服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6303|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its# k' r0 n0 n4 }- o3 @; W* r5 s# B architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 H$ I% f; N! e: @ |: {7 ] Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") i$ ~: ^% V$ O city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 9 f& V- ~8 b$ r5 a% xAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; H+ }2 B1 H# T6 S4 S' X( R8 s9 ] 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of c. P( K! D5 Q1 a. D) G Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ' ]6 Y: j! x: ^& u) whutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among / `! L: a: X% q. p" l* keach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ] M4 l i7 aand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 6 T+ f# r0 R! G" P! sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are / C/ \- C w6 ]# I% b0 }% Cdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and9 ^" e; K* t, R1 x forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I" D; S! h0 D5 t8 _* ~5 C was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ) m/ L+ S1 p9 u% g1 w! Wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 8 b6 _% ]- C, c, Y: ~& }and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ) H _1 [: K* S, Hhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment : A* r9 e8 i# {% Q; D% \of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 7 l$ H4 k9 H. q% K0 b, U. Jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are) q3 q& j5 x! u. x& I only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ) U3 f- C, S2 ^0 Asort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 9 L4 D$ Z2 N: N5 cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move , x. N5 ^" L! q ~' E: l" |( Y: Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is $ q. t' {$ H( ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,; s9 R3 U6 ~$ B' K this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 d8 H' G4 u: G& t& [0 l still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to & ^# d! a% O. m. H# \"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ ^ b9 x, b7 p& a) s! Q2 S c money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was + M L+ P q: S d0 C2 na beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 0 D0 |/ l' D3 \9 c% ~parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across " K; ?4 j7 A% r: b) y5 u* {) ^: Ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & s( R, N2 h$ T* u. K" ^2 B w8 r! Yimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 8 ?" e, x; M5 l) ^6 Odevelopment.

Hutongs : z5 _* d2 U* }in the old days were residential area where people actually lived - B: y# P0 A8 b$ R; `' a( Ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + S4 U* M- s+ ^! |& z- x( min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 4 }- x. E# `7 G2 [ }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ) H0 U5 e- b) E2 d- [( Y) Rwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ; a$ Y- j! g3 N1 @Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date % o& c- ]4 n1 g3 x, U' x6 mto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used : K* B1 |; f2 U4 h+ e: _4 ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ I2 ]8 a6 d8 I, isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 3 t: t! m) j5 R6 ^0 G, r7 J1 M$ Vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 _, c2 R7 ]8 a0 N4 Q) K live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, c" v$ Q7 @1 A: vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 9 D4 J- B0 {9 {4 R. |% ebalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 0 r7 z8 @! X( q+ V% V1 Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" ^. J; x$ t) H v renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong3 S. U! c; ~# M. U Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how " d# F$ s& t* d" D! jpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be # c3 h7 O( t( Qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 4 e0 J3 s) u% v8 K) rmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 2 N* l( D6 @, K5 |+ s% d8 D( rNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are " V. ~* s* u2 {( V/ ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 @9 \6 \+ g8 B7 `3 N non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image; \* X' \% X' K' [. @3 j6 h of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 ]4 p' E& C P! r Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& e3 ^" M$ C' h# z( W" X people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they5 g% S. y+ a- ?. g: f- } may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some & D. s3 g0 y: G* U" }) cof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 7 B {- E, ?3 X9 h8 ~) z; P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ' X$ R: L8 ~ M2 @" X, e4 mpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise8 V" @/ ^: Q; s. O apartments are the way to go? No.' ]- F9 z! P% ?. L( [8 N + A2 Y4 r" W0 \/ C" A( v3 ] $ i, w; h; l2 N* p6 K

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 8 B! d9 X4 H9 @% T/ q( z' ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 k5 ]) G4 x2 F'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ( x" {' y: F" h5 d3 Q8 M' p: w# Zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so " f3 ~/ S; y9 g2 R3 e" l" g- Ufast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ) `" R1 i) U/ b. Y2 K+ ?" Eresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' {$ C9 d* D. e0 q Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is: Y1 s7 C/ O0 B& r! R unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-19 11:37 , Processed in 0.116008 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部