服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6526|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its ' C9 | h" U# warchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider % C" O* t* x# z8 M+ dBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 1 e( z/ c# ^% U l' ]city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.8 D9 U1 L# I2 N2 @( z% g9 Q, M8 Z According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, \7 x" f) I4 |% v g3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of# l) r+ a+ g- K2 C a Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within . L6 }3 y( S( y/ s4 Ahutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among6 V! a9 E, E: |( m each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera . ?8 r! b9 B8 z5 cand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is% q) d, M! C( j harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are$ q. V* ~7 H: P+ I* d descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and! s$ u* ]$ S+ p7 P6 X. t' H forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % p! q# M: m9 ]7 L2 U. R Bwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great ' R! K! ?' b9 ^' H& y+ [8 ?& O' dimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, j s# ^, u% }5 u, o and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 4 w2 ]1 G' [5 q5 Fhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment6 Z8 l, N8 [8 X6 X( t of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that " \6 ~: y, }4 j C: O1 x$ Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# x$ f! i; l7 Q4 e% @0 U2 L. a only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ! f+ L8 D5 e& ^sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government' K+ ^7 f2 T2 A# | want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move1 B; W: m( s, |, @% f8 D0 Y to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is6 S" W4 A3 J X7 z, U7 D( L "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 f+ Y }( X8 }! E: a0 u/ Z this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are/ K9 C- t: W# v3 k still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to - j8 [6 N# p# a9 E$ S5 s0 _"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make* s; I" \- I) P/ _& x money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was $ h/ C( a& `; }. M. c9 K! za beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# u3 u5 b4 `/ h) B parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across6 ^5 H. m3 u' c% m; Y the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural. I7 _% Z. Y# B+ T9 w importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 7 C" N. Y3 K) zdevelopment.

Hutongs' [1 v# U2 H% l0 n6 ` in the old days were residential area where people actually lived$ w" [$ [" A3 _# {* C( j" j there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 6 J8 l: n4 U7 gin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not% _7 J! Z, K0 G% H- j( Z% x1 n have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you / R. E H. J9 T! ewill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. o$ o7 g6 N( h9 s! T. HFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 1 @/ ~4 c* i$ `' x" w# P3 y4 kto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 8 i* R, U0 R5 \8 n4 G \' Lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 L0 c: D2 v4 a. F* K4 Z support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically : G' @& x @* ?7 A9 Ounfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to . G! Q. l& F1 s/ M2 i, G" n0 Alive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 9 V6 c) M! m4 e8 }; t. c$ lhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the% A L8 o$ I4 Q balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the9 [) O/ C0 Z T2 b project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be + P9 r) P7 R v" {2 O7 o8 r9 @1 Lrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong . B) n; R! C" ]+ jMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how % y+ J* k2 p7 D6 c4 g, @6 |5 bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 3 f3 p4 C3 i% `) T* ktorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 3 d9 |1 n8 x8 ^$ ?memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". B# b2 R1 }0 g! f% t1 t1 C Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are : H+ ~8 y2 R( oaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 D9 w; U+ W8 i- q) S( L5 D; E non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 0 d2 u- B9 s8 k/ U* v6 t: |of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 W' q9 \# @8 r" P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ! `& v) _' h: U$ C0 T3 {, s0 Ypeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they# D6 g! \% I; j6 ?* v# R; S. z' m may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some ( p& F# ~+ B! T9 Tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before& v! l- a: P0 g* M" g5 J "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all # q" F) h# m1 X) o9 ]" {# i: ?people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise " _: ~% j0 u. H C, Wapartments are the way to go? No.1 ~" D4 Z D+ u9 `' s5 c " B! d i- B: K; T0 G, g; L - N% C" \: Q( f

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the( R" ]* [4 H* ` situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this* k* W7 B4 P" b6 \( | 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make . P! V# C( }5 V( @1 @1 w3 [no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so8 L# L2 Z0 [8 m* O% F8 q fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ' g1 {+ _/ C( m& R0 i+ @resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless5 p4 c, u' B1 O, Q/ l' q4 Q. m Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ( R& f n9 c) q; e9 uunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:41 , Processed in 0.118536 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部