UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
7 n* S K7 [0 T& J5 [$ |5 p0 Larchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider# t" z# J: E5 Z0 M
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"4 R- G- J& f1 Q1 O) z2 A" T/ ]( a
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
7 p5 I2 d. t3 Z+ MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,, ]8 {7 R/ Y f/ v/ U2 ]) H
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of2 t; H5 q0 v3 h, @+ T
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within% O1 G5 F. \8 @8 s+ u) L
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among1 P$ e2 C( `' E
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; S6 [9 L4 Q( B: x9 f: ]: e# w4 I
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is, h' W ^0 C- e$ p' f* x) X
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are8 z, Z' v, ]# ]
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
; e1 b& n$ Y$ M) T4 U Hforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I9 F: O0 ?) p) Q6 X* E* b3 l9 G
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
2 E& E ^& {' E# s5 `0 \) T7 }' Vimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
. k; {! X* {1 V. S9 S+ X. ^and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong; J5 Z0 e5 h0 T4 x% k- E
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
8 z+ ^ t+ O. D' U' R7 V8 F& Cof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 I2 l4 I# ?" Y( O6 a
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
4 g4 c1 V$ t8 u3 v$ konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a" o e, l- h# I# t1 D
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
3 P: }# i$ l3 ]& r* S4 L+ Hwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: I% q4 Q8 L2 H: b6 E1 S1 u
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, y0 _) X; t: X5 _2 \
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
$ \7 m( z. [* @+ c- E8 Qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ X- n7 a! ^+ ?& T' l! ?# s: m
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to6 Y( o8 U' X9 w! @0 c9 u4 f0 }2 x
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
8 P( _) g/ }* B% X- i5 G7 a- bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
{! `$ r- u5 x( h2 Fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
4 }/ ?5 }6 g- d- @2 x+ f' |parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
: Q& ]$ T) m) M) J" G* nthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
& I5 P' p, @- v: c2 R; Vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 D0 Y$ J! ?2 A. D- z) q7 H V8 a/ ]
development.
Hutongs
$ `5 i# m4 K( K+ l% G( p5 Xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived, ]; y& R' q m% p
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions4 {; g4 c9 p% q/ n
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
" v* O; [, ~7 T3 K$ ?( n% P8 n- chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& o0 g# Z; a3 c$ s4 `% Z4 z! c
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
8 G( C C( w8 Q$ Z% G4 q7 `3 ^Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
" v) J/ R- _, K: n* mto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 u; T/ F9 T; S* [9 U, ^
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
$ v) b6 I& A. R+ x0 ~support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically6 r3 l2 m: V. o
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
. P( j z+ G/ J' P7 Q: d1 N) Plive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
! I; l- H: o- h; D; dhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
% I: m( \/ f8 i2 r/ x2 J. K0 b/ Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
- n; y+ S) b- F) sproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 H) w% \% W/ V9 _ N- E) C' g
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
" j! W( L4 h6 lMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how! |+ D- X- R3 m% B) U
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
- B+ {+ M2 y& v! ^; ]torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
$ P; [7 x' ?- L# ^7 @, c4 ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: U+ g" _2 u$ O
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
; B$ f/ j0 R, u8 F; W$ {aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
, {' U& \ y) @non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image! g) }2 N8 U7 w( T
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) z! i0 P! B- S9 N9 ^2 n: ?
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
# Q# ]7 C# `* z- Ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
0 Q# e" W# Z6 k4 o' S; m& C( U9 amay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( V9 P5 C$ J6 C
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before# i* [6 x3 |+ [4 Y1 L3 z
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
& H' K+ h6 Z+ n3 Speople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
. g8 h+ ^% b" p! ?0 N9 B8 O Aapartments are the way to go? No., q( ]1 ^/ n% Y
i7 b2 \- ]. ?' W( z
9 O; h3 W( W' c9 @9 {! \( [4 V6 U
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
% }% z1 G; h! I6 x6 `situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this3 C: M8 T; S% w% `$ P
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make- O5 T+ M. H3 B$ ^2 ^
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
( X" E6 ~9 p; ~: t0 ffast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant4 B8 x# [5 S& F" m" U
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless* A q8 ] N$ }/ E
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is u8 D; H4 y& c$ w+ `) ^' Z
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|