服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6225|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its6 p2 A* i! B' Q1 i" T) H6 i architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider& { b" a" J S6 V7 |/ R Z Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"; f7 \+ H6 l0 X" L city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 ]7 _' |5 M* C) P! A$ R& j) c According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, k3 s6 h k0 b/ {/ h/ X3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of & E6 T& d! _( k1 z8 m7 W% BManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within $ {8 h6 p7 R* d7 k vhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among * b1 S) f! ^8 o5 t( c) _& Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera , |9 q+ s* p9 ~# I& R& Vand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ) o6 o' t+ B8 L4 f- w Vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' m. t- {& L3 f7 Q, p% X descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 7 p5 B& I% f' e; \) Sforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I* `1 O! C1 k1 \( R1 `4 ~ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : L/ s% h) y W( x5 ?7 m" d# c0 R1 pimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,4 \; V& t/ f( a5 h( F4 g# P and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ' r4 Y- K7 Q2 i/ t2 K) Hhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% C4 I. X; |: x. A8 j/ }# F7 f of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that# ^% h0 r1 Y9 }$ L: [8 t' d no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are # h2 c- F# Y1 donly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 0 T8 h& N) ~- ^sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 7 X/ m* v; _1 M8 j9 k3 h7 @* Twant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 3 W1 a$ f- A; k* zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , Z9 o: ^1 V, |9 P"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,1 Q3 j4 P) |/ U* z/ u4 _ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ' p4 ]1 w$ R: t- Ystill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to / L: X0 [" F% N3 j; _"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make / U+ P$ t; j6 vmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ y# ~6 n+ s! U: }& l3 ba beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a " {2 w1 F) ^) B4 }$ r; S* V$ Nparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across0 D$ F+ T# P* D, n$ J8 O* n the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural . ` v! L# k% v( @: kimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for # i; B$ Q- S: a, Kdevelopment.

Hutongs; B$ L/ F! \$ u- B0 k; o$ d in the old days were residential area where people actually lived: @1 Z9 F3 E0 w+ J% M there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- R) a0 g: o( D- f% m in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not$ S9 N+ I+ b% N* q+ X/ M have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 T; u2 B( H# k7 {0 V H will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. , {' W5 J+ K0 g. A+ g* qFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 1 L+ y5 E# |% {) N" ^& e5 S7 Mto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used - H7 y9 @$ p$ N% W7 O! V* Lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 1 G$ }( U) \' H( R# S, M4 ^support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ! m5 t" c/ A3 B' Z' M! Funfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 7 u+ r: G2 q$ A: l4 Rlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 1 Q/ s [" I# q2 }1 o- |- H' whutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 2 b3 W( v; O. D' Ebalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the - z+ V/ M$ M3 y/ J. cproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be( l* p( X/ P- j/ y6 w renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong: r8 M/ g! Q; m4 A0 U% f) i1 B Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ) o6 n* a$ z: k q7 Dpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be. J X" O, n4 x- n: {0 @; o torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ( F8 i1 v$ U( H- t# lmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".0 K( {/ C* q1 A2 | Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are. D. D. R9 d0 w0 Z aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, ^7 b5 f+ f: F non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 ~& q9 H$ J5 c4 T I5 g! d of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 U6 S2 J+ M5 A1 ]% sHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 h2 _% ?9 Q. B people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they / W5 @. B" U3 ?9 ~8 A6 Umay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some+ D7 l, V+ b. J of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 2 a7 L* i! u( z/ j"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all & I0 {: P8 u3 Kpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise . _7 L/ \; x; Y" |7 Zapartments are the way to go? No. , o; \$ [' L, _* U' a 6 j4 ^2 \1 b* {+ [ : |3 @* B3 a& _0 ?7 x- w' f

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the j6 u2 v# U4 }' a% x situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 0 D5 a6 ?2 M+ X4 \+ V2 N'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make: e$ b9 ]/ h: N4 l- ^2 \ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so* f' \! r2 l# x5 C- H9 { fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ Q& W/ n& _& R0 g' @- s+ e resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless2 M) t) t# a5 ^) v5 ]" K Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% Z" z4 S/ V# Y9 |# h8 Q; _ unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-11-26 07:57 , Processed in 0.128138 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部