UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
! }5 D2 T: A6 s. v: q# A8 H/ Aarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
; e% \" R) K7 u# LBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
# I: V0 b8 k; |/ G& I7 T& r& Vcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
* a# O. P3 t$ h8 @6 j1 Y2 M4 n! V( EAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
4 h! l: o) e# S: C" M3 m" K3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! M# F# \8 ? ]
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within1 i' }, l6 P$ R9 l& N
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ?" b0 n: m( p' S
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
" ^4 K) H" S' P3 u+ _and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is3 h. f2 b" [% G8 f9 ]
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
. L" J( ^; R' B" L! }$ `! v" q: fdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and3 `; h: o k2 e7 d; Z0 p3 x
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
! I+ f# H8 q6 d0 c$ T8 A$ F) jwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
. G* Y- i5 T: _1 K& G$ j+ }8 ^impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
0 Q1 C2 ~6 M- J: K9 `7 ~$ }/ d3 Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong4 }* D3 h A) ^: V# H! d
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
" x2 u/ u- p* ^% E o) P V, \9 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
7 B: d4 m' [$ K6 | @6 Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are! c* _/ Z: V f9 O: D# T6 }" v* q
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
9 E+ |8 J- R: M7 k/ m' N# O: osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government( V5 F: I& M* `2 g$ f0 \
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
2 }! r# M4 j6 k: ~! Dto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
1 k* o y1 o3 W+ C F"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
+ U }& S0 e4 v* O: e6 Ythis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) F5 l! v" T/ A& }" E0 Q0 w
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to0 i* f/ ^6 V( B, C* @1 ]
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
' l' j( S: @' v3 r9 j1 A, j6 qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: Z# v" J: T2 g& e2 ? A
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ^3 r5 y8 L' q: `; b2 X
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 V& e! P* M! {" I, l% |
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
/ [6 y- p# _: pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
3 C$ p& ~ \6 g) t* d/ ]) b% Hdevelopment.
Hutongs# E: B' l9 {* e( H
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
- v8 S) M7 U) q4 ?there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
+ [7 i- d* b# u6 `$ [6 Yin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 Y# p+ X1 k) d. k0 z. E- g2 i
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
5 g4 [" _- l! e1 W4 lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
, x! G1 W6 c9 {7 O: S: _Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 F& s6 v" s- ?- v) J! H7 @
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
2 a8 x* P3 x, Xto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
# @6 ]' W+ F5 osupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically @9 D0 \9 f* f* ]/ i
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to- c" U6 A( I! W) q/ f' V
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
( S* q& l" m4 `6 p: rhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the1 t- D, r& \2 c. U
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the* }8 Q# d9 x* \0 h7 O1 g0 j+ s
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 }1 v$ C0 m! `9 ]' e$ w5 b
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
0 c. `) E" J" r4 O$ `( |( [Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
$ E! k( ]1 ^3 Bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
% `4 A" W7 C3 U r6 D" Gtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
6 l( _$ V$ V7 m8 e; r2 a, ~memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".# v" m ?8 A7 f( _* _
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, @# D6 b; ?9 Z$ a& d2 m' H" _
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, ]- K4 c( l( O9 e
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
2 ~0 J1 L" p5 k" ~8 uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" Y# u' l, I: t+ O5 \$ d
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those: K' |( A# J3 J0 `, n" \+ ^
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
6 b8 g0 t7 s8 H! _* gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
; ~: r- @1 t1 U, l+ r5 fof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
P' g) \" D( _" o) R. @"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
4 s( a- ^/ _' r N: i7 D+ A, A4 C$ Speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise' [9 F3 s# _$ I) B5 D3 E* D
apartments are the way to go? No.3 A% ^8 X0 d3 ]5 @! k1 c1 W
$ O; _* i6 y) {$ u; T6 S1 P- d, j
P- r) n) g1 x6 j1 H$ e4 r
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
4 B; R3 S0 k6 G- y! t' S" Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
9 m# f# R9 M6 b8 R8 G'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
# b1 H- M( _5 z" ^* Rno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
1 d5 Z# @( {8 f7 l! Ofast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 I, N! f J: r3 L
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless/ Q# {1 w7 o- G. \; e) x1 J& f5 ?
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- i! V1 C; B2 w l7 `
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|