服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6222|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its $ ^% K" M5 X4 W; w/ Karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 ]9 U% G9 r5 K7 N9 `4 n) ] Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ; p% ?* @0 m; @- a6 {9 ?0 ucity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 c; |$ r( t* K3 R& Q. G9 h According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,7 Q( v' H) H/ |+ v( a2 { 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of / e* G# ?+ _7 [ H2 C. C# `5 ZManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 2 d0 `2 h" m. [3 Z8 O8 I8 C4 E$ `hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 H; n0 i* r% a1 D6 Q each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 N2 A B" h" _8 A. v and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is + J, a2 w# [% \1 B% t* kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are# u1 S! i4 {. @$ K6 C) Q. i: b/ Q+ e descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and% J0 V/ e; x, V# f forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 0 `* d' ?$ d9 Qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ! E5 S5 O9 f& d, g0 \impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,# V. G, N" U* F5 X and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong/ q6 Y/ V& z& M8 E1 J$ y has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 i( M2 w% Z( r- ~4 p+ W# Z+ m$ q of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! f5 ]. o; [0 X# T) R! i no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) u, z& y1 p' X3 U6 Y, Y& Xonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a , |& H. W7 W8 f! ? T3 u9 wsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- R- o" ]& f0 R# I* W1 u want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move $ h6 }7 U3 r |0 {to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % C& z: a6 v7 |+ G$ ]6 E; W"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 0 G- `4 {' j: k6 N9 J2 k1 y) Hthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 4 J2 O- B/ U' d* ustill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 9 C* `2 B( Z1 c" P/ h% l"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 n7 n' B# [5 j" |( }& j5 h$ umoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was * r( h% n, T. S# H, _. {% xa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a6 _' U7 [& `: z( |& } parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 5 C7 U* s w8 e4 L. v9 R0 e0 Z7 [8 C( tthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & j9 y( Z% [. z" u$ m0 S' wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for / n' B* q4 }3 g, Q" N3 Kdevelopment.

Hutongs : b* g3 E* C( G5 Xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived. m! B/ b% E2 v# N there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions $ }) q# g* o4 K0 n# i6 r- g+ iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not , C+ M4 j0 o' M! c3 a# v! d7 khave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you4 X3 ^3 @3 C' R9 C- E' }) v$ W will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + I. I/ o) x8 o5 D5 z! RFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ Z2 K( V' k+ a. \& N to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used $ N( L, P2 u& Eto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses c. j' E9 Q9 [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically$ z( J: b0 K4 z. O unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to0 d3 G9 H# a2 }8 u5 V live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, * Z! I, z) a" shutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the7 C2 j* p* } ~" q( a4 K; O2 F balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 1 g, n: z2 C" P( D# t5 n' P7 oproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ! i$ a& N; I& C# u ?renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 1 Q, ^; m$ ^0 Q! n4 o4 dMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how - V$ r' e0 t& L) \! H9 ?. |people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% N3 \( L$ V9 `5 y0 [" |; h5 v torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished & O$ V' D; i3 ?, F: V- tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".! ~7 S1 V: u! o6 | Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* s/ e4 o7 Z9 J, r: s: Y aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 O3 K! Q6 N: D/ n: {1 {& X; U) K non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image q+ X1 C" F+ l0 a of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 6 O# F+ H; v' f2 m& s( zHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those X- r, {7 N5 c- p people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they, g2 X/ l9 U8 ]: K" j2 ]$ A! D) i may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ( x" Q' J) \0 @* L+ I+ p$ }of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before # J! c# k' k5 a: G% s"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 e6 Z# r, z, ppeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 [; E; b4 w9 A! }' B% r+ a apartments are the way to go? No. * m" ~) L! U+ f" A) J( } ) ]* n* q4 l+ c; {* ~ " ?7 w& S4 U7 b8 ?+ \

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the6 a; v( W' q! T! g2 K! [ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this & Z: |# S6 e: `) \ D3 f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make , Z, K3 ? B' sno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 1 Y) S6 o& Y+ W; H9 Z9 ffast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 c' o' l4 @' ]3 M6 h! H resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless$ ?/ ~' v7 Y& @4 J6 M) V# p Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 9 n& V. V. f; q' F t- G6 _unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-11-25 12:48 , Processed in 0.146755 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部