UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
' Y* |, S. {0 V7 darchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider, }4 X$ f0 t1 n" t/ P# b
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
3 |+ e3 i: @- `" I( U- tcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 ]8 |+ B6 T* t8 b3 k9 a
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,( Q L4 J# D$ A, h: A% B9 q2 p
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- t- V3 Q0 t: i3 g9 ^
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
- a+ ?4 @( r; ]& Phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
. I+ M6 B1 V: Feach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
5 Z2 h* ? ?' k4 e* K* {and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
* Q+ g/ F% X. B& A: t4 Z- zharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
8 H& r- D& \* s1 p! @5 G. ^( K! r( c' sdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
B& I' e3 d$ M& N/ kforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I% e. s* N6 h# B6 N- Y
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great1 u9 W3 N/ Q* ?, t! r
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& d. T# q( r5 y* O. c$ k
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong8 C1 d# M& ]) y. J' y! D
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment, m7 Y7 e, `! u8 \9 ?7 b
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
2 B: _) M8 O* \no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
9 u7 i% y5 T8 j6 p1 N2 |) v$ eonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a, Q! g3 e7 ]& X; a8 y; [/ K
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government9 c+ i; y1 W8 R6 h
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move% w2 E$ \9 t1 p7 A
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
6 K' W/ m* j0 n+ o/ r6 M( S"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ t0 f. F1 z. ~) z! I# r( j! |) z
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
/ a( @: P: e2 D& ~2 }still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
& d2 q$ F( T9 J* T/ X"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
3 O+ t! J4 E, r' K i5 I( zmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
; ?( D) ^! W7 T. Ca beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
3 U% r' Y! r, M& @' Z* x3 O0 l4 } uparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
! k" G B# F) N! N9 u# T6 V7 F9 Athe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
- A7 u4 |( _9 C) vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
, t8 b w3 G, R4 d/ G4 Ddevelopment.
Hutongs% Z4 f- X* F a- u: \ u6 U
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived8 F8 _ j; E9 s
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
% P9 P2 t" q, `: ?/ S, F$ Rin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
2 k4 J% o% [) T0 d- Hhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you8 L/ p% U5 ~# g0 A& f
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
- L# [4 e% x' ~ C( \ `+ IFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
: u( Y- i0 K& bto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
) M& z$ E8 g4 Z; g4 x% Zto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
' d C( r8 U7 c) y$ r1 p. L% P/ G- Qsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
8 C, v. ]8 J6 b5 uunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to- q0 S/ r7 z" W3 l! j0 D
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,/ X6 O" i2 ~! D2 }7 k+ A
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the# T4 L: D' d# r; z; H, E6 ]) i
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
# Z7 d V1 ]. E8 Uproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be; R% y* d3 ~% V$ j1 E* E7 \8 D7 z- J
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' o0 v* F& l) R- q' J2 X
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
- L0 M, W1 |+ r/ y$ Apeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be3 ]% F& h7 f, o! ]7 v7 V
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished Z* ^( o; P" e3 _9 y
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- b$ H! b% j; ]0 P8 x0 A2 z* h
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
) P* z) H) K7 l/ F: {. aaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially9 |$ k: E8 c: z& ^- m( ^4 G
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
- A& B1 G7 z" Dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these D; t9 \( A2 Y$ h
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
% [9 `2 B0 \% U3 _people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
. d! v: S8 R' u8 p9 u* `may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
6 Z7 u5 H. l2 `of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before* B; n7 g( T% q1 V7 h, y
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all0 O5 o1 Z) _& M9 z- n1 ~
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
7 @( x9 d. h$ \: Z* A+ _' n* Z4 gapartments are the way to go? No.
$ V6 Q2 ?8 |0 ~2 |/ o1 @6 F 7 A9 h2 ~* Z1 g3 r. }) X
9 b1 O/ C6 i \
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the* I1 T, ^/ z* g( Z
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this1 } |# D8 s3 N/ @& K) j& U
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
' W1 O& n2 x' I8 uno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
6 H- ^0 u9 o! }5 R) n jfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
0 M: U9 N9 C/ P8 Y. X+ @resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless1 T. U2 t( |/ Q$ U
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
) E! E# \% a7 h5 o! E& c) wunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|