UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 n) w/ {2 W) r9 k0 F- y
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
# Z% {& @5 I* V* cBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
0 G( I3 C' Y4 Z: K Scity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.4 d% I v/ L$ W' C& U
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,/ ?/ S3 Y9 h2 C' B* L/ z' G
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of% G9 T$ ]2 n+ x# B* }5 k1 G
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
C/ q( f; u+ z4 \hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among) q' X1 v% E4 _* b0 K
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 p3 Q5 a, S0 o! x6 Y) e
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
P f" t( f- @- T9 i" w! Nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are _5 g$ C9 f4 J
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and9 W) J. R! O9 |2 A9 R
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I5 z9 v! T6 U5 l
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great7 O* S! l9 Y% m' Z
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
1 e {8 F) t) b0 F% dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
- e! U ?8 Y. Z+ Ehas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
: g: }! m2 f% t4 w5 L; h, h8 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
* w- U% y+ z, X& H5 |" X8 fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
* [% C& c: A% D/ [6 q) d) konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a4 K) ~/ V; M/ r% e5 D
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
' }, X7 ?6 [3 M0 [4 o0 ywant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# o9 @0 t9 K% P4 r6 b0 h4 t7 C
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is2 J/ G- P* ^9 o
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
8 J9 l h" k" ]+ F% y1 qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
! T$ K5 t/ Q5 q+ E- p2 tstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
/ {; Y V; k" a: W"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
) I) R- j) q% ?money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was; A9 J& i" Z+ R+ ^: a" e" X* g9 F
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
) Z* J' p' |2 e- H0 \4 kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
A" d2 o) H& H$ O: \the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
$ {5 ^! j& a" W# p& Q; c& limportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
3 d. e' H* o9 b* |+ X0 [$ Cdevelopment.
Hutongs- o P4 G" v2 Q+ M+ w
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
2 p3 A3 d. }. }. I% }, Ethere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
! E v0 `; {) }+ c8 S% S4 Bin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
- e* S: B1 ~& v. B6 }1 Vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you, @* F1 d* g# t& s! X
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
( P P. U0 D$ \; PFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date3 ]' c" u4 z3 i/ x, d
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
; b3 e- F# K8 e @' lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses( M ~4 t: p8 v2 o
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) F- ^% Q- j: Y G+ g
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to- W# L/ r" l- A7 T% ]+ k
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
- V. Q" I& y4 T4 g% C% dhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the6 g0 K, b! k: l X9 o
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the1 M }5 b% ]& p( j: b. ~+ H7 q: h
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be+ `- o8 I5 u* ?: `% a& Y; N
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong$ f7 X) B0 j3 t; B$ ]
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
) s1 {* o- q9 A- l7 [3 xpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be' u# L. E/ @" x- ]! |6 d: t
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
: g% i! K" i+ _6 l# Cmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
* S( d, o: b- n: i/ ?( |Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
$ p& H1 f8 j3 w* Z5 Waligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially- i v) x* ]. f. }) }, k: K
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" o+ G$ F7 T; \: N# K6 m; Y9 lof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
# h8 k/ D% M$ k: A. p9 C& b& }' lHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
3 _# B4 Q% X: B! F3 r: Y6 apeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
" W0 y2 R8 h3 V# l/ h. @0 _3 Emay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some9 @, Y9 ^7 y- H5 C$ x7 a+ @
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 g) I3 u. t. S
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
" C2 c R$ l; f* S) t7 s o6 y- tpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
" {/ i( Z4 [7 b; R8 {; X5 [apartments are the way to go? No.
& ^+ k2 e; [5 A1 n 2 [1 Q1 e& ~2 @- P& u
6 e0 B% ^4 {" w) G1 h
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
9 Y* Z) W; D, n/ C9 {situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 R: q' r6 G/ b3 \$ c'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
9 L. h$ d U# k# gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
( N( c' j& n! |fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant& m% z G# x ?/ T' _$ |/ ^' A" t
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( Y# ^6 c u+ f# p G
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is$ f5 H; R/ _0 M
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|