服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6319|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its6 j& i# j# e0 E! V8 w& @- ^ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider3 W- {6 T& N4 k# | Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* b; J2 P: L- c: j% ~; a3 g city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.+ k( L+ \& ]. D! C7 m According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,0 ?% N0 p9 D& _ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! K: Y" r5 A5 t# h Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within$ M9 B* J: I) m6 O+ g7 Q: y/ q hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" h* }. O4 ]' M! P0 I each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 8 T' k- m9 k# H5 O2 Nand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( \3 |7 o2 ~1 q1 j2 m, A3 G harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are * p1 i" S1 }( _( i5 `' }+ udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 8 D# u) U$ T) Jforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I, Z- p* ]' U; V. B! w. [( F was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : @5 B4 G/ x+ C. d& n) h# eimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, # ?6 c# X: ^( Z0 j* pand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, f4 H/ e$ X6 t has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( v0 [1 W$ F+ ?- y. a4 Nof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that' b7 I( g$ R) I5 P no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are. `- A* T. l" o+ i only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a- P1 K3 L6 \. p' R7 N5 g sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government : C K! l" [ W. s8 s7 }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: n/ k8 q' S( }1 }# A. z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is4 i# ?1 C/ g) |8 }9 U; Q3 r" c/ h* h "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, " O' X8 ~9 l0 m+ w cthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are3 Q5 s( _. p5 I1 h0 a: k. I4 E0 W still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to T- _, v, r" S# v( h "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 2 T4 a6 ]4 E$ F; xmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was! j8 y( }, S. b+ K# y9 t2 d6 L- B3 ~6 U a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a h' U7 G9 O6 R& d4 D9 ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 5 M+ A+ U# t0 x- j" @) L( T+ ~6 f) Wthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural/ Z6 b: Q) @# Z importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 ?& }8 `7 V/ W" r development.

Hutongs; U3 e3 L9 h7 \" B: z; P( ` in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ l! K) |4 V- D% X* B( _ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions $ `7 d2 Z6 ^. N. jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not + J% n" X: Q: k, R0 z2 _: R7 @have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you \& T; p! J3 Awill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs." v1 C4 i1 k U! g5 `1 V) U Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 2 h @) n3 d- F6 e& V1 ]% T4 K8 }- Y, Ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ; O' _# c9 X. t! Dto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses : P5 c5 j1 y) t" ]. ?2 Y0 usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically $ g; ]) I; b# q+ ]$ @8 g8 w bunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 8 R% d X8 i5 u7 w5 [4 ilive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 4 c- Y% t& ?, Q' k" Ehutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 9 \+ P' \) A, Rbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 5 V) n1 L4 ^0 N4 _+ Aproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ! l/ i% \% J6 Nrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 S) }+ H$ S, Y j. v& P: v5 z Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' g- I4 m* A- [people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 6 A% R6 v6 ?" t- H7 Q. P! Ztorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " b3 ?" `: n4 U: U7 Q: B9 z2 |- o. Nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 8 h" Q6 I: J. i, D8 CNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are3 f, V/ b; V/ v aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially + T! D' R4 N2 K& e6 N5 m$ Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ( {% u( P2 ~! e6 }; h5 w) cof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these! }( X8 `4 s5 \9 {( ?( z Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those# d+ R: |' m; r7 ]6 l2 L! S people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they/ \, e9 I& S1 M; F& W$ {2 Q) _ may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ) g- [. O$ x+ ^7 P) Hof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before, ^! a5 I2 @0 E2 Z& F: B* X( t "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all + P& f' Q! J5 speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise * i ` O0 }& p6 `9 xapartments are the way to go? No. 1 c) V% `. P0 N) k1 H+ g; w ' c; I( w! k b , N; P, ]2 Z- {9 Q9 x, o" E- `

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the # d0 z# n4 ]+ B0 [& |situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this `6 q3 u; o5 P* L+ W5 F 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make : Y6 ~- U. E& m. |* A% qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ; p3 L2 s' t0 L/ u/ L1 x# _fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 9 q2 J9 F2 `0 _' o9 q4 Rresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; C; y/ W' ^; r- \! T' { Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 2 F6 K: f3 h6 ounlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-26 09:55 , Processed in 0.123895 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部