UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
( I. C: Y1 e0 }( z. iarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
0 A% } l# O7 T5 M1 I( _Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"1 E, S a& _9 v$ m: G" g
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.! q. v% D1 g; F" b1 c& U9 h
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,7 R8 v) E2 k0 r Y) x" e- |& [. ]$ B
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
+ |; u- V% ~3 X7 K$ z9 CManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within0 J& n5 _& i8 h
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
4 X+ M, [; \) [: U* r7 qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
5 S t! _0 Q# f. w5 v# O+ A# Sand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
% ^( l" r+ N% O( Vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
, o. b( _4 o; Kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! M; Z0 S6 W0 x+ s" M1 `
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
" ?7 D/ P5 F6 }1 e# `- Qwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
. k. n3 w$ B7 c! A2 |! b# \* Nimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
O3 l# A% g9 d" E; Tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
) ^; T% ~( K1 o4 X1 ~! Bhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
. [9 B2 t1 H3 c) Oof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
: E! X, \; ]% m0 Z5 h& `no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
- Z4 j7 @4 M7 M- q* Z& D; |only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a) @+ {& E$ ~; H" \9 p# K: a" i
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' X/ ~4 J1 i, C6 V( ^, G# I( y, r
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
0 ^( ?8 | ]: hto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
; w) K6 Z+ A( R4 ^! b6 v' Q" L! T/ L"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,8 `) u7 e! U" \9 K2 [
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
6 B- Z% [7 M$ D9 Wstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
+ G6 q! z5 _; g"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
2 n0 L& `! c5 k& A$ amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was- F! }& v A; j G, P3 i/ I
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a9 B: B' K$ h6 K
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
% N+ `2 _6 h; M% {! y5 U5 X3 pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
' @ _, R& K7 F4 C t7 S/ wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for1 l+ K }' [9 ^: M8 Y; e2 U! O
development.
Hutongs
% \- U( y/ [- qin the old days were residential area where people actually lived- w& ^) H& B2 x6 |) j, o
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions$ N; A+ x/ V9 @" T: v! t! l7 E
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not" B/ X! ~* ^' g
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you# c9 I) D& h1 H8 P
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
& G. P0 o S, O( Q8 d: j' I1 F+ cFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date6 H" k4 q. P+ D
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 I9 [) C" K w! X. s
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses" s0 k" |8 W0 ?! f* i
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
H# s: j, z9 t0 E6 [3 T/ Punfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
6 n4 ?3 j# `1 c9 F1 f2 P% [7 Slive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,1 \0 g2 f; ?: g' j5 l
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the2 j1 C+ P6 H$ p5 @2 h
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
* e% `0 s% M. N% w6 X _7 ~project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
& Z; D3 \; T9 v7 vrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 R) _; P- G' C7 ~, k/ O
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how! G3 e4 z* Q5 ~1 w- W
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be8 O" q" e* [. y. C) `- c
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
; c. V0 f& b/ ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
5 F) t8 X; f( i! ^' lNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
2 P- @3 c$ s+ Yaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
8 w( R3 g3 h# t3 Pnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image0 g6 b: A/ H: T# l
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these7 ?! U# R t- A! S
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those( r6 f/ q; J0 L- O: v0 b
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
S& k& E; R- `may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( g0 M% m0 ?( s4 A) @, ]3 `5 k2 v, ?
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before& d. C8 Q9 m3 d/ T4 P
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all; m% G# M, `4 c5 ]8 g
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
$ S7 `8 g1 e1 t3 e$ M0 Vapartments are the way to go? No.7 [9 H- N- H* m0 t [0 O
: }& m- ^( o: j" v- q# p* `, d" I, D: a
6 V+ t6 q9 _$ |2 I
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
. x4 T7 s" |5 {; C' jsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; d% a U6 a, Q9 [# {" N
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# Y( H) O0 w7 ^5 b8 e
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
2 e* Q0 J, L) l' [fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant9 x: \3 |2 r6 }. i. G! O% L
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless r: r$ b1 I g' F! T
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
0 p U `+ t0 [ v; Yunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|