UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its, U& \, l4 X% v) Z
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider5 v0 d' B Y6 ]5 `5 t
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"' o) ~0 B; M& @* U" y
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 r: x2 G; z. y6 |- m
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,9 A; R3 l4 e4 ^ j( J
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of( u# P! m2 {2 B3 a, w
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
- G" Q6 K) Y5 |; ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
: F0 v5 K7 h9 i6 a1 Peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera" K0 L* B, q$ X- Y# q& k
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is. x9 K- u! [: z
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are& i$ `2 b( M) ^5 g4 ~. Z) j
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' W8 N( P# G' H( k, R9 T
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
0 e3 o% ~" K" f v% Zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great2 W1 U3 F4 E, f5 p
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,; ]& C, _; \# i8 V" ]
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
# @ [" V' Y1 Ghas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment6 k0 ^' T* u. Z! d
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
+ | A4 M# b% q2 [* G6 _) ?no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are9 u$ x* C- v: C+ P9 V
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
& L+ A- J" H+ ?+ {sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government+ B- ^/ r+ ?6 D* F1 I
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
* s4 h2 E) k( @* c) @* nto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
- q- H1 T" x* r% M4 @* W5 o; L"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 j. C1 c7 ?" l; p. h6 K! M- R, `
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
T9 S8 o+ b, s- wstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 G, }" o9 ~" D' L- y
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make0 u4 S+ {; |; @- w3 T# ]6 J
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
; j3 f! v" H: r& Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
8 m1 n; t9 _1 Xparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
# \; ]' c2 g* n+ r0 fthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural' ^# b6 a% @3 N4 Z' v% l
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
( ^& O0 M/ E1 C8 ]" \& `! ydevelopment.
Hutongs
/ l5 ` L" F( D* s) ^# P2 q. K+ B d- yin the old days were residential area where people actually lived- {6 V% i2 K% ?" o- k' M& W2 ]: o0 G
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& v$ M( j- q/ D* L( X: n+ J
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
% W* M7 \( J+ _ U9 k4 D7 t Whave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
0 g9 c! e7 v$ u* ~" Y8 z+ P( `7 Iwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.* a% p f8 \; p( ~$ }( @. R
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
8 K, i' G; M$ y- ^5 ]* pto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 R& j) |" b/ Z: _, Y, e9 o
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
: u, l0 v' R4 z( [" o9 g# |2 [support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; }: R( R! P$ X% ?
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
% J) B$ [5 C b% M. `: m Olive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! A. g5 i0 l( ] k
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
5 A7 [* |$ r5 Z; kbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
( b* C2 {: X! I( C0 y1 m/ Z# Wproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be: c) l9 Q- V8 j. a4 {' W X2 [
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong+ K( E% W' q) D, z2 P, @
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how" O1 `/ L8 g3 X1 r2 B
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be/ O9 i4 y' ~/ T1 s
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished9 W3 u; v" ^' d5 V7 k+ D* K l
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- \1 z% Z4 P: r8 q4 Y R) S
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
1 Q; k k( H; n6 Oaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially" T+ p# A P! @9 E1 a
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
* H* }7 ?3 n6 u' ?7 Rof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these9 M. L6 w! z! D6 C% v; V
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
4 u" j7 Z [% H! ? M6 \people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they( B$ v1 d! M* J3 a; p( C
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" X; p( G' Y M# T7 ]% O0 W! y
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
8 R0 o8 F5 ~$ R" P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% p! ~) R" p0 t G2 W/ y
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
" G4 i) d- I- u9 Dapartments are the way to go? No.
* v5 |$ J S- F
0 O, k5 V/ h% N3 M0 N- Z8 e $ F. f. ?0 {: _
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
/ u. K% B0 a' h& h$ l; wsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
$ y9 W! C. i0 C$ p9 B! N'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make Z' q* w" ?1 f& i$ p d9 u9 c1 r7 O x
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
5 E$ B; N" H) l* d- S9 D) ~fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant1 d8 v4 [; @# L' ^$ h1 I
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless' c4 y& g4 \( g7 q) p
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
' x# w( f7 o' C; M. X. r, {6 _1 Nunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|