UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ f3 B' m! H2 @/ L5 }
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- y( Z/ G% {- z; {" y1 b
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
3 D4 x+ R: A* q$ I& K* gcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
* @" C9 u' u; g5 M2 @5 HAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
/ {+ N' B/ G& E: Z; I. }/ X* q3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of8 Y! q5 Q) |2 f7 l" R- D
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
& x/ i0 E& H1 q9 t( Thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
( [. n% D; x' z+ ?, Qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
" D; K2 T: G$ s O" G& Uand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 T3 t1 p: `( q; Wharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are! G! `1 L `5 {. D& O
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
/ ]6 U$ Q2 N% F, n2 aforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
5 P0 l4 r0 A, }) e! Zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
2 e5 N o' B. K' T/ o4 ximpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,! W) r. T5 s+ h3 |+ D
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
- q8 c# |; B) U- phas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
$ T) d* [) V4 {/ D4 zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that/ u1 r6 I+ N7 [3 Y
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are4 n, g0 C4 p- B' Q. Z
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a2 a0 ?0 N, f4 Z0 }$ o" D
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
: \: Z& W( _" \. L8 zwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move% n6 r5 I$ q) E. _2 y5 x, t
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is/ ]$ ]9 g3 \4 K& g
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,7 V, |% d4 l' P
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are3 J* X) K1 B& W8 Q; O' {. c
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 e. p& l/ w" `# X* ~/ }& P" D
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make, ]: B8 R$ B0 [0 d1 w( O3 p* ^
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
. o7 [$ C, k* G6 x* pa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
) e! ~$ |4 t: @4 k6 Uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
: B' M% D% Q0 h: z/ Cthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural+ U& Y9 p& {. f+ w4 X3 L
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
& U3 ^5 t. D9 W$ F) H' wdevelopment.
Hutongs6 \$ ~) b4 x( ]0 r3 A9 G3 q
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
& A6 o7 X* H; gthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions" T$ Q/ h' j0 X5 k2 u) p3 K" W2 D
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
4 j( a S# H' L6 P! |have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you5 d2 Z5 E! _! q$ @/ C. W
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
1 `& B/ \# w- e3 UFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
' I' z/ v7 |4 z) c c' S6 [to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
+ e Q0 e' a! H; yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
5 G5 s; t' p* b) C7 }2 F0 V5 W: t* W; w% bsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
) x: m9 L1 v" z3 Uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
4 Q1 Z& d8 D2 d9 m5 M2 qlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
: E6 t1 E5 V7 K% Vhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the% d5 q+ i% v, P+ f6 s
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the1 g5 w, {% @: {1 n' M0 P$ ~
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be8 Q4 o ^0 d( ]
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
7 z* I: c: t9 n7 d4 oMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
$ J6 ?) E" p4 g" j; L3 t8 y: ]people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be; G) z0 x3 c) @
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
3 D" h1 D8 i5 n* @; d: vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
6 a* _- L" w! [5 {5 K S3 kNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 Y0 d1 Z: k. j' {' A$ A
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially% L3 Z6 c. q: f: W6 v9 s' _
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
7 x1 [9 D# R, V, lof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 W: r# N- w6 A9 l0 A9 R/ G/ E
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
, }0 R/ ~* Z; \8 jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they0 v: y0 y% K4 B! N" N: k4 T* Y& H
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
( \# F' M! l! N) vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before6 _1 o' \. _; F2 Q% @3 U; n
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
' V* j) q$ v8 \0 H& Epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
1 A) ^+ {/ K/ |7 j$ Aapartments are the way to go? No.
) h. Z7 W& Y8 t7 i& o1 G $ V* p$ y/ I6 V1 W* A6 z5 ~
% h0 M1 v; q& q& n7 u
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the, N) e" Q6 [4 N% e/ f$ ~6 s! E
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
u+ Z7 ]2 }0 R( {6 Z% E3 }& f'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
' Y7 W) V8 h" `0 l6 f5 Vno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
0 h" c" P$ N7 }# l, P% Gfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
0 f1 T4 D2 I8 {. Y* eresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
/ G& S u: ?% N/ kBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
! c4 Y4 F6 A2 Z0 dunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|