UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
8 u/ b- d; i+ O3 Marchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; H9 e) t. [& w: t4 M/ b
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& |$ p* L6 s; v) v3 p- x+ h F
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
; ^ b" u1 F* Z1 l2 R4 E* DAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 W' @( \# ?6 r2 H' `# L0 d' `3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
; W+ B7 d; d/ w' U' G3 Y* }7 o' TManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within7 `1 |# ]) Q( J7 u$ ]& \
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
9 ]8 A' }7 k+ i1 R- d# Geach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
6 C& G+ v6 w. a) [and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is" X! e1 Z3 n% ]: N, f
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
u2 r) L( |1 Kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" ?3 I$ ~) t7 n) Fforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
' L7 s) k' W; f" `4 w* q% Bwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great. C2 J5 k% ^$ p7 l+ f O$ }3 ^% h
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished," x+ {. R) ?. C, m a& z
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong8 G* o. T l. d4 c, b2 ?
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment* }: v1 S3 c% y4 X1 u0 k
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
' V5 l) d/ `* s5 n* v# c8 Cno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
! x0 h* g/ K. p+ N* R/ Wonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a K1 w; g W1 g: M6 F r
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% S, C/ U! E) n2 o
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
) P) W3 M. w! Q. h cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is5 o! e. q4 G' C+ F
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
, x% u/ j3 ]% ^+ J1 u# Rthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
) j! C2 H6 T7 }; C( [still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; G. I. U1 q& F }+ K6 |- N$ _( @
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
: y( P- x" x# T) Qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
2 i2 g; v* u0 H/ [- pa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& A# S$ z4 y+ m6 r" z9 U' ~
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across2 w. g; t" l$ `% C4 C
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural# w4 o% |1 w1 `1 l
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, E: p) a$ V3 u* r0 q- C
development.
Hutongs1 N+ ^8 B9 _$ n1 k ~- ^
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
, `9 X' L1 y5 o" \$ A3 Sthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions6 T0 D7 o2 T& i# o6 @5 _# H
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
: e; @& N1 ?3 _have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' t+ G/ v% v( \3 X* C: X9 \6 O/ L0 nwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" F' n) t& ~( kFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
; L% c1 Z) i2 D @5 q ^to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
+ K) ]/ R" ^) o' C# Y4 i! U+ p9 R, Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
8 |. \) k; _ K3 M2 z, V9 N+ \/ isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
" F6 P) P3 A# t( l/ junfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
# j- ~) n9 C# p1 alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,; }5 d) j3 x2 ?6 b4 _6 X0 m
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the$ _2 B$ \, B# G+ M8 [) d
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the9 V! F, R: R9 v5 j% E8 a
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
a/ n4 {5 t2 brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
- a! ~5 ~7 S% q+ A$ u6 I6 l( c+ RMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ F7 F: o0 _# Z; y8 ipeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
- j5 Y2 ] ~; w6 \# ]torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished4 P$ o" K( Q+ \% u d. b
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
& q6 o% d) h# @Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
5 h b7 s# s; _6 `aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
# s- b E+ r! D: E' K5 ^7 v4 v! jnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image7 X6 M; _6 e% V+ L
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
) H; d$ a9 a& lHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those8 b8 W: K2 w7 Q; x4 B
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they( B+ q3 O+ E3 z! Q. C; u7 O/ J
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some7 [! {, F% Z$ `) r x& L+ e
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
9 n& h1 w4 O V+ _# O* G"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
, v) A9 A5 l$ J+ Ipeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
, R! {9 e" M5 \1 E6 sapartments are the way to go? No.
4 h0 x) [$ R/ D& l" x ' _" F. ?7 N: y
9 x8 \' V8 k' M: v. N1 ]% l
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
; F; C3 y; c# K: V. S6 esituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 }/ G) V0 v+ }3 S4 e1 Q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; {3 Y- M, ?5 e$ J
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
0 G+ t1 \- J! ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
1 W; s6 G0 t* v! T' s. Bresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; v1 E1 j4 D p1 i: {Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is9 Q2 X/ N+ P* w$ b) a, c" X' z1 D* B
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|