服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6444|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 0 I3 q, W- x& w5 zarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider . g: L6 ^( B0 M$ p: L" G3 FBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") v+ M1 r& K0 _5 f( j3 U" v city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." }8 G/ [0 Z( g/ V7 {$ @ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,5 F7 k p5 e+ z# m. e9 w 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of" i/ m1 c$ U: K3 ]5 P& K. A+ K Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within0 o# h" w+ N1 \7 m# `+ l hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among " u' l% p+ r1 ]" W; f. ]( peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 ?; o D' w$ c and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is0 Q6 P6 C2 }1 j8 F0 ` harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are , X8 l5 z4 D- X! a$ M# }descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ^! ~9 ]" w) q3 x( lforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I; H% @6 N/ s+ N! i was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great* n; ^# z/ c _7 {! b5 | impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 2 [/ p+ |0 n* h) O% Cand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong - ?% U4 E+ a. Y, I" [7 n1 Chas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ! ]" Z- v. [6 c% Bof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ( _ x3 t" v0 e9 `0 G! k1 Ano hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are, W" ?1 `1 W$ U$ d& A/ f- ~ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a) b4 r. M# L' ]) X @% ~1 Y, o# L sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& V1 C" X4 c& [: r& c want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ( n( i, C5 ^ m. p3 @to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ! o6 n5 \5 d" o5 c$ r( B"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,# ]. K8 ^, F& U% F# s5 q$ J this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are5 E" l# p4 ?0 q* o4 q7 Y/ U still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to" T! Z T& V( A* r/ r5 T, f( J "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make " m& o# J( T9 c% Qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 4 R* C& F% L% E" E# Da beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a3 U. J! B; [. s! U( n% f2 M4 e0 j parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 7 R( _4 J1 t$ `& i0 jthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural9 N0 Q, p; X: F; W% j: i' h importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for9 g, v( l- R1 ^5 U% h; ] development.

Hutongs% q7 q6 a! j, m in the old days were residential area where people actually lived + K* C1 I1 F. e* {$ y. r# `- Tthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) J8 F4 m/ h$ d6 @3 ^. o" Nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not; J0 n x0 ~8 h8 C5 i have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you: l; D; P3 b# |- i8 D8 h will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ; l- k# J3 \1 T: A- U( T+ @Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 0 o6 @. i, C4 @ n! D7 Eto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 \: f& L/ }! g% M, K7 S8 k$ u6 b to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ b' e! J/ S9 C7 r% I5 w0 bsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically4 s2 N, O, y, c- N h& t5 W unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 E# L1 o* ~2 P/ D K. G" ^7 E7 {5 Ylive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ' K4 T! e2 B1 w2 i- q7 i! _hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the7 k; V) Y$ q6 N; k+ i balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the, F0 [, L& \; z: i, k( t project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 d! H. _* K; ^1 t$ H, S renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 9 |* W/ R: O+ f) eMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 7 t, h M: M( ypeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be . }2 ~) X5 s3 G7 j# Q) atorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished' _2 [: d2 a% d9 d. X0 ^ memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 3 R" g) h" D# A8 D0 ZNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are: R! S& P9 V; { Y; k7 @2 ^- W aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially8 c* e0 `. r/ s, I4 E7 @* K a! i# G4 | non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image . \* Z0 f% q4 C4 z! s0 U j- Iof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these + H4 `4 b0 V6 `. e7 KHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those" h+ i; r# X1 v4 o: s* a people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they \6 j$ w# B3 p9 n6 Gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some8 X$ n: I9 @9 C1 R. F2 z1 L of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 W7 s7 W8 ]# E! K7 ]" d, Y! z "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all : j% }/ \5 u7 ]. t3 P6 e1 |; R" bpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise% N2 O4 F" p( f( g9 q+ E: F+ T/ u apartments are the way to go? No.4 w' Y3 L2 d; ?4 M) H! ^2 e 9 E% F& s; G) [! s. n3 z 9 q5 u( ^* _! ~

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 1 T" @ ]4 f9 \1 Z/ C+ \$ Ysituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this _) _) D* K2 ?% L @ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make2 o. l7 c4 v5 L1 g* Q no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so * b# I8 Q# B& ]' G- u! ]1 dfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ! m1 l; e9 `& R7 U& gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % u* ~/ P4 y5 q( o, lBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 5 |4 y9 u7 h! J. p7 [ Wunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-14 20:39 , Processed in 0.117055 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部