UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
8 J# {, ^# W/ B# Sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 ~3 G7 l& b, m. G( ^! g& D2 Q
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& ] a. d3 h3 P! I* r
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
+ q( C4 L) B4 G. k1 l0 IAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
" K! W9 q" Y0 _3 _3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
/ Z8 H# r- d, n' Y1 s- q$ J1 `9 RManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within3 d h; [4 z+ c/ e
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: ~- \' S; i' F o
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
! `- `" V- U5 x; _and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
0 f1 ]3 {+ K( c% @' ~8 q! L+ [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
/ N9 K4 V" h' ~* Y+ E) n% Gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and7 _' d3 T3 z6 [0 x" ]
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I0 t" T7 t( D5 Z1 l
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great% x7 f9 g2 ?4 [8 N+ W4 w
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 _) S9 y2 Q' b9 a3 \6 H
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
4 m+ D: k) F+ z' Jhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
" Z" A+ r' G/ Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 |8 R6 T! @- Z: ]9 L( U
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 y# i# a' H8 M! Y
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 L; Y e! p" Z& p/ A8 W
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government0 b4 C2 K* p4 j$ y _) }/ A
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# c& ?! N* ^4 A1 P
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
$ c* E1 v# }5 U! X: Q* b"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
0 }4 {% K' X8 N; l/ L0 Hthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
$ n: ^2 P& x* n- g' A) fstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ?: f! p: C' N0 @" u7 n+ j
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
& f% j3 F b! j0 mmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was0 Y6 E" M- J5 Z, j8 A7 S# \
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a/ ]' m* Q) l. z9 X3 V' m7 {
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across# D$ Z9 B8 u6 A X4 ]8 s& D
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural H% [3 |& ?/ `$ s
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
( H4 F2 g7 \, e6 v9 ^development.
Hutongs5 S, |# f2 _& z0 H
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
) j X1 L& }" l& z+ V* Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
' M, J9 m( R, e* V" tin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 T( m# \ Y! n0 a, Y; q& T
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you; \- `$ Q2 I% [7 H: X/ H+ b/ A k; ] w
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
! m8 c! f; O5 t% W2 YFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date8 X3 F8 V' V$ K/ J! ~6 ~
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 @) L$ w8 g# `# @8 `1 ^
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
. o! v# ~7 ^6 R2 l& \$ z/ ysupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
, N! }! C& ^0 |! Lunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to. q* E5 C6 L8 n/ N; v5 J+ Z4 O, W
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,3 \& v0 R% L0 i8 J
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the6 B" l1 Y2 x$ Q/ h
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the7 q+ i9 r, o+ z0 W, k
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
+ \4 K, @2 X: Z7 I4 t# Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong2 T+ c G9 |/ i: D9 t3 Q2 A3 K
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ W5 \! g6 M+ K. ~people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% d* ]9 T# i ?: j2 s7 _4 F: m
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished0 t- n5 O) z& T" r+ t1 G
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
$ b# \, p. a7 f9 Z* m" f' S9 LNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& S! l$ u( Q% f3 W8 |( `
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
/ j4 P5 f$ z% d9 mnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
- M& K8 S2 O5 h3 Lof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' S6 o2 _ E- {3 L( j
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
, n% {$ l4 q$ m3 epeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they; c# k# d% z7 \6 W1 l1 B
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
y& R/ T2 s/ k9 c8 Tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
+ w! s2 h* C9 a9 V, J"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
# Q( X T1 h6 gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
x# J! Y) {. k A4 K* ]' H) \apartments are the way to go? No.
) E4 m# |& o( H6 D
* \8 I) C! H9 N* u M
: S1 x5 q9 M2 f% ?% K
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the. }/ g) N5 C; D0 N( ~
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
. f0 O1 u# w- ?+ Q G% z'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make% Z+ A. F3 j/ ~2 k9 E5 S$ l
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
/ ]; h7 u: n2 q R% K, k9 Efast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
( n( ~0 H5 ]2 F5 C: C1 h8 ?resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
0 ~$ j8 `6 c$ Y, KBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 e9 u; y: h% h( X
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|