UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its: {# `7 L7 | t4 `) U
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider! F6 Z7 ], n/ G4 `8 \" S2 H
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
7 ?% W, S1 W- e) c, P* qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 A+ I7 W G+ F- u2 N
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
* L! C* v; Q2 a' ^' @3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
4 g" j$ a0 P5 `Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within) I3 X& g8 H/ ~3 l% |
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ S# X; C* M2 v/ a
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ T! b1 T$ e6 K ^! R) j
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
0 D O$ n5 W; e5 xharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( I4 q4 x& X2 _. \
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' g+ `9 U9 V2 P) i% D% Q
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I F/ U. @0 @5 `+ t) z
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great- |. Z' d. U [! B/ U
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
) c+ r9 }. x. V) a' w: |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 b8 k6 k+ ?5 c: G! {+ m, ?
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
( g+ N+ a7 X1 v# x9 D1 zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that" z! f. R( M$ k9 S7 L3 w' F
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
7 T& V' y0 e, \" vonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
& y2 X( w1 J3 |1 X2 C9 Ssort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
* _2 L, I! M2 ]: D$ O! |" ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
7 D" I: w* Z" @. @0 |, `! Fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
* ~0 S1 o6 _- l U"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
5 O" N3 Y+ o; Q$ U2 O7 }this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
4 Z0 \3 U& L0 y7 p4 Estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to3 `9 Y# h S* {' z0 m8 ~* `0 c3 S
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
% V: F) F0 Y) N1 bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. w3 h2 u- Z3 s/ s
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a" Q8 r$ q6 m4 J
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
1 i0 \5 n; O5 v- n# n8 p/ o7 q) @" vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
. J4 B8 x9 ^( @3 s: Ximportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for6 R, t' [0 ~* D2 E7 Y8 I
development.
Hutongs8 @5 a8 J8 W! A: x( `1 @4 |
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived0 N; _2 s9 f. N' ]3 F
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions# a! F/ J( _$ Z" q6 i( y% @) m
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
2 n+ x& J' Z' |have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
9 X1 Y/ ]8 n! Z* fwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
) \) a2 ?) c7 \! t! `' w0 xFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date) E' v1 o% @5 _2 X0 r; |4 G+ Z3 @4 T
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. i h, }& Z$ ~' b* ]6 Z' C% m- t
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
; ]. \9 S5 t0 r) s; f& [" F3 wsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
: T0 g+ j2 k" P* Z, v- S% Aunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
- W% \- b' y" ~+ c, [live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: v% u: [& e5 U! M7 Z9 H% Q
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
* @* ^1 k7 Z0 n% rbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
* p% V5 k8 Y* J; w; b/ h5 oproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
$ \3 n9 m. t9 g' @; W: p- V2 Jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, u1 J0 ?, c- @. k
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how- H+ W+ O& S. `9 S( J- u
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
2 h, [5 K7 @& E; K3 ttorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
5 r! m# q' L) C. @: V7 nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".1 _ F4 h4 R/ O4 Q5 K+ n) m
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
) I0 T7 `; z) G$ J% Kaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
0 p. o: V$ K9 ]2 r- o) q8 Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
5 A3 h% d' b5 I1 Eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
( Z. \) t4 V3 x1 s4 v Y/ vHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those u1 E: i% o; y) |" u
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they- n; K# p* n4 w" ^1 T7 ?" {: |% \
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some. R4 K; _- D6 l2 X, Z% @, H
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before/ \8 `% M" \$ B Z% [4 l$ m$ e
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
6 C7 g! Y$ T, Lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
9 l! {5 b5 E. _! |2 Xapartments are the way to go? No.
9 @6 R W5 ~( g _# |" E G% M + G. W1 W) W$ h2 o
' Z, @8 b7 H- m5 T/ n8 Z G
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the% e- Z' {" P8 b' V6 d" l, H% i) X
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
# k; b1 U' X R'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
6 S7 m) ]) {! u, ~5 p) J mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
$ A) y! Z" u1 j5 J4 ^fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
, L$ a7 b: Z) \( Zresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
1 X/ e( d7 C3 c! y" M! oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
( r" Q# k9 @8 W$ T" K+ T+ D7 aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|