服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6759|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its : x; p# _) f4 j! N$ |2 ~: R/ [7 I5 Zarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider - _$ h- x8 t* Q! o' iBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"1 N! n$ s9 K$ X2 I5 ] city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , Z* R( T; r7 a$ \9 A- VAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 7 A& i5 q" u3 y+ S: J3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- }8 ?. I4 S5 \. ^$ d Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within # i& s2 w1 B9 x; ^& thutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 8 w; }: A; F1 G7 j) \- G1 N+ veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 z i$ q* ]( [. i and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is , v0 q* d6 S* u) Wharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are % [/ W5 [1 r4 A' I8 c+ m- C# ~descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and; ^" p, M g" }# `/ y+ ]" @ forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 3 P, y3 `' y+ C6 c3 o* x. lwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 3 a; e% r" N6 uimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,1 j, A+ r8 \0 E and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 1 f+ e& l* ]$ |has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment; c# k. y3 a' L% U5 M7 m& p( n9 k8 C of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that$ P; P3 X/ N: b7 z& ~ k4 k no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are9 y+ Z5 c( r% ^ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. W# x0 x7 B7 r: l$ p$ H sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government & o9 @3 P( i- w( awant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move* o; h9 l) Q' R& P/ h+ | to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is, r" S/ z# b# j% L "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ]; Q8 b- N6 Qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are , h% B( X$ T4 [* C9 ~still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to * Q% O5 ]* [/ f% k"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make( G6 G' Z. w1 \7 x. ~( y1 A money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was" m# `, {5 Q! q0 }$ x0 Z: S a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# |7 T2 S. d$ \9 T; @' d' m parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( T. S( @/ E& J' M$ e# Z the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural . o: a7 G0 t; h* T; O+ e0 q9 vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for% e6 \" ~/ u6 S$ o# T6 v i$ g development.

Hutongs0 q M. I+ @+ d( {: P in the old days were residential area where people actually lived O- m+ R/ u+ | there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions% S' n* _. n+ T Q, u in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ) r a! }0 y G v, ohave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you; v, u1 e8 T2 ?( ? will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. ' m/ i' L$ t" pFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date( J- N' O, {9 V" Z7 J% G8 } to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 [4 i6 a# G2 |- @4 D7 B+ } to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses . B3 e+ ]$ R. f6 R" e, O) s9 }# b, [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 2 K/ `3 \3 I' zunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to * p4 O) X: P! V S9 C, f- dlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,1 K& @6 r0 x$ h7 C5 t+ t" a1 ] hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the! s1 Z1 I( B9 Z9 B9 @- G balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 4 |' }8 ]7 ^: Oproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be - h4 \: E# r* o# P9 Grenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong2 s: }+ }; r, h' s6 O6 S0 o/ K Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how9 f% _- E8 B. n$ x7 o7 D z people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be7 X: F6 }+ n4 k torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished4 B" u, E7 g- ^4 r% q memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ) t( ~- c9 P9 E7 {6 fNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ! Q' e! q7 }- L2 x3 w2 Ualigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially % Y2 H4 s4 O5 H2 f4 xnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image : z) F- I- k) c+ ?7 D" Mof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 7 d; R4 y; }3 G, pHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those - s; l" L& X* H' Q( n8 bpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they # L( j3 Z; |. K" lmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 8 i/ [# I2 q: Z( y/ ?6 lof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 2 |+ n( G0 _* Q"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 R v" v- j! lpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 v' J V0 ]# q apartments are the way to go? No. 8 M4 P/ G$ |5 M8 O - a) [1 V3 n# `: C; {5 c1 `6 s . I |: ?! P! r& \% a" x" ?) c1 }

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the& `3 S- q' q3 i situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 3 ?4 M8 o/ i1 n, M8 R e'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make5 N; E+ V4 [! L5 k no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so" {/ j& ]; s; p) q _ g g fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant + y! K8 `* w) r; h+ {; {. uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless / t, S* U5 t7 P* KBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is % B' `% M& T$ P/ x/ ounlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-17 06:36 , Processed in 0.633319 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部