UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its* g$ l' D/ s3 {
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
. u3 Y L) e* K* D) I8 [, GBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
! l2 J2 C( E6 g: zcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
" t: t: I% e0 b' d0 rAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
7 |: [/ s* N% C1 p# C7 f9 n3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
+ J/ @( D h0 ^0 B* qManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within; H3 s8 I# m7 G- }2 c! X3 G
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
2 W( n l& v" ^: V3 @) V4 K( peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera7 C- G k* y9 [. c# Z3 [, P
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
5 @% m' F" f- |harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are, \1 ?9 k8 K7 {+ ^
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" G2 W+ v8 ^ J% O. N! {forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
. O4 F/ g* [! h" k( t! N5 f9 twas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
" {& p8 K# `/ ~2 f" C% G, Timpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
7 f. w7 n4 K; l8 j! yand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
: c5 P C2 T! a9 fhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
; j" R; `: H1 V# n$ E& R# e9 Eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
; J6 R& U' E4 nno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# }' Z" G! k; Z# B( [$ y
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a \) f# h6 ?1 u6 }' c2 O
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government: k* ^3 @, j1 t
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move. R/ D: V2 c; W: _7 B
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
* m' x1 x) ]! V* J0 f# t( c"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
8 r3 @$ [( c# X8 \' i* S! ]this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are; ?5 J9 d$ k4 Z: n1 Q
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to* f" g( H( N( G- Y J! U
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make8 e/ Q4 |8 n2 I9 x/ d
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was/ Y* k0 |# A1 V/ f7 L* ?
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
# i- w' L3 U0 t7 r$ \parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across6 ]3 H3 i% _, j" M8 X* _8 C/ W
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
& H6 F% \) k7 I" ~4 S7 G Eimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, L7 R1 w" G% c0 ~! W
development.
Hutongs
& a1 C4 k. C* A, p; win the old days were residential area where people actually lived
1 A+ Z1 G! \6 z7 x8 C7 ^0 l- pthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
, r/ V' {1 X- N4 P* ^- Y; R* Min hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
0 y8 s$ U H" J3 X: E6 bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
* V6 G/ A# Q2 P6 A" g# _will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
; |7 a* ?/ x8 F1 }- NFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( y. f+ F% f1 i0 C/ u. \$ _
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- g; F6 F$ {) H; [; z/ @& z' i
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
1 Z" c; {, n( g- e: Q$ b3 ^* g) Ysupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically) [7 r( t% u: j6 m9 S `
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to @# j, L2 S. I# z# W+ B/ k
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,% ?: w6 c3 |4 L9 V3 C
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the5 o( {; q; \9 t. ]6 m
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
1 r2 M, J% b; \8 N: p9 Y8 vproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- s0 F& H9 w7 A' k! e
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
' S) H: a/ `& K* B# b5 A+ ^Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how& C* t$ s! n" X5 Q" F0 p
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be5 W% ^# u" Q+ d" B- U& C# l y2 _# z$ d
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished0 d+ }; }( T ^4 a1 O8 X; [
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".9 J% `' a+ K' g* t9 g
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
. z0 Q( O @+ F+ R u6 galigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 v# b8 c3 }& t
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
4 c* p" ^ L. u& r, {. P8 fof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 F+ \# x8 ]( @
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
1 H6 S' ^! S% s, ?+ upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they* i+ u- R9 D4 B6 T
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
' ~9 K& C6 C/ a5 k7 vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
4 U& f7 ]" l+ P6 y- e2 y8 t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all. U# U% @, i. a) Y
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
$ Y) r3 J" J* E2 T3 V' v5 l; Gapartments are the way to go? No.
# D0 } w7 x% E& a) z2 ?8 t : ]# J% ~) L' ^( t) q5 a8 t; C
* o. u6 w2 h* C2 y: ?- b
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
2 Y. E1 }- W; Y8 F' a J' r) U/ Xsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& N1 X5 {# i; }7 [, A8 w# j
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
* F* o' Z/ {0 u M) O9 l% C3 Nno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so9 |0 \; Y0 q* p1 `/ P
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 O9 D& e J) Z0 \
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; P. P' S' [, n/ R; r
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
- A& e$ U" y4 F+ e; d& [3 g& Zunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|