UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
0 }9 F7 d( U c( J3 c& q6 w# @architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! f' V/ |. g) X8 k7 u ]4 R3 O
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"1 o" U9 K# H% T3 ?% r. _
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.4 e$ z& s) G7 r8 h V
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,3 R' w! @9 O9 K6 `* i3 X& Y% o
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
' a K6 g" P/ AManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within& i" }4 n2 q" Y9 c
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% A2 L& r8 [. x, p, ?! d' k
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
8 P% S3 s% T) G$ |and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
' F* k4 v7 e6 d5 kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 \5 J) ^3 d& j% _$ K/ G9 I. P+ |
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and: u( I/ `2 t0 ~- z
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
5 \' Y- b3 L$ B& d; e. D! w* S+ pwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great8 I0 ?- u9 E6 ]: S [1 U4 D( e) ^0 G
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 z! x; ^* I! Fand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
9 c- k6 b; U2 n2 l. p" shas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment& b2 e, r4 t. X5 {1 a
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! w1 D: |7 d( D3 N7 E) A
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
: H+ ^( }8 V0 y( e5 K, w vonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
6 H7 n4 ~( P2 m2 V; Usort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
! `( R+ U5 F" swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ E- Z, @: Q" R6 j) M+ S
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
, q' N/ M% p, a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
; Z, ]1 K* V' Y0 n5 _this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) E! p& {8 ]( v
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
7 E; d: a# r/ C$ Z! P! I"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
7 j$ J$ B3 N1 w; b- Kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
" Y, ]0 J( f2 A, {# U- [- r2 Z( Ca beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a% T3 D" Q; W" l' k
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
" n9 o5 ]) D8 xthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 g! S5 d# D+ a6 w3 N
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! S' Z, k2 S6 @9 {% ^$ D% O
development.
Hutongs
2 V. a6 U/ y8 jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ ~6 A3 Z+ X+ y8 ^. r* P4 J) O
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
, Z' v+ z3 I6 q; [. Din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
+ ~4 M; B4 h: d* o7 y) I+ T% @% k' C2 khave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you% q% Z; j; C' ^0 ~- @- d
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" R# }3 ~' ?3 m" q: z' K5 \1 ]+ HFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
l% w3 j2 S3 N- _4 W8 O5 k& G9 Hto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
4 }4 f$ z9 C& N) m; W* X: dto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses& e2 M' E5 H! h% D
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
( e/ S5 R4 U- y# `unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
# {$ b+ [" l+ i4 c: f& z" e% ] blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ J: m/ ~* m( A8 l0 Z! b* l
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the8 Z; W1 u k. ]
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the: u7 `' d: O4 }0 q! s9 j1 s
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be0 C2 F n8 g6 q0 ~% k# j. l; Y% ~
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 D5 K5 Z5 n; i) h2 l
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 B* v" }$ `- w
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
6 E& Z6 E% I5 y! c( n* Etorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
& G! ^' Y0 [! u. j' }# ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
3 `" f" h1 p! @- tNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
7 [" O$ O: C5 A) M6 {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, y; q$ d7 j, v% r& [. F
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
5 u. f/ b/ Y/ }4 n" M* K2 yof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
6 y0 L& {2 f4 i( uHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
% V2 B3 x* _8 k* s1 U. l$ Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 X M" u, i* G
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
! Q- D' N6 ^) W" J$ Hof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
- S4 M/ F U, b+ J( w v4 R- w"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all* ~% X' v6 X) ?2 I
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise! V0 y; h6 P3 N! W+ [+ H
apartments are the way to go? No.
: a& ~# B$ y; E* C r+ e9 a
1 l# W" I; I/ P* B 4 n, B) F6 K; `
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
+ S8 a( x3 f- H. w msituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; H; ?. W: k T/ J/ |3 v& U
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
! ]! t5 B* k2 S- Z$ }. Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so8 H2 ^- g7 U# w
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
* g* X, ?6 P8 p/ u zresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless# L' F: N; \( H+ E! d: Q$ `
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is) p; n4 @' f1 F. f1 E: k8 E( [
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|