ^
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 ]0 ~) b/ t9 s; a
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how# S8 h: d" K6 L/ \' ]) L
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be0 y" e" A- Q& A3 N
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished7 P3 @2 ?. E& L- m" ^
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
e: y$ I+ R& w/ U* p" f- w9 F3 CNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( r" @3 _9 H% S# h9 f
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
9 h. k* w O0 ] K, N4 Gnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 ]1 t) N6 e. W: S& }( M3 V
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ Q& f+ j( |& i" a
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 d6 u0 x# O* g4 Z0 V6 Q( O: k8 p
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they/ B, f5 K1 G0 n& v
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
4 K: I9 ]& E) ~/ Z |9 `of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
6 f" E9 P8 z1 F; [% A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all2 {4 l" R6 f, I1 l) `
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 h2 |- K* T" b0 j
apartments are the way to go? No.
' f' e6 _1 c3 V# V& y
! u8 L4 d8 T5 @( }# l( ?: h 0 J8 R" b( }# c K4 a( A
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
* p, e. N0 E$ K1 dsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 V3 `( [/ ?9 G. X& T: B$ B/ o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; p9 R3 Q) I0 H) _
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so( c& a i* L4 S
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant) i V- ^; Q5 p5 R9 ~8 G! y, [/ V
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; W' m/ Z/ K1 r8 \' p L
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- {0 y) X$ K: s3 p: ]! \. a! N$ u& A' f
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|