服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6605|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; J$ r7 |9 J: {8 z% v% ?6 p8 Z architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider ( p: s$ j8 p% F0 Z3 v1 wBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" k9 z3 E/ z$ G! A. ^city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.3 C. |% K/ P) s7 N% }/ X According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, + l* r2 O7 W8 \& ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of: k9 l" q" N% {. `( i5 g' e5 _ Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within; l) v3 l$ I$ m; k hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ) p& l- R8 Z+ _0 N; w/ Oeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 5 x7 N. E' b! J. y$ band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is ' p# D. {+ ~; l3 O7 d/ _9 |harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 7 M* [6 `) @- O5 T4 O# Jdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and X: Z- ~6 W% t1 \! P4 {: K1 I k$ b forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % T d# ^& k# |0 C0 mwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great3 X9 F/ `* a" n3 J0 ^. s impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, : Q1 n. R1 e# N8 Kand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- R; A" q- n! e+ _ has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 9 t ^8 n3 U5 a; y( p- x4 d: {of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 V2 z+ k6 x; l0 g no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 6 W) X% @& i# g/ yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a " L% m3 u6 G# B+ `6 X* Usort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government3 I$ t" x3 j7 B/ ^2 ?8 n want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move3 o1 I5 s% O8 \) ]) E* ^+ O to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 6 x2 B' O0 Y7 N& {' a/ C d' l& G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ( x# I6 b/ R5 Ethis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 0 _; N1 T4 n Z: T3 W1 [' Qstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 4 w( f0 G E/ O5 z' y"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make & @! z; U8 r# M2 y* wmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 1 H1 R/ X6 i9 W+ P9 s0 w. Qa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: {3 W8 C! Z$ [* h& V! ] parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across ! }- C D& `1 w+ t2 |% l( Pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 I2 k1 X% U9 q+ V. i8 o4 x importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for . h9 S: M g5 }2 h' J8 D( Q( [- \/ udevelopment.

Hutongs . s' V* B1 f% ^8 U2 P3 z, y' iin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 1 T/ R8 c p9 l1 r" J7 w% w) nthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions , A) |2 U \) c* i( ^/ H3 Jin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not/ j3 A7 n( m& y6 F; v/ S4 C1 h have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 r) D' @; k: a w- `3 i will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.' F% h; |1 q, h& _ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date 8 ?, O' P! C( B1 |# sto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 0 n; W6 f+ B& @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses + Z# J7 h/ i6 b; m( F0 n; ]1 G/ ]) Osupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically0 D0 e& P9 d( v: g( C% u5 K unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to/ p1 w( {. g- ?+ M& P; U0 j live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,8 ^6 ~5 h& {0 N) U) b hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the0 R7 a. ^- U5 }. g$ o balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the + _: v, {2 h/ t+ E4 ]( iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be: \& x. C, \" n8 [+ a& _ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong , P9 Y+ X% K% F9 v8 [ S2 QMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 J l8 P R& p. J% V; { | people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be, q1 l" T9 T, l4 J# S torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished# y* F) e% ] q1 |) R# b memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".' z6 L( ] o' M% z) K$ W8 s Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are T) b, N# x: p% h( o aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially: Q h# L8 N8 j4 K non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image4 q2 m8 S2 k0 ~; i of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ! f* U1 {# C0 q7 u/ AHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those " H. |" @. \/ n( Upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 9 f8 Z3 ?9 i. a" c4 U: Nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some+ b7 K% S" ~* G$ ~# n/ I' W of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before : C) @ m! p) T" B/ D' Y9 U" A( |"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all" g- q4 l& Y3 n+ Q( f people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise; u3 ^% e$ T3 u" l6 P: E apartments are the way to go? No. 5 I9 [* b# B7 z# @/ q' D5 E + ?+ _$ M9 U7 M2 {( z 9 V+ a# O+ q7 R& D) B7 ]

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the# z ~& ?0 ^# z( S* U4 I5 c: p# |/ t" r situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 9 l3 C$ C0 {6 U( A6 g) G8 `'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make% u* l* E' E: c% C0 o no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 C( | I; b+ y" q* o! v. `$ E fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant3 k* ^ c) a# z& b+ a# k; F3 G l resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 0 @3 ?1 i4 `+ H) ?9 uBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is4 P8 r) `& |# i& H& l; N! E% Q unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-31 00:29 , Processed in 3.016114 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部