UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its' ^5 }6 a ?$ s) l
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider& j( S$ E# r1 N& p
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
/ @# Q) D- J' R# ncity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
- g$ I& t) f' }/ m. V- ~; T% E/ gAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 c' j- b; L( ~! R& I3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of1 V: H$ C5 q( H% N( S
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within6 \/ g' S# O: ~; N4 j
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
1 \3 k: d& z: Seach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera8 I4 \. F& ` `! m* N
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is L' N6 P6 A) ]/ Y0 P. e. M
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
1 j' v) @$ J6 u0 [descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and; S w5 Y9 N, v9 r
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
" y8 P: G" j% i' cwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
1 ^! X, ]7 s1 R' {' }& o) e# zimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
# Y' b; }0 T3 O! l# tand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong& V! p, ~* \: [+ Q% O& d
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
! C5 g7 v, v+ } D) I/ x( Fof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that) Q* X+ d: P# U' E( M- @
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
/ p* J2 Y8 d# ]( g% Z( U2 ionly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. `( ^) U* w5 N6 v* j) H; y: i
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
6 Y7 h" S9 H G$ }$ uwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move: r6 j P7 k1 A' x/ \# F
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
; p* I* s6 N v4 t"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
) W7 E2 R% G Y6 `4 h8 z0 Ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are. M# j4 i" M. V& M4 W2 g& I
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
5 D d$ d& \9 z+ d M4 ]1 Y5 l {* Q"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
. ]( `: i9 P) b2 h- D. @! C2 _money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
5 U; r2 b( `' G9 H7 k pa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a0 {) ]; l+ v# r4 z
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across0 x* P$ _+ k( H4 m2 ~: ?% {
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural" u% p0 ?. @- q) r9 w, k
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for" T" u- _0 D8 _5 H! w5 X G' h6 B( D
development.
Hutongs; V7 N, r) c6 B W6 D9 v2 {
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
1 c- R6 f2 y* ~# p3 }. bthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ @- q6 C% {- ?# C/ n; S, e7 h: o
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not6 S( s4 | A! T9 U/ B# T6 {
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you+ }3 O4 J2 j) w0 v& v
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.% {2 [2 @ s( C" v. l# |9 [
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date, L+ Z5 \* ^3 l7 u7 r! x# J
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
7 f6 g1 m) W6 Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses# Y- G# \: E+ G# M) z/ ?: v
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically/ Z: A5 J' q4 Q$ a4 ?! b. Y
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 {7 [9 x' U& L/ ?
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
; m0 J* A# {, o: `/ bhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
6 {% }. n. p4 @6 N- Cbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the `3 m" K0 S6 w) f% y9 w
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be: P1 k j! Z `) `$ t- }
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
! h) S% E/ d- b% Y8 q S$ e( mMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
7 @) y& r$ P, T9 C& Y/ bpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be) o' ? Y9 X& y7 F5 p9 R: L: y9 l6 m
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
& R( v2 ~' e+ \memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".$ t- x9 o# A& @0 M
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
" w1 I8 U2 j. x. {& Y; V7 c- Caligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
c( z* i" z% I+ g+ j7 h Anon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" ~6 ~% L5 E. e4 m; l/ gof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
0 s. Y F% d/ o4 Y9 d8 cHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those2 P1 G8 M% B/ c; z* P$ `- i6 N* l- K0 a1 p
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they, q5 P- N) R6 M! |7 x6 t
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some) F {+ p4 n; w2 l# _$ T
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
( K. }0 [- |& {1 ]; E6 j+ {"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
1 ~% o q- t. O, bpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise. p& ]4 g& W5 h& }, [7 S+ ?& F5 S
apartments are the way to go? No.# k; K& O% u4 c$ U7 i3 D: {) T/ ^
' g( m7 X+ V v4 M; v6 F1 M; o + u" r3 O/ j( J! s0 s
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the8 m0 M9 j; G; H4 q" V$ ^
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
& S+ ^$ ~8 n6 N6 }: z% i'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make6 Z' V7 {, S5 D% B( P+ L
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: n9 O: G5 F. Z6 vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant5 A }6 T8 h$ Y
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
* C7 F. V# A- C4 W$ g( ^# XBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
5 D; A6 L, ]8 y4 Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|