服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6785|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its: {# `7 L7 | t4 `) U architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! F6 Z7 ], n/ G4 `8 \" S2 H Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 ?% W, S1 W- e) c, P* qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 A+ I7 W G+ F- u2 N According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, * L! C* v; Q2 a' ^' @3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 g" j$ a0 P5 `Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within) I3 X& g8 H/ ~3 l% | hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ S# X; C* M2 v/ a each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ T! b1 T$ e6 K ^! R) j and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 0 D O$ n5 W; e5 xharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( I4 q4 x& X2 _. \ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' g+ `9 U9 V2 P) i% D% Q forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I F/ U. @0 @5 `+ t) z was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great- |. Z' d. U [! B/ U impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ) c+ r9 }. x. V) a' w: |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 b8 k6 k+ ?5 c: G! {+ m, ? has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( g+ N+ a7 X1 v# x9 D1 zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that" z! f. R( M$ k9 S7 L3 w' F no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 7 T& V' y0 e, \" vonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a & y2 X( w1 J3 |1 X2 C9 Ssort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government * _2 L, I! M2 ]: D$ O! |" ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 7 D" I: w* Z" @. @0 |, `! Fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is * ~0 S1 o6 _- l U"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 5 O" N3 Y+ o; Q$ U2 O7 }this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 4 Z0 \3 U& L0 y7 p4 Estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to3 `9 Y# h S* {' z0 m8 ~* `0 c3 S "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make % V: F) F0 Y) N1 bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. w3 h2 u- Z3 s/ s a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" Q8 r$ q6 m4 J parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 1 i0 \5 n; O5 v- n# n8 p/ o7 q) @" vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural . J4 B8 x9 ^( @3 s: Ximportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for6 R, t' [0 ~* D2 E7 Y8 I development.

Hutongs8 @5 a8 J8 W! A: x( `1 @4 | in the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 N; _2 s9 f. N' ]3 F there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions# a! F/ J( _$ Z" q6 i( y% @) m in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 2 n+ x& J' Z' |have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 9 X1 Y/ ]8 n! Z* fwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ) \) a2 ?) c7 \! t! `' w0 xFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date) E' v1 o% @5 _2 X0 r; |4 G+ Z3 @4 T to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. i h, }& Z$ ~' b* ]6 Z' C% m- t to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; ]. \9 S5 t0 r) s; f& [" F3 wsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : T0 g+ j2 k" P* Z, v- S% Aunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to - W% \- b' y" ~+ c, [live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: v% u: [& e5 U! M7 Z9 H% Q hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the * @* ^1 k7 Z0 n% rbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the * p% V5 k8 Y* J; w; b/ h5 oproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be $ \3 n9 m. t9 g' @; W: p- V2 Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, u1 J0 ?, c- @. k Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- H+ W+ O& S. `9 S( J- u people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 2 h, [5 K7 @& E; K3 ttorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 5 r! m# q' L) C. @: V7 nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".1 _ F4 h4 R/ O4 Q5 K+ n) m Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) I0 T7 `; z) G$ J% Kaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 0 p. o: V$ K9 ]2 r- o) q8 Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 A3 h% d' b5 I1 Eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ( Z. \) t4 V3 x1 s4 v Y/ vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those u1 E: i% o; y) |" u people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they- n; K# p* n4 w" ^1 T7 ?" {: |% \ may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some. R4 K; _- D6 l2 X, Z% @, H of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before/ \8 `% M" \$ B Z% [4 l$ m$ e "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 C7 g! Y$ T, Lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 9 l! {5 b5 E. _! |2 Xapartments are the way to go? No. 9 @6 R W5 ~( g _# |" E G% M + G. W1 W) W$ h2 o ' Z, @8 b7 H- m5 T/ n8 Z G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the% e- Z' {" P8 b' V6 d" l, H% i) X situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this # k; b1 U' X R'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 6 S7 m) ]) {! u, ~5 p) J mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ A) y! Z" u1 j5 J4 ^fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant , L$ a7 b: Z) \( Zresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 X/ e( d7 C3 c! y" M! oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ( r" Q# k9 @8 W$ T" K+ T+ D7 aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-20 16:12 , Processed in 0.117568 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部