服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6663|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its + l8 t; z, x" t- m, oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ; e q) f# i( qBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ( W3 a8 f" ]# k, o, ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 5 y3 {, z% U$ AAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,) s( f8 ^4 k. a0 X6 ^7 ` 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: T. B: z; j- @3 D0 A9 T Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 2 ^4 Q! i9 Q0 }, |2 N, Jhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 ^& P8 i' E) T each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 n P7 y2 j; i, S5 T6 L; q and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is / ~, X! F/ E5 _7 k, j+ J/ nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 5 ]" z5 z8 `. x# E! F- Udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and( O6 L" H" d4 V; J- c forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I! z5 {8 W# T# T7 r2 O was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great! N7 ^( _! W6 k impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, - k! W3 I( B u5 Iand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ! j7 H: j' K! ^1 B9 i, Phas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 1 D: S/ x4 p# O2 k: D) e" A# C Wof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 8 u8 n; w3 O6 J* J4 |& Qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( n+ ?) }' @) Z# s( U( j only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a2 Z5 V0 w) k- f/ B sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' H4 P0 Z( r# j7 x' j want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move % k( k5 T1 [; y1 e/ D" cto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , K! c) L6 o& n! R6 [. m+ q/ a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 0 w! T: r& g& i6 othis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! i z# `! y, Z, _ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to; C) ]# w! |6 G) F! V "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& N% t/ e& ^& s2 d3 o% A money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was % F" ]; o! {3 Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ; ^" @0 @, R# }: Vparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across: q$ I) W& P; I' \8 } the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 3 v3 G: l; T! kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for X( M1 c+ h" G& P5 Y5 Z; R1 I development.

Hutongs" Y4 x" I3 {: |( n in the old days were residential area where people actually lived) ? {; x% j/ S. `+ S3 T& I# C4 J( C there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ! I/ u) {1 _" o% ]in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( F5 _& D$ G) U4 \2 q, J- q% K' T have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 7 i1 r2 s9 M2 l" H3 Y( Mwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ) o% ~, y8 \( X6 P+ {+ SFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 1 k) p, `) \/ a# Ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / ]8 m9 S" K' v( F( r! q8 |to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses& N" h: R! h5 }) l1 |0 u support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : ^* k; S- ^ ~4 p( Z0 uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to: ]( ]7 @+ l! {' a1 m: B- P2 Z live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. T) k/ J4 ^+ d+ {' _ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the3 V \. J4 h+ ^, M7 X* b balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ; n# J7 Y) i& w" o# Rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 d! j$ Q$ f' [+ ?/ L) b O' q renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong; h) A# D8 `' J! x# } Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how6 [8 O; q* D5 y# K people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be, j7 J: R: W1 _& V, X4 R" n torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ) M$ I \8 D# b0 i3 z9 J/ {memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 x" b2 I6 w5 y% V: z Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& _, E5 w8 i8 h) y& Z' @ aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 E6 Z8 T' O# `/ h non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image9 p9 d4 F# |! ]3 A of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these- \* z7 u$ v4 B6 } Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those/ F+ {! r& w0 |* J9 O# y0 T people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 9 Z0 x# M4 Z& L2 G$ o, Smay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some A2 t9 z0 E7 F, t& c of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before , C9 u7 v4 H& |" M8 h"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all( v. C, @& v; m" p; V people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 0 v' v; o }3 japartments are the way to go? No. ' `, v, |6 Y: a& { @$ v ( }4 f2 z6 c( [ ) T, ~' F/ u2 I# D, e7 N# I

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 7 Q6 V6 a! M% ?4 @situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this. i8 R( [7 h9 Z7 p- p- r 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make9 c2 D' ?, b) R$ X; X no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so # p5 d+ v0 U; U0 F6 afast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 3 V5 N% f( w" F# q! Z7 O3 Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 v% x$ Q6 l5 u. S. T0 Z9 Z# `9 J Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ @3 r9 h& N7 Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-7 07:59 , Processed in 0.114532 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部