服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6770|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 4 |) N( h+ r1 o: f- uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ( b0 v8 Y' `- b! a- QBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" " Q# B- o7 N8 c; v# y$ F8 qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; s$ ]4 E3 T4 l) G$ `$ s According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 x( j; G; N# E D 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- [; P* o+ M- |) p Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within5 P, b/ X- k6 W. ] _# q hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 }% W- h- J- b! G1 h; M each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 4 K+ c( r6 K# d- X3 J" o1 [8 ?8 Band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: l1 S; `0 U) y( o6 E% N' q( C harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are , M& W2 ?! q6 T: Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and " L6 R, Y8 Y. X- }$ q; N0 r& gforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I . T; W p6 Z4 Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 e3 Y( R; _; \. ~6 i5 C4 yimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ) S$ V( s/ Q$ j. `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 \7 k7 L ?( p3 u has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 7 D# ^+ I4 a+ K& B& s: Kof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that % T% J1 x+ f& w- |* Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 6 Z% z. j" P! i0 D T$ ]! e! X+ qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a( v7 \+ ^2 R/ i( l0 B, K8 [ sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government, h' k1 _) ]2 a. B8 t. S want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move! Q+ }: ^, H) u6 i1 y to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is , e6 F* o7 q! b H"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- O N) ~6 g+ j G; z( k7 d this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' u$ F# Q8 J# Q+ W2 A still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ B7 N7 {$ i* ?& l "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make * l |6 k' G( y( A+ N. I- amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was$ e5 i$ h; G: M+ [3 A a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ v+ _- S6 x3 O% Y3 w( _4 i3 m parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across & w/ r( j) k/ v% h/ ^( athe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural0 g2 ~8 ?7 S/ J. Q importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, q+ b, o8 I" d development.

Hutongs ' j0 o: ^4 U3 ]# K( u/ {in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 9 V" h- N) j7 q( fthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) k% R6 A$ h: M' t- g/ E, iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! s* ]- ?5 |- {9 g: `# z have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you; ]% |1 z" s* U& `/ l3 r: S will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. " _7 b' y9 `: X$ o' q$ YFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 U6 t6 N- U5 j% H6 V to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used O5 ]" s1 O' I2 m7 }to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses; ~4 {0 {1 v8 M support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically J% O# G7 W7 U3 Z; w K$ }# w- D6 y unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 2 r j9 T! J1 ]: n' h2 X0 Glive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ) F6 ~/ `3 L" ?hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the( }& h# }* e3 T' w# Y& O balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the, P. A# T( h' L. i4 y7 G' q project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- H% f- P! q6 q# i% N* E# l renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ( }, l! p' B. L- D" UMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how* C2 l3 }% L8 u people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 v8 H4 H( @+ A6 L8 Dtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished7 z( U/ F; y c7 p4 M, m ~% c memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"./ g: Z4 h. P6 I6 K Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are & G( N9 i X. [; w9 K2 a) ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, U% {" ~- A2 n/ \0 w# f& e non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image : k! C! e; k) k' x7 h- dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) U$ r1 K. J2 g8 d4 ?: D" d. j Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 3 c' P) q* z3 h1 y! M9 v( Fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they " t7 V% B3 M4 ?: ?9 a8 X$ z/ Bmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 5 c5 \$ l" ` z( A1 |of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before . Z. @2 y9 Q6 z! z; }) A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all . A C7 Y2 A# N, epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise }- q) M! V7 W" uapartments are the way to go? No. % G+ B M& {3 A; \% r ( t, Y0 ?: l: I! t! N' z1 j9 ~ 7 Q" X3 e, L5 J/ W6 r3 J

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ; s& W: u% j) Osituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; p- ^: j* B! l7 `9 f 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make " u! G, z4 I- B& Y* V; mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 8 J9 R) E# ^) A. o( m% Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant( f) ~, X/ ^7 X6 @. A resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; G) `0 ~+ F* w% K9 x- q Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ! N5 I4 [4 W2 Z" W9 Z3 |1 S! x. Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-18 14:06 , Processed in 0.117509 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部