UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; R& \; i. s* j
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
7 D3 `/ V" O8 R) p; _0 GBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian". T6 t& W% ~+ l. R
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
) z0 j- k& |. oAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 R* U0 a; e7 C# V7 T, t3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of, G' Y! E$ O/ }9 C+ }. t0 s
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within6 K6 z) N( C, H$ `4 _
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( Y" e/ H: b4 e
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera- v8 F8 s& Y3 o8 [7 D+ [" v; U" [
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
# E6 z7 S) c1 y0 A/ ^5 [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
( b: P2 \9 ~! }/ K/ A+ hdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and9 H! `1 g9 c0 c9 ~6 G
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
7 t# s6 z) M) }1 I" ?) ]was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
5 p. e6 X9 s# e1 Kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
- Q3 e" u4 |/ `+ W( Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
7 }" u7 m4 C$ V0 ^has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment$ U# M( \6 J" I( ^ Y w
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
( ]7 ]/ F' h5 z6 t+ w9 bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are: H! r0 f2 n5 i0 ^# q
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& k3 f9 U5 K# N
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
( }+ f) w1 S$ X6 W* }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
5 J1 F G+ X* u4 P# \5 Fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is* z" R8 f. P3 ^8 P
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' U2 c2 t; q$ _: l' q* S! P
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
% ?: `& h7 S8 u* t, B! }* b; w: P: Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
3 U- v- `- X4 r8 e"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
9 @/ x# ]! K7 n" C8 {" d1 m4 o- t/ zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
6 h4 V$ w4 E! C2 ua beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
`: F, p7 z; K. r0 r) Kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across+ d' p8 i' i$ E/ E9 L6 T: p3 m
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' f3 f, {$ n8 k' H. v) n
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
" B0 g# X# I+ A0 q0 Adevelopment.
Hutongs
* S) L5 J/ l4 x/ Y0 G% _& cin the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ w- @5 m8 ?6 U1 s
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions. \8 `# b1 \" W3 V4 g: @+ @
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
3 Q9 u$ C, [+ h1 b5 yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you+ y# x' ?* m. O5 Q8 \
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 {. y" F7 `. }2 T
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 R1 w6 w& y7 O( I4 ]8 p
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used' M7 l2 s; `/ g2 s
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
5 e1 ^$ y: v' p5 M+ ~& v0 fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
3 o' V+ i+ q" |+ B: Y! Eunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
; B' d/ U4 G2 ?3 W3 U9 `/ T7 R: clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,7 `$ ?: f7 `9 k0 E2 N. C" C6 P6 D# H
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
" s2 o! n' Z* J6 n: Z: u3 c3 K1 ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
) [, c3 g2 A) V) Y5 Pproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
/ l/ g9 X; z) |0 r; O' ^renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' k) t5 G% n. V. L
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
0 m9 `4 V2 r1 g6 j4 M4 @people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
, m" m* @ c% |& D0 f# |" `) qtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished# z q& c: m( B
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"." r, v$ k7 `5 _9 i& ]4 p. {
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
6 e c, |* Z) z( l7 p& n6 Ialigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, ~" c1 o2 `- o9 l) O
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, e6 k- x! h) i- r$ h1 _" f
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
; m3 p; U* V0 j8 K$ f& ?Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
/ T' i9 G' S: y; Upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
& @$ J% e8 u! e+ z) Vmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( d! k4 n, _* b+ b7 V
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
+ J8 j3 i2 V* @, B1 D/ N"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
" Q* K. ^% t. c9 U* W! Cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 o+ n( p5 P( [7 x
apartments are the way to go? No.
9 {! [' i2 R3 T8 {
1 Y9 M* U. F5 j# m$ Z6 T# j
/ R0 Q$ D/ H! \- e0 y% [+ e
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the3 K9 M) ~# u3 @: K
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
4 k2 ~0 V# ~3 b$ v# J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
! x K. m% I) G4 g/ ^4 c Pno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& C ^5 g4 s4 l6 ~% g5 U
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ L9 h. c# X' ^4 |$ W
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
1 K" J7 e4 Z( S$ oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is$ w: k$ k1 |+ p& T9 g$ Y
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|