UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
5 A) g! T. k: ~8 \' d. b5 ~architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 S( H$ A8 o0 b5 u0 i$ S7 _5 @
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
& J+ a) R- c" C9 |6 Kcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
7 c$ g# U+ t. h# _According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
* g5 C$ C K5 `& k; W1 A4 h) U" ^! `9 i3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
2 h- w6 t4 V6 p, t" y3 ]Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within8 q: c( B! Y8 g: U& O, `
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
, i* n. D7 X9 w! _each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
- [8 f8 O4 m* ?and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
# A7 N' _! X% V6 n. \harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are/ b+ [# ]7 O+ B( z, v+ [
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
) k6 L5 w* {2 d0 ~forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I) D# w* d/ p3 q6 \! u
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
' A; e) S @0 _4 j; j, T) X5 u8 cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
+ Q3 t9 ^% {. |( S% Tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
: e, a5 `4 W% G% fhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
: z+ u0 a( s, z1 _) m( }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, b* Y+ P& g$ r2 R+ q8 ~
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
0 D+ ~9 {5 C7 d% H% d2 i9 _1 x# Nonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 I. L2 i- ? v
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
$ H. Y' A& _( ^1 T* g8 y; T. n( t* lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move& A! e- i1 Q% s1 B8 g: f' i$ r
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
9 o' `$ D: G& O" ^) V"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
! @" A! M8 c; F7 H; o- ~this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
4 U- o5 n- C. W+ xstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to @7 R4 H5 y* T. B' d1 r. ^
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
% l3 G( h2 S1 k: p6 a3 }- O8 c0 imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
5 h9 Z" f% P6 @, {8 D' E! D0 Za beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
& }/ u( l) C4 y. N! Uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
) e3 ^6 C9 o* b: jthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural* L9 t* I0 {6 y- o
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
% q9 I* h( N% zdevelopment.
Hutongs, u. S( Q& G8 B
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived h5 a* X1 Q( e& O5 D1 \- J0 }+ d
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions+ o4 d) X7 s4 a) H
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not F" f5 i3 L6 b: B9 \3 M: K0 p% R
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! j1 V0 a6 ^/ d0 E& ?6 t' V3 i2 D
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
& Q/ c& Q* |8 V# Z+ V& M0 K4 R8 uFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
/ A% v1 p* a' Y4 w* z; D1 xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 P/ P1 o* {8 e$ c9 o; F
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
3 L0 D8 b+ N- V5 Usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; v# a3 t9 q. T7 H( D% q; T' K
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 |/ ^% u& {4 }5 U6 E( I) \$ G/ O* K! N
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
/ s+ Y8 {) T8 z- P, l$ v% Nhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
1 P) n% f9 w7 ?/ O" }1 Jbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the- w: u! D# K6 z+ S8 J5 M! P
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 `3 ^* y3 l8 D2 f5 G
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
0 w5 ~4 `0 |: Y! N. q% xMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how4 R ~0 k" S: B+ c [
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
E' V% H. U: m5 R' H" E% G( _torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
. J, |8 m. X7 |1 x) g, t2 Tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: n/ a: f' ]4 e ? r
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
4 I6 ` s7 |+ Y8 g. V) F. faligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
: Q& W) j8 j7 n6 X. C+ b2 R7 F) [non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image% G7 U4 L2 S/ s% L4 ~
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
) b5 F5 v6 C) u; p6 y3 _Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those. ^" f8 H2 J- i; \
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they8 M' `7 S. \+ g) v4 `$ Q2 W4 e
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" P0 P7 f; d4 F0 v. L- p* c/ M
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before/ @0 ]: G+ ~" v+ l0 d
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
3 T5 f. H7 m/ F% @2 h+ J5 Ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise$ r, p4 U6 d: G* {' D% g/ O2 v
apartments are the way to go? No.. P" M$ a+ H- }: P" n4 Z+ I
! K" t) [- u# s3 W J1 k! {
2 m4 @$ h) |5 U8 g7 Q, V
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the; q) V a" y0 n+ `
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 C7 {0 V6 g. u$ \/ Y8 c$ ~( |7 c) e'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make0 R; e: N7 ^$ A8 I, K7 Z. y. y, P
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 j9 w4 {+ {. {0 t' W7 J; @, n
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
' Q2 G, C+ A" Q1 K4 Kresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
: c6 o R: o- T! R5 oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 \; t9 D) r, t1 H9 C) k* l8 e
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|