服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6521|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 9 p* A4 `, y: n1 ]0 uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider D* W7 T4 F1 p l% ?, j Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ( F3 E% `2 I$ Z/ Bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 0 }7 X) C: F, r( n5 GAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 8 i" J, n/ F) P9 l3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of f Q. q- |4 x, r) z- D Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within / X+ y& l& c) c1 @hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 1 [: o4 R# Q1 _$ X# D* x5 M. Zeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera$ u& t6 @* Q: Z( y; ] and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is U3 j% P* n, }6 _" h harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are _8 b1 a4 V2 @% b2 \ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and0 E0 Q/ E; E7 p forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I* E, [# p7 D+ _" o3 b4 J was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 s* \9 v, e w# `& m" L impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 _+ q2 @' a B: u! v and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong & l/ X% q8 Z5 T$ b, ^/ J x; Chas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment: }8 m! p, T- D3 y7 T# K# \ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 n9 e+ K& [' |" c+ R/ Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are$ ?! M' t6 O. ?8 L2 z% @5 P4 M5 Y only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a : V7 T" i5 m2 }sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 |7 Y# b1 _( G8 u9 r/ h. W want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move& y/ C; L, g( j$ F to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& ]! W1 \6 W# h* i* a% O. G' G& L "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 ~# y {. j) p( w0 C this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are) Q' N: @ A$ R- G& E0 q still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to2 v# Y8 m: A" g5 J+ w "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& S6 Q. J& B6 k money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ O8 K9 q8 O# P& a$ J a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ v2 Y, D8 N+ o2 ^8 H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across * d7 d) d+ Q! r( h1 xthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural & R7 z% I. \) H+ k1 W6 p. iimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 6 i" K1 x0 B U/ _development.

Hutongs 3 q5 }1 u( u; s2 E1 W0 @in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ O* G: G D' q# y" l p/ p+ U4 F there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ U0 }* ~1 b' K7 e/ n' s in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not1 \# Y r [; n/ ^( ~' { have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you - H: m/ \7 V5 ~) i, g: pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.) S, G/ h2 e: {+ \$ R, ~ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; j* w2 o; { G! ~ to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ N1 p9 j: }9 C6 Y, M8 ~4 x( p to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 ]) [$ g: x; |% p1 b support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 7 D( h. f3 H5 E/ y: [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" s$ H4 G8 p; J: i! x live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ l( b7 B* L0 j hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the . I0 s0 h8 B U0 {6 h, W3 u7 ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 2 c4 z: S( ~+ ]8 T C1 Yproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be5 b2 I- S! I) f: [4 w b2 ~" m4 Y renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong0 b# w4 Q3 w. U2 n Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how( h) q( o! X) o1 Y4 E% z- a& J9 I people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be: e4 V+ R! C) B6 J torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 7 L4 f$ o! ] c' R3 Amemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". * x6 w+ }( q" A1 f, ~; UNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( T( W4 Z4 q H! ~2 U9 R aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially ) ^7 X8 H1 O' I) E( Lnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 2 j& f. R9 }7 D! j& f. Xof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these& I. W) S' @, T- r4 P1 x/ D Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 Q1 Q' C' a. D people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they# E6 ?( ^2 Z% i5 ]9 ^3 V may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 6 E2 u9 i1 p( D! T2 @% Hof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before+ }: E/ @& G$ q& H "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all& U) _2 b. \. ]. U( D people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise & K1 T, s7 ~# q7 ~: j% Eapartments are the way to go? No.. o- F0 U. q, M9 I: r( } 0 F) R& @! Y# W U! D v9 t 5 h+ _# F ?6 ?! l: i2 Y- g' L1 J3 m

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the & Q' O* l7 i1 |8 C9 [( j1 i) d0 vsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 5 r2 U: N8 C3 k# M# G; N! w( W, f, q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make" I2 G: E4 _9 h( r no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so# p7 m! i8 H2 U( |2 ] fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, W1 @, ~/ O: e resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) q3 w# Q# S8 D$ _0 cBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is5 O% H, e# F( X" K/ G unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-20 10:31 , Processed in 0.145762 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部