UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
+ D; O. A* U- y2 I' G7 _architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider) |5 ^$ B+ u( Y/ {& V
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
; M. o9 s8 J/ |: Y, Gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
8 j. O' |0 _: bAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
R5 T2 J. [1 s3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
5 l" [- m. q" ?9 k& G' bManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
" D5 H4 N7 j( s. qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among- u7 ? d/ t3 i" O
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
. K9 g7 X9 o# i- H Y3 t5 qand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
! S: G* Y; t- M0 vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 Y0 W7 J2 i+ p9 u" o4 I
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and D8 U6 _2 J. M/ y; h8 ^1 n; ?5 n
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
4 j0 u9 I& z( B& Swas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great& |0 W$ S& Q: ~) g, w
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
4 N% p [5 s) b, o% Wand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong5 p( W- y+ m- Z: l% o: u1 a
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment5 V9 p3 w. T4 w# v
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) w. v6 J5 P" z% a! G9 w! N
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
4 ^$ K6 Q1 G8 |1 m6 m, jonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a8 b/ @2 g; C7 c) I. F, c
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 q) S/ J, u# G9 |4 v6 b
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
$ C; b* i+ u+ g. {2 m) C7 y8 pto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is* Q, w1 G+ `/ v. n3 G! C
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
7 U& B( k8 t& n, \this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
" Y/ ^9 r: e; O1 g; istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to5 T G1 r) T9 g6 x7 K% m
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make1 a' k8 R M4 C
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
6 Y7 W8 W8 y7 \( T1 ]a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
% H# i8 Y- `+ C% R0 n2 Z& Tparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
3 |0 j/ s2 D p+ d. O2 ?the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
m _" S9 p6 p9 I$ Z' J' Kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
( ~0 ~) S# F; ]2 p7 Sdevelopment.
Hutongs. i) Y. F5 K& n {. d8 u
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ k5 h$ \- x9 v9 U
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 s3 Y+ y# t! V
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
( @9 p; b4 `1 i3 j& o E# o2 Phave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you+ v3 U) H- Y8 v% u9 v& x$ V. b$ k
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
$ @. c; F' ]& Q& TFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
' A2 b( ?% X, {3 @0 M' v. ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
; r4 o' S: n# q4 ]! _2 @4 n- X6 m& hto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
; x% f5 ^* S1 Q) w7 S7 Ksupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically! r" {6 a: j O _
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
* Q+ p8 V% d" j+ k( M/ Q: ?( _live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
! b4 b5 C M3 G; D+ {+ k& U0 Phutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the- I# N, N! V1 v1 \) D- O6 z
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the5 O8 B2 O# |" ~: v. r( r
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be+ o4 q2 r& ?1 j6 L7 [7 k
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- C, `2 ?6 u/ n: t! c' d: t
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
. C% L: J2 ^0 E/ Wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
3 s% J/ B- M( |+ ^* \torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished& H2 P1 p7 A% |1 ^; P
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
6 q3 e3 `' I! c# [' q( f1 B* x2 vNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
: S: ~8 X$ N, M; t) c/ Z5 M& maligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
* j5 Q3 e0 q2 Y) R* Knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
3 g9 O2 P; u$ Rof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these+ P. X# J ^* l% w8 _6 }
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
3 Q8 b! Z1 _( ?: m: o' ^ Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
0 z+ C+ b0 q5 ~ d2 o Rmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 }& |" b' u1 J' v ~$ g/ _/ |9 e" N
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 T( {5 \- E* X! o0 p! d
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
, b) `# j, U! B( i/ fpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
7 H0 u' g/ P& A6 capartments are the way to go? No., ~( q' H9 @% b! L7 S4 t( G
, T- I; }% ?* Z4 h8 D - \% z. t. j) E% s, E5 g( D
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the' z' W$ d6 ?3 U3 d. C' O- S$ E; a% ?" C
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this$ N, o. T5 A* O$ t) {, J( p9 o4 O
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( r/ f( D. w. s G' j2 x, c, {* b
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so' P I9 H4 X8 j7 l0 e
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) l6 Z5 W2 b" v+ Z/ Hresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless" c/ G# i( d- c
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* Z" R3 \: p, m! t( s/ c" e/ @4 I! m# a
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|