服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6601|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its, F D, X4 }$ \2 V architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 f8 [8 {+ z1 }" ?Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 6 x- [; L* }2 i+ E+ N& c9 z' A- Ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.% k( t; p/ c) O/ z$ a2 j* W; w* [ According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, E/ d9 G, y. u! U$ k/ S3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 3 Q% T) ?% y5 d2 U% R* [Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within % R" ~/ s: c b9 M: m6 W( }8 r4 Ghutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among & j% M5 o& W. Z& ^) A/ @each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera7 w! ~0 z& t$ e and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 6 T# V. a. }) Q& fharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! W! g2 z( D* G! p* t6 `descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and - P! y7 z* J. b0 _9 N3 g' Pforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I: S. k( F; O9 C) A' r" {' u% ] was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ @. h: x. ?1 R6 p impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, t1 A2 K7 ^' T and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ' b" `1 l) a a% Z+ v# ]! Ehas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment/ X( b+ \( R9 z5 l9 P9 }% ?$ m6 f+ g of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) U1 z$ b$ e9 ~; Z no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are $ }0 n% L' L! Honly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " H# k* E- d8 Esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , i" |4 {) [# q7 r S% Owant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# {; D3 ^4 R5 {( g7 x2 o to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is; f9 H( ]2 f( e, y$ H "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ! z6 Z3 a- a6 d* S/ }- r4 Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ; J" T( ~& Q/ o+ G, t6 l# H( ]2 Mstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ; x5 w+ I8 H8 n( @, t0 V& U"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ) n5 L3 m7 ]8 T$ H9 {2 xmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was# P9 s; W- E$ R- B D0 _- L6 P a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a7 i9 U5 s6 V4 a- Q; W1 b. ` parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across8 O! L. z# f. {9 P the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural % D/ ^% B& N4 @" \) r9 Q$ timportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for- f! F) }" N7 s7 ]* _0 j( j development.

Hutongs6 z8 U( Y2 K0 `0 m8 p; B( b in the old days were residential area where people actually lived + d2 V! p' h @$ b+ nthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions) J+ Q* u8 B& ~( T4 U( o$ ]9 u/ c4 H in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not2 y7 d* @$ y+ t. H I. D$ f have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you+ j5 L' n& ~& c3 Q1 N% X will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.0 x! s- N, F9 y7 i, i Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ f! K& Y0 ]0 [3 n n4 H to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used& t/ p2 X4 x F3 q to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ e* E' _( @( L" p/ N) e) Jsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically c- V% x! M l2 p' ]. B, gunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to6 s- H1 e, t7 R$ a, g9 z live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,3 E+ l) t; Z7 J1 T/ [6 l6 d hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the" E+ B+ y1 B: n6 Z, h balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the & a# `: @2 Q0 s/ @1 B7 Eproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be " ^5 z- q( k ~) {renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 {! l5 G$ W+ i- e) e! m Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 7 H. Z, R3 Z y: u4 c9 h) ^2 epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be / U- x4 F: u: h5 q) g( n- etorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished * Y# i- ^) d! G g- Nmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ f$ j$ w8 |& x; o! iNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 6 i) R! ?6 U t) N6 P! Ualigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 6 V5 _4 B9 A$ _5 V |) Mnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image8 E( i2 m, I; B of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ) [# U+ \# E: E- M/ O GHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 ^4 A+ g1 L. k' D$ [' ^ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they0 G5 p+ n, V0 @) Q. ` may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some8 M; ]2 o+ _2 q of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( s3 j/ ~# C$ J) ?4 ]/ u2 I"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all % _* @' r2 b% G* ]8 y* o6 ipeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise4 A) r6 q r3 z0 r' { apartments are the way to go? No." I4 a3 k+ o: p- X/ r: W , j+ D$ l8 R! X& e) l* ^4 b/ S+ { ! [' _4 B; A* u" |+ m& `

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 5 f% R8 J. _& W7 y# _6 ^* D# y8 Wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this a' F) S0 }# Z/ ]! I0 f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make8 b2 i# q) j# T7 U2 Q& Y no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so$ A. J1 ~; c8 l8 W, v: t/ |5 _ fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 2 u3 q# d- m) w. U, Y" qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless4 m' s* K& F0 y& d) J Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 9 x' C, Q4 [1 D, I: [6 v5 W+ Gunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-30 13:37 , Processed in 0.121844 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部