UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ |( G/ i8 U) t; T8 S
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider% b/ k6 P5 M+ u' V0 B( s k
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# g( l& s6 u* d1 w, A: X
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. \ ~, S' c: L- f E: L2 Q k
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,6 E* h9 ~$ K# ]: d" B. x) K
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
4 b; k6 V0 T. |Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
4 M$ _( b( J2 _7 ?! c: Qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
- y6 Y3 Z, s9 g& \6 \6 ~, S/ B- reach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 X: {. E% }1 T) [5 Y$ Q1 v& G6 B
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is9 F6 o2 i5 c# S# _9 c5 N
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
. h& u" f* |7 [4 E s( H4 Z. J: b4 wdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and8 C3 y& [! N8 {
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I, H2 o9 y5 R2 {- ], u
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
. f$ |& u; J3 \/ t) w: ^- Zimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,7 f/ {4 ?% f% I" w3 Q
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
' p6 _* r! y4 d, }( C/ k$ P# lhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment9 [9 T, ]8 b3 q+ _9 O: i
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
r" J# b1 W3 I: uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
3 [! F6 p3 K) V% g4 N, Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a! r! H4 E; q2 _; y* m9 X3 o
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
! a7 ?# q4 O: K. ?, U) I/ Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 F5 K4 s8 c- q! o: x4 X3 G
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 R% s* ^0 ^" i1 g
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
: H3 H m/ F2 X. m& k" i+ a. [this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
% V# N) G( i- c+ L; @7 ?1 l- Qstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to5 h0 d- I m' t) L
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
: B- q- [' h' H1 W& K3 N5 jmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
: o: |' J! c( ea beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
7 n* _& S Q" b: Z7 U! Yparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across, r4 f+ f" ]9 M+ J; E5 w
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
& G" p1 [8 W8 uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for5 G0 d* i( s% B+ p. d% H) J0 `( ~
development.
Hutongs0 r( {6 c1 ?6 J- v2 u
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
9 o# W' \4 @: z/ U1 k8 Ythere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions% }8 ~6 f7 o3 y" C0 Z' G, `5 H' F
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
2 p6 J9 L: `% R% s% W( ~have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
( x9 e" s R0 J; ]; }0 n, }. cwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
# Q4 @, f/ V% o; v" O# U. X qFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date& f8 S" V5 r$ z9 _3 j
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
( e9 s% S) a; Q9 l0 b& s4 ]# Gto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses Y/ f, u a+ J+ C3 F( F0 V" P
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically0 n2 @) s- ?3 u9 P% }
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
4 U" m! c. n! P% D8 t: i5 r) Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,. F0 v3 l! `! ~( Z- W# j
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the, }4 D0 y( M/ b0 H, j
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; D2 V- r3 C/ m: p2 d$ j
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
) {, Q y4 @+ h8 mrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
6 u, e7 q) x2 K3 _2 FMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
R/ S2 e- a2 ?4 S+ b, K4 t1 k* hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be8 T* }9 H5 B. B
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished8 z; R+ Y. Q: c) y, K( H
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
$ @/ e1 D `' N2 t" Q+ N$ yNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are* y7 N: ~; \# }3 |5 x) ?
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially6 @, z& k, R. [% _' z( P' A
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" X' |" y6 g- t$ sof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these' O4 P# b$ u' E/ A M
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
4 l8 f( ]- ~" Y6 b1 cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
9 ~& x5 a4 @ pmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some$ ?, Z8 q- ~. R. m+ v+ J
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
* m9 l# p# D2 M' I& _"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
# J7 w1 c0 ?' P: a: K* K4 v! m; H# {people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
* z) F3 C4 {- Z: p- A- hapartments are the way to go? No.
; i! T4 u3 R- `9 O2 G
* h# u# \- F! k2 W 7 F* n$ ^4 E) c
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the1 W" D& _1 Q: c0 ^7 i" n8 I* o
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, i" ~* w2 {9 W. B0 D
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
3 l. k3 |# H E# c. ^& S$ lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so( u# J* G @/ t8 P& u3 o; i2 A
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant2 l$ F* u$ h- ?+ U* s7 }
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
# Q U* N, x4 _2 E; }; SBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
1 u9 m5 o; R" T+ L; Ounlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|