UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its, L7 k! q$ y/ M7 ?
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider/ U0 L2 S8 A6 {; E. `$ ~, n: q! }
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"- k) [9 E* l$ _8 b: G& _! t0 E4 ~
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
% c' U- ^+ h* ~6 I/ ]/ [: EAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 K G6 Q9 w( K: C7 \+ y
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
L( \6 B% s- {Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
' ` C/ T4 j9 r3 n% E. {hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
$ R. \9 E; l/ X( Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
0 l$ @% E E* K/ g; G4 b+ U, iand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is' ?/ I2 w* O5 I" z
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are( m& ~+ Y1 R6 c: I, i, N2 G
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and/ a# j- B( ]& z# l( Q
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I# @& H$ _" q- _1 [9 A+ C/ C: [3 x
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
2 {2 u) N5 U' S9 E+ x/ Limpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 @8 s' Z! I& X3 I
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong& p& s5 Q7 T% G G4 } Y: ^9 f
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment$ c. u* I8 R( n
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that$ ~2 J7 Q% e0 B2 W
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are2 D5 p6 ?% _4 }0 H
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
& ]( R% q2 W2 k3 [& r( X4 ?2 ?sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
; y4 w2 P6 ^& g- ]( G% o- [2 b! B& K& gwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 A N4 H1 a! W& g
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
|8 `% l/ L& f5 z3 C"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
& q+ W% f# |/ y' d9 N* Q4 ~this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
0 I3 c8 T% c" f8 m$ t4 }3 qstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
% O5 @: J( j! d4 _; y W" a"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
; y$ n% Z) _8 V! k' Imoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
+ H7 u1 ?' ~4 O' C- G0 \a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
/ L2 `. B2 H$ O! _$ zparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across) C" R$ G5 T: @# p6 ~
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 ~/ ~ b' K6 M* O$ W
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for. D3 G- ^' @& R' a
development.
Hutongs5 |0 R) U4 D( z$ s5 P+ G7 ^
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 l! m" d& e' E- U! K7 k
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions3 |4 ]. Z* N% }
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
7 o0 j% E; F8 z" \have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you c$ n/ I$ v" J& N$ M
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.0 `- h7 b: p7 ~, j8 M* i
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
/ f( \: p6 ^) L/ Dto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
9 C- S6 \3 V/ G8 F0 y" U" g2 {to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
) U% j' r1 V6 fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
- k/ d- P. K( l6 zunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to" B- `3 J. }6 f* O$ L( p$ ?
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
- C8 G) i: p) n( phutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
" D: F* _) C& k$ r2 I0 Z" H2 Gbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the8 e/ d7 r, j" b* A
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be& o% V2 h! W% d5 r1 D
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong% U9 X7 A# `* {: |8 |
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how4 T( z( }8 P9 [- k$ c- E. h
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 C; D5 \+ {8 {2 X2 K& m4 s" Y
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished( H3 j# O: r. `+ c2 f
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
4 D8 P \7 V R! x* B* o1 |Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
) }7 _- p" O( G- C% Zaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially/ ?+ y& L- n: E! H
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
& G% d9 |/ m+ t9 H0 `of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
6 h' j0 n5 G7 E5 S* C+ sHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
" H, r' V# A( @( j! {6 Hpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
* q' ~/ f- M2 tmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' f9 @, G9 G/ E+ w
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
8 H0 \" c+ z2 h& ?: w# y"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all$ r S" }. ^- g, U+ l* o
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
I. ^* r6 l5 M8 n+ H% Napartments are the way to go? No.( N: u' T2 Y# S! E2 w
0 B% Z' u" ^- B5 g7 w6 f' d' G. ~
9 i% ]7 ^8 `) x, J
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the$ _$ ~# t8 {% B7 Q! p7 {
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
8 l7 T8 V* f+ a$ K+ n5 c'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
4 o. T+ R/ f. d5 l; ono money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so- w* C4 f! m( e! o9 R/ M
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant8 F! d& A: L! W$ i7 C8 F
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
6 Y+ ?: W/ L, g% H7 [Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
5 K P2 h+ B8 Runlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|