UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
2 N& g' e! {& n& W/ karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
. q6 e" x* |& tBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"7 [1 j( F- @. X7 s" j
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
, w4 s+ n9 X9 ?: \- n( ?1 CAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 v) d& g* E- |. L
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of) y5 M! i& ~; x
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
+ g3 G- ^" Z# {7 f8 w* Lhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among6 h/ B% X8 T; u5 p
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
9 K0 F1 ]0 J E8 @8 o* nand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( m y+ q, y) E2 V2 L
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( u3 o; W/ r! T
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and+ {; I! _/ G% K; \ V/ ]
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
& S5 S* }9 [; r/ R/ y$ t1 owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
" u; {" U1 k6 U- R4 m+ |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
% `: b' V7 [7 ~- h& S* land we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
# D$ M, D3 K7 lhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
7 P' i. \& m2 Bof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that& K; D' i! D' }$ J
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( M( r' w: ~8 _! S
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& P6 R) W4 A6 j: e5 @! ` J! { `
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
* D1 Q1 k! H5 w+ z1 e% N. j( ~want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move u) w: r+ ?1 g! G5 F( Z. C ?
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' O& o3 P& ~% C( o& ~
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,% _* _4 i* i/ m% O& E C
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
& x2 ^9 a( \" P! ~still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% m6 n6 r* r1 A) f- S& r2 L
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make2 @% r1 K% }2 m/ C, Q+ B. ]& k
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. U0 D! L7 S! y0 H7 g0 z1 G
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
7 u6 [' {: ?. ]7 i$ Yparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
" N( z( g9 q; ]4 b0 ?' Gthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural+ P$ R7 D w- n3 U% S1 B! r
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
2 ], a+ n* s- L7 y% K2 s/ z [development.
Hutongs
" k: j2 d( ]" z. ^in the old days were residential area where people actually lived `2 s+ ~; B# J7 [, W
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
: O+ }" X7 q" n. U# z( V2 Yin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not3 P' s2 i+ h+ A
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( P$ Z# l* n. p2 K; [4 {0 Q. m
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
: ^( l1 |$ s$ m4 R4 ^Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
" b/ ^) f3 r, I3 D/ ?to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
: P" u" B# X' q' X5 N8 u3 rto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
( t& `- i: v3 U0 B/ S' ?support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
0 \- l: r5 _$ I- [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
5 ]8 U; A$ G# Vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. D& \' d' G5 d: A. R4 F. I" q: d
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the) c+ V! k5 m- z+ v! K3 r/ I- S
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the# I L$ f+ ~3 ?
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 x5 o8 g% \, }2 k; F
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- w4 `8 G. w& t. n+ p5 g T
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how' r. c# m5 J, d1 ]9 N7 r
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
9 r( t. J( o6 m- {0 c4 g* C9 etorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished7 F' l9 ^; P7 w- Z; \2 B* l! J
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".4 `4 `6 z8 H$ e# ]+ V5 v( R" Y% d+ Z
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
# `5 t1 [2 O R# [4 M) H) X5 haligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially) N& j: C h0 Y7 |0 {: Y3 l6 c1 t. o
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image6 |" Z2 |% J5 z: x! R# p: \$ f
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; Z! C( ]. u& r+ d6 K
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
! Q6 ~0 S) I' Tpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
3 w; [" [- F- p* Amay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
, g9 d. U* H1 \+ O7 S' K% O7 Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; g- _$ ~. W0 _( \( r* w
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
! n' O( g9 z" dpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 i1 D2 w* ?/ V+ I% F0 [1 i T9 F
apartments are the way to go? No.
+ t5 R: U+ r1 ^) b" E! T% K : t" f, {/ a- G. I& J2 E
/ |# p- M. j- z. Z9 U
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the/ d; J: I ^1 w" X7 Q8 f/ t. k
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
; h$ u2 j; u2 j1 o. F$ C8 i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
7 w5 T5 W; [! r9 V3 f! b/ Jno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" |+ v& `; N- w6 a% u
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
# b5 j- L3 i1 O8 q! E2 j/ Xresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
( k) Q0 X) v. `4 }( G' P2 M: W7 v3 XBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is! d6 ]4 a. n# h, {! T0 x. [
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|