服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6379|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its3 H. K) d- @8 h8 j3 i9 y. u; Z% j architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 3 A9 o* Z( W6 G8 rBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 5 V% |% p4 S& w4 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 6 y& A: J/ l' b) s4 b( W: T1 i! DAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, . Y4 y+ P% @" V0 S5 ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of : @2 |/ x* b/ u, k8 h: @! o# X1 _Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within0 u6 p0 O4 J9 d, o hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 2 |3 @* J+ r: z6 J, }! {each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera $ w% D- A$ q% N/ cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 H4 y3 B( }8 V5 q4 s( r2 Q harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 5 L+ M! L- y& Adescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 Y, M; ?! t9 K: y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I: J: c6 y8 \( i1 h3 L was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ D+ g9 V# R0 y impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 5 m) `. K( V! S' t, F4 ?! aand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 6 t# p& K# ]' T% P( Fhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment . Y: c3 V3 t6 Qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 h' X0 i7 g( i# e no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are* R1 _0 [2 j1 }% k4 j only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a9 k0 y7 x! e- @# g sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government $ q- O( `- B1 K7 U: ewant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move + ^/ \4 D+ E' p2 Y/ Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 5 x0 `: J' T$ b& O5 g4 R% }3 F( }"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, $ b h8 N5 F( j7 k- v) wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' J: ^& H+ i: Z& [! H# |* ~ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # B3 F1 W+ b( U* Q1 J"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make " i' K" K% _; ^- Omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was + o) M4 P7 i a0 w5 v) W8 Z% K( I1 Xa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a & G) }+ ~- `0 f5 j. w- zparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across ) M% P6 D5 M8 e% b1 [8 tthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 2 j Y" W3 I. r3 C! G8 Yimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 0 _' ]8 |2 s& Z" u L& jdevelopment.

Hutongs2 f9 Q2 d3 n6 P- g2 i in the old days were residential area where people actually lived/ ~ i2 A& Z0 D# v4 { there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions , \' T( |# u% m5 @ B) E) n$ ~' iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 k: H8 z/ q5 [* O' |! A have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 W" Y4 r; O( L4 O will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.5 @$ m3 W/ ]' ^& v, H; L Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 7 p }! r% ~9 e5 \( Oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 1 B7 i3 W* P) T6 U, dto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 Z* l. V; h' @/ Y. w" o support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically `# O7 {- L; d+ e unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to - m9 q$ t4 q$ N) l5 i/ ^% M4 R- ^live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' a) _) e0 w2 P4 P hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the $ y1 ?% ^1 F; ^" @! g, T) ]$ Wbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the& ~- O& S* i$ ]* c, e' c9 R' {- P project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 s4 Z, M) S3 z* m( o8 x! A renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong/ d# S+ ]) h% g8 v7 ] Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how1 i# \5 ^) ?0 }, L% ` people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be G9 ]" Z: E! Y' }( atorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished' v, R4 p, v& |) r8 h& v, u W5 X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". # M4 W- K( d4 \- o' ]$ x. pNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 7 R" a2 K" V \7 K" a, z0 Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially . B) X( {, e" anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 3 L# B6 s& `- P1 r7 A! e" j& uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these: c; D3 [: ]9 d( `0 q. M/ r0 ?9 L Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those " q& o- ] |, j j5 Zpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they $ f$ O/ l) s9 @1 ?may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some , f/ D+ \1 {: {; s; @of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ; i8 e" E, M, _$ D: D0 P$ B"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all- R$ p; e2 @2 o( [( f people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise" ^: q; F$ v+ n9 o0 f7 t8 L apartments are the way to go? No.9 X# ?/ k0 E6 p l . L2 w9 Z1 n" K - `6 f; O2 `- Q8 e/ [0 V! l5 @/ r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 8 y8 U, b7 R0 w& B% Rsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, t8 q- T: d; @ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & u& i# l$ c% A7 k2 J, R3 Zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so: P' g( y( ^, F fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ! J+ J. Z/ ~; h: X9 Z3 Iresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. O! C1 O" J S, B Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ; g7 s2 }" U# ^unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-7 23:21 , Processed in 0.121639 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部