UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
o7 O& d: v' y: Varchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 E1 d9 X1 e1 h; [1 B$ `
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
/ L/ k) W9 M3 k1 L' E+ {+ ~city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 ~' ]& w* q3 g q
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
, ]" Z! }4 ?- x8 w3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
+ V% T: I% y5 e7 D+ F) zManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within: t3 _* N6 X/ C/ {+ W4 ?
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% v2 H9 s( @% e5 o9 j' O
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
) _2 o4 x. c" N6 t* b4 |1 a+ Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is* p0 _9 N R4 v: Z: L# I
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
0 V& f% w- I/ s4 c' Z/ Z* P7 ydescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
+ Q i" ^ n9 ^% z- B6 jforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I$ J; _& U0 @6 [( _6 Y
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great2 S" B4 ~$ F) f
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,+ x" G- q9 h) }$ {! E
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong0 L& J" h5 f, H2 G
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment" |2 P* a3 S; l
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. F9 |/ t- C- }; A% ]3 o) A
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
& w8 ^( Z8 u0 b1 P, p9 Fonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a0 C9 ^( N' N: o; Q' @3 Z" u
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government. j% y2 D" i; g, s( C7 x& g
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
8 c& Y5 K* d- b2 R- |/ zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 ?- D! }4 s% J2 J; z
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) E& J0 g5 k# a- h$ [
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
) R% H8 o# v9 y8 T4 Y$ P$ }still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
2 m9 K; K5 E" j"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
7 ]* L c$ H8 _3 v0 D* J# U8 ~3 b" [money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
* q# \$ `" h8 G$ ]8 Ja beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# v9 w9 n: J7 b0 t4 c/ m
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
4 f, j0 j+ F& [1 @+ g* Nthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural% l( h' _; V& J2 h4 P' y1 k) V" }
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for( t: \, ^& I C2 O x3 A
development.
Hutongs
: y1 P5 Z3 A7 E7 X$ U1 P4 `+ n8 Tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
! m. X% p0 x- x) h# l# ?+ D) xthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
. U& f( U3 B$ U8 R0 hin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not% c, v4 Q% t4 M+ m
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you! ?) q5 f/ f3 o3 s. Y2 R7 R- f
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
6 u! @' \) {0 z) J1 p+ t9 oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date9 L/ _1 \! ~: ~ E3 H" }8 t
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used3 s+ T) G: a# G* }6 ?3 P
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses+ e; |0 ?" ], j% f7 G8 a/ a3 q
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
: [ J- \1 I1 ]unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to7 ~, n! k4 K# v% t3 @" z% n2 w, `* g
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,0 ]8 u/ X ^1 Q' O; b: Q Y
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
! X" C% a9 O( |7 q* I9 l6 Q+ dbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
) d% c. q0 r" E: nproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
! ?) {" X& D' z7 o6 J- I9 e& vrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 r; s! m5 A0 `, J1 z6 a m
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
& G8 r% {2 u2 ?5 `2 j: ]people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be3 T* b1 k' o. p/ \/ G; f0 l
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished( P- M; y# Y2 H
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
- y+ S( n' Q) ]# fNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' q7 B# S7 m' Q+ _( E1 V( i. p
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially' F6 g ^( Q9 k1 F0 e3 d: W2 P
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
/ ~, M% V( ^# v) u( p6 Yof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; o; E/ ~- A, C5 b
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those# Y, l! ?: S+ ^
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
+ ?6 U# B, i- {( {$ vmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some; a; w' x0 `+ J/ U# M# {
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
4 \/ a- A" M/ W"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all j; {# x& S! ]5 r
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 G: }1 z8 Y) x- x& l% ]
apartments are the way to go? No.
$ Q9 \1 ^, f% x4 q& p7 d0 X d
4 f5 q# S3 h* O+ ?
6 N) ?0 j! x# }' M5 Q2 d
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the8 u% l; m) J* O* q1 p0 W2 q9 k
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this6 {" P6 R$ m4 _6 a, l! {6 i
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# @: Y, u$ m) l: P/ k
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
/ F- v% a) C: P; W5 bfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
D% a: Q! y: Y3 e% xresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; g4 H: }6 A5 Z1 M, U' `$ U
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is S; m; N* y# Y! n/ o+ ^
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|