UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its# k' r0 n0 n4 }- o3 @; W* r5 s# B
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider7 H$ I% f; N! e: @ |: {7 ]
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") i$ ~: ^% V$ O
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
9 f& V- ~8 b$ r5 a% xAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,; H+ }2 B1 H# T6 S4 S' X( R8 s9 ]
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of c. P( K! D5 Q1 a. D) G
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
' ]6 Y: j! x: ^& u) whutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
/ `! L: a: X% q. p" l* keach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
] M4 l i7 aand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 T+ f# r0 R! G" P! sharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
/ C/ \- C w6 ]# I% b0 }% Cdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and9 ^" e; K* t, R1 x
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I" D; S! h0 D5 t8 _* ~5 C
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
) m/ L+ S1 p9 u% g1 w! Wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
8 b6 _% ]- C, c, Y: ~& }and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
) H _1 [: K* S, Hhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
: A* r9 e8 i# {% Q; D% \of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
7 l$ H4 k9 H. q% K0 b, U. Jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are) q3 q& j5 x! u. x& I
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
) U3 f- C, S2 ^0 Asort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
9 L4 D$ Z2 N: N5 cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
, x. N5 ^" L! q ~' E: l" |( Y: Yto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
$ q. t' {$ H( ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,; s9 R3 U6 ~$ B' K
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 d8 H' G4 u: G& t& [0 l
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
& ^# d! a% O. m. H# \"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ ^ b9 x, b7 p& a) s! Q2 S c
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
+ M L+ P q: S d0 C2 na beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
0 D0 |/ l' D3 \9 c% ~parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
" K; ?4 j7 A% r: b) y5 u* {) ^: Ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
& s( R, N2 h$ T* u. K" ^2 B w8 r! Yimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
8 ?" e, x; M5 l) ^6 Odevelopment.
Hutongs
: z5 _* d2 U* }in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
- B: y# P0 A8 b$ R; `' a( Ithere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
+ S4 U* M- s+ ^! |& z- x( min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
4 }- x. E# `7 G2 [ }have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
) H0 U5 e- b) E2 d- [( Y) Rwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
; a$ Y- j! g3 N1 @Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
% o& c- ]4 n1 g3 x, U' x6 mto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
: K* B1 |; f2 U4 h+ e: _4 ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
$ I2 ]8 a6 d8 I, isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
3 t: t! m) j5 R6 ^0 G, r7 J1 M$ Vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to5 _, c2 R7 ]8 a0 N4 Q) K
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
c" v$ Q7 @1 A: vhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
9 D4 J- B0 {9 {4 R. |% ebalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
0 r7 z8 @! X( q+ V% V1 Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be" ^. J; x$ t) H v
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong3 S. U! c; ~# M. U
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
" d# F$ s& t* d" D! jpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
# c3 h7 O( t( Qtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
4 e0 J3 s) u% v8 K) rmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
2 N* l( D6 @, K5 |+ s% d8 D( rNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
" V. ~* s* u2 {( V/ ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 @9 \6 \+ g8 B7 `3 N
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image; \* X' \% X' K' [. @3 j6 h
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 ]4 p' E& C P! r
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those& e3 ^" M$ C' h# z( W" X
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they5 g% S. y+ a- ?. g: f- }
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
& D. s3 g0 y: G* U" }) cof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 B {- E, ?3 X9 h8 ~) z; P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
' X$ R: L8 ~ M2 @" X, e4 mpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise8 V" @/ ^: Q; s. O
apartments are the way to go? No.' ]- F9 z! P% ?. L( [8 N
+ A2 Y4 r" W0 \/ C" A( v3 ]
$ i, w; h; l2 N* p6 K
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
8 B! d9 X4 H9 @% T/ q( z' ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
4 k5 ]) G4 x2 F'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
( x" {' y: F" h5 d3 Q8 M' p: w# Zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
" f3 ~/ S; y9 g2 R3 e" l" g- Ufast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
) `" R1 i) U/ b. Y2 K+ ?" Eresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' {$ C9 d* D. e0 q
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is: Y1 s7 C/ O0 B& r! R
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|