服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6693|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its " p% |- C8 Z' w9 o8 z7 [( zarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ! B4 w9 H( ]; d' JBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 4 S- J& Q, t) f2 D* U* ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( |$ T4 Z( j3 L3 y! fAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 O2 C4 f$ a/ j# D3 C' F" i) K 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 s/ L6 l Z9 y+ W Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within5 d$ L3 T7 {6 Z/ Y) `; N, F hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among3 a; e: z1 r, l# @' ?; k# D each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! D3 Q1 L+ C1 w$ n5 J) i and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ j3 |- G5 M' T, s6 T+ s$ \ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are; q' O5 z% M! E" c) g descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 7 ?# O# P* g" |forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I + T0 A5 X. p+ I3 I# K$ b6 Kwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great0 W8 g% X8 w$ d$ A* ?4 L: z impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; l! M& @8 A+ U: Y0 } Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong y% a# {. J! S- L) f has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment* _7 j. ^1 _7 \9 E2 i of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that; G+ ], J: {7 R1 ~; Y no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are3 n8 q3 h0 Z" S; v# O9 }7 s only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 8 \ }- s: Y$ r! c; G5 W% Fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government # D. z. Q4 _- n" L: }% V2 }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move! J7 O) r7 {8 M1 O9 s. l. }9 m! ] to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is0 c# ^9 W3 K6 |7 T6 s; b# U6 G "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ) P+ Q& _( f, Pthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are + `* `: [. u9 r* f" B; Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to8 I* V6 \. X6 }8 N. J8 w "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make, v' E& O9 q2 c4 w0 K money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was , n5 w# ^9 c6 O- k+ Y8 ~( Q6 u; va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ) q) _( i0 w- Y, v6 ?% Bparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across% [0 `6 E# }4 |4 N the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! f& x8 d+ ~3 R! Z: g limportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; F0 _. X7 ^5 i0 H6 N- ?8 b development.

Hutongs $ ]. L9 J' F7 _/ rin the old days were residential area where people actually lived , o$ J# H5 S T( [% Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions # X$ h, u! F9 f" ?in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not# l/ n8 O2 ^ d5 T8 b* b have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' Q7 W% d! }% M& pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs./ t G% i, G# T2 m( G4 G d Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date% m) _7 e n* c ^: Y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- P8 u6 I/ B8 B* G to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ' R" Y& R/ M8 m8 \+ Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ! D1 k! b' Q1 [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to% r- B0 [7 K# \% ~4 z0 w live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 ? D) X S2 Q3 N5 O hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the `5 c6 N9 z6 Obalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; c' | p/ @" U3 A- d! R project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be! c0 A# A# i: J3 L8 ~; }4 T* r. z renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong1 s$ w% ]) n4 u' U6 r Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ! L6 b2 o$ j) ~; z6 v; Q: fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be $ Y) {" @3 h- |8 Ztorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ' N2 e; {! o5 T) Y: Mmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"." `& P& |5 \8 e5 x* q Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are / e1 n3 o/ z6 u @ K, S" d9 A jaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially - I7 S+ ~0 }$ [9 O+ n' Wnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" X" k6 y! ?+ r0 t of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these , p/ k( F/ ?5 r- j$ E& X; dHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 0 y3 U k0 o/ { g7 X3 |! \2 [* e; tpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they % U0 E) B5 A9 Y8 w: k7 Nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some . v4 o4 V7 a8 ^& Qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before. O% }5 W: k# P3 P7 n( Q "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all( l, f* K$ g2 [4 a people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise & {& l. |7 I. W n$ D* hapartments are the way to go? No. : X) L, Z8 F1 [ . ^7 [ f: f4 e9 s2 z% P * I; ^! c: }1 D$ o% G/ o

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 0 Q2 B [& M$ A" c7 ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 1 d5 ]% h( g/ a' d# s'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 2 {0 B1 j, y- i( X: ~9 h$ \8 Hno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so/ @/ k' G9 Z! E; b fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' s" ~- F1 J3 w3 L1 b resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; ~0 Z: `& l. Z/ j6 \4 a0 r Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is! Z/ _# Y4 l3 q7 k5 b unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-10 14:58 , Processed in 0.132846 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部