服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6835|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its " K: c- K) F: c. r) {+ Y6 yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! |( I0 G; r; l Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" " U4 W; e) [5 X$ B8 ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ A: J7 ?# W3 F. ]' n6 | According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,& D' M5 o7 Y- U& u3 Q 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: ^! B; w7 I- E1 F+ u Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within! W( j5 v, O4 Y- m: Q* u/ e& M hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 3 D) `) c: M7 x% Deach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 8 K! G& M q- Pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is- M. R5 F9 t" l2 `( D harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 2 U7 L. e' `5 ~descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ' M& T; X6 Y9 D. ? tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 }' Z, Z; w" {. \2 l+ p& `) Iwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great / X& J2 ^5 @' ]! N' n5 B/ s$ w& Timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,; k) ^! O( R3 n and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong7 ?7 F3 ~3 O2 O, j8 B! I6 _- N has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment , M! k; v+ o- u1 O- aof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that6 f' o& N$ _8 c0 P6 \ no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 6 Y# c4 s, C5 A! J3 Ionly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 4 w, X: f N8 m8 Jsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government! G$ M8 { p5 o want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move& l4 h% v! ~9 D! j to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is# H% \" k. d4 h n "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ( A' F' {. r4 A' u! Kthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are: R, u7 I8 b# E f still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% n) a, F" j; W2 U" H' q "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 6 `5 P4 R# E4 C+ E0 \money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ) F' \/ i" W& B+ H; E) G( fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 7 o; i4 T* z2 f( ^$ V: M1 sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across * F$ M" k# F1 xthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural " M5 n$ N, W, o# A$ k& Wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 7 A* V, ~% J5 u: G7 Qdevelopment.

Hutongs; e, ]% F" \( W in the old days were residential area where people actually lived4 N. v; C9 G* b3 _; m; Q. [ ~ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions b4 I% P$ g+ j! C: G$ ?- Xin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 4 P& {; H; ~8 @) vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you. K; x {" N; c0 ?1 V. V will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.4 P$ K5 E# J- |' d% y6 X1 {$ Q Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; S' M8 v6 v: w/ t. R m- M8 Y to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used * w/ f2 {! u2 E+ O+ j& i& @* n# c, nto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses - K0 d! _3 v8 J K h1 N) [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : X$ L0 C9 T: cunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 R3 l% g+ u1 P live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, : u F4 K7 o6 Uhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the; C8 e( f, q2 E/ {) X2 G2 g balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 8 k {' h& L6 s7 jproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 2 \, [# L# I* l; E, lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong! B! |) p7 C/ r0 R. S2 z Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how # }) L6 m3 ^! ]" N$ Opeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 r3 O1 B6 { Utorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished) M: B1 l# l- }. p$ I7 X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ) P6 D; |& ^* H* ^7 z* {3 ?Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are - m8 x" L7 }" [ C) A4 I+ |aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially+ [% Y$ O# V* B1 \& W" p1 d7 s non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 3 i' k& e+ f. P, y4 G3 Iof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these * s* Q, w/ W2 h; a5 Y2 p" SHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those - h1 _6 q, [) b3 k$ cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they $ w( w8 P8 S9 v- d m; _may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some! U K0 H3 _) Z u9 y of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before. J; j( O/ e* y- I "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) q3 y/ ~! a& A/ O people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise$ j0 [2 o ]5 Y/ N+ J }5 @ apartments are the way to go? No. ) r# |0 t( a2 v/ l7 a* J; h . P9 C% o# ]& S; X; g$ U a$ X/ \$ ~# L9 k: V7 @: r+ ^

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the6 G3 j+ v4 M9 P t ? situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; Q d8 i( \+ N" V 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( ^2 v, q! ^1 v! K; \( [ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ) p+ u+ `* Q! t" c3 Tfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' l1 b4 E1 a2 i/ c resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless % i6 U8 h5 K0 h( i8 L5 ^+ n" t0 xBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 @5 x: [; q: `8 o' ~) b unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-25 10:02 , Processed in 1.840429 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部