UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- r1 O; y! T. {3 C5 z2 X F
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
6 ]- g7 I' S c. \1 U9 ]Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& e/ G, e4 B. G% {
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 n: X5 E- F5 e- s T
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, z% u% A X" a, M4 Z
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of/ `5 x; K8 `8 x4 l+ M7 z
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
3 O3 P# \$ i+ `hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among3 ^1 r3 H% c( I. l
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
8 ?6 i! ?# f5 K; Pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
) A! Z8 h5 M! L/ E7 T3 r3 O+ R: lharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
6 Y( ~$ ?5 i8 c6 A. t) ^: Q6 Udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, M# w. S ~ ~( g. n
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I) D8 H+ j n' q; }. B' {
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great& y( Z2 W* g# O* x
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
8 o7 g9 X( G; M/ O+ l- q- {. nand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- x4 @% H- V4 m( u0 R% p* _4 k
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment( M7 C% p, e/ f! G
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that$ a) H& o" _5 [! H/ F8 L( H( n
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
4 s- p8 x/ \& e; Xonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a V9 k- q! R9 f% U5 R/ B
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& P% u& P; a" S8 A4 v2 {
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
; H& @- O# l% `: p1 \7 k9 R/ uto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is) Q( `! r4 C3 h: }% {0 Y6 `1 `- l$ P0 o
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,( j) I7 B$ R( ]. e! b8 @! t$ I# K
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ u5 [2 @# |1 {9 ~
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to8 V, C6 H( z3 b
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
% }* M7 R9 a5 ^5 X6 C) J, _money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
: N) Z. l$ U* r2 u$ f( ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
/ e( K) j% j8 o: h/ i" {3 \7 uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
9 v7 ^4 U( h& U; h f. vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% z5 S6 J2 n- x- h/ n9 F
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
- D, M! X. @1 V" Fdevelopment.
Hutongs1 H. M9 Z4 S0 b9 Q- K
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived# t& a4 I& E0 t4 B2 t" y! o
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
2 Z3 U2 w8 U! Q: s' xin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not% B! E5 L! A. t m& ?
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
2 p. N4 n+ m% f( jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.6 _0 H) ?3 U% ~3 o
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date E( g9 Q5 `% R% v r0 E
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
7 @- B0 g: F0 |* G6 N8 tto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses1 G) ?+ O" k8 ^0 l/ Y9 d* s/ c
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
9 Z, O$ U9 W/ y6 ~! C+ X+ S7 d( \1 Lunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ [" {* h4 Z1 D! u7 S8 A/ i
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
: I$ V* [1 R- X+ Ihutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
2 _: J4 E! ~% l- V" [/ @2 Hbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the2 o: |& Q$ ~* T$ F4 S. R/ u8 q, b
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 a- A7 @9 N. V+ c
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
. Q' j2 s& k# [Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& y: Z, p+ b% W/ h- A( a
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
+ z' h P7 j& N# b6 storn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
- @4 q- O( M# tmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".' r0 z2 K( {( W' z9 ?0 [
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
- M" |+ B Y: E: qaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: F9 j# {7 ~* H
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image! h: ?& M. W/ i0 I* c4 W
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
& J9 E: ~' L. N8 R% IHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those5 K' l# w+ ?' C7 b
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
) u/ M" F4 a* c2 U. b* T Cmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some* a! A* @& ?" W: X5 |% \) J
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before, x( e0 V% g+ w: U% g6 d
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
# f+ O5 x1 m9 F& G0 T$ N Tpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* W/ q" m8 r6 k, q# L
apartments are the way to go? No.% E1 b) v' R) t7 z: ]/ ]# ]' L! U! D
; O% c8 j) I2 x& }+ X
$ O6 i+ M: ~7 M+ x* Z2 S
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the( ^# F* V1 J$ N5 a/ ] C7 J! G
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
, n% `8 R F) o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make: C- h4 V9 ^6 z L
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
# c: v0 U4 A6 z' f4 mfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant! O4 ?1 R/ V' ~$ e m
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ p' `( r: S4 _! q, T, o
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
+ {4 ]7 i# }$ A8 W+ Qunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|