服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6401|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 5 r/ G: ?% }, narchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider1 u9 V9 k9 \% ]0 @ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 J& k& ~4 T/ X5 t+ F; i w7 B3 icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 A- ]# P: j2 }( ?* v According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,. E/ @+ A5 @6 V+ x. i 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 U& a1 c8 @$ e% p" h Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ! E5 q0 V1 J% f9 \" j' [hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 1 Z8 X$ D' V- J) q# Ueach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera% o2 z2 S; M# b1 {( y0 I and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 1 L& N) l' ?4 N) T/ X1 bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are8 D- W. t# e* s/ `3 d! y" f! a2 j/ B descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and : z+ M4 C' ?' n! i8 @0 n2 v+ Hforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ! D( t' y/ T6 `9 Y6 Cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 8 `, x8 f' Q+ S& M- u- W2 q% K5 Aimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) E$ H0 b. Y {3 D/ d and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong! |5 S# D3 M* v6 r, P$ f has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 F1 T/ N. h; ], P, W of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 4 {) p6 N, v. `9 i1 qno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 5 Q$ ~7 H [& ^only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a: W( S1 y+ g8 `6 Y: a+ d$ Z sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government7 `4 ?8 v! F1 C( L want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 8 g7 C) h" o/ T- C( g/ Ito the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, R% R. D5 n6 X! _& |; }5 S( z "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,' z) ]8 v6 u$ ^6 F! D this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are # v6 e& Q( O6 A9 bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to' J0 N6 `/ i6 _. \ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make+ a6 d1 n4 e6 k$ S3 U money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was9 r o# l2 h5 P L a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a : W2 s1 b' B- R) aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across) }7 ]0 m" _- l the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural - V6 Q. Y* n" s6 uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 5 e6 p7 f& e' W4 I0 j2 Adevelopment.

Hutongs 9 A6 A$ @6 p3 k- Min the old days were residential area where people actually lived" z2 C4 O$ f/ w3 q7 d. C there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions, |4 g; S' K+ j6 G0 G2 t! v in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not- b! l" g6 X) u have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you # F9 i+ g' ?% O1 l' E' ^' l; Uwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 7 m! O/ y6 o& g0 a) i+ HFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date " Y( k3 S% p2 X ?7 |8 \to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 @5 Y# P" G3 D! U$ W( W to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses) t: g7 N! z3 F: f. B) _ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : Z5 Y! y s2 e' Nunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) G4 Y8 d" Y3 Y3 j+ G2 ^9 S live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, * f5 [) z1 P/ O) k% F. q4 Shutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the6 K( M6 G1 Q9 k9 ~8 b3 x( k6 i# a1 d balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( A! t" ?' u0 F, b. P: m& Nproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be& j1 h( X% s1 i& R renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong( j% c# T M* L0 c6 B3 z; h Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how8 ~7 b3 C* {2 G* u8 i& {1 n* N" e$ `* l people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ( _4 E7 l" p# Y# Dtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished) }/ k* l. Z5 k# ?# I N, N% f memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". + G# R8 J2 Y/ {# v; u- P, p: JNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are# H8 y5 x+ j( P8 o aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially % R* X5 k( @% m" T5 }non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image) i- D0 l5 B; [) u+ Q$ R of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these, H# V! o- S' C, J Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those5 C' l4 M# r8 J- }! l8 M9 O people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ; _2 x' w& J6 t1 n$ imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some! I) Q- r) B' y: O: l$ @; Z of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ; t1 v& ?0 p6 H; ~" A. t"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% E% G8 @/ @9 U" _/ W' u% u& s' [ people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise; u' C* \3 ]6 S7 x apartments are the way to go? No.8 `2 H7 X2 h0 D & c0 n+ k( }2 V5 B4 l# @* q/ L- Y0 I* ^ / Y* C4 F) p$ S0 V2 d( M

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 4 U: X, u: d& u# Q8 n9 a# csituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this3 d4 \! l0 y: M7 \) M: m3 e 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make * h# e5 |' t0 w, i2 e# D( Ono money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 6 H+ h& k$ i9 @* _$ Q J( Vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant" v" ~, _0 @( Y1 d) U2 k& k resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless & J2 h z6 r1 y: z* n6 H: d5 h! t( BBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is R$ u* w0 l$ H/ V; G* Funlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-12 04:10 , Processed in 0.118366 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部