服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6530|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its - Z4 X9 }, c) w5 o% H" \9 i/ _architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider * P9 D3 I/ w( Q/ E% lBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 [* P5 t. \+ O$ }% ? V city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 b' q; v3 S0 v R2 e8 W8 G$ m: R According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,2 l" a3 g8 M2 Y6 J/ P' \' ] 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 1 t6 b A7 C) Y9 JManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within% H3 |! m* S' V9 T: R6 _ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among $ k2 T' z. K+ ^. w$ C# y9 heach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera2 Y, J4 r9 y& \7 z and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 2 K, Y9 [& k; q2 Uharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are: }1 ^1 H/ Z0 m1 i" P2 e! X descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. u3 S! E9 {( V4 h* d forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I . X0 o$ T7 n1 C* Qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great $ D" R6 k9 D" D% p( N- zimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ; R" W" x. s' \+ Q. h2 tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 H; G+ E! S D8 `2 X has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 5 N9 e* @5 D7 O ^4 d# V& U. Z- J; }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that2 Z' n5 B6 c# K3 b; f5 o) W no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ; O W' U6 m# f$ e6 q, W$ Ionly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 2 `: E t6 ]3 t& B+ E: R9 v' v& Zsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ) P8 x! p+ ?. p/ }% |3 Swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 4 I) c% x$ \. `to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 V" V% k! b, P"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# E' H) j% ~3 T* b* x% N# g this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 1 d! s1 q: n: D6 N8 c5 p wstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to6 ?; Y( N. A4 |% A4 s) E "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 6 K% H; Z4 I# @; amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was% j' g) L. x6 P0 Q. Y5 V( e, C- M7 H a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a1 K/ m7 |, h- t* y( u parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across4 J% I- w$ U9 {# {1 b the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 o1 n- I7 V k' {0 d6 g( a3 N2 E importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# { R5 v$ u/ z1 p& | development.

Hutongs# p+ Z4 m+ R' [* N% G in the old days were residential area where people actually lived* q. v2 ~+ v% I1 t0 r; v: | there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 6 M0 G& P! }2 V' V* R# Lin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 C0 x Z2 B6 I, I. O; [/ X: v have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 3 \1 r7 L& e) }* ^will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.3 ?7 l/ f9 Y3 P8 V3 f, A# q Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ' J- h4 Y( R5 V6 P2 S# Bto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used9 v1 a& n. G7 u7 r9 r" T to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses " E9 x# C" o; V( w: f _support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' \1 w$ S0 G, J4 m2 `- t+ L unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 0 J9 ?+ c4 S. J$ Slive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, : I1 p! Q: ~* e3 w% Phutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the ; K; B! g0 J" j; ?5 Kbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the2 Z5 S* h x4 A$ r' y, c project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# K* l% q8 {+ N) Q/ v4 ] renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( ]1 e, t- R$ V3 O! p( \ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how & m: C5 l% R) Ypeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be+ @7 |" V* h! l, i# b. B torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished' K0 g4 t! t7 U+ M7 n- B memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ m0 k/ B' W& l- n# yNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are $ C, u! o: F+ J( O; {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 2 L/ E1 ~6 G7 }% ]; F1 Enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image) D) g' B2 E: ^4 Z# A& c: n) ~& G6 L of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these - ?3 m3 i" Z4 R: jHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 6 @. I: ], p, B3 O7 k& vpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ( \8 ^+ S2 H) x- a, r. T0 Y* nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 6 I0 r' |. @, Vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 5 P) c1 g1 ?4 S( U) }"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all / D$ ^3 O- K# e( P+ s8 cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 ]- u \. O# d" p: G apartments are the way to go? No.. s3 `3 T7 i! K, i . ?7 S; B& X, ^" m 8 l n5 W! o! g5 [

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ) i3 S' K% f2 Z- j, g- Z3 Usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 ?( {2 e4 A( o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make; g+ D+ a8 P" T$ B" k no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ) @5 T8 H! `* @+ y8 A8 }9 m+ \3 Vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant3 [6 ], r2 a0 A, O resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' p. S0 E; t9 c8 n Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 3 L) |' Q4 {5 ]% o7 C. n, r# Qunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-21 11:50 , Processed in 0.140395 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部