服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6577|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its2 ~( W* Y+ E- h9 O$ f9 o9 u. B architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider: y# A! S& S3 ]! e Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ; X( L0 Y' `) V4 D, `city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 6 K# ?: z. t' R) a& H, VAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,& z0 G* P1 P( S0 e# q 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of * D6 x. V- E/ u0 S- {! T7 RManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within+ |# R m5 f6 Y+ j hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among6 G: t8 z* p+ h5 o: Y each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 {) o$ L$ r: x4 v0 L8 u; k1 C and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is |0 A# Y% T( _+ O3 q harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are2 ]8 P2 l: o* V/ `" o" e& Z descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and . Y4 Y( t) r( `& U, }forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 7 d$ d0 t: @) V7 `5 g Xwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great I' A7 K) k' A1 G9 g: t/ A5 @4 wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, " X, I. {5 B# A6 Q% I# Sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong+ S6 `! y/ i( f2 M* S$ s& f; u; S has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment % S. |0 X& R$ w" |$ Q' e$ u5 ?7 @# ]: ^of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that/ `& ~5 _- `" K* K) T* I no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ) |" c) W7 z- U6 U( {only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 1 Y% A* B% L P, ?5 i6 `5 Lsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 H; V( U6 j7 E% O8 L- X2 { want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 0 K7 \0 ?3 J3 N* ~" Rto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 7 i- k& c9 R/ D. w; E"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,1 h3 j- P$ w6 c0 K this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 9 Z4 `7 l& d6 D# `0 ^, \2 xstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to : E4 ~9 G0 N7 k8 ^0 s! c"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make- N, H9 t5 i. o. \ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was1 _4 K5 u2 s ?2 m1 B a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a9 ]+ P6 o& D! `: t9 R! D! P parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % G) H4 F$ H/ M3 G& H" Y2 {& F6 uthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 7 d' ] d/ J& b6 iimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for* I# ^. Z) `3 @/ m B development.

Hutongs : I: q! L: ?9 G h7 qin the old days were residential area where people actually lived+ ]) Y8 a& m, H; m there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + Z# T% \. m- u* P |in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 8 @- @' Y- q5 V; |" N' d6 Chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 k7 Q7 `7 y" l; B, M1 `$ N% k will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. & C# K( F: ]8 Y9 ^- bFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( C; \; q9 f; \6 y: R+ P to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used/ t" N# Z+ m% g }; b8 Z/ f5 ^2 F to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses+ V+ u0 |/ e+ k; F support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically# V4 `+ n, p) n7 V3 T g3 u& ~+ D unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to) {: S# U6 `& p3 p( c3 [( Q live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,0 y1 |) D7 z3 l: F4 E! [ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the- \5 z* M. K$ h' a z2 _ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the $ C& X! @" Y2 B# j8 }project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be+ E* p" k9 C! K9 f% A renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong % h# S( E; O+ ?& j" JMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how % Z8 R# Q5 @. q; fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ; g% ~9 o- m# p$ ~* r, Mtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 4 x" A, z* k0 h8 f9 ^- B. o* o/ Imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".: K* q3 ?* T4 G( J u Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are7 c% p9 x9 ~: g% h2 z1 u* } aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially + b* h$ M3 s' d4 fnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image( ?- Z9 G8 V8 U% u* J of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these1 a9 j3 V9 M {0 P Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those , T3 ]6 ?1 A( N6 E( jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they / N. a) w% h9 [1 V: R0 Gmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some4 i% e4 B: p/ y" p# k of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 6 L3 [% l/ q. E2 v q$ S g"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 5 I: l' u% ]" gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise ; i; W; p- w2 X) F" n+ japartments are the way to go? No. ) `6 L6 w0 \7 C) ]/ E' t 3 b4 Q, i2 g* `2 [. r; u) T5 j _* g% z* w8 C$ c* q- P/ c/ J

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ) K6 H8 e; C3 N e+ D9 N3 Z( fsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this ( j- [% b8 l1 [4 l' j* j' ?! v1 s'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make - r6 f+ j7 } w6 ?$ c q# dno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so $ `0 T2 C& d- \% B" @" o" ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, v W6 K1 g# k) B resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless7 ?1 _) m' o% T$ [8 u1 q Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is) Q4 |, j' @2 O unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-27 22:44 , Processed in 0.153224 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部