服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6611|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ W4 H8 S7 U: R. e architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider " d, s- K; A- ]Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 8 O2 S7 S' D! _" [1 U- ]/ ?city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 `2 R3 [ g) }8 ]; g; c' A8 t& v According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, : s) F3 I% J; `! P- N3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ! {1 J: n' R9 A) wManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 8 h, i! `* P' f. uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among/ h% a& o" I1 n; P3 Q4 @: M' U. U0 Z% m each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; Z Q8 ? Y; X8 h2 J: h( g4 L0 ? and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is : q x3 i+ A1 d$ N+ S" R [harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are * u" [5 K7 [5 N! h: odescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . R; \+ w/ A+ z9 h3 y) s! Gforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I. M9 g3 F% Z" l, {9 h was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 3 Q- z9 P, x) a8 T. qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 J) w) h; r$ d* [+ t& V% `% f and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong" c1 h: e) l1 e7 U* p: \& S6 f has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment + k# [# r7 M: b" c4 U; {of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that . d& s: s6 Z, ^" E: {! @" X0 jno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ P/ T4 h& ~: c" h# B6 M. B) c only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a x) |2 ?/ m( x( @5 l) t2 d sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government# g% Q& D+ @0 G$ Z0 e( P want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ; w# t+ x) X" ~3 vto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is( h5 H( j% I9 K" j: ]# [6 o0 q3 w "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ H. L: @& J& { this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are- M) _; D& L% r% z( o% ] still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ P: b2 z7 N+ p$ u1 f; ?% p5 H "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make$ X" J) @! z5 u% R+ \* \ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' E0 H# R" z& w. F) T% n a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a $ Q8 ]: [! p) H& x7 t. k3 Tparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across; d/ c+ _) r2 b S' U the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 U8 |. \7 I4 V' k7 \ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for& B. \) ?! O G: _* D0 s development.

Hutongs 7 W1 T, Z3 e1 x: uin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 7 Z) }% _ U3 `* W Z# _there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions8 f3 a$ V! u' n& o7 x in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not7 e, u# V8 v8 a have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 6 f+ o' f- U. k5 Lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 6 a3 u! x1 }/ k) ^Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, E- s& i* t0 N to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used * e1 n9 T7 V; K+ l. ~to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 C7 X- g# _6 r" V0 P0 J4 [3 [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically. Z" G, D" ?" }2 [/ B% [. ~ unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to $ G! A; C+ b; N" plive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,# j6 g: ?3 w, O4 r, Y5 u; {$ { hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the. i: h2 q* ]! o; l' l; b balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the " U8 j$ q0 ]9 _% ^3 Wproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 4 u/ U! _6 i+ F$ [- Q3 w* ?renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 6 R, j% r7 p, x# q. `" p- y$ ]6 ^) ?( iMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how9 s0 _) N; b7 L& Y people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be F" E* H$ G. E$ u0 f+ ?torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished : K8 v5 m! X4 T: u0 t8 Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 0 p3 `2 q+ \, A' j7 y2 y9 ~Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are# `1 Z" F3 b/ @/ m* \- t8 y aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially% _. Y+ M2 W; p! ` non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- S, H" y2 D- r, Y$ X: T of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these / A% _0 `/ A0 h3 T. NHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those# j9 u3 Q! L4 m5 R9 D people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they , H* }4 q! m! @/ Dmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ; c% T2 }/ Y2 T5 Wof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before - x; T E& ?! ]$ a0 z"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all : E4 Q/ z# d' Z# L5 M% G: A& o: m qpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise1 \4 n) j3 S0 Z1 _* g5 \. r4 l% w apartments are the way to go? No.6 @5 ?3 r' }3 v' X6 q 1 D& X {2 v, l1 V3 a/ s* L * ~% `+ \5 J* ^" ~8 n* m2 T$ m

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the6 X1 v6 ~# q# N- y. l: R0 b& @2 q situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( t: D/ u' Z. P'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ]% J2 E: d6 ]0 s no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 0 Y3 t+ V3 D% [* cfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant2 a, I' q( u4 D+ [4 u' M3 Y3 T$ C resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 0 Z/ u$ C- y( E5 EBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is) ]: R/ g+ [* d" q- {+ Y! v% m1 U! { unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-31 13:37 , Processed in 0.118953 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部