服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6243|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ; ]4 j1 d% n; `# L) p4 Xarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 y% i! D* l, s' I; g Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ) g0 m7 u- O8 N* `' ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( O& f( H! C; f7 C! w8 ~5 hAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 R/ z( |/ T" M' c 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of0 [7 j" k# @, k/ C; y Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 0 O# z$ S4 l; Z# K+ uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 7 ?: \1 ^! i" u6 @& J& h5 Ueach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; w5 N! N5 n& C1 r% E; b and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 9 y. Q' `" W# M! B2 [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are. b7 D, a: N6 U descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and & ^4 T( X) V8 ~forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I , Z( c. P) l; D+ u! ]! qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ p9 x1 R- ?4 K! C impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,8 V' s2 ~" N9 C u! d& E0 `1 x/ | and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong" y. k4 W% Y7 R( ~ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 3 G8 \* P! F; w: Eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that! {: {* l2 M! x, p2 x no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 2 E& d; K6 f4 q% s, ?! ]" v) Fonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 9 r; y, D& k% ^' k7 {- wsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government / U/ Y, k! g! Q9 [5 Hwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move4 {8 z( H7 A: w2 v5 S/ p9 ~1 W; N% T to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, K% |$ C# w% E1 n7 ` "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,: n- o8 |) [% d/ A/ Q this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! b$ w' \6 G9 _5 o" U. H# |/ ^ still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to! o8 @' Z4 Q5 B3 R "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 W; ]2 @- B$ J& S4 [& I4 Smoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was # ~8 q/ L' }5 k5 @* ya beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a # }: o/ z- m3 y: O& E2 I1 L* Zparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' P, O6 r6 \9 I the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- V- `/ N1 W9 b importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ! Y* B5 q7 t! idevelopment.

Hutongs4 j# V, ^! q& H! G. D in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ) ?5 @) a) T- B: h. H+ T. rthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions' f/ l% h5 e. I8 b3 r/ _1 z in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not2 \8 t$ M0 U8 D) M5 A9 q have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you & O. F6 b' C8 t* Gwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ~* J. z' L5 J; C* _Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date! D8 s$ i% R- i+ k/ g to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 1 w" i1 u6 H6 f2 Yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 1 m# R. o& W( b* ]( q2 k& @support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically% p% E; f1 s. h3 d* ~ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to: n3 \) D; X8 M9 j live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ( ?2 ]/ [! Q) B1 X: @$ u* thutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the . ?( L6 f+ l5 O# a2 D1 X# X! |balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 b" j% T+ h: r# [8 O project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be / d) E- Y! r8 r$ I: x9 e+ Prenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong U$ a8 z% C3 M9 F& |* I/ @% y' { Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how - q/ U u* \' C4 Q1 U2 r0 f8 C" F& M$ Qpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be1 |; r9 b) q4 j/ I torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished, k) v6 G, z+ B' E5 M memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: z& N" B; d3 [/ e& e" g0 S3 ^ Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are, N, {5 T& Q6 ^% H: R aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially+ A" |; ?; ?5 N$ p3 W non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image' J, ?3 k3 O& p! t' Q of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 X* a' I- k+ B. ]% J: |( j; y4 n7 C Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those / o1 v1 c+ q \5 S6 @; Rpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ) Q# J( g& q" b- i4 E& \may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' t2 k1 f6 M7 p6 x, |" F) B of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 8 f* o/ w5 r( s6 V"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all' |; q4 j* q- V& { people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise, y! S! L1 b; e$ T* L apartments are the way to go? No. : [% n( E9 Y1 [; i. g' V: i 5 B+ V8 t o- {) S7 Z. E: N% h- I# \% L7 \ ; B1 b `' S0 M( @% ]0 R

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the' R$ O* x e. {5 f2 t situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 J6 f5 P- z2 }8 |# T9 v7 B/ p 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make q& O# V' J0 [ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so5 o R! r7 V4 s7 M+ l3 p fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant0 v: G1 u' e/ U resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless% Y0 e1 L/ s W7 k6 _$ ~1 m Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is 1 R( l8 ~+ S% W9 Munlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-1 08:53 , Processed in 0.148684 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部