服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6391|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ; ?3 w1 l& E" M" earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 H7 z% ~. z- d' z Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 0 g: T! u0 Y' G. d+ Ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. % {1 i% M7 y- s% O0 SAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, " G o& Y3 B! k% {! j1 s3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ' Y2 w% m2 E% i f5 A$ {" e7 |9 jManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within0 @9 g5 t! n/ ~+ e. x; l hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 1 h! h; Y( Z( H o0 \each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera+ \* U" E# N6 ] and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is% \) [+ u) ^! H& S) R harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 4 x* @' c8 { [: h! ~- Mdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and& p7 `4 F; ^2 c9 N, f! _ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I! g# y5 c2 j$ T. n2 ` was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ @2 {$ v' {1 s; R, ?/ } impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& k! t4 h! ~3 `; ^7 o0 k and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong9 {0 U% i& P, \" {! l6 f has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 8 ^! u7 p5 C2 b/ ?of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that: p, D# e. A; S7 H no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% ~* W, f* s$ B' |+ \+ V only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 3 M' _* C9 t9 i4 w4 l* f2 D' dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government . k) f$ a8 T) l! p+ Ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move+ f K5 D# A( I8 N to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is % e! X) b& }2 K$ I5 V"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,, E6 g9 U7 N: c& u5 N4 ]% ]5 \ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are . K$ N2 N, D3 p5 q/ c* Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to4 _1 j* f$ p) m "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make8 n B2 W8 k- N1 a2 V money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 9 l5 s+ j- T9 G- ]$ Oa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a , }* ]0 l$ p# ~8 @) j' mparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across6 H" ~2 Z- Q% ? p# B) z the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 2 Q: N3 P7 x2 O+ s" Q% cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for4 j& ?& |) {. p0 j2 m+ z. P development.

Hutongs 1 D. g/ g5 v) ^" g. L; Tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ U3 I1 T! s1 D. T there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions. ]* h! s0 L0 X; U; t9 P in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 4 Y5 j' W9 v8 V) c% I! Ehave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you . H% y( n' F1 J* l) Jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs./ G. M: t3 Y- k( k9 E" n* A Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 3 P6 \) P5 g/ l2 L3 A) ?to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used! g% }! R$ J& J0 @ to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 ~ ?! X5 ^1 Q# K4 F% ~+ S8 Gsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" n! N1 g/ X9 ^( S$ @ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ S: _# Z2 K0 z$ t9 {5 C2 }! s7 T live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, # c+ d9 |1 A' X( b( ohutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the2 A _1 t( J8 ~" P# S balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 9 r+ R* A2 d( q Q$ cproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be & n& g7 c0 G; h* b5 ^- ^$ e2 v# Crenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong% w1 F3 ~; y( \3 ~7 R3 B% z$ f! A$ O Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ U- t$ u( [3 q people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be$ \. ~9 ?, h# f/ S6 n3 y torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ) t2 o$ t' [2 r+ {5 u2 M3 S Omemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. x9 C% c' q) V; q8 ? Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are : _1 P. }! f) B6 M- @aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! s$ x- d1 z" A! G& U" X6 I) E9 A non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image) `8 y8 N) o3 L" S, K& } of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ D ^. Y6 b7 t4 V Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ' b0 D8 B6 D# w/ Ipeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they" ]0 ^' t. y7 S6 o may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ( @; X* Q' z8 m) Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before+ g* K2 {$ d2 V! V1 D6 u" m3 E "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all: o0 w( d/ H0 E* n8 ?5 Y" L people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . [+ k% I1 r; Z1 Y/ w: Dapartments are the way to go? No.# Y ?, K' D3 g4 K" D T6 @4 @/ t+ u/ n2 t 4 O/ D% A+ ^/ A6 j( ]% u* ~

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the+ u# i; \1 h- W. f# H" D0 x situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this" D: g5 X% z! P i 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make% R: F+ }+ m$ r/ J no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so + z/ x1 |9 G" p: F' B' \% ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 9 @: ?$ t! [* I$ ?resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ! X8 b" S: p c3 N* Z( t# KBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is8 I; m2 s- v$ u6 i unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-11 02:42 , Processed in 0.115698 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部