UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
& p) x8 |4 R e( M2 g2 oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 S2 n6 `$ V0 S% q( ]
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
9 v) |2 |" J' Ucity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
" \ R3 n) n& S) V: GAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
( e' T0 f, E: d7 ?" y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 p& l3 [, L2 m
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within7 S. B1 A5 x/ T$ j$ R: \5 {
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! J' b v' K; Y; w" G$ k
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera3 P0 P7 o1 ~# n0 _
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is* v: s$ P$ }' s' w. q
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are0 m( W0 X' G l' m* j
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
P# {9 C1 g ^% f# t; m1 R5 Qforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I- d5 w4 X! H$ W% _" I' p( ~
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
0 I" e3 b2 m- E. s3 Oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
( V3 F, z3 e6 J+ s. Z$ ~and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
' b) {% j0 P1 Y6 }has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment% S. j! {3 X( E# Z* C+ V7 e- {
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
( F+ b9 k; ]4 C% v+ m2 ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are" f, \5 x5 [8 q( a( T
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 ~$ Y7 j& ?! @. {
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government7 X1 C! O r) [" j$ p. t
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move; N/ U. G- F: i5 j! }
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
J( p0 _( I- B6 e( N* h"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
4 }) f5 D( \, `. Lthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 H' X) r5 [' |, A/ e: a( { U6 u
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
% n9 [9 W+ h3 r) T9 `% w% |* {"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make% ~( z+ @% B* F5 U& F
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
: @1 Q6 E1 y5 |( h1 M1 wa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& g, }. T V' T" F' H
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 G$ T' o: I$ t# g) b; ?3 h! p( q. a6 l5 R
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
/ l7 Y8 }- X6 \importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for! r. j, t" ?- W, K2 D
development.
Hutongs4 u# B+ Y. i$ ]' f! j% n& l$ W
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 m* {5 r% z+ Y9 x" L3 ?
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 x; p/ b1 F; X( T8 b8 f, v6 {1 f0 L
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
& c5 `) L# A: C' }" M' T. i2 Bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you3 Y8 t q/ K% h7 j) h C! E
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
- g; c1 `5 z% z! Z" _+ {, ?Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 J! a0 q P8 d3 G
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used: Z/ t" L+ X1 k ^! k9 Y; K
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ ?+ T1 q0 |0 V {) d# ]9 E
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- p2 l3 q' G W5 ]- ]5 F' Q
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
& w2 l" |: O0 `2 z7 n! }( Alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,; S5 p! f/ u5 ]% N
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the }4 ^3 J4 {/ `' A
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
$ Y1 g. {/ Y0 g, }( eproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
$ F z: W- M6 I: X! |3 r1 U6 orenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
& n2 m0 ~" b2 A- v& b4 B8 t0 g/ JMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; L1 _6 ]- [5 R' E% C4 P
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
+ k; @# C$ F1 E2 F7 a: x' }torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
J: K3 H9 _: g, t% f) p+ F# v& ]: _memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ p5 G) @; n* B* D+ @0 S
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
0 Y! k$ e% X- m5 c" G+ R/ }aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 |; M, A% A- C- m+ l
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- u9 R; V! j% D/ m$ t! C/ b
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
7 w! D4 v5 \0 z" _Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 P/ {, f+ Q7 G( H5 u# M
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they4 A7 m% q3 ]9 R: z
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
; G* {) f4 v" o y5 N( yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 A9 \ V3 E' @" r) A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all9 c5 E; C5 u" r; T! Q2 ?
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
. q n9 _4 Q) [) h$ U( L7 V2 ~0 Aapartments are the way to go? No.
. W G5 o9 x2 p/ D$ ^# v8 W , v: I) @8 w* p1 x
6 i" ]' G% k* L) _ X# d
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
( Q1 s+ K; X' Q# T Xsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; k8 j5 w. j. ?/ V6 Z0 H
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, n# }2 {# e0 G, j# Z' e! T
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
" p7 y W1 M) C0 a5 ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) \$ e+ h: U6 E/ ?: \& d i' `8 {resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; A! s3 S' m: w1 i, @ [Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
- u/ L, S+ b* V5 d9 G: Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|