服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6795|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 9 F4 [( f. g2 [% V% Rarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider' r0 a9 L/ Q5 H, _# a- t( Y0 ~ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"& f& x, K. a3 `( o) ~$ H city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.& _0 u2 ?0 r9 X2 B; ?. \* F5 n* D9 A According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' @' Y* Z" N, p$ |& j1 T 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 R5 q6 z: |8 Z% Z* m* E Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within & F" t* b, i8 h8 D. F; qhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among" s5 X1 C, F2 i+ ^ each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; y% T6 Y' z, N+ e( D' l, E and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is " P- G- K- C' D! g5 g! A' H0 vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are # g* X8 z" m6 y/ A4 Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and x x4 ?2 r. c7 j/ Q forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I$ u3 J( b! X# r% W+ [) F2 v- v was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 3 b0 ]- m$ o# E5 I; G2 timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) j/ g8 q; L3 u9 G! t4 e4 N" P and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong$ X! H4 i! p# w t' B1 s% w- F! e has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment * A% P! j: l9 C0 V7 Y# k6 S% eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 1 P( Y3 {. l% h/ o- Z. q9 H* ]9 Lno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) @7 V }3 Q3 d" @! A" ?* Z8 Oonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a- b* H! r' @4 O$ |) N0 H+ f0 i sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government - M) Y+ M8 a; s6 s, b# [want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & L g/ m: k) W. v7 r% q. e+ ]9 i: Mto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& Y$ d# H/ x' l" v- _9 T "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, & w$ _; {+ } g/ }this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are8 l( P( ]& v# _+ m: U still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 4 y, R* b- p( D7 Q' N"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make: x% V5 C# ~' w% a$ s, T4 p4 \/ {0 N3 [ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was - v# m+ g/ n% }( ~. ya beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a , E C3 X/ S% v7 i* M* ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across ^5 R7 @1 D" y- y6 ~ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 2 s' L2 F, [# E vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for \5 a t; t5 y development.

Hutongs4 f2 v& a% U/ P6 I in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 X5 B1 @. y m2 tthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) I, z) X$ I2 z/ Jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not% x9 B6 ^# o* j6 \* ~0 D' ` have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 1 A J3 N7 e; owill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs." U) l2 _, @- x3 e9 ]; f, s J- ?& q Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ! {5 N6 h6 _& ]7 xto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used % M2 I7 o! a- p) kto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 4 V6 i/ o0 p7 j# f8 W% [) }support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: u- W. c( q( ~- ~8 A4 D unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) r9 e8 n8 N* |9 n w live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, + d% Q1 s# U5 R2 B1 z( C: dhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ b6 v3 M5 A- B) G' _* G balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the . t# j, Z% r! r9 N! ]) V E5 k$ K( rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ H/ U9 d! i$ j4 f C) g5 ^ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / E$ I3 X+ k5 PMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 I$ A9 F4 W) B! Vpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be" U) _% C0 A. s, `) }3 ^: s+ t torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# a, B" P g' h3 U- o memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".0 l& v& {( ~3 c Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ) @" @1 u0 k9 Y5 yaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 _0 y8 L# l* S0 R' \6 Y non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ( c2 X0 f5 `; i: R7 x& ~/ f4 Uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* D4 Y# }+ _0 i% h ~: J Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those0 `3 Z+ b9 s7 W" x6 L people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they2 }7 \8 Q1 p; E; x2 |( Z may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 7 l$ n! J+ a( g% e( T1 Tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 h7 G/ k/ Z" n6 Z! o "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; r* U; k% F, x! D- ~! d$ e people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise & k$ s2 q! _- }$ W. k5 iapartments are the way to go? No. ! P! p7 ?1 m% _- N3 D9 I ? # n* I% N( U$ t ) S$ M1 s! |* f3 J! t, e

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the+ N Y: Z% W! I situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 Q% Z' ~9 e1 r2 c'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ' G* }' P! @7 J1 p8 Xno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& |7 F* _: x9 m( C& Q* g8 c, D fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ v% g8 d8 `/ O resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless+ g. c, ~6 V2 x$ d4 b Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is E, [6 `, I( g6 ^ D unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-21 20:42 , Processed in 0.115672 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部