UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
4 I6 H- y V a |5 N) p2 farchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
" t3 Z- ]; S2 T& y: U& R; YBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 x% G, [& w2 l7 F( ?& E
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 ~! v; i8 T& w; u8 ?
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* S/ X" i3 s8 w6 I1 ^5 O8 l+ D
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of3 W# |" d0 s7 g
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within/ u( ]6 k! M" V1 s' I. F+ `& ]* R) `2 y
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
* K# e( y& n0 F5 p4 p% _/ l& Y! j6 _each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera1 I( |9 S+ o/ h0 w$ R. T
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is- N8 d8 K9 z _1 K
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
' ?- A. q \$ r& Q+ |1 hdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
7 p+ m$ ^7 E5 }6 P) mforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
) @# E! i0 H8 |3 w* y) l! qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
! `0 S8 F( }( n" h1 |impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,! M0 |8 A2 ^: K. m8 J( ?9 U
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. U: `/ }& l9 `, m9 C) l
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment9 f, l3 e3 E+ G, j: v* ]8 m, T8 B& [
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
{2 H, e. Q& F, l9 P7 ~! Eno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 o# r3 t& F, u# V$ a y* o
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
3 d6 a5 T8 r3 Asort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
1 S9 t! }) ~" x% a" iwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
+ V: M# t; T: f% g7 t6 v% ?to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 P: N, A) ]- d, D1 U
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,+ h# w/ k) G+ k9 m6 B- f5 `. B5 F
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
6 {* M) m$ s& \! C& c2 istill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to6 o* z; z1 n' ^& C# |% N- b
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
! p% t& A. M* S3 t' d. X1 E o- Emoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was P9 R) T/ K% [" k$ d" Q' h
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 r$ @4 s. E n" g! q" W3 H0 S" k' B
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 X3 i9 V/ J0 f( Ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
/ D5 o/ t) z- n$ f+ c& I: ~( A3 Ximportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
6 T& X- |/ k" O$ Y( u+ e9 Qdevelopment.
Hutongs J+ D; C6 g+ d" W8 O7 H7 l1 O* X
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
) s) O7 d* W8 f8 P5 P z2 ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- w# X: N1 w4 s/ D9 g% R9 _
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not# O/ o( w5 K$ G/ c$ A* u8 C2 F+ m
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you) ~* w) [* D* V, `8 e8 N
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.3 u9 x* m# ^0 d+ e) x7 W; o1 ]
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; ]* H7 j z# u3 U
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used4 y/ F6 ^1 |; e7 o9 S# @
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses [; b+ T6 ]# l. w& q1 n+ o
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically5 D& Y' r$ A; G& N/ H* x
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( `+ \! n" u: B! `9 [
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
4 D, {/ f' |- _$ Ahutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the- R$ e3 `& \' t1 H8 T5 U0 V! t
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the) }7 V/ b+ T' O7 A
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
0 S& x- [; V/ r, e/ n5 Trenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
/ Z3 k8 O3 c, A; K( x1 q% `Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
5 a& I( d7 P5 x; k: q4 }! [# speople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
7 u7 p0 N$ K8 Q7 R8 V% T1 F( ?torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
" G* h: h3 s" X) W! R0 h' Kmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".5 Y/ T/ c" _: c+ Z
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
1 x, d* y6 K) ^( |* w _aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially( V0 Q. M ^+ R3 m, P! o K( B1 j7 Q, u
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image+ ~( F* p( h* `; I
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
4 q c& j1 D: \Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those( {8 W2 r+ h3 H; M1 `) p, E: o
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they$ P; q8 Y' V% c* }4 M1 A
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
]; U$ \, ~, e& q) j* Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before* F1 M& |. u* K( E
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
$ ]8 p7 F! t0 p* v( F* P6 k8 |' hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
' }' O8 y4 T7 Z7 rapartments are the way to go? No.
1 _0 T0 U3 N& ?& j % e: L' N! z) D, }
! U# S) W' d: g
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the Y4 @" l4 z# L
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this/ u! I" }! O+ `) T0 L1 b% v8 t7 m& V
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 \: D4 \7 x' X! [' y& F: N! f
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% v: Z1 s! }+ o% ^# N
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant: v9 O7 {4 A3 [ T! X2 J; R
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( \% c7 C( i& {. r$ l( J1 o1 D
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is9 k, A0 m2 L( n1 \( N
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|