服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6477|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its+ F; U( ~- Z; R2 q* `3 m: ~ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider3 I" U9 [ h" ?2 L& I- R1 J' m Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ; V- x c+ I) H; kcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 8 w. F" T+ B. c) b& ?According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, $ ]+ y) l- y; h3 _3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of : @5 n7 L( R1 |6 m" AManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within, x1 `. H0 ^2 b) Y1 k( U hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among# t4 `, R7 G9 s each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera / D0 E6 t4 \% e) V! mand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is" _% T7 @) o- `3 ]+ F+ r* ~ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are & p3 L( ^3 @6 x& W% edescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and * V: u3 t, G+ e& Vforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ' h4 P4 G+ k$ owas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great; V: ?/ H, F& Y! k( v impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, / a5 B! V# b1 l2 band we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong$ P E; v& I" |& G* Q& X$ K has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment4 ]" i5 D M4 h+ k; | T, _: T, y of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that: Y) _: p2 I. E; v6 m9 |. r no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 2 A; [7 w* Q' f( z {8 `% }only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 1 `. m% _3 j9 e, Esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government / I1 \) j" _/ w; m7 \/ swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move# ^% Q1 X# y& J2 Q to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is2 J# v# Z7 N( x" [: K- ]3 d "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 6 f- B C: }- jthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ( a3 ~" v3 z# i/ Y: C6 `still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to* X4 s; f. J& |$ O/ K1 h) a U o L "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ]7 ^: j' h( y money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was9 d6 j+ O1 \6 v' N+ E a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a) v( T7 d) E: r' U6 s! |/ { parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across& K; \$ Z7 o, k the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural/ f. T: Z; x' X9 W/ j% b6 H c0 f importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 2 r3 Q' r8 k2 Wdevelopment.

Hutongs- c9 u. s2 Z4 A& G6 D6 R3 x in the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 N" h2 Z$ i3 F! u/ P/ g there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 0 d6 v( |) Q% A( V" d8 K2 w, bin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not) o: H& y$ N! y. R/ g2 s+ v have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 f7 w- b# y ~5 B7 K0 f. S will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ' h$ ^5 {3 z( W7 ~5 [# \" LFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 9 T3 l' d# m) u9 U. ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ) h! Y! i! z1 M. u# {to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses . J1 U, e" X S e6 [; csupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically" [# `% q5 I' o* f9 {5 D1 s5 t unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) w2 O u6 c; C* {) O6 N live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 \2 S: l# g4 w( w& H1 W- Z hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the1 f8 v1 q: o3 u' X balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( n! o# g( z' q1 h- ]' r( Iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- z# u# j, m9 e% |! @$ x9 Z) x renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ) ^/ |9 j3 P6 s# L' i/ ?0 Z# _1 R) jMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 5 o# W. U" i! ` w& |people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% V; f, E" H3 R: f+ E! V& v: j torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished/ S9 V% Q6 x' f3 [* C memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".7 `8 v/ _2 _% H. W" J Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are+ x$ S5 R1 I' p3 g aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially. h6 k; I- K- [$ Q! V/ s non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image , H1 Z1 X) v) D. Tof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ' k6 L2 V& |. m( @Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those # s! G5 G4 B. k- C' W3 bpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they f, L) A, t" z X" ~ may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ) u G6 i& D# a: e5 t' rof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before$ ` `. `. e+ g$ b! N "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all! \; f9 f" }1 c6 c" s8 z people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ' T' z: {& ?# K8 G* }' Papartments are the way to go? No.3 e' n$ T5 V$ c 7 c6 P7 T/ t' l; c 8 E: y }& P' o. Y9 h% {

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the " F& T/ B# \6 `0 h9 x3 b" tsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this $ ]: g- U8 n' Q; X8 a% S- W2 A5 Z'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make+ o0 U1 ]) m# D) ~ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so' Z+ h* l Q) a fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' _5 ?6 k1 U( l( O" H. D. v9 Lresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 8 N& D1 I7 o1 R% HBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is# H# V7 O4 r4 F8 e; b7 k) B1 S unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-16 21:42 , Processed in 0.132325 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部