UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
* r/ ]8 ?" Q' Darchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
. o6 W, b& V% o: w! wBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"- E5 ]4 V1 V! h; ~
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
0 D4 _# Y' Y0 \* Y6 F# OAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
/ ]2 h7 i; m) L9 I7 F% X3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of9 K% e. T' l" {% Y/ W0 I* a
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within; C4 S6 ]: g- c8 X1 K
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" S; B( f9 M* _* @; j
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera Z$ j" @" C+ a8 S
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 @, P$ {* f" a+ S/ i3 v- B
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
6 N6 T' z6 A1 C# M( [4 Ldescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
T% c7 w& p! s/ w1 @9 s: Hforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I, a, E, a( s) K/ r: q
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
" {4 g/ I( u) r. e2 Nimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,0 U) V7 Z, i4 P# H% R/ y2 ^+ w
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 v! Y- I) |9 m3 ]
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
/ V1 W" c& n, a, O' kof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
: k7 S' g2 t, [7 r: k9 [7 hno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( V8 _% t; R- \" x5 i; [( E
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
% x S& T2 p; r: G- B. [" gsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
( W# z5 h4 L* t2 Q- ~want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- q/ U; [$ H: _& \; I8 I
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
( P, L( I$ ]! F) c& ?' e"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, P0 d5 I* W1 [( s1 q/ A- y
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
2 S- i N- M8 O) K* Dstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
0 n' B, p5 _' n; P"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
+ Q+ m+ O# p4 o" Qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was/ Y1 e! @; h9 r1 j3 o I7 d2 a
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a2 x5 j( Y9 N% Z9 ]) }: G- b( }
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( W Q0 r4 z5 Z( y1 v& l% y- a
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( ^' m( b0 C G ]9 Q+ u. U7 \9 q
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- u# s- L/ m7 l/ F+ g
development.
Hutongs
4 d* \! j, `. }1 X7 q2 win the old days were residential area where people actually lived
7 ^. U3 y/ b) k* j0 F9 U" pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ m! q) N: }5 l. V9 l7 j
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
+ ^0 |; p; p5 u! a: Phave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ r. O" ~ C) A! R: o' Q& U
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 s6 }: K3 G" I- N' g9 B' a( j
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ |9 M" N6 f6 X# _# J" g G w
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- W% b8 l. t! o
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 W7 \$ h) Z0 ?3 l& Y
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically+ w6 b: g, d e
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
4 Z. d: o. a; P8 Y( `live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,+ y7 u6 N8 A( Z5 u5 r1 W# R) M
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the- l4 c! m' G! s' F; ^
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
2 r* `0 _8 L# l( Z1 t/ ~# Dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 Z$ `# h) K" q! r2 B2 O: z% Q1 A
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
, F; g- x7 @/ t( a, k: FMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
* E6 ]3 L+ b8 w* G K8 g epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: E7 U2 W( q j; y9 H' b
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished8 d3 ~+ ?& W& q. ?5 Y2 U- x3 Q) O
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
. K# o# C, U! [- y, FNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
6 ]$ y: ]( [2 Y9 S1 n4 \# maligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
1 E" `4 j* e/ r" X( dnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
' \9 H- l5 u1 q& s+ kof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these5 I& @- ]. G+ {' _' i; x
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
5 t2 P b. }( {6 `. v0 `people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 q9 [7 W2 s$ I9 |4 j) L
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 a% O' S" ^, l) k0 v
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
$ G) x8 F, r5 b" k2 B* o7 H"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ m) F2 Y9 n( W+ X
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
" m1 [+ l6 C, r( {, b0 O/ Napartments are the way to go? No.
% v+ G- {+ p. R# R + T( r% d0 L- T! ^
6 t$ Y* B+ k7 j' p2 `
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the/ Q& F2 W1 Q" X) W) N# P" j ]) l
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 N, N! k; S& n7 D5 o2 b* b
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
- K+ ]+ |8 U5 S* M W, W; J O- a ]no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
) N5 c+ R* h s) H" O4 a1 [8 Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
1 a1 p; l. P9 f" l0 l$ g, l$ Rresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless1 P9 s# c2 A( ]* D6 U
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
" E0 }3 a& s7 j: I8 Junlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|