服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6587|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its$ ^1 |, \# s2 v architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 0 f" Z9 D! T% l0 A f# o3 m6 ^Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 0 ^+ W+ W8 p4 p( Bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.: w b5 M3 h% g0 p5 }, L8 { According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, , N% d+ m0 N" g* v9 v; Y4 V3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of / P. H3 P, q9 u/ F. w. QManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within/ j' j8 ?% [, ? I1 j hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ) N6 G/ l- \& ueach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera ' _) X2 ]/ B& f% ^! Oand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 8 B" J+ z# k3 q5 w) `( M- Oharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are7 f- n7 D2 Z) ~ K3 \3 V descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 4 j- G- F M. Bforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I) a: E3 Y) @& [6 g. l was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 0 a% b& s+ w$ Z T% Mimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,5 P. e1 v) K- j/ E$ E- }; N4 P# [ and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong % U: `8 B' ~8 n$ h- Whas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment2 }# ?+ ?7 j; d( P0 I; Q4 R! u of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 0 Y5 \& }$ f" Z7 |- P4 l% s/ ano hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ A+ c% d' B( H% S8 M only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " j+ F7 W* b9 [' ?3 `# Esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government m+ q& n/ V- W3 a2 l) D& C# a9 P want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move5 J+ U3 W: O* P( ?/ f0 @ to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 5 z8 c5 e+ K/ J/ F! Y: H5 {"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 o" G$ ?# l1 A7 ?5 s this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are7 x2 |% [( o+ i6 N/ a# H6 u2 _' m still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to( ]. f# S5 j) U "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make $ ~8 e8 R8 x$ `, D; Y0 E# j( {money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: K# b/ G# ]- d1 \& |- U+ K2 g a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 5 k. t8 @8 U- B6 _* gparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across# X8 h* s0 S w5 R7 \2 ~ the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ' ]6 g4 O6 q& Z2 e# b9 cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for - i) y U" {& C- r! o- r# O: r' h7 Mdevelopment.

Hutongs 9 { E( q, K' B" b1 K; B# ~5 Jin the old days were residential area where people actually lived3 I, Z, ^! I! _! j# R. ~ there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions * r/ H; W% F! A' Din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not . H5 P+ B( r& ahave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you : b; G' F( e5 b! f. N1 hwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 9 d3 T6 t! X' \9 X6 [$ f5 K1 S+ i8 w6 aFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date& V; B% a2 r/ V' a$ a to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used ! v3 B1 j0 K$ S( M0 n! ^, j" Ito hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses . f+ B. k+ h1 n( B+ Psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically Z8 B' L3 w9 w D; t& a ?unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 d# W5 B j! J- C0 I! Q# O- n8 z7 d live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 1 q, q# f5 t% X. r- E; V/ U4 Zhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 0 a6 Y4 ]4 P2 z1 j$ {' Fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the + ]+ ~5 m* Y0 k2 bproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 8 I* u- [# r" E Trenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong) w6 W' [8 I$ V; M) m$ f Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how5 l" G5 M; x, y8 @% U; d people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be & j8 J/ L. h7 q- g5 Ftorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished & [) @! ?- r4 y9 j( r2 t7 b M3 Vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". $ b& T) O, ]. T, qNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are. Q, M1 b2 O) E4 R/ q3 q8 N$ O) c5 ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially " r: m; ?, |4 j* r9 l1 knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image ' x! q2 }+ \. W$ Z* Mof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ G1 h( y6 y8 q* L# { Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 3 M& V$ r% G. v: _people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they, \/ e. C2 q" m" a* x may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 4 v3 }1 l0 C, W9 eof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 3 X8 f+ _. X+ ~- d* H"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all & x$ H# h! J0 c" C% q0 F" k! L) C4 apeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ' o6 L! V8 Y+ r0 S6 @$ Sapartments are the way to go? No. " v* b+ T* P0 c8 ~$ x5 N, x6 ~# m$ c - Q5 n$ v% u( }: b* D3 ]; q3 k & }/ R; Z$ D3 ]! F% I

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the* Z1 ?% M! t6 ] situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this # z; }! I8 G. g9 `* `: H. @! s'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 7 F" P/ x' ]& t& l/ [2 A \3 Fno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so # S( ~* P5 Z9 j) p7 I( tfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 3 \3 c3 o! ]5 Q. T% ^' sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless3 U7 Y8 R1 n% V6 Z Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is+ X$ ~. H2 O [- | unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-29 01:37 , Processed in 0.127655 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部