|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 5999|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ' Q! W( O0 [3 W3 q: ]! D9 F/ O) a: Narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. ?7 e" f; j* |% D$ Q: N5 F9 | Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"6 a }: |( k) l city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 H" F0 k: O2 o According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ! n: c2 a& ?! l4 q3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ K4 B8 C6 [' B I% i, i0 z Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within: V$ S% N- M3 P% G# a# R9 Q hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among' O9 u( d: f0 ^% [5 b, ^! W' X7 r each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera D; J/ y- q/ Zand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is x) F: M0 }1 h' y! W harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 9 _1 ^ s- m1 _, P* v9 Ldescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ' ~! b- N; C8 Mforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 9 q3 u1 {. P! i2 E! M/ cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great8 D! I8 M- W5 P1 M- e9 c \ impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, T, o) }) x3 q4 e2 | and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong $ O! Y7 g8 W ^5 q* uhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment0 m% R5 O+ r/ g( Q- ^4 O of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that $ H% J& A9 l$ y8 m0 zno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are$ f+ C! a4 F/ _8 @" }, T only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 7 j2 Z! d: X+ fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government7 \% h0 P! z" Q' m want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ) L0 \, l4 y. ~0 m m- H/ T0 ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 6 k: P7 j# d' Z) t( t9 L5 s- D"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, # B% K9 C9 Y2 H, c- K6 X& Ithis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' q* ~8 r7 M7 W8 k& O6 L still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ U6 Q0 O% ~9 K' r" `$ U "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 7 x* U# F7 \- omoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 9 s" c1 p: e/ Y1 S5 aa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 4 W$ V; h2 G+ ` k* n) }+ Aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 `6 H- {* h3 W' Z the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural6 {: Q5 ^* a0 f' M0 E }5 ^0 M importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 Y$ D, C8 v/ e( r# R1 |/ ` development.

Hutongs + X6 a' N8 N6 ~0 J+ v/ n+ sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived " b3 L0 D" v8 Q! m, gthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions - @5 k1 _) I% u, ~+ S. jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ R$ p7 a- N" e s have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you " u3 u1 ?; g# X, J0 v3 L5 cwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 5 p+ N3 }. h# `9 c6 N% q, FFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 4 R2 P7 c' l- \: _to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 y4 X3 j2 J# s5 j- @# n& n { ^ to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 m, J, z: f3 Q support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically9 e0 [8 h I' v5 P unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to % i0 p$ c. c; V3 X0 h5 u0 h Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, * ]1 `! f2 [/ }& {hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the + a" A8 `5 O' L* D0 |balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ' g. V( { \ \1 x% Hproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 W, l/ V1 q+ H: w; P; O$ M! D7 A9 hrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong1 N7 Q; v2 E7 `0 w+ F1 D Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ; L1 G/ V7 c6 Y9 z3 m& P c: Opeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be - Y( P; h$ p6 r& H( ]7 qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished9 e8 N( U! _' m memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".2 E( q/ C( i3 }- t2 j+ b Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are / C) i" ?' o3 Q* Xaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 6 z/ t/ D9 n+ L- q+ S& \) ~& Z1 C6 qnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ! V3 N1 o+ n( D2 m9 `# vof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ @7 E$ I/ M- [# i2 Y" C6 R' l Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those/ Q2 k1 `. d: c; h people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they , C+ Z- j Y2 {/ b/ [% _may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 2 l6 C/ y ^- y2 |6 Pof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 8 ]0 }8 z' U* i$ T* V I"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all / I8 Q/ v8 D2 D& J' W; w: cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ; |1 F& e% U; W" hapartments are the way to go? No. * N# E- Q1 {8 D8 ?5 F ) Q# [) F; i/ N! U 9 ~2 C3 C- R. C

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the' }7 ~+ S; V) t" F situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this + t% m: {# H1 o'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make! T- O7 f5 g4 H" q& k& D& |1 y+ B1 @* y no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so3 J: n u: ^. _7 f fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 t* e% j- H" Q# J' d resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 p6 o; C) h$ X5 H2 {" n- CBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is$ q9 l0 ? \( z3 \1 p unlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-7-9 15:58 , Processed in 1.142781 second(s), 6 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部