UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
$ A: f$ P. O- U, C/ J+ g! \1 M9 rarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
3 _9 Y3 E, b9 I5 @/ n& OBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 f! z' Q7 E7 g/ @# k. b- `4 g. Y4 p
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
4 p( }6 z3 b9 P7 ~% T, U9 c( xAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
7 o+ W# g; ?( g" U! U, M3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
3 q) c+ x9 L" {6 UManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
& x/ S$ |4 M' nhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" ^3 m9 o- _# l- Q( M
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
$ V* l4 m9 C; B8 N0 X2 ]7 Oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is4 c. Z$ k) U* s/ o6 h* D
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are o" u! A% {3 Z8 P
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. G/ ?- m9 O8 N1 [5 l4 i3 G& e8 N
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I+ Y: T: }1 {0 p& ~5 |
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great: `0 h( B: I$ V1 m
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,8 f% v' L1 R( e8 [) A8 e
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
0 R# x1 y m V, b' Ihas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
3 K% T/ k0 L" pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
+ r# g" \1 Z1 O Z9 Tno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' a) d; Q+ V; E J) y9 ?+ D P
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
7 n. i4 I# A' @; q! dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government+ G9 j0 i3 ~" `9 t$ H1 D' D1 l8 D
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
& v4 s! ]* i& F# N: m8 G6 Hto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) ]3 |- M) n( z
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
+ ~4 y7 c8 d# k0 }% c0 k' r5 ]this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
; g! b0 x. h* K9 R2 Hstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to8 B/ @" T( ?8 z: `- i: \
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make1 r) ~- W+ J3 I' R6 F( a R
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
/ i) f* D! T& M* ?! sa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a4 h; P. H+ a# \4 p2 m7 B' p: Y3 [
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
* V2 L4 y/ s) I: _/ ]! Z5 ?the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 y! \; ~- N# p, s' d% h" A. S) `2 F e
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* y! S; ]: V) o% Z, s3 _ W
development.
Hutongs5 r: P3 g6 U; Y0 K3 W
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
; X3 P% Y* l2 i9 c2 x- ~2 Vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
; o1 t1 M' _* p% T: din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
5 F# m5 W+ B. c2 Y8 j2 {have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 d, Y! s4 P% P8 Y$ Z: V" E' D4 M
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.1 p7 L0 A$ S! Z
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date# m' ]7 T& B6 n& \
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
- P+ F2 y' T' Z& {& ?5 G" Ito hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses3 j( ?' l1 d4 z
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: \! j+ R+ t, ]% _# r4 ~. j
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to, s. M. t3 ?! b: a* s# ]* e- N2 e
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. r# _ |: {! F6 K
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
. a1 T" j1 t6 @6 L% Qbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
; e9 m! M( h( D7 |' eproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
L8 ?1 j+ I( M- S4 Mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
6 x2 w3 x- ] a$ ^Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how3 ?/ T" o( g5 e
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
( R- f+ `. B6 ~) y- e8 mtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished% _% n3 m" W! q8 i- I
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
- j& `3 a* w' O" r# hNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
. |% N4 ?, K; d" P1 D. {$ yaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
2 k8 ^1 T& g" k0 t, w, w: Hnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
) G: z4 r. P. gof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' M5 \* y( I7 y5 Z
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those% \5 ?( r0 v/ M1 S' C
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they' d" l+ j+ O8 P6 W, ?
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
5 w! Q2 @ T1 Dof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
+ V& z' x1 W3 t5 N"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
5 w+ \5 i8 e/ ~people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise6 N @# n @' [5 y% f' {
apartments are the way to go? No.
* G2 N) K" L1 G; B! e
4 s5 N. A) _) m" Z! y4 Q8 y 5 y4 N* `+ @1 \. [0 g6 h0 X0 |
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the" R# a1 g4 V$ e
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this4 y# d8 z3 c2 }# T: ~! q
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
% l7 ^+ k' f( {3 S6 dno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
) A# s( a2 w I6 i0 Mfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant# i1 i! W. c' h+ |) b# ~
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; g# ~5 n" H5 m2 e ABeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* p2 S6 s6 A. o1 L) F0 N
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|