服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6584|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its / T- K6 D, ^+ [1 uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ( x7 O0 z% `( {: qBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! l6 E& `0 E W& ^ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ; Z6 H$ b4 N, R% i5 G4 [1 x( N3 sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* Q& A, T0 c, k+ t5 | 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of # o) p+ I4 S( C, |+ F, fManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within! i( K. ?) q; j6 i& ? hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 7 ~3 n8 K9 T$ a. Yeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera% j$ u' @/ D0 [- ]* `# N$ [ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is / Z; G# y% Y/ u5 J, `! g' }4 g4 dharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& I4 B3 |1 R6 m5 y8 n+ R& |* u, m! o+ Z, Y descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and b2 S. ]0 T( ]1 q$ ^( qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I" D, P2 o9 [+ M- T' J was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great - `: ]- y9 N* i) v S2 ~impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 j& _) V) p0 e2 ~# j: `* |# X and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ' _/ t/ B: f3 a/ mhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( f5 J3 R3 e# N& o$ k$ O+ pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that+ Q" j8 E$ p' u3 L+ t4 y" t8 \0 | no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 {3 \* y) g3 f! i/ r7 ?9 S7 c( @ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a % g: ?4 l9 f/ M# ]8 K8 A) O4 Vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government/ Z; W, q( U: O' z9 J2 L/ W want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move % B. g0 f9 o* g. m E0 rto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ! `. @; @& b4 f"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ; I. n0 C" C/ w- V/ g" Wthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 1 O2 M! C1 U; N J7 e! f2 mstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' T* i# j- ^, X' B. C1 a7 t1 x "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make3 M+ R8 q( y2 c1 r: t# r money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, i( I& t' {; x" f a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a. f. d2 U3 b9 C parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across . L3 {( y2 H" [; w6 P; m Bthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural5 D$ B9 l: w1 }$ O/ W2 [7 Q importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 5 ]8 I6 j0 {. d( L2 j6 h( tdevelopment.

Hutongs ! ~: |0 U D+ Q$ v% Y. kin the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ d) l0 R: O3 O0 B there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 3 ?! w9 ~! X9 }9 [" a3 S1 o1 cin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not * f' P# A. x9 K& U4 ~have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you. L/ S1 k/ O! t8 R. [2 b3 p/ H will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.9 j0 W. J/ F( L/ y7 K. e Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date1 d$ X3 ~3 d% ~; n3 }$ I: u to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used$ M, X0 |3 S& Y' j- k R) m to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses+ D- M7 N- V1 h' g6 g support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ) |( T |2 K6 y; S# Z. }unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) P6 t M4 m8 ` u7 K; ? live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' V- [5 H0 L# A o. _2 D- A! J# K" X! y hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 2 N7 E% S2 [8 v' b" lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the* P- s6 T' Q8 D m project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" F5 ], a" v8 o% M: R renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& U* Y+ I2 Z" [ `, M Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 6 V6 S' k- l0 z" r, A, s, cpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 5 ^) G* Q. y: y- z0 jtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 0 t; l. x! l4 W1 }; Lmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- ^; {+ i% L D0 y9 v Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are# f t7 |. K6 \/ @. V0 _+ I aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ; ~/ c; d% |; Tnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 7 f$ \/ P$ ]# ?* c+ `of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 6 i2 {$ X9 }8 i8 l( y6 b* mHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 9 h+ n8 \% d# {3 S, k' |# q( |4 epeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they . x- e* f2 X* |0 V$ t- f+ ~may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some `# p" ^: s- O2 v. N8 r: _9 H9 B of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before & P, r4 a3 u9 X: e& I3 m"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ) w+ u/ {* h8 x2 ?% @1 Upeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise0 _3 h9 G: D4 y8 N apartments are the way to go? No. - w: J% p/ P# h/ V D ) N! E; y+ W2 ?$ O# e Y& C " _$ S! m7 `) s8 O; u0 [

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the0 |* @: }9 ]: E* K2 } I situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 0 t& F s2 C {8 k0 B5 x'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make . d, ^9 J; t) x; E; ^" v, _no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so/ o5 J2 _6 A& W, ]( r) K# ` fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 7 Y0 q+ s8 D; r- o3 g cresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ; a. _1 M$ L) k9 n* ?- v# qBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is9 m) p2 Q* `+ ^6 Y5 A9 i4 [% X unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-28 13:12 , Processed in 0.118764 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部