UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
/ P- v+ x9 m& I# Z" \1 J2 y0 karchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
( E9 H3 D, P2 Q3 \' ^0 |$ ^Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
' }6 ~ _9 z5 m- |1 [- ~, mcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
3 w+ @5 |1 ~, ~5 N: _9 x- }According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
% U: u5 U# N. u3 z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: T! T9 t$ f) U# ?) V8 k1 R8 X
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
% r* u6 D3 d5 Yhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among0 F9 w) f& v2 j
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
5 A7 n5 w8 c9 a# Pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is, w3 t/ A5 z: S/ j& m7 I% u
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' W2 b4 ~- {6 ?5 x% f0 V0 ^4 X
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
3 t& `5 A$ B- Kforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I, ?7 l( }( x6 y8 Y/ s5 V! ^. |: ^
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
% a8 F& s& k: L" c, D5 w/ g& jimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
+ w+ V. H8 M8 Cand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- Y8 _: ~8 }# p E. q
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
! w: c/ C: G2 jof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that, ], c. U5 `, R: j- p' M4 `* k0 A
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
8 |# C2 x1 f1 N- C0 j+ k, Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, I7 P' G5 L# {
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government8 ` i8 M' a3 R7 ^) y/ m
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
( E! g& P- L( K+ A2 [to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
/ R# v& T, G7 u" r% ]"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
" y$ W7 V) L' Y: ]8 B5 ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are% p- i2 n5 Q4 p1 d; o
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to+ P8 y# Z# z9 x3 l( ?" Q( r+ p
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
0 b+ w6 s2 ?6 n6 ]& m& Ymoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was6 V' x7 l0 J+ Q' y/ \- b/ W% [) y
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a2 M) h$ F/ M" I: \. Y- @4 q! h
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
1 L6 Z0 M/ h: P0 b$ u) Pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural& I0 {; d' M' d, R) ?- Y7 a
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for: P! z# w- k/ V! ~
development.
Hutongs
u/ @3 |* P' m9 b+ ?* d" P8 qin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
& r" z2 E# ~( K/ K8 Q+ A. Xthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions* [; t- t/ m8 D* }5 T v4 J1 [8 \
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
. L9 d) |4 ^* ]have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
9 I1 O" Y# B9 L% t! Ewill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
! E5 |7 W. z0 x! ~ g+ M: [Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
. a* }! C! n, Z! i L7 cto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
9 q& U# Q/ ]% B% ^1 x5 t+ lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
# k1 L# X; |) c, U8 I" _support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 }5 V! l/ |3 t5 z; c
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
& O6 Y9 C3 B3 \6 {0 c0 ]% G9 clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
5 s- V; i: R" \) I% ehutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
, e1 F+ v/ q# f0 q3 Z+ Y4 p# Lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the. y9 j4 k# e& a6 w# k
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be) N1 D$ X# Y+ \1 ?
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
* y0 V. F+ [- j+ `Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
% ^8 R$ M6 n Tpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
7 h, |0 ^. x2 Itorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished. r+ D5 q3 m+ Z
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".' S; J4 U9 X0 l0 {
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& y' h6 p: e% R/ Y7 M" P; ]
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 ?7 z2 r, Y" `& |! s4 K
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
. B8 ]/ e: t) d6 Y' n4 b) j7 t. [of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" U9 i7 t: }. I$ B
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those! Y2 I5 t0 b1 |
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
, }! N0 u; X* hmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some& T9 B- Y: q" o5 ~2 I/ x9 Z
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before. J; v! j+ @8 `. N2 e- j- F
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 c! u; l* [# n3 n
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" \2 ?4 w- r- z1 k5 w( ?+ R
apartments are the way to go? No." }4 K; [4 B1 w+ \) |
- W# Q$ b+ [4 Q' i ]+ d
! u# @: B p8 s* q, O) N+ K
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
& O( ^" n1 A% S& v5 o1 R* Dsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this7 L# i) h5 b$ M- ~! x! d
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
* X0 s; x/ z0 U' ]1 {0 s' p+ o) \% bno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so: X" y" U. |; x
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 B, _/ Z, E }
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
/ |: D" Z# l+ W4 b7 A+ r0 dBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
! d* \& ~& F1 C* Aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|