服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6689|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its * @0 w6 {1 w: i8 uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider0 ~- j* @3 D" H: j! g( f4 f Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 2 ]* ^; h) W- k0 E* Y0 F2 fcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. t4 u! H" L4 r1 V4 q. e& QAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,4 { T1 X, v6 S# R7 b8 I 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- r( z; _4 h+ l5 u Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ; J1 O4 E+ ^2 s( z$ Z' [hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among3 i' }+ R e5 A2 E7 j0 E; }4 J each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera# J# ~- o) N, D% ~. w0 z; K" z and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is2 o1 F+ t, Z% D2 T# x. Z* H harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( G3 V* Y( y1 h2 I) f& c5 _ R descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and # I& I$ k; |3 U2 }7 C+ U7 m. Tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I( g7 r1 _% X) r$ _8 T u6 U: A, D was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . O2 q+ a4 L4 y2 N8 t8 B+ |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,. c3 M1 _2 c. f& Z and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong * s$ u n7 d) x4 Hhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment" u7 J, |8 z L" t# R: @& Z$ ` of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, v) i8 V! {6 Y; ` no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are - `* }6 R' c* S0 ?2 }& R: Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a + H! [& W% W' |9 o$ e7 T# ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government - C; p, v0 n: k L, B9 Zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move c( |' P3 C# s to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 w( E0 i) n# Y) D "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,0 i0 g' W$ \! V( a' R this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are , ~" r! J5 N0 N. Gstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to $ L/ F% J$ H, u1 Q6 y8 A' ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 5 o- _& u' ^- Wmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- L0 U0 Q& a- Q a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a; ^6 J9 k b5 U- f( {9 a parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across $ {% M, M' B% P/ [+ P; Ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural y4 d4 U' W) j+ c) j$ t/ w2 u$ N importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- f |$ j4 d2 x development.

Hutongs/ \, Z( ` C9 [' j in the old days were residential area where people actually lived1 k2 _$ U- U0 w; k* Q2 _* A there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions* S5 r3 e; C: T# P v. T; k in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not. R9 v5 x* R6 E9 ] have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you# J x, _4 F8 ~6 J' v& f* B will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- [4 ~/ t! g- d; z* g Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date + z5 H0 C8 }7 y% k4 {0 I) J2 J9 Wto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ^5 z, _5 O/ v( \" v# [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; M2 S! S/ x1 o9 F9 Lsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 0 `" K2 J, K: A( S. u5 A9 L: ~# Junfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to e1 m5 X/ q& E N6 ^# V/ b/ a live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ( a* o' m0 r' ohutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the% v- K9 q7 L, G3 Y balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 1 T2 r# N0 h; q( T& _( z6 i w# m- zproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be & o# z7 c; U, w. v. [ D# grenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ e- c, o8 S0 }" x) `. \$ o+ [ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% S5 h, F' m. T3 E, Z4 Z2 Y people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 [6 y+ v$ O$ h1 w1 Ztorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 8 `# g% g$ y9 Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 9 w% F$ L1 e- k- DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are * ~6 n" l& z/ Y, B7 waligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ) O/ n( e+ M! D- @; m4 H) w1 Znon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image , x( h) y. M/ d0 a! I; Xof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these. ~- h3 m* G+ z7 q+ ^2 q: h Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those3 }, f. h u% V people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 4 F$ O0 V% p) ]& |( \may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some0 U m- y+ \( D of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before6 h! a5 C4 _: ]8 C/ c" R( T "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all/ J: \8 u) E% A( i! {) z e* M people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise+ \4 O: s7 p' V8 l) a7 A& `# g0 R apartments are the way to go? No. 6 r7 g- a" m) W7 ^ 9 t8 \0 U! P& N * Y) [9 W/ {% M/ _0 K, Y0 u9 }

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the+ X( d" s. f1 m3 Q' k situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ {% G1 M+ ^( a 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( n2 P! k7 u: Y R# Q no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ u2 u" ?7 V# K8 b2 [fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, c8 C- @% X3 \' v resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 9 j& `. o% S" {5 W) a# X/ M2 jBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 8 g1 S* Z+ n+ T' z4 eunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-10 05:35 , Processed in 0.121652 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部