服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6688|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 6 \' A2 T+ M1 ?9 V, S% V7 Parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 A( z5 b+ g6 y: E( n# TBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" ) H$ c, J, s7 ^+ o7 J& G* Scity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 A0 ?) ]& q' Z' A( V6 g According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* V4 ~" ~) p: i. U, y0 L- T8 N 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ; Z3 e! }. X2 [! B) Q6 vManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within" y: C# f- W- `7 t; B/ X- @ hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among! F x% p6 T) H3 e each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera P) J. q4 @: L. T/ o+ Y and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is/ u& i) l# r2 a! a& N( A: ? harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& j6 r/ T0 x+ l- a+ r/ K- k* c descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and7 V# |' {% g- k7 _4 O" i forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I# l# P1 m$ h1 w! }6 X4 E was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great . X6 H. q+ Y$ m. l. O9 X$ s! _ oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,3 p* J7 {# v$ ^- u& N N5 q and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: o a6 g$ V( P8 t& }! T, G has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 5 Y; Z: @. S1 M# mof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that+ |& r+ Z0 i, k* D no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are. e1 ^/ U9 O- k+ L6 B# | only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # ~( C/ ?; [8 fsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government" R4 S$ _& |- w" H1 e6 U want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move * W9 Y" s, G# C- dto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is & Q8 V) A1 a8 V"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,7 W7 F; P) g! I$ J9 M7 {( L9 r% p this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are9 n0 s6 b& {6 A0 e& M still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to, {+ d/ @4 U# S3 d8 s. o: \6 G& S "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make% M, z1 W) S" x3 Z) Y$ U* `" s money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 1 ^+ E4 n9 @6 o( _1 fa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a8 R2 n* K3 z- h' N' E9 a& n$ O parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across0 y. x: \+ l& I& f4 _) a) X the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 5 x* W% p% ?- Q0 {9 d+ iimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for" e4 I0 [4 [% X development.

Hutongs' K6 v# {+ O5 a! p. T6 v+ G in the old days were residential area where people actually lived * M V( ~4 V, k- T6 X, wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions: C# Q1 z9 @7 p3 j; \& f7 {* p in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 4 a- ?" I1 j' V0 b. O0 Rhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you / N0 Z% F) @, e/ l9 y7 \will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 3 i f0 y8 o! D4 i5 i6 vFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date6 x- g- E; B6 J: F3 D to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used( e. O" N! q* a to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses/ M2 g0 B6 g- F2 U Y support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 ^. q+ d- J# y4 T6 A* [unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ' w, `" `0 i9 }8 m( Y% dlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, , ?7 G* x/ F- S% _& R. rhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the; I. g+ S' ?8 R$ W3 b+ m0 e7 X balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the : F S# x8 @7 R+ t4 R7 Iproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ M9 ]. H& a- @* f0 {% r renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ [! X8 @: J R/ `& u Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how 6 Y& r8 z" Z& R9 epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 5 W' r/ v4 U/ i6 ^torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished5 A( g' c6 Q. [; ]3 J- N- { memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. V* X; ?5 z5 z1 | Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are 9 r; F& v* Z6 P" G. t+ O" }9 daligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially& z& k+ l, u# N% I non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image3 D. v. b: W H: c6 B1 C8 n of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these - f5 ?6 r3 V4 [: cHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those , h4 X8 G5 j# dpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they& N, i4 k/ M4 q1 O# \8 o4 {; K may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some , K9 d: F9 L7 D) O: gof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before3 \8 T4 ^' m& {3 a' d "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 8 P& n, M+ K3 F5 Zpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 8 y. g( @7 `; w) g9 Aapartments are the way to go? No.4 p4 W# _" @ |8 [+ O, k & F$ e, Y! _, @/ Q8 z. B. o , z. [, @) l$ r3 J$ I2 x

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the4 B7 ]1 I* D) u% \* D% n' j4 G% L3 {, D situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this4 I- _: A# B( V 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 9 m3 N \% h! t1 Y+ r# @9 H: Vno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ( D6 R& V) K4 [7 \; ]! b+ J& l yfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ) F; O3 r+ t) J$ Uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless1 K7 |" K4 [6 L% k" \! M Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is $ o- S8 q) ~# b# w4 iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-10 02:00 , Processed in 0.112902 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部