服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6833|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its/ V& Z# Z6 i: q5 a) ]7 ] w1 ~ architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- [; |+ m$ H) f Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* K2 V4 l8 W4 k8 k) `% D. J city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 5 X M. \9 ?3 jAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 t7 ~$ [' e2 \% _ h6 y 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of" o7 {, S8 {0 H" [( l& ?+ x Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ' h" ]3 f) ]& ohutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among6 ^* B V. C5 N each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & W, ^ J8 t4 k3 T. J- L9 ~- w& _# Fand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: z/ a0 p# g" [* m) n z1 z: R harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ( c( y- A; o7 r0 }" x+ p6 B( @descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and # {" u2 E" d$ f3 }& qforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I y' s! K+ J* u& `" I was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great # O% ?8 Z/ \/ o; B- A5 K% oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,; D6 H8 o. R8 n and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong # z* R# y1 a2 u, [has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment6 L- w% L* n7 M j3 R of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that6 G' f8 n: [7 Y- b4 _$ { no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are * s4 W! z) d; w% h. F0 Lonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a3 J% Z, b1 B: ?; p& b8 U1 B sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government. a. d4 `) K* P2 P) { want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move* V; H! i9 {6 D V5 e7 C; Z; K to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 r, L! v" p: H+ S& T n$ }& A* T"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, : {8 w/ ~$ C8 {0 Athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ y# Z( q! I# M$ y7 I8 M* h still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ e/ g: K8 i, A1 l& A "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make # x0 V% i; F1 p$ ^money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was " N" E0 q" u$ D( Q& e; j$ _. Ba beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 3 e% A# R, D& q- s! w$ k+ P" @: Aparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 6 [4 |8 I5 }4 c/ m/ ythe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 9 p; l. v# s, x( i+ Dimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 0 p% o; v0 a/ n# R9 h2 ~* C$ Z3 Bdevelopment.

Hutongs+ N6 L: |* l U" w9 G3 m7 C: H in the old days were residential area where people actually lived9 n: a/ C: f! s! x1 W6 I; b+ p there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions7 S" |1 |( u) d- @7 `( ~3 P in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 3 L6 w( ~! f- C4 s1 ?: Rhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you/ a7 M% x3 I! X6 G will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. I9 R- A- a0 r& J, AFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 6 K% e& }: v( ]; nto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 2 U* |8 S' K9 o0 l- W' C7 k1 oto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses ) n2 e: S/ ^* G7 x* Osupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 8 ^8 j( K$ s3 |% munfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to3 B- Z* A* @, ~, a' B8 U live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & m, W( Y2 ?( p, n+ ahutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 6 O/ o6 b2 X4 a; c0 H" w5 g' Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the. m; U* P/ M6 f+ t0 g B* v* v project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be; ^- o' }& \2 h% b3 c- {8 d: d renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / S6 ]% x: V7 ]" S& y" eMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) d8 o/ x _. i" Z8 o5 {# m" h4 j people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 F; i/ ~$ u; X4 { torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ( B x+ a! s; [8 r3 i8 Fmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".* y/ ] ~* q; f, q6 o8 n# s# M+ p Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are$ d7 K x" `, S2 M) B aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially7 C+ N4 c3 T1 \ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image2 F( w* A" u" ^$ d9 {5 w1 r8 ?' P of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these # u4 w1 m. H6 I& T, a/ mHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 0 l& M4 B" D; ]* Z' ~people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they: H+ \& b$ Y& e! ]! s may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some2 e$ E# I4 u! W: u. M, L, U of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 7 E1 L) M2 ^3 |/ f; {"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ) r. A J: e- h) a0 |! \people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise# u2 E8 D% i+ O" B apartments are the way to go? No.0 G; n) d, i, K$ ~/ x, f ! ^ m5 l* R4 M1 z6 ]1 c2 L& o! Z % P- A$ s. P8 ]; r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the/ Q5 `: b: k% a, F" Z situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this6 g" t: _. E3 t& H6 P0 { 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ' _9 ?; v5 ~+ Dno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so; @; n* R% O8 p& ]. ^0 m fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant% m( B2 {$ i* s% `1 @ resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless # L1 b( k$ R* H; Q [8 X! H7 QBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is8 l* r8 a N% k& ^2 D unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-25 04:50 , Processed in 0.113697 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部