UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its1 o) b5 z/ v# o9 d1 S* g8 z% O
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
4 V: w0 m$ \& |+ I5 K% `) vBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian", w4 H$ J( o" Q5 |% Z
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.% v) v8 S7 `+ m# ]5 H
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,! D" Y! G1 l7 l8 y; _
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of% |) Q( M% x# W* W
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
9 n$ H E$ y1 D% |* f* ^) d6 v* a. rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
' c6 u8 \! [) y" F2 D* y6 q; geach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
2 }0 K7 R' w2 y7 _$ Z6 C1 x. Z0 Wand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
8 T6 [1 Y/ a& p7 ]+ Bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
: r; Z$ H3 a: E J/ F1 \: A; i0 gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, j8 Z$ M4 `$ N. p; v
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I ^# L8 V5 r' v) m l
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
i% d3 b6 e( l: Q, J3 X) o5 wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
0 r, H* f! _4 K* W$ w' Aand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong& a+ {8 Z' d0 k) |' f- K
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment% p: |) s/ b0 j% N
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. g7 N2 p3 J1 Y* J( H
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
6 x1 x; b% r- B Q% |) zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
0 [, B$ L7 q# [4 p& J7 isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
' e! v+ n, A, Z* j4 lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- o0 m; C8 Z }
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 o3 E3 `, d% ]0 l
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
3 y. H; \% ~! ?1 Q- t# M2 uthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! j: d- F0 q. k! @1 m6 A& a4 X
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
( a ~" r+ v" A4 [$ ^: Y* c7 E"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make! L1 v& W& c7 C
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
7 k* \7 V/ q* o3 [' R; Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 m; C0 C3 L& |) X& X
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ J* D8 e4 d& r1 G) d$ Z+ M. }
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 e: w2 J O. f- A& S. Z
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
; r& O' B, o& g% m" u* R- idevelopment.
Hutongs4 F; L/ k0 |1 f6 C' G* W
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
$ L- ]9 K& v8 Y+ S, p: ~, g3 Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions3 d6 s/ M: \1 i8 P$ W. d
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( Y$ ?1 Q# K; Z; d9 {' ]) k
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
' O4 F4 K6 ~' o% K1 I- c% D7 m2 mwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
# J& R5 G/ d. A p+ T9 iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date |( d( O$ D5 T. g7 R! C# N
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- | K" c* F: e3 Z4 j
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses6 y T2 ~1 W. D6 w" j: N
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
/ f# x" q5 T0 p9 B/ w: m# w4 o; runfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 {5 k6 g& q, ]$ Q; ^1 n
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
& J' h$ f: y; K' {0 [! bhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the* I ~ {4 d1 X
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
- _: K$ k8 J0 o2 {9 ?9 _project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 j, W1 X. Y* w
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
1 ]. b4 @" |* P% ^/ t% _Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
( F) [8 w" u$ ?5 a, wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
3 V- l+ y7 G) h' g, z7 gtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
, H: ] o3 G6 b) U- omemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".2 t2 e% g: X$ H
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& Q* d$ D0 ~9 L1 s
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
9 d, d; K: W' P0 T3 w5 K! Nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" s, {' e% N, w3 O- r% n4 K+ }of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% i* ]0 x& M0 v: `& |+ N) U
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
, I! H O3 ^* f+ K; z1 Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they/ O! O& S/ S# ~& b, H6 M- [
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some y( \# a4 u0 I, }
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
5 n( K% K- }5 b* [( H"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
7 u, P) S4 v2 k% npeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
+ ~! I. i! z: fapartments are the way to go? No.& v1 D# ^/ @! F+ g5 v; z6 X
( t( R3 r: r" S , _1 T* s5 [+ \' A9 G
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the% U' i% U; v2 I; ~4 Q6 P
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, O1 l# F' B: p! `
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, i+ c! M5 t8 ]# }) F
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
' U5 a( p- [1 h7 pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ e) U0 J* X! j1 Y2 a$ U! g3 k, m
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
! q. e% P7 Z. i ]5 F3 TBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
; H0 D, F6 |+ M7 b! ^0 j' m! I* Eunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|