UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its# y2 I3 t8 O# y2 j
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
- C+ j3 C5 e) O i6 b# rBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"7 ?! B1 y0 J0 |( n3 Z0 [
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
4 {2 N3 m/ Q7 m) Q4 H% ^According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 o$ [ n9 n {4 b
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
9 t( }% q! W$ a- C9 ^Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within3 i# n$ E. T9 H# q
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among7 L' A& r9 {; r" ?, a
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera U& z* }' t) g
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 o' V1 b5 {. n- C2 D" G6 M' i' oharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
) J4 R: }# P- y' X( d% \) Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and" |, Y/ P- w8 S. R6 P* F
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I" i5 [% s, o6 ?: W0 T: e
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
. X$ U1 O& I0 p8 H7 @+ C: ^$ z5 B; ~( Ximpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,7 D+ J4 G3 d0 k& {% D
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong2 @ Z% {0 _9 v: n* G
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
; c% v: b) T# Z$ [; D* \' W2 }/ Fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that6 |& ^0 o/ ^, e q6 Z
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are, l- c5 V) \0 C9 x4 P% Z, Q" `
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
1 ^4 ?3 `8 E `# j* fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& Y, V8 s/ t& v- `
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
7 y! R, L) C. e4 ?& P% K1 }8 C2 Sto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
& y x0 Q8 s7 L$ v"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
4 r; Y# D9 [- y1 a' Jthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
8 z; V3 Q% B; P& h! y$ p4 f& F/ D& D" `still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; P8 K8 S2 m" w7 ^0 Z( j
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
* m! G% e7 b' _) _/ bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- x, @3 W7 Z4 @# t
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
]: P1 } d; R) W( C& Lparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& ~# Z$ |/ H5 ~4 U
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural3 v$ I* K+ a& f6 c4 I, A! ~; C
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; Q2 T% x3 Q/ E2 g2 E
development.
Hutongs% g# H% Z4 Y8 }
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived' ^' L# v" H. _: W3 k5 r
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 D: g# v% P# h6 {7 N/ o
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
5 B0 J) K0 {$ K3 Yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
% I) H( s2 `$ Z) v$ }$ g* twill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
0 k, o& o" ~7 w7 bFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
. V5 A# K I4 z" R4 V4 r$ p4 Oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used6 O8 W4 ^! B+ \, t+ }9 Q! N2 x
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 z8 ]: d) \- p; W8 a1 N3 X( d
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically3 l# q# P" u2 {- i8 S0 l* f" S
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
. l* ~% N0 ^4 j# X K% A( l( \1 Ulive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
/ _' d' z1 M) K7 `8 v& Qhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the" y& i1 h. |* K u
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
. B" a+ b0 g5 ]# n, Tproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 B5 t% j4 I' _. U2 O& J8 Y
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
M1 |2 t& i$ ^: h6 gMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
: Y4 r$ W0 N H+ R) [) O* epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
* v- m6 k( e0 i: S; b1 j( C, ttorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished5 j" G* S2 D" E
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
3 H6 ?( @4 y' V2 @6 K1 h# {4 INothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are7 }* K+ q* {0 ]2 j0 e( k6 [& l7 ~9 T! q$ C
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
" B, g' b* O+ g dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 u0 F/ q- ^" C) \
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
/ `6 N7 s9 D9 Q) y$ X$ X) JHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
5 U* |, n/ I: R/ x9 kpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
3 Q8 S: _, h# Hmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
( K4 l8 U/ S$ V4 Jof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
% H. O6 m$ J6 g) G% v"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
4 f* q7 K! S) Q9 a, ]people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* d: D8 p D/ V) x& w. f
apartments are the way to go? No.
2 R8 K3 k) R! K* Z % W- _' } v* B* R
7 Z' P. g% `: S
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the. }" W5 r- S( L) K b
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 g; z7 ^2 }- d+ L- v- w3 ~5 x5 c+ q. ?
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make1 t4 P; x! c8 Q- u* `- U- o
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
; |) X! F& p6 o- h- [ i9 {fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
8 F7 J" V: q6 L0 E$ `1 M/ @4 |resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
9 d0 f8 y9 C) q1 ?Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is) x+ I5 l. x6 c5 Q @) ^. y
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|