服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6263|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 7 @; P+ ~2 e8 I1 c3 Yarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider+ B" }7 e& p2 ?) J* X/ H2 j Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 5 l( [- g5 b% Mcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.( y3 V0 c y" O( x7 c5 N. | v According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) ?0 a; Q% }: [% m2 n- j 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of2 C* c, B2 d1 {! E& d) f: X Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within / b a1 n% C1 Z; whutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among# z; G4 [1 O% X) y# \+ R8 l/ q1 | each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera $ s1 O- T g# o8 S$ Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 6 k/ s' x2 B* o! N0 w. y6 Sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% }0 p5 c" C5 c% ^; n2 E7 b5 G descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and8 l S" K4 d' ]( g6 }5 J forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I . [6 ^) B+ P. awas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 y c1 o7 [6 h! ~! b, _ impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 2 p4 C* [9 z& }) Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 M0 f* T0 ^' {& k# r+ b has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 r* b$ G* g, O6 | of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 G# b2 V9 T4 Z' _* ] no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are3 a0 S& r5 ~7 x! c+ g only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 9 M& w( y y* F# M2 vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government- ^: e( v8 \/ }1 l$ W6 C want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move) C1 @/ f$ |: ]* X& L- Z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is# O7 }& n5 D4 X B' S "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) U2 R7 s. F0 G) Y! M) g3 m% K" y- F this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 0 ~* o$ m; D" v! U. Istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ; I( R, d4 c8 s) f8 h"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make1 i* N: z2 q0 q$ q( I9 o* m money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 0 R( X- w5 p& b7 _4 {8 N9 ha beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & d9 `* R+ p: U S5 [+ sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 9 \8 w! |8 e/ L7 B' o+ L& Dthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural , O. A5 t9 o; B4 I+ G B' Y" Z0 U) d! cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ' q! \7 h8 I7 I( u8 c. i/ xdevelopment.

Hutongs) i3 u3 T# r, c) }7 M! p in the old days were residential area where people actually lived. a5 }; n( b a. q4 D. c' J: ] there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions , @, u9 G6 P2 d% U4 ?" f. Fin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 0 \ F/ K; N' g; _* X- w& xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 6 ^/ `2 C" H1 P& e( M+ m3 d( S# L( _will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. . m+ s! `' W) |4 c JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 A- _" u J! C7 a, |: c" F3 k7 N to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 F" E/ R9 M$ K7 o5 V' } to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses , {+ L/ E- y- x( D% g l7 Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically # F J p. Z3 g6 F* j: K- }unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ p; b6 i% z* c# \# x1 J; t1 a live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' ^+ G% O( g4 q! o/ T hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the9 E8 n8 X0 v: T4 L3 g; H balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the . B, \* l+ ~! @2 [ Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ) w& }5 w/ Y! I" v7 v6 Zrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( c4 @/ _! D D1 R3 q Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ) R- R& F9 J7 O: Y% D* U+ K Epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 0 M/ {8 x% u0 d. B* Itorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished # H: Y: k/ {7 j# Vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". % q- \- r6 c$ m2 k0 v& R6 H6 W/ n+ cNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 4 m* h( ?; w7 }. baligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. \/ R/ \ ]/ c non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image: o' e: i* p7 Z- K of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these& L* b' r( o) n! B( N# ~ Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 X4 o) `3 C/ |6 i people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they% M' K5 x* L2 l8 T9 t% ` may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 0 t# J! w9 U9 P+ b' L. Q0 _of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 5 v% ^4 Y" P% m, T; R; ~2 G"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) S, s9 `9 t% L2 P( e p4 t, ? people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise% R6 C% |. J: X4 U$ X# e: V' y: [( Y. d apartments are the way to go? No.& E- M( z" \! B7 ~ ! m. a7 L9 g/ U0 w2 H: l+ ]6 J% } 1 I; n0 p- E- b! b

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& S+ i- h6 P+ [% q4 i# F4 i situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 O& g" B: |+ d. `# W 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make% A9 E1 B$ ?. b# Q Y8 [ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 h o8 {3 |$ |3 o) ~# C fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : q8 D8 Z8 ?% v4 w2 ?1 L6 D; t7 `resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 8 r6 g3 g. R7 U2 ?; T4 }5 `Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is s- S) d, ^& Y7 M/ m8 n! \" Y+ A: ? unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-7 02:37 , Processed in 0.116726 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部