服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6257|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its & p) x8 |4 R e( M2 g2 oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 S2 n6 `$ V0 S% q( ] Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 9 v) |2 |" J' Ucity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. " \ R3 n) n& S) V: GAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ( e' T0 f, E: d7 ?" y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 p& l3 [, L2 m Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within7 S. B1 A5 x/ T$ j$ R: \5 { hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! J' b v' K; Y; w" G$ k each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera3 P0 P7 o1 ~# n0 _ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is* v: s$ P$ }' s' w. q harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are0 m( W0 X' G l' m* j descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and P# {9 C1 g ^% f# t; m1 R5 Qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I- d5 w4 X! H$ W% _" I' p( ~ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 0 I" e3 b2 m- E. s3 Oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ( V3 F, z3 e6 J+ s. Z$ ~and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ' b) {% j0 P1 Y6 }has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% S. j! {3 X( E# Z* C+ V7 e- { of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ( F+ b9 k; ]4 C% v+ m2 ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are" f, \5 x5 [8 q( a( T only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 ~$ Y7 j& ?! @. { sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government7 X1 C! O r) [" j$ p. t want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move; N/ U. G- F: i5 j! } to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is J( p0 _( I- B6 e( N* h"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 4 }) f5 D( \, `. Lthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 H' X) r5 [' |, A/ e: a( { U6 u still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to % n9 [9 W+ h3 r) T9 `% w% |* {"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make% ~( z+ @% B* F5 U& F money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was : @1 Q6 E1 y5 |( h1 M1 wa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& g, }. T V' T" F' H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 G$ T' o: I$ t# g) b; ?3 h! p( q. a6 l5 R the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural / l7 Y8 }- X6 \importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! r. j, t" ?- W, K2 D development.

Hutongs4 u# B+ Y. i$ ]' f! j% n& l$ W in the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 m* {5 r% z+ Y9 x" L3 ? there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 x; p/ b1 F; X( T8 b8 f, v6 {1 f0 L in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not & c5 `) L# A: C' }" M' T. i2 Bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you3 Y8 t q/ K% h7 j) h C! E will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. - g; c1 `5 z% z! Z" _+ {, ?Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 J! a0 q P8 d3 G to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used: Z/ t" L+ X1 k ^! k9 Y; K to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ ?+ T1 q0 |0 V {) d# ]9 E support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- p2 l3 q' G W5 ]- ]5 F' Q unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to & w2 l" |: O0 `2 z7 n! }( Alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,; S5 p! f/ u5 ]% N hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the }4 ^3 J4 {/ `' A balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the $ Y1 g. {/ Y0 g, }( eproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be $ F z: W- M6 I: X! |3 r1 U6 orenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong & n2 m0 ~" b2 A- v& b4 B8 t0 g/ JMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; L1 _6 ]- [5 R' E% C4 P people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be + k; @# C$ F1 E2 F7 a: x' }torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished J: K3 H9 _: g, t% f) p+ F# v& ]: _memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ p5 G) @; n* B* D+ @0 S Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 0 Y! k$ e% X- m5 c" G+ R/ }aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 |; M, A% A- C- m+ l non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- u9 R; V! j% D/ m$ t! C/ b of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 w! D4 v5 \0 z" _Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 P/ {, f+ Q7 G( H5 u# M people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they4 A7 m% q3 ]9 R: z may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; G* {) f4 v" o y5 N( yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 7 A9 \ V3 E' @" r) A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all9 c5 E; C5 u" r; T! Q2 ? people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . q n9 _4 Q) [) h$ U( L7 V2 ~0 Aapartments are the way to go? No. . W G5 o9 x2 p/ D$ ^# v8 W , v: I) @8 w* p1 x 6 i" ]' G% k* L) _ X# d

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ( Q1 s+ K; X' Q# T Xsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; k8 j5 w. j. ?/ V6 Z0 H 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, n# }2 {# e0 G, j# Z' e! T no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so " p7 y W1 M) C0 a5 ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ) \$ e+ h: U6 E/ ?: \& d i' `8 {resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ; A! s3 S' m: w1 i, @ [Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is - u/ L, S+ b* V5 d9 G: Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-4 15:51 , Processed in 0.141061 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部