服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6774|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ! E2 w$ `/ O$ b. P3 Farchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 Q7 @$ H! N: d; }1 h1 S" a ?Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" , _& q7 i" R& G+ ucity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. $ X# I9 A: L# tAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,, K5 i5 i( M+ x+ j 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of n8 T. S1 p" o. g4 Z- i* b Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within( W: U* b, t# q' Q* ^ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among A# y: W3 c) \3 z each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera j$ s1 p, j' A; Z6 H and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is , k% A: P( U' v, V4 Wharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are . X4 c4 ~! a/ Q* U/ ]) X8 ddescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and * @# V/ F/ h/ {! c1 Iforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 7 d I3 ~7 d2 J! v1 T' Pwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 d/ J0 k& f( n: b4 @, I impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, * h! u. p* x2 c4 ~, ~* U9 Kand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong" w1 K9 r B% f) ? has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ( b. v2 `' ^) G9 J& _( Zof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that : f$ N0 N+ s/ Qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ! V7 W5 k! ~& m+ o7 qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a$ G" V4 Z+ w( k3 C- r1 H! a1 z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 7 \6 z# Y* I8 q1 I' Z, t) jwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 8 M6 R9 O6 B2 L) O; {to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is9 C2 | j2 Y* Z& V "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,9 N4 [) K0 v( g this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are + l1 n2 \0 l3 Zstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to# |2 p8 D' C( w$ @9 i, J5 J8 Q5 y5 L "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make7 H/ d. N7 y3 e5 F' {- s1 K money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was8 x( _- n% {8 ^& v5 d0 M, n3 H a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a) m$ s' a. Z% w8 @3 l parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 4 s( J/ p# R! ^ Sthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural + X: b" }# W2 Z) Z% H0 C% i z0 Pimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 2 r9 B% n: V' X& w; Q" Q; Idevelopment.

Hutongs+ o, Q/ J7 ~3 p. J* Q- ~ in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ @# x4 z: i3 r) Jthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 8 v, e5 t7 }4 h4 B1 nin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 1 ` i) { M. {+ lhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you7 t. V! S7 c) W0 f8 a; W- C1 Y will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. o" m" A% |0 C1 @# E$ XFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date , ~# K; A! D8 q# O% i- D: H7 i( yto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used : L- h$ f+ b$ l5 ~ S4 Yto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses' L; y/ A! h' \: q3 r+ [7 { support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically4 N/ b0 G! S2 S& S6 T. h- G4 T unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to % J' H7 I/ h2 ^; C" i& Q/ S U1 ^live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, L7 M" W4 l. d' S hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 2 W: P0 E. Y9 Rbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( } D% v1 y/ m- e" F: M, @project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be. `; ?- x- `$ J( n/ w) Y renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong2 h% J7 p V+ d3 l* I Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how6 l- G- K' [- d; V* G" ^- y( T+ T people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ; {3 [" q K8 T( Q) ~+ Ttorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 1 M# n L( A3 i, gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; p+ B% v0 D# q9 ^; }, v* K Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ( C6 ^) ^8 u( g2 Ialigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 P6 _) R( [3 X6 p+ X1 { non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image # n' }/ @0 K3 `+ Q& v. U4 s0 V" L Bof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 y. [3 k, |* u7 M/ S. Z4 YHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ! M# [8 A: E" npeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they/ W% s/ e# `( O7 d' N, X' s; Z may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some6 |4 m$ x4 U! H of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ' L4 w* F+ S# U8 q"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 5 ~7 k, [' O& U( q+ A+ opeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise A) t/ [% Y- S- ]& k/ G' Q$ X apartments are the way to go? No.! w9 E. L3 v( [; s6 W' x& T / c2 d: p3 w( o4 I4 H$ E 8 m E/ i2 n# s

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the / a4 | r4 F- F0 osituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this' A9 W. j0 C0 {) e8 F% j5 S 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make * R5 @; @/ G% Wno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 9 q1 w5 m" ]4 a6 k; efast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 1 B4 c& ~9 K1 K- q A6 Sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 M8 Z) T' b4 H( Z9 d0 p9 R$ f( VBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% }1 A* K7 B4 @! \' `. l unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-19 08:32 , Processed in 0.121806 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部