服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6259|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its b( t [) i8 o( L1 Tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider / u8 N# U) E; O: E( A% v ^( HBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" * \/ n1 }5 L, M+ y( n5 _9 I* bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 0 T! s- f& V3 ]- E! e+ HAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 6 U& S$ I* ~3 _+ n8 M( E& y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ' c! Q& t# I. T, f) qManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 9 F. I( i' v1 M0 ^7 qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 2 L+ ~% u5 _. ~% {each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera0 Q! E0 _$ S2 t+ N- Y G and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is+ {1 w- e1 v' g; v* o5 K6 c5 T harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : a5 f8 e/ i; H% v' M+ j0 \descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and6 y# e, _" }% h. \& [/ z0 X2 w forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I: ~: x1 }; E$ E) g8 d4 L( u* r( k was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great4 j5 c% f% m- S6 Q" u impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 3 m. ]/ ?/ z4 |' V5 @and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong & d; s9 J4 _! zhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment) _5 ]# u) k8 _* n0 P( w of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 3 _0 E" p& U" ^: Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are2 I5 F! C" W: @0 p7 n8 Z' F \ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 1 p" A6 U' e% v1 msort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government* ]- ?+ i8 y6 ^$ K9 Q+ F; n want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move0 S! _, _% p/ ~6 [7 S1 a! T3 I to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 E. F' P4 H6 D- W8 d* K "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 9 ~# Q$ Y, g, v! j# Dthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 4 I: t9 O. Z8 d7 m R. ]1 dstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to& q% d- [& n( ?3 H. [- ^9 i "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make , \% {* F' n( f3 Y: g5 K2 jmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 7 O5 M- R& C* c1 U- G9 Ja beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a9 ]2 t! \. t& C" N' c: j3 S2 z parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( ^) v: z$ c* L% x* u; B8 P the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural; l5 z. [( C2 }! F p% ?3 l8 u U" O importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, Q3 |* X$ c- g, H1 L' Q% a9 \ development.

Hutongs8 Z! M/ f* k, d8 L! a' S in the old days were residential area where people actually lived* R. A$ B+ H# v there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions$ G9 T( E0 e, @1 \! F in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ; @+ q0 K# ^* i7 c! F! A3 Rhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 ~! L# U' A2 N) u will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 4 Y' d2 E: i& B$ E# M- oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ X4 `6 v, B8 B5 Q4 o+ Q% n to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used& U" i3 t) v' i# M, ]7 g to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses9 _& \9 {- u8 ~+ T b support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically " n, U* u' B; ^# o, j1 g) w, Tunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to # m9 s1 f# m3 `' j: R* r' @$ Glive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,4 \& _+ W8 h6 m0 {3 W1 ]% O% ]7 N hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the9 O5 c% A1 L1 u. w) D+ |( g balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 6 V) x4 q6 t& aproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be* c3 G9 O: c4 |, Z renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, }4 l" f& v$ _5 `+ N; \4 _ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how f, W: n3 ~ _5 \8 epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be9 o, X$ J$ ^) V1 N8 j torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 O& c& K6 o: b: @" \1 ~# Gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". - Q% g$ G$ r1 @- N5 v1 {Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 8 U9 M% h1 q7 p& O0 z/ ]% Faligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially " T5 f& S4 s: vnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 B) A" ?2 W: | c+ e% Z4 j4 _of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 1 e& e; G& P$ CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 O+ n, h" F3 n/ M9 _. ~ people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they & c: o$ O4 D8 X5 M; U$ \' e( m, bmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some7 B# b' _( Y- X0 C! y1 o of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ) I1 s! X4 F/ h1 B+ C"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all5 l# j; m2 E- h7 c, M! b$ j people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 7 A4 V5 ~5 h, p! y5 h( V; b* z1 s+ ]apartments are the way to go? No. 9 k, h; Z: A y& }4 K/ z, W : J9 c# v! |+ I3 V: J6 t- g. a 0 ]( @ l2 k4 Q/ i, l; ^

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the: W" q3 J- ?3 o' }7 K8 f% j n situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this6 S% a* B) s5 S* w* B6 C 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# m$ j7 h2 K$ [# }, e e: K no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so " c, K" m6 Y/ J# A8 I+ _* l# }fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 5 i& i) V( N& ?) C; sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless $ i' g* J* m. q$ g4 v" BBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is/ m g C. [( ?: x3 D0 H \' m4 P unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-5 16:04 , Processed in 0.117690 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部