服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6571|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its* F2 W1 d# |1 o) A! n- b# Z$ o g architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 8 K8 C5 l5 r ?4 G4 C2 OBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" + X7 B& q f1 @( h, l; h- T* ?city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ) F6 s$ m8 w8 W+ e, I: YAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 7 \9 o: v& }- I `$ P3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of. I/ w, V! y: G+ @1 r- v2 I Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within# Y+ |1 i! r. a" a+ r1 [ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among4 b: a: x& d1 R+ p each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera c/ z( m+ z1 v9 F and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is5 Z9 F6 g1 e7 u _% | harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are0 {5 J" a* r" x3 z( y# u6 I% E descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 5 c$ {, T: X- t- x( Qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I) r# x3 @- y; ~! ` was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great * K& d* o W, c9 h* |2 c' D" Jimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, , j$ V& z' |/ O0 `9 Land we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong z8 g! N$ t' c# F1 Q$ Rhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment+ Y6 }, g- `/ G7 O5 w of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 r! u7 A/ a5 C1 y2 V2 H0 W. R) L2 K& }no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are " `2 O! A5 d: M! wonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " {, I+ A& [6 P5 Vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government$ s( h, j& Z) w( Q/ }1 Q want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# n, Z( f i7 G* C- M; D to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, _) }2 u; L0 {. ]& K- {) D* b "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 g3 }/ ~0 S8 }1 A: h this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ m8 H a+ i6 w still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ K1 \; r o' e8 l: q0 H; N3 ?3 t2 C9 j "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make' x: {9 [6 |1 g, ?, q money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ i1 Q/ Z$ ?% a8 S, }a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 {& h/ h: M; P2 K0 G9 `: r6 u parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across " R% `7 F0 |+ V9 C+ e N! Bthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' }, P( f: q9 z* z6 j: ?+ X. { importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ' ^, {7 I6 f! ?9 mdevelopment.

Hutongs# D3 p6 w- c6 k( f# J1 n in the old days were residential area where people actually lived : Z+ O* _& f6 u8 Q; K9 r8 V8 ?there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 3 P$ h7 G( {: v! {in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not# N7 V6 K1 h. K1 t have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you9 v$ K9 q4 B- L9 m! ^# M will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 ~8 b. _# P2 w) ]+ t Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date: p: v1 ~1 C3 _! m# X, e to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ E4 g9 ^+ I' `1 I- Y to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 3 I4 g8 v- [9 U# W5 Esupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically5 n1 V- W' ]5 E6 N0 d6 l unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to4 P3 S/ v# y% i' g; [' d live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, . {/ X% H, M8 J3 vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the * e0 U J) f8 Zbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the: ^* k8 k$ r1 O: D4 ~2 m project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be) b( e/ s! }# j V+ r renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong$ ~ M U! W" R Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 7 g) [) b0 h' n, e$ G1 opeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be; C& i( i) M. | torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished : z7 [4 G- {* J7 ^2 a. d" I( ^, [memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 6 e A0 l/ ^' U: {5 @( ?Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are4 N- l' e0 R. c" w6 u7 V L. I aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 8 x4 @1 m( }4 E: o" [" V4 u z9 n9 {non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- E% E; o# Y; W6 T of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 0 _. l) ^3 M; C0 o# O$ rHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 7 Y- J+ ~9 u$ d7 R+ D3 Rpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they1 D" o3 j0 D. T0 U( g may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some: W8 W9 P. W2 F9 w- h' z9 ?3 [ of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 }7 \" u5 h& V "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all W" D: k. S4 q" f- C7 }: P0 Qpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 5 }. M5 a, I0 c3 S1 Papartments are the way to go? No. s* n. M: [* ]& {( A5 i 4 M( P* g+ r) C2 i' W, P 4 ~5 z8 \# {) @# |' V8 f6 K6 o: R+ A

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& `' L% X8 C/ j7 z2 _3 }# K1 u8 o situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this6 F& i. Q. I2 D! a% V 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make8 [4 A7 r! Y2 M n7 @5 ^ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ) _+ E( R9 i+ dfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' P/ u! g' P& n* Z! z0 T! z* w8 d resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless6 h' q4 d$ e" l6 m- G Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is( {6 m( q) t: @9 A unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-27 05:54 , Processed in 0.120141 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部