服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6543|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- m! k0 ?! X" q9 | architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider$ o: U" d' h! `3 O" c w Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"( ] b9 j/ T o city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.. ?3 d% I& Y( E0 P According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,, Y8 H/ A+ S5 L6 H" P 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 5 [$ h0 z0 e d8 s4 S7 l u1 QManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within* }' b, y2 g. ]( K% f/ j z hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among# x% ~2 T, a+ C) z each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera" n+ v+ E4 l! R l* P' n, R* f and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 {5 L) j$ p% v5 V4 N; L2 o harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 0 ^7 t0 J5 `( `2 _descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. h* R1 R T' L2 S0 K forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' v( |- C7 {! J" B5 ]was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great0 k6 z$ U3 Z! w impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 7 c( \ H9 d" ^0 t) N/ \! D0 Dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong# h7 f3 @! z- U+ q has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment / e- E, W* |' @4 K; P6 l, k. E* Sof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that' P1 b6 A9 g: u# _ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are; A L- S) H' Y& u& F! `2 F5 ] only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a6 L! k# e# g6 c1 G }4 b sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 O K- F3 t4 o! Q$ ? want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 5 _! R' B* N1 W% cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is0 h! P1 {% j+ j4 K0 u8 s( q "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 2 Z6 r. o' v# H: Z$ w* \this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are : ]9 ?+ r: M% L8 c9 estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to- a7 `* X7 Z/ }8 K* V* l "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ! n# W$ W# f) Nmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ! _' g6 ~5 T. p3 {* M$ K. Ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: m/ M8 p* i/ m7 \5 h parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' B5 B, I# k; ~- m; ` the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 9 D. O% ?$ N2 P3 Wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for2 Z# b* A( } v4 o) N: _ development.

Hutongs # x1 I. S* n7 r% U7 |- Jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived : m9 l4 y/ ?+ N2 A& cthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ; ~' }# L3 N* Min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 z$ U/ B" |+ v ~6 n3 j have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you, L) A0 k- W% l will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.* ]' @$ P/ [" [: u: M Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date - _2 G+ V8 I; W8 I6 lto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used1 h2 M2 |% u. B- P; L to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses " X @* _0 Z8 w* o' ^support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ' N/ b2 P8 M% gunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ M! Y& |8 E3 E. t+ u w0 D! n2 x live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, " `- F! I+ U, U. k: v! Ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 6 _8 c3 X7 j1 l% t0 u. _8 {balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the * T' y- J4 }0 x4 o7 gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be t5 o; R4 v* [* | i% _) irenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong % Q; o, y$ |- O# q+ vMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how s: o% y& M, Q K" L people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be - d- j/ S& [$ L5 t+ D6 l& S7 Ktorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished- h1 v- E4 E. T' Y, n& @" O) p memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".+ q7 T: P' ?7 n8 e1 y2 x Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are * u H# q" ?' oaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 1 F, D1 ?5 `6 jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 A4 @& I- Q8 t3 @of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* ]! e- a1 I& O* o# Z Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 f( M+ y/ c' n( d5 f+ H people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 M$ k- z$ Q, [5 W# { may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some& K: l/ ?( K5 g( s7 z) z# w" k of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before7 V& U% X, Y& ?! K+ d "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 4 W' m1 e* O) B5 ~( x1 Ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise + U' Z. l9 e, o N: I: G: bapartments are the way to go? No.. O2 x% w: I# f$ Q + r5 r" E: S# U & u9 I ]" f3 ?

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& h5 a% E% ~9 R+ C$ i X( @ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ' a8 k7 d) V7 b0 y7 [5 e'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( [+ w; h% R* l y no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" _5 l: a/ r( u$ R9 g5 F: x fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 9 C6 p( h" ]' Oresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless - r0 o) n3 c5 \: } R/ }0 \" t3 }Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is , T0 D- a3 _4 Q5 ?$ n! sunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-23 04:09 , Processed in 0.133702 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部