UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
& [* o. r* B0 f) Oarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
( Z: @6 ~1 k4 V" m6 i& m! H/ ^Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
6 k7 R1 c6 {+ N' bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture." _9 K, _* v0 \) s: E- J
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
& `- r9 C9 d2 Y/ o% |3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
4 q6 I3 r$ u* L! V; l3 x C1 wManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within6 ]8 v. S1 G5 Z9 W
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among0 c5 s# X3 L" `* k
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
3 U# ~' b% `0 g3 rand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is6 T! G) f0 P) x- s2 x
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are/ [" F+ A9 s# B1 S$ Z
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and1 v R9 A* _( z2 o" @
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
/ p4 v3 E) F2 v/ Jwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
% }1 q8 X$ _: p' \( {2 Z9 a2 Z# Aimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,6 S& {" O/ t+ |2 F% U/ \
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
7 Z. K1 `3 F6 u9 o B) \; `! dhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment5 Z$ G" ]/ Z$ h5 I0 z0 v
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that# b" `! ? F2 R5 B$ z
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
2 w! {. ^1 e$ l) A! h$ lonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
% @" M# ~, h2 n: T( ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
. E% g' c5 A3 \. K* ^9 ]6 Rwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move* y9 e+ O- L+ N7 [3 G- D1 ?% x
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
8 V$ j0 O2 Z- [ y( O"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
* q, G3 D3 m( K0 d0 [/ j9 z* D: Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are8 t0 o$ J1 u8 Q$ E
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
. u4 I4 P6 g9 R) q! L: r& ?$ T"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make W' O4 s! u8 \" r* ^" g( R
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
( V) R1 t4 a' l+ Za beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a* L1 N: d0 I. P$ u
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
) ^$ O9 i% {, S! Rthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
u# N* {1 s/ ^' Q% Oimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for' F& w& {: z/ J- t* Z
development.
Hutongs9 _- ?7 t% Q$ v& c' y) L
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
6 o8 m) L; G) b x' _there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
: K5 v+ v _1 oin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
% Q* g+ w$ r# ^3 _/ K4 a" X% U# {have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' |1 L) {0 D" Y ]' H1 v4 q
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.( [# N. \: {) ` ?" }' U* t( L! ?: H
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date3 T' \9 U9 w4 v9 ~5 `0 P$ n- N
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. o; r. ^" g$ ]' V& X: @
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
7 f- m, }. h; p# Z, S: G- @) @support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically g" j! ~. A) k, |
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to9 @- j% V0 @4 ^' r- A" | g
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ b0 J1 {" Z' |( W% B
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
, I, H5 z/ I( y& m7 P- I0 lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the3 o% f% t) P8 }+ ?8 ~1 _
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be( R8 O. `- l8 o4 C4 E- v
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( ~+ q8 {$ I. v
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how3 V, C9 @+ h7 a9 ^0 U: J0 ~4 i
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. }* t! y l' A* j. T- _" x
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
4 I2 I9 }7 ~& p' ? c+ fmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
3 S/ Y& j2 ~1 \1 GNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ u8 i& t, b5 f- Q
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 p1 Q! I1 f0 R7 b4 y; O& G' A9 m, x
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
$ R4 f4 ^) h [& D& s* `$ {of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% T! G: v& z! {7 N1 f7 ?) F
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
1 M& Z6 Q! w7 {3 s7 L# wpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
6 X4 {# |& z( f9 a) Y1 c0 Z% hmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
7 K1 ?) t2 X! h. vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before: U j. l8 M% }0 e; M: g, S; C" Z9 n
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
S4 {7 z, I5 k% apeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise0 |+ z& Z$ _9 P6 q
apartments are the way to go? No.6 v$ R5 O9 k$ _+ `
, C2 D" c, r7 h+ ]7 m' m
6 }9 b$ Q& e* y" n& H1 s* j
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% I! n5 f [: e$ }+ ~. ksituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
: K# |/ w- f4 O: d# s7 p6 q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make) V! _% L+ V4 z/ ]4 X: G
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
' U4 q' [( x( c1 w7 y5 Ifast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
x8 G, I" P5 J" o( h! t8 Lresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
F! k# h3 f: k, pBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is8 G: y. Z7 L# x+ {
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|