|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 5781|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its: @) U9 i. o6 s3 |/ s architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider5 C. O) Z% z+ ? Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 6 Z+ h# o+ V K4 Icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.( e, L6 n- v& _1 v' T! e. j According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 2 R" a) W" o% ?3 S0 d# ], W3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 6 p0 Q: ~3 e. pManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within % g% T. ]/ T0 k {hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 6 \7 I; o% D& p A7 Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera" D1 x9 }* K% Z9 I9 `; w and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is1 P; z* w+ ] o harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 2 I* m3 q, d: J9 S5 v/ Kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ( l8 T5 T0 T/ S+ M) D4 `( jforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 2 h& {6 O; h8 I* z) wwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ; Y% T: k. i# o7 S! Timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,- `0 {* g1 p& y, g and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong; S# V) V& v3 ^4 w has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 |9 G1 Z6 U% P: e9 j: A, R* { p5 fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 e! u4 N5 r: C no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are # W$ x" T( x' n7 g! N$ Xonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a0 D( X- s/ {8 y" y" t) P3 d sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 8 ?8 f V1 W; ?want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move " Z' p' X; B0 o: eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& q& E' G2 A6 N" [. W' Z4 H9 r "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,; f8 x' G" v3 L2 K, k5 w" [ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- y7 g9 e' T I" F still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to, D `6 s& x3 F/ k9 G "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make5 Y+ B: b6 ]8 n& f& C money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 0 V) y! p! T* c6 o G6 Ba beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a j& x- j: a+ t/ i1 T6 ? parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % d3 y/ Y7 j2 e+ P) c/ Vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural" @# B9 q5 Z7 u3 b; `9 R importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, O6 q! Z* [; A7 M, n0 J. u development.

Hutongs0 J% o- d6 p, O% E; G) j5 A in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 9 b, L! Q0 D& @2 j2 Zthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + L: n5 G# _- U4 Q3 U# ain hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ; {) ]+ D- [" m/ B% }$ o; W" Uhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ! E: {* V- L4 v0 vwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. " n) l( r" [: `6 _1 _Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date* W6 I: W2 D# t to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used5 b3 B# G1 a5 M d% M( R; J( q to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 n0 B+ Z2 J2 G! ?/ k5 m) X support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 3 E+ H' ?& A6 F7 ]7 \8 `* b. runfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to% a/ x' O7 Q$ G7 }3 K3 X; T5 t live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 9 D* U3 Z4 O [hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 3 F% {8 D2 k: j) vbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the) m/ ~7 h( b; L2 K7 q" x project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be5 T( k& L+ H7 ]% H B2 L renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong - n' e1 b7 {. O% {# VMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% r2 N3 }) l' T" i Z) E B' B people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be2 ^9 y# j/ E8 s$ d; k torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished4 n3 ~9 O3 S: z memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". % [* ~4 h: \. [% @Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are - n7 \) c& J8 @/ j, g' T n- ]aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! s9 p, o6 H+ ]# B) u6 A1 |4 M non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image+ S- ~! A# g; ^" K; V6 \2 o+ t: R; S of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) q I j3 K0 L Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those % e @- N- j. l* h5 Fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they - Z5 _, Y+ Y7 q3 f9 P# Y3 \8 Emay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 9 ]1 D% k$ z* e4 _# J2 G4 lof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( X4 ^) x4 ]1 {5 s/ M"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 2 _: |" D% s$ d5 dpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 6 E+ _' U! j& z5 }* l( a9 G, P" y8 {apartments are the way to go? No.2 ?. o2 b8 C+ {' r 8 |+ u3 }- {; }* e$ X 4 c( ~8 j. \" N6 ]

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ' {. t- q' X0 Fsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this * D2 ]6 }6 l5 E+ t4 @'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 9 Z7 a" [# b* h T' n0 kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 9 I; v# E/ m7 q8 C) d! jfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant , w( w: |6 z8 ?7 h4 {resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless) p' ^ S. Q7 J Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is2 c% o s" Z& z7 q) c unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 08:59 , Processed in 1.125263 second(s), 7 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部