UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its. T( `4 y; I8 k7 ?+ ^
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
" _" Q' {( j# C$ l: U& HBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! H! q ~1 k4 |* _5 b% U
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." l+ Q a% ]4 }6 X c% T0 n8 z
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,7 O. \% q+ ^6 H _0 q8 W
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
( o& p1 v1 s* Y; a& NManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
: p6 g+ f, j g: I; m" Ahutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among7 D5 G e' p2 @/ G* ^. x
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
/ h9 u, s1 f3 d( m5 ^and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is b j N+ f3 z" o; K
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
0 U% {: U d* }+ ydescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 B- H6 o! z {3 i
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
0 S" e; s- B5 J; w; ]was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
$ ~* V. r$ X7 c" cimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,/ i6 j0 I+ l' U" O. ?8 F. t+ r
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong6 x+ Q& [$ d! w: I* S
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment' I* j5 l9 m Q
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 }+ l+ T; T$ {2 d6 [2 D# i8 a: j7 H
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
o0 `& [& U4 r" N7 k* j& a% f. Zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
4 c7 ?% ?: X' W9 T9 ]0 jsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
W; C( |4 i( V) D( c" owant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move" ^0 J: ^* r3 \
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
8 V4 @6 @, H. q! Z6 A"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,2 Y3 S" `0 F& c2 H
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are7 H2 C3 p) {; J1 r
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to) _; B, o5 R5 Q7 L# B6 r* }
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
$ K; w. [: g& w# j: D+ d, |money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was% i7 Z* A6 M' _6 J
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a2 x& M, P! n3 b! M0 M
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
) T# m6 I& _; a& pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
8 h; B7 i! M( qimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
9 ~! H. p" N+ \& u3 E$ W1 fdevelopment.
Hutongs
7 `. ?/ T2 i2 w4 uin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
+ U/ [9 o: i4 W$ H) V1 f0 vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 b# l/ F5 G/ A2 Y, r! u
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 P/ A+ u4 ]7 J8 C! V
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
! H9 U2 p# A9 q8 x/ {will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.& F P4 r: D7 X7 M
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
: z b/ G- s8 y' g; G* h$ f8 L/ v) dto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
) j; u; C0 s% a7 v) Y- t5 wto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- t. i+ {& U" s! U1 |
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 }5 Z6 y+ u6 I1 F/ F" e
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ E9 W3 @" B3 ^. N% P
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
7 ~8 V M ?$ H3 z4 y- {hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
. a7 z( e3 ~1 [/ W1 U' F* J3 Zbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
2 H! t8 [; r- Q5 U5 Iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
/ E( V& [' }6 {4 }- Yrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
% J$ Q! W5 S6 r2 I& n9 u; tMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
?. G1 I/ D2 b' B4 g) d: R9 lpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be9 V9 Q" J* N+ e8 M
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
) q* e) N# k8 C/ [2 N# r% e; Kmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
! Z& g( U+ q, d* t3 o9 v9 BNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
& D; |& {2 _+ }5 Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially# Q" J! {* }8 r8 w: U* p
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
7 t0 [* j4 V' n( yof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ L% ~0 }' F2 s: Y7 {
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those3 q+ @5 n- B6 x$ j3 w' [0 G( i
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they3 [+ [ X: b' k, M
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some Q& J8 i- S5 O# ?
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- x W5 F( U( {
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all3 r0 P! v: l5 @7 i0 H8 V1 V
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise- k- X+ i! Q/ ~
apartments are the way to go? No.
: C- J: `+ @7 G# Y' p" W3 F
: k: c) z1 m9 ]: u0 k5 ], [ 5 U9 `7 O# W+ N8 r. X5 i
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the! z1 j' @/ q' C# u' u
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, a: L- l5 W$ }$ m: W7 d
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
7 U& @$ y5 w; _; \7 t) A5 ~no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
5 [# s# q! z9 R6 b+ E5 x) q7 Pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
( f2 c- H$ E. ^* T* M6 rresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless L. A9 C6 t% E B" y1 U- s
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
. {* c1 T. J$ }7 W8 d- u3 zunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|