服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6388|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its2 R0 B- {; V0 I Q- c0 _- W architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 c' I8 i' [7 U5 g Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" , p9 b/ @2 A8 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.$ X7 R6 t3 q7 T! u3 V According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 1 c, i8 a. {/ d( u" j3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of5 {0 [; v' B1 n8 q6 W* F% O( |5 V. _ Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within% x' W7 D/ A. r! ~( N7 } hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among % c4 h K5 o- y/ @0 B1 ]: Qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & t+ f+ u3 s. r% s4 l2 eand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ `9 c7 R% C9 K* A harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are - Q( k3 q. B4 p" I' k6 B# Hdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, E! g/ C% a' r% C forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I + z s" p/ Q! Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great) D1 b I9 V( I/ d, a) w7 S1 A impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 1 k" w; d( w: W: l9 L1 Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, p; e8 W/ i. A6 J9 \ X has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment* `# a7 c/ }8 H of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that - ~( x, h) R, w$ {9 b0 Y4 Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# k+ F" q; _7 m" b8 a+ J5 h only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a . w6 t5 c% r( x$ vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government2 v* Y, ~" K0 j% T* ~5 H want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 1 D9 j9 B: {: T, X% Qto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 7 k9 M C5 d4 s' Z* X9 B"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 `9 p4 r q) V this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are + M+ r) U( Z9 ^; C a( estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 8 c3 K% C% v. ^7 a- G: ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 5 E: e! u1 s' B' [2 W0 Hmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, U7 R$ ~) `, X: V8 p, i a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ( @/ e! n) X& y, Mparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across ! R7 f0 }3 {/ h5 ]8 q$ V. j) hthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural : \$ j8 l; i% L$ ?8 wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 m& R0 A. [6 D9 k$ p1 L* Q) \ development.

Hutongs) H7 G8 D# e D+ m: D) n, s: ] in the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 V# @( W8 W; o7 E there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions : W( l+ \& B8 w* a9 z: ?in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not , l7 g1 ]0 M: Chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you 4 i' G! c4 R" ^5 v3 b8 G. |will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. - H |. B# L, p# t1 b* iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 6 i1 O% c; o' e9 k Z3 S& q9 jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used% t& |2 D0 }$ ? to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 e2 _3 z0 J; o9 b# q support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; r: H' [# S) V* V2 C: q/ a unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to , ]0 z. a0 J: J6 T. ]" B- blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, $ d+ S+ h2 F8 {! ] y' G5 yhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 0 B: E1 G S, @& r+ r3 Xbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the ( l' e0 l+ P" ]+ B$ Dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be* l' r5 a' O, R, t renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong ' N( q9 j/ {' V+ N+ d6 |Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' ~- x6 C! Q! L2 s7 i4 M- q- l& hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be! @, b/ C$ A/ r* f- h torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished- Y; [7 s! o5 X" W* o# Z memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- t: e3 W( {" b* Q1 Z' O& q Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 j2 ~# ] q7 B5 U8 ?) z Y1 D4 I O aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially& X; Z- w. S/ E2 e( N" H non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 C8 e! z: o. l/ V p5 M of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these # }& |2 z [2 x( Y! D! g$ CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 8 Q+ {9 o0 w) U7 Upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 1 z: V2 F! E& i# umay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some . q% p* s F7 Q6 {. aof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ) x }' e% F% v. z"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% B& S8 O+ J$ | people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 0 E4 V, F: Y5 f# z; p1 a2 ~apartments are the way to go? No. 1 w2 H \! e' {' Z# j2 v e * q- t2 }- `2 D & `( D' ?4 @1 U

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the $ p) E1 H2 ?, g1 dsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this / W0 o& P1 k9 f0 K& \+ z+ J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make - d2 n: R3 e1 m3 @# Q8 Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so , _6 s$ ~% P+ u" f3 @$ [7 ]$ Xfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ]0 k: g6 @' e z3 Qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( Y0 V s, X& O Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ [7 }' Y7 f2 f, j; O. V; Sunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-10 11:03 , Processed in 0.125147 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部