服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6307|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ( b9 ` G5 l9 j8 Barchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 0 f4 {% _( v- \; fBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"+ k! n) I* y/ D2 T4 Y city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.- G4 y) N" k2 R3 p6 E( U$ o2 v! L. G According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, - A5 d& X8 D- x! ]" Q9 r3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ^8 m0 J: W) H: }) G Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within " Z8 s6 @- `! @8 D! i! W6 H: i: phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( U5 G) X' s* X+ x each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera* @! d# B5 j0 \& {* M and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is. ~: Z# A( h/ _/ q6 c0 ]6 A harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are+ p; a" U" \& F$ Q+ V: k descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and. K$ T( w! B" `8 r; K3 L forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 4 F6 c2 c( u5 R @0 }6 Ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great - v' d7 O7 [! V8 n% ^8 ximpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,4 o8 d6 w" S1 Y5 } and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: j6 ?0 z$ {/ ~4 N has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment# V% i3 `9 t$ r E5 r1 w of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that& G: |* J' g! G8 A* ^2 H& m) N- W( s no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are # K% K7 D8 k1 x2 Z" J5 h2 A/ ponly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ; w8 Z' ?4 b$ r' _0 ^. vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government+ f' M: z7 O2 l$ _ want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move0 ?! j0 F" g) A7 ?0 Z to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is7 Q5 e, _; j& @. M, \ "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) B5 r( K: y; W" J) n this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are I1 s/ |# L7 w9 Y; T4 c- _ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ V: X" z2 g) l. G6 g "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make# d9 _- |# u* V k1 Y& F/ p+ t7 s money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was. |/ J5 Z. l) Z7 `$ G a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a; N& v% G) L% A. l2 Y parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across , n/ k2 F, C9 o, pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural/ b: H" N* }* U" h: f' ?$ Q. L8 h importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 0 j5 N7 C1 s# `3 d8 m: _6 f# S- E0 `development.

Hutongs # X& c$ d/ ^# M- ^4 j6 Qin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 X i7 P. h& s1 t8 K) ?$ Xthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 S$ }& h& w, T, Z; B in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 9 n* l( @ v- q. R- U2 Z& z1 `have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you3 Y* J) c6 p/ D9 S7 d! K$ n will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ; I8 X$ O$ j6 Z ^4 O5 h2 @/ z$ AFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date p2 T& j* D5 K" t3 t- x to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 4 ^+ v: X# t& [to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses * V. F& x+ F4 z; Z, g* W usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 1 W) X [/ O$ f$ V Gunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" M2 N6 R9 ^# G) g0 U live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 1 ^: r# Q- K& E1 R3 _hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 3 B5 Z5 {) z& y c. Pbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the* @4 l7 x& J9 r! Q# ?# D project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 h2 w, s. ]! v9 |/ y renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong . F3 k# J. w: a2 \+ YMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how - g6 m8 a" }/ |, H6 Epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be $ N- D+ d$ f8 z* i: p5 _torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished7 [! Q# i* ~. R: l9 L memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 7 p2 {9 Y; U2 P( p/ \# K: f7 sNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are! D/ @ T- `7 Q2 o2 q aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially T- P0 ]7 {1 P! } non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 I( E9 @ q7 t9 A1 M/ k7 u7 ^of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 8 G) }; `. c" J) gHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those8 _0 W2 u; z. L2 \4 ` people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . m, ?, C/ N! s0 N3 j a: _- Jmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some9 b) [0 a ^5 \4 t: t1 F9 ? of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before7 ~; U3 {" t, f$ K% S; G8 q+ f "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; ^+ P4 _. }) p3 K# F people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 2 s5 q" J G9 ]2 P9 ]apartments are the way to go? No.5 _' x7 y' {$ j. @ 4 s: y: e8 G# p' y* c ( ?8 ^' a4 ~+ r, F3 G& w2 Q. h

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the . x* S6 {( ]' h9 ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 1 h7 U2 U( S0 w1 T# ~8 [5 W'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 8 k% b2 L$ T2 g* B( |; V- Dno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so9 l. l( S* r. Z4 J fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 5 |/ B, X" J7 m9 D: Gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless3 X; M1 s4 I4 N4 a) s F Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' L- |" _7 }5 T P* F _unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-21 02:07 , Processed in 0.112504 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部