服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6654|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; R& \; i. s* j architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 7 D3 `/ V" O8 R) p; _0 GBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian". T6 t& W% ~+ l. R city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ) z0 j- k& |. oAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 2 R* U0 a; e7 C# V7 T, t3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of, G' Y! E$ O/ }9 C+ }. t0 s Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within6 K6 z) N( C, H$ `4 _ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( Y" e/ H: b4 e each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera- v8 F8 s& Y3 o8 [7 D+ [" v; U" [ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is # E6 z7 S) c1 y0 A/ ^5 [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ( b: P2 \9 ~! }/ K/ A+ hdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and9 H! `1 g9 c0 c9 ~6 G forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 7 t# s6 z) M) }1 I" ?) ]was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 5 p. e6 X9 s# e1 Kimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, - Q3 e" u4 |/ `+ W( Gand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 7 }" u7 m4 C$ V0 ^has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment$ U# M( \6 J" I( ^ Y w of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that ( ]7 ]/ F' h5 z6 t+ w9 bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are: H! r0 f2 n5 i0 ^# q only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& k3 f9 U5 K# N sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ( }+ f) w1 S$ X6 W* }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 5 J1 F G+ X* u4 P# \5 Fto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is* z" R8 f. P3 ^8 P "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' U2 c2 t; q$ _: l' q* S! P this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are % ?: `& h7 S8 u* t, B! }* b; w: P: Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 3 U- v- `- X4 r8 e"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 9 @/ x# ]! K7 n" C8 {" d1 m4 o- t/ zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 6 h4 V$ w4 E! C2 ua beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a `: F, p7 z; K. r0 r) Kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across+ d' p8 i' i$ E/ E9 L6 T: p3 m the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' f3 f, {$ n8 k' H. v) n importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for " B0 g# X# I+ A0 q0 Adevelopment.

Hutongs * S) L5 J/ l4 x/ Y0 G% _& cin the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ w- @5 m8 ?6 U1 s there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions. \8 `# b1 \" W3 V4 g: @+ @ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 3 Q9 u$ C, [+ h1 b5 yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you+ y# x' ?* m. O5 Q8 \ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 {. y" F7 `. }2 T Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date5 R1 w6 w& y7 O( I4 ]8 p to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used' M7 l2 s; `/ g2 s to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 5 e1 ^$ y: v' p5 M+ ~& v0 fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 3 o' V+ i+ q" |+ B: Y! Eunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ; B' d/ U4 G2 ?3 W3 U9 `/ T7 R: clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,7 `$ ?: f7 `9 k0 E2 N. C" C6 P6 D# H hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the " s2 o! n' Z* J6 n: Z: u3 c3 K1 ]balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ) [, c3 g2 A) V) Y5 Pproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be / l/ g9 X; z) |0 r; O' ^renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' k) t5 G% n. V. L Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 0 m9 `4 V2 r1 g6 j4 M4 @people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be , m" m* @ c% |& D0 f# |" `) qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# z q& c: m( B memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"." r, v$ k7 `5 _9 i& ]4 p. { Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 6 e c, |* Z) z( l7 p& n6 Ialigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, ~" c1 o2 `- o9 l) O non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image, e6 k- x! h) i- r$ h1 _" f of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ; m3 p; U* V0 j8 K$ f& ?Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those / T' i9 G' S: y; Upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they & @$ J% e8 u! e+ z) Vmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( d! k4 n, _* b+ b7 V of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before + J8 j3 i2 V* @, B1 D/ N"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all " Q* K. ^% t. c9 U* W! Cpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 o+ n( p5 P( [7 x apartments are the way to go? No. 9 {! [' i2 R3 T8 { 1 Y9 M* U. F5 j# m$ Z6 T# j / R0 Q$ D/ H! \- e0 y% [+ e

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the3 K9 M) ~# u3 @: K situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 k2 ~0 V# ~3 b$ v# J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ! x K. m% I) G4 g/ ^4 c Pno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so& C ^5 g4 s4 l6 ~% g5 U fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ L9 h. c# X' ^4 |$ W resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 1 K" J7 e4 Z( S$ oBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is$ w: k$ k1 |+ p& T9 g$ Y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-5 22:32 , Processed in 0.126380 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部