服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6644|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! p6 C$ B, c% n( a) { architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 9 ~4 w- G, F5 r2 K8 S# w4 r' eBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"( q2 E, m, M6 k P; ~ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. \( T' F- `8 ~6 @ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; m$ y, z- w% N2 G3 a: W. o 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of , n8 v7 o9 v) x8 E% e0 T2 x1 I- GManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within : I) n: b( I, n. k9 c$ s' W+ khutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among + ?9 _* \* S* Q1 r1 beach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera , R6 b) J9 W7 L/ e" E6 pand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( O% f: B% g! A: e harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are % w4 _1 Y# J. edescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and % {4 G) u: L) f4 Tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I8 M1 {$ D4 F b# w2 D/ | was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great1 f7 K8 G+ o4 c) m impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,3 `, j7 u" E7 w8 ~! m and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong |, g! m7 \' N) `+ Q% G8 e has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment6 F' T4 p. ~7 f: C of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that / e# K" B1 W1 o0 e$ _no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) a% `& V" m4 y' s: Jonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a$ J( P7 o. s" b% N# U. S/ Z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government }) q* d: ^+ }0 p7 C9 A want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ' c6 ]+ e; J5 B Oto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 3 I% {1 ^- _/ P7 Z1 a, @% `/ t9 o% V' e"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,4 s9 S/ z! h0 Q/ D# K8 [% k/ @ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! h0 t; _ ?- u still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to, s* u6 S+ A1 C$ S4 \ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ p3 Q" {3 t3 r2 N+ o( m money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 |7 K/ E2 V0 t8 a& N* Z( S5 H a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 6 X$ ]7 [; G8 @9 ]0 z! I( o: Kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( _$ L4 W& W; m9 ~4 G) R; I0 _ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural e/ |9 n1 M6 Q' D( e. k importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for $ y: W1 z1 W& \" ~8 ~development.

Hutongs0 ?# o7 c. {, S1 e, r in the old days were residential area where people actually lived8 K! r# e: v, U0 Z5 S0 J9 |" `; U there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 D1 }- U# `0 J2 B; \, v in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not % l: q. H: V5 X- N0 u# Y5 Yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you2 O; [- K. `6 D will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.2 r& i8 i5 Z. e' ] Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ! l4 u2 L( B Z5 A! X- Xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 n3 x& t9 K% A& R% c% E to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 Q: @: ?) o+ o' J* |: O/ Ssupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : S( `8 k4 O; V6 B8 c2 N9 nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to0 ^, L0 ~4 ^, ~( _* F live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,* ~5 n, a9 i- C9 a7 x1 d hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 d d. c* b/ `" _9 F/ f7 f' f( k balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the # I* }* |" c. v& C5 kproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be + e: M9 N* R% y+ ?& brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ @( C, W( }; W/ v! _ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how$ m0 ~. C- i' x" e3 b5 P people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be& X: Z+ z8 m$ M" {8 g$ W% J9 J torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " L) y- C* }6 i" u3 k& ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 9 ?' k* D- I# dNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* k0 ~' W- M: t) @) m3 x/ [8 @2 ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially9 N a6 c5 _6 ?& j# `' T" H non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 6 m* O2 P' W; ]$ }: u& {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' i& h: X5 C2 K; }- l& i+ }! f Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those! P. G: y. r* I! i( v2 a0 R people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they # ?6 k0 F6 a$ R, w2 W( imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 7 P1 G" ]( W' F6 E- R. Mof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before) j$ L/ P, {6 G8 y# e, i) g) U R "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 X6 Q" S v4 ]# q) y* l ~people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . H( r; X0 j# E, ]apartments are the way to go? No. & I+ Z- [/ f( n5 v6 A) ` / A. x# X1 l7 o' } 9 ]# E+ E0 ~* L' z: S8 `0 k0 t

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the! D4 Z# b. H) N5 I: p situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this. O4 w7 C. w) ~ i, R4 O 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" Z" b: ^$ L+ X# e: p2 H no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 n1 b! d& {+ `/ h' `7 X7 g3 _* p5 G fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant # \6 }" ~+ X& C4 {3 Rresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ V( b* p/ }% w/ p( \* f; f Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ! ]6 c6 P! h, H! [1 e! \unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-4 06:23 , Processed in 0.129302 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部