UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
/ ~+ U6 s: ?0 T9 C4 w% Sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider9 Q# B$ x2 I8 i' z
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
" j3 ~! F" b4 M: w' F8 [; M# h Ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
$ k$ I0 W+ ~; Q2 d7 v7 V; AAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
* M/ M$ t3 d" e) w: D7 L# m( M8 \3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
& d' m% N/ v' kManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within7 w$ p g2 w3 B
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: z3 c5 E: M8 L- {
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
3 i# s( t s6 M$ qand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is- ~! z2 M* V5 _
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are; m3 k. e) D9 b8 c
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
5 G/ @8 m, d. `9 C$ l3 hforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
$ E; E! t; X# U2 cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great8 E5 I7 K3 `5 O) \9 k- Y( D' G
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,* J7 ^, {/ b6 A$ @2 C( a! B
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: r% Q( p' F; ]) P" B
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment' q% O. `4 a( v7 x9 s
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 l8 {- k3 e: f1 k2 v9 H# d
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are t/ J {# ~- {' l, P3 Y; M6 y+ _
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& R2 _' y! u2 f: X/ j. U
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
+ C$ @& Z7 w+ j, Q6 s1 fwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, m* @0 C& Y( b* v. m+ c
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is+ }! z' D+ Y* ~8 _+ \+ u
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,+ ]: A" ^' m1 {# \, G
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; g. q9 k! q8 i1 I/ ~0 F
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' \) s6 E5 m7 |# L" P: T( R
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
, K" o- H1 j( A3 j0 J& N' [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
$ p) ~; \6 F4 p: w/ _a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
/ p# F* F3 O+ ^+ {# t( z$ Y% tparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across3 H1 o8 s0 b& [* h1 `0 x# B* w
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- N# T' L9 y% }% N: M7 u3 t1 V- |( o; y
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) j/ s: {0 F O' c7 b- l
development.
Hutongs6 I1 O. F! t1 H9 c+ m" K
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
* k; p! T' ^/ R) D' Dthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions' {1 `# m& w7 b! w3 }/ `6 [3 u' ^" j
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
! V: B {2 C7 W) y5 u# R( uhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you) t: i$ C* ~ [ j4 v9 F$ H
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
; l% @1 H9 N. v3 MFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
8 `! e! o; i; [- W* \( uto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
: l. q2 L. [+ \- Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses8 }. U. n& V8 I/ r
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
# U. T W' t( y$ X8 q3 bunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to3 l9 \% G/ A/ P) ?2 M
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
Z- N, G3 X5 |' X( n7 jhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the& y3 X) C. l4 B; M$ u: W
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the0 j- b' `9 V8 j* \) E
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- A8 L d) H7 C7 b' Q
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
! w8 N3 U$ x6 o3 e8 GMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& }5 j$ z' x6 }# b; S
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 G, x# P8 t% M, F2 s8 O
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished* {: q! F6 K) H
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
* A$ n8 N* ~: E9 V% V" ]Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
- P% D" U- T7 s8 Daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially8 r Z0 C. O6 W) X& q3 M& s
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
j9 p$ e i+ ]' |5 S6 Aof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; n" y- T+ {& r: w; ` G2 P
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
. [( P* h8 l R7 Xpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
% B: F! F& {% Q, O% K+ y# Zmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 U+ g' h6 R% f2 {6 E/ }
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
# E+ x; T: x4 @3 H"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all3 ` C5 l' O& R2 W" d6 L
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
) p/ H: p( `: F" Fapartments are the way to go? No.0 L! w. P" h- ]. I
# P+ {" @, N+ C6 B & f7 {% w3 }0 u! c
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
' I" x0 O9 i/ s1 q/ gsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this* N2 L: r4 E$ J0 T; e/ p7 @% B$ M
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make- p$ x7 b5 j- H6 s7 n
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
1 d: Z+ S! C6 J- v7 C7 W0 w0 \: xfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
6 B" }, U6 i# }; \ Cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
* c# q4 ], |6 s5 H9 t0 FBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- e0 Z F; G8 H4 K
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|