服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6546|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 2 i2 f2 M O0 B: W% c& p4 Zarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider( O9 E& l+ g: n' q2 Y; N9 e$ o Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian". y s2 z2 j! b city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ' L; ]! k' A5 t! Z4 C& O% u X2 ?According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . ~4 ^7 m; ~, V9 d+ I, ~6 g3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 J+ q8 R% J9 G! \' w/ gManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within " }; Z. H* K7 `% ]) }hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 p M9 i& |" k; m: o each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera * S4 n# H# b- ^" n: ^) ~and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is& f2 ?8 x0 @5 t' l" S; v1 x harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 1 y* e; D- A/ l1 d6 p! v cdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 2 O3 i! `6 b) z: |forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 |. D- o) E; G; c" zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : p6 c5 X0 Q2 W: _% @) bimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ C3 l' U9 y# O2 t& Q% b and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong/ D/ F7 z! R; b, D a- n" m6 g/ u has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 5 m" v1 ~" e; R3 _% iof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that . [: x: E' k' Ino hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are! w5 T0 x- X. N, X% J2 x" |; R only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a* v9 E& I9 J# h2 z9 c: K) G sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% W$ m/ M/ }/ O. \- t* B$ n: t6 b% a1 g want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move , L3 [1 g3 j- w" q+ N& s# s7 f" kto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ! }8 F% g+ e& Y; W/ n: K: N"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ' o& s; k% ^: y4 r3 n. gthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are / k4 Q9 ^ \/ o' g `) J5 jstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ) J+ r0 ]" }& M; S"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 8 e3 V" Y# n2 x' o: [( n! Fmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was" l+ ^9 j1 R- X+ D( H a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a) y9 v5 ?; c* D3 s9 y7 g3 C parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across1 ?- \! r3 Y, F; k! u" x the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ' l" U2 A& @5 [importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for" K5 [3 b* ~* T- Q$ h. L development.

Hutongs % z8 p4 s' h0 J0 Iin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 L- _! f1 Y% b9 g# ^there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions! e2 ?/ E9 d3 Y9 Z6 o0 A in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ k" {( ^& c- I( H+ M have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you1 e+ i3 f- A% E) k/ g& a! ^ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ' U3 F) Q; k' C! WFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date7 B; I- }& `7 _* C" ? to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used " I) X! m' P! C, n( s- kto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses3 s1 g$ M" h! E support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; U! @- w; z* v! o: v unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to - R0 s# _. G+ j& R" Alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, % f# ? g. x" s k+ z& ?* ]; }5 Q$ }3 khutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the. b H3 C3 V/ F2 d balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 0 \& o: Y' U4 w' l, W: V; Vproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be - l1 o* Z. }1 O1 @: [renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong . T3 b5 g4 ]4 T; k8 `5 ^Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- l4 k; e; Q, t: n3 H. S8 F people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be / v! F* S v0 u( S' S& t) Atorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished8 t$ H# S9 o5 o. |% R: ~! J memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".( w7 p: [3 w! r) | Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are * {, r2 T8 Q3 ~' J$ jaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially B9 T; d0 n6 q7 [4 _ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 r s4 _* d3 o$ Z: Y. P/ Hof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these3 T5 W* n" ]& M6 m) R% F Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ' L' w! e" P6 d! P7 C M( \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 1 n/ F2 p* B, N: |2 D; h7 l# h" Rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 8 L+ T: Z; r8 D: ?of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before# ^& Q3 O, R4 S, G' M% x" ] "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 2 n1 j+ _6 c" t3 Xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 2 h& q" H* p( \) {: X; sapartments are the way to go? No.* P+ G, }3 V% a, l Y) T( [+ N5 ~ ]; M, K7 w9 a% I3 \, n, s 7 u- `) t8 J- S/ P$ `+ ~/ P' P

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 4 P7 Z( \ q5 }' S) e: Esituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this5 E- [8 z8 s" {3 M; x$ b 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) A. i- l+ I( Q/ J; K$ f5 c no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so . ~9 ?& f% F; S4 \; s, a# ^fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant! H: p6 k0 W6 f5 c( L. B resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 8 B7 p/ B, t% A6 V( k; V$ w% | }, NBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 1 _ H2 c2 P* h' X+ V6 eunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-23 16:30 , Processed in 0.124180 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部