UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
4 n* O1 P0 p) ]& _architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! ~, ^& x# J1 p. `/ C
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
; p, H- t! N# \4 O2 A" ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." D; {- N( ^1 y) q( u
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,- ]. S% y4 D; o7 G& K$ T8 ]/ |
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
4 ^& d3 H% ^' ~# l }Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
o& S$ Q; a, o) ~hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among1 S! a! W" x2 _# L; ?
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
. @9 g( Y. Q4 M8 s& d( z$ `& H0 d* kand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is* t9 H, i5 [9 U: u$ m
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
% E. ?0 c4 _* V. Ndescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
8 g% e* V* |) R- o# Gforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I" u5 R7 a6 v. r5 @* \5 a0 d: e: k
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
q. V; p. o9 t, W, i: z' `: H7 ^2 n! [impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,6 L1 I/ @7 s# q7 { _; O
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
1 |" G e& W% k4 P* R2 Q& jhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment; J4 |+ f2 _9 O& o9 q3 F
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 }* u0 x: N, O4 b' ]; m7 G% [
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
: I4 ?& M% k) y, s% h& J3 Donly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
O e, K: V! P; ?" c) Dsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% ?4 g% e- N- A- w
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
7 Y9 Z: X* j( Z+ Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is' F4 u% } A$ y2 u! w
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' L2 i+ r5 K5 N! n- I6 h+ |0 S
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are# Z! @# o1 H ~
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; w% B i& t/ W5 m, @7 q/ P; `
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make D' A: o6 y* g% f& Z, s4 Q
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was( R5 e6 b9 {# o$ Z
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a9 D+ P. b# y5 m1 D
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across0 p/ o! h4 C, g- H r& Y, N( j
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
" \+ H# c, d) `$ M7 a( Dimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for6 ~8 I' t) F$ v' x9 w- b& q. n
development.
Hutongs( e$ W8 F, C2 S( g
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived- H: j) E r: ?4 l+ l
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
/ ^( f- j9 H! d, Hin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
2 c3 }! A) f, F& _0 Z: b& Thave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
" u# L; ^! w% pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.5 ^/ U" z8 z; u' u
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
* g& r8 i ?, g* Z& o1 m. V/ E0 ^7 Gto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 i* E; X+ z/ }9 [
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
6 Z8 ~! o& o) d( r$ E1 Q* Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; E1 R6 |& y) ~" a8 @. U6 u0 E
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
4 e* P& ^0 v: @( x3 Elive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,; P+ ]) \3 H- q3 O' d9 N% r% I, a
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the, @8 v. i+ j3 v0 `0 N
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the$ `5 H! t& @; L7 Z5 i9 i
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
+ P' g2 y @& _: k9 |renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
& S0 w5 \$ k3 c+ g( z: V! MMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how0 j5 o% p# n$ K" V Y
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
0 U% e: F9 i6 C4 J7 N6 _1 htorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished1 K4 M8 i% M( p! D6 v; @ B; ]
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
- h7 R! p, Q& g- qNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
. x0 v4 U }* e* Daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
# b4 C' |, C% N' w1 Xnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" I$ \" M( U+ T0 mof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 d: R8 H. w, L, u" x l7 V- Q3 v
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 |9 }0 m: u* z0 W5 h/ J
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
R E& }1 F2 [may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
8 ?* L6 d& K& `2 U% j( Yof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
) K* v* c9 X0 c"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
, \2 O4 `! Y* L$ f. M) v' }5 speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise8 Z( U0 Q& x& }% Z( t) {! Q* {
apartments are the way to go? No.2 f% {) W" Z) J7 s: t# X3 }$ i4 H
9 X# Y6 K# C; ]3 k P. `5 b
; j a+ Z% n+ I; }- @4 g
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the4 c' W. M J, m* b2 Q
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this" f0 j1 C, T3 @ U
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make. N4 t& O$ F) u2 k
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: U" S8 g" Z: F) y! u# Vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
- T9 ~; {. m" W, [- Mresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless9 B+ f! p* n4 g8 ?
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
$ p \' d" c: B; nunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|