服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6335|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ! }5 D2 T: A6 s. v: q# A8 H/ Aarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ; e% \" R) K7 u# LBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # I: V0 b8 k; |/ G& I7 T& r& Vcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. * a# O. P3 t$ h8 @6 j1 Y2 M4 n! V( EAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 4 h! l: o) e# S: C" M3 m" K3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of! M# F# \8 ? ] Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within1 i' }, l6 P$ R9 l& N hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ?" b0 n: m( p' S each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " ^4 K) H" S' P3 u+ _and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is3 h. f2 b" [% G8 f9 ] harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are . L" J( ^; R' B" L! }$ `! v" q: fdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and3 `; h: o k2 e7 d; Z0 p3 x forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ! I+ f# H8 q6 d0 c$ T8 A$ F) jwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . G* Y- i5 T: _1 K& G$ j+ }8 ^impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 0 Q1 C2 ~6 M- J: K9 `7 ~$ }/ d3 Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong4 }* D3 h A) ^: V# H! d has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment " x2 u/ u- p* ^% E o) P V, \9 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 7 B: d4 m' [$ K6 | @6 Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are! c* _/ Z: V f9 O: D# T6 }" v* q only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 9 E+ |8 J- R: M7 k/ m' N# O: osort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government( V5 F: I& M* `2 g$ f0 \ want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 2 }! r# M4 j6 k: ~! Dto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 k* o y1 o3 W+ C F"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, + U }& S0 e4 v* O: e6 Ythis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) F5 l! v" T/ A& }" E0 Q0 w still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to0 i* f/ ^6 V( B, C* @1 ] "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ' l' j( S: @' v3 r9 j1 A, j6 qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: Z# v" J: T2 g& e2 ? A a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ^3 r5 y8 L' q: `; b2 X parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 V& e! P* M! {" I, l% | the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural / [6 y- p# _: pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 3 C$ p& ~ \6 g) t* d/ ]) b% Hdevelopment.

Hutongs# E: B' l9 {* e( H in the old days were residential area where people actually lived - v8 S) M7 U) q4 ?there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + [7 i- d* b# u6 `$ [6 Yin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 Y# p+ X1 k) d. k0 z. E- g2 i have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 5 g4 [" _- l! e1 W4 lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. , x! G1 W6 c9 {7 O: S: _Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 F& s6 v" s- ?- v) J! H7 @ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 2 a8 x* P3 x, Xto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses # @6 ]' W+ F5 osupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically @9 D0 \9 f* f* ]/ i unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to- c" U6 A( I! W) q/ f' V live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ( S* q& l" m4 `6 p: rhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the1 t- D, r& \2 c. U balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the* }8 Q# d9 x* \0 h7 O1 g0 j+ s project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 }1 v$ C0 m! `9 ]' e$ w5 b renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 c. `) E" J" r4 O$ `( |( [Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how $ E! k( ]1 ^3 Bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be % `4 A" W7 C3 U r6 D" Gtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 6 l( _$ V$ V7 m8 e; r2 a, ~memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".# v" m ?8 A7 f( _* _ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, @# D6 b; ?9 Z$ a& d2 m' H" _ aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, ]- K4 c( l( O9 e non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 ~0 J1 L" p5 k" ~8 uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" Y# u' l, I: t+ O5 \$ d Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those: K' |( A# J3 J0 `, n" \+ ^ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 6 b8 g0 t7 s8 H! _* gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; ~: r- @1 t1 U, l+ r5 fof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before P' g) \" D( _" o) R. @"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 4 s( a- ^/ _' r N: i7 D+ A, A4 C$ Speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise' [9 F3 s# _$ I) B5 D3 E* D apartments are the way to go? No.3 A% ^8 X0 d3 ]5 @! k1 c1 W $ O; _* i6 y) {$ u; T6 S1 P- d, j P- r) n) g1 x6 j1 H$ e4 r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 4 B; R3 S0 k6 G- y! t' S" Ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 9 m# f# R9 M6 b8 R8 G'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make # b1 H- M( _5 z" ^* Rno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 1 d5 Z# @( {8 f7 l! Ofast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 I, N! f J: r3 L resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless/ Q# {1 w7 o- G. \; e) x1 J& f5 ? Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- i! V1 C; B2 w l7 ` unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-29 11:48 , Processed in 0.124503 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部