服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6371|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its. ]' V _2 a8 q# [ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ; r3 a" L# D `9 c7 j }2 f0 D' WBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" % U- H2 R, D$ }: @city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. & Y4 o/ ~* G/ U) f w+ j8 x1 oAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ( |" R( p/ @2 s1 A4 N5 t% U3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 4 r1 z- ]( \# K: a6 PManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 9 d' t7 w# y* f+ Phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among' y8 o+ K; O5 R* Q0 y& _# G4 E# d6 c0 n each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 ?1 r* H. j9 L3 `1 { and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 2 s; J, o F. }) o; a* f2 Hharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are , O5 w- w8 c+ idescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and / T9 f$ e5 u: qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I$ k9 _/ K% ?' `2 X. z% c* d was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great " E/ |4 o% K1 |$ f2 rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,0 p: _* l5 u9 s and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong4 K; E, }: o% M7 Z7 D has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 1 X" M6 E( C5 w; M+ A+ {4 G( }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that . X. W# Z" y2 S5 [no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# r! y+ s- S7 e$ V only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a' n3 t1 z& J" `& i& Y) I: n! Z% _- Q sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' k: s; `" i; s1 n want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 4 N; {# w% h2 q- ?% z9 F) e7 j" e, fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 T2 }& x4 N) c"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,4 e! T+ d# I' [, `6 e5 y this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are o. I r% R( Z$ g' U$ G still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 1 E( _+ K7 e$ O0 N"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ! G/ ]. @: [7 P9 o& K9 zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. d2 C3 A% H% b1 r) ] a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ Q7 c; t& R* R' k+ k parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across* e* W- I( m9 J* ?% c# u% ?; j. f the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural5 p x8 H, _1 O. r importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* E- E b4 D. r1 e development.

Hutongs 2 l6 i7 J% K# h$ L- W! x+ p3 f4 L4 xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 3 G7 f5 u g% _% ]there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions c. E4 f0 J2 T% A6 E1 u in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ; h% }9 b7 ^- [( \2 dhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! y8 t2 h) X3 N9 y2 g0 \ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.2 i1 F: S" k1 ~ U' K |5 Q+ h Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date K- M3 R; k! n4 v! Uto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 9 q' d! I* Z' S1 u- a% Y- c+ Xto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ; z# @3 }* j( [* {& n* E/ psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically- m# Y) q5 [; x% H, l% f) z8 u unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to7 J8 @9 ^" z4 Q8 D" r" i live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, $ A6 y; X; c R1 a" Thutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the , S4 x3 \' B0 t) f9 v V# Hbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the# {. t* n" \( a9 l5 U' [7 U& B project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be0 d& U) v! g# `" H5 L0 b2 H2 O( W. p renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong s9 ~& \0 ]% H' D7 p Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how/ W, W- M7 }# J& a( [ u people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: u8 C6 \" ]& }3 j5 M: ] torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished+ G& W3 O& ~7 \7 k& ^9 M& Y memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ; }% W# j4 j j" H% T. i/ \8 i3 H0 bNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 0 J- ~$ n( `: u# p4 M( f4 n4 _7 |aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ) U; q+ S5 x' `" [: j6 U. Lnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* m3 C# g1 q5 X2 F; S of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- r$ i) I& N! \ Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 o4 w5 C' G# O( ^ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they+ q, t2 j. }3 i# E9 Q5 s/ { may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some # k& g8 Z& Z6 Y7 Aof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 9 x. ~9 u+ K4 R$ R, {: f"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) }( ~9 o* l. @( D people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ( ~$ r# T* _4 I" d! Z u# ^apartments are the way to go? No.& O& V- B2 ]) `7 ] 2 f' \( n7 l7 w3 i" \ h 8 `: f4 x& J, P" f% U7 H+ h

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the. m: E5 a' e9 R/ B7 a" d; G situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this" {: v7 D# H6 n: b( Y# k# r" c+ {/ W 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make / A! K3 t6 K7 f( O) `. ono money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& M3 G! k" O3 n( c/ G% P fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant' H. h' J: ]; l+ W+ m* h resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless $ {4 }* t# J; Z( v8 N$ pBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 I" b+ x# {, |/ Q f. k' h unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-5 11:41 , Processed in 0.130559 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部