服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6708|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its. Y! Y2 j( X: x& ~# L5 q architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ( R; N/ m( R) G; c. Y' u jBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" * P! i8 g/ T. E) xcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. / c s+ S, c8 sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ' A, e; }% q. k5 z0 g7 v* H* I3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of `& W0 a/ {( @0 v& Y9 f6 K Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within }& Z; }0 M: c) ` hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among( g9 F1 s) G$ m# H1 z1 |& w" H5 e each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera" H( x1 S0 j7 I3 ?. \% v% T and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is6 w6 @0 Y' Z' \: c& m harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' G! \* H) Q! A+ Q9 H$ j5 s descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ; S! j5 e- h7 P. b$ mforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I) q# P6 h& W- h9 M. E3 V1 @ was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : C, H0 O. z) v/ M4 T. F8 U( iimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 0 [" L1 c% g0 G7 q* _( Oand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong # o0 Q+ C& g7 y8 h$ ?has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ' X! I1 ~! A) O4 i6 Z3 `4 ?9 v2 Wof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 J1 P( i1 v+ @: D+ _no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ( Q! [: R0 J3 Y" \! B. Q" Xonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a7 {4 b) `6 u/ n) x sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government2 Z8 d# n3 C$ ^9 A6 f) R want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 9 i6 C/ L( _& K. Kto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 4 J. ?5 d! O1 R) ^& ]2 K"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ( Y4 i1 p# d6 b9 {! I0 n& Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are* F1 B1 g3 q/ E/ i. I4 ~$ N still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to9 K! |+ X$ f. F' A+ V* f# H "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make8 M5 y3 b% Y: @: i& E money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ; X( U0 y. g1 b+ [a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a * c. s4 p! i0 ?3 g+ h, X# U6 uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 0 P k/ h1 b% J) kthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 5 J/ A! O; B8 `" \importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 8 E- G5 J& y7 D1 B' H6 r9 cdevelopment.

Hutongs3 i- I4 E/ _( c$ y. K2 s in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ n+ c! V( f; F. B+ k. ethere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- d- \+ e9 D. [ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not % S% z: I) N$ l$ xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 4 m) a9 j; Z& M; Qwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + g) L4 N3 i4 ^/ kFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date # N q( B5 M9 G3 Wto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 6 B5 }7 p5 P1 e% @& F5 {to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses5 [0 |# c! b% e support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically . ^3 j8 g2 m' b$ q( ]2 Uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ! `* V9 _ {1 d: k* G0 Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 8 v, {7 N( h, m& Z4 O# qhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the & l. `# N7 f. M+ tbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the& b3 }+ [7 f& X6 D- N$ A0 d project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 0 B7 W8 _# ]* W# y* M/ I4 t* C, C3 jrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong- ^$ |6 a% A% m8 M, |+ V Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how & s; ]! @# ^8 a6 Q2 hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ! U j8 }! _5 v/ v/ Storn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished1 e% U. K0 \0 \8 J1 p memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 7 P4 i& [; E6 b' sNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are( P6 i* X, ^$ b2 }: C aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially# {; _8 R, k9 S3 C/ Y9 v non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 o& c, i( P3 A$ \6 Z, ` of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 5 n; H0 L4 C+ W; e6 [+ F$ C* d! aHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those * {- x/ @. c$ i# G' Q$ Wpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 e$ T) X2 a. V. O, L Q may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some $ H |8 f* y/ L. H! Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before0 S+ b5 X3 m5 s: { "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 8 |2 W0 n( U) a4 P1 |+ e9 dpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 1 j, s8 R2 r% e# ?) ]apartments are the way to go? No. H9 M! Z/ ? j 7 w7 M3 q/ E3 n" `4 y; E 5 Q% \+ {: h" J* _

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the . T' R; b/ U$ n% E# |situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this# M5 k1 L* U4 F; F6 Z 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ) P; f: Z" w5 o& K( _" \: R5 [no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so+ d% P) X6 |; e8 K: T+ L fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : h! @8 P1 {: I1 T! _2 C- Bresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ) W1 W5 u- k+ F3 SBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* p* R6 N* B" r6 w unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-11 23:30 , Processed in 0.121180 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部