服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6763|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its! x% q4 B: p0 f3 G- { architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 9 ?1 I, j6 X6 G3 vBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 2 X2 m" L9 e2 n c& T$ g3 F9 Bcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. - J+ f" }" q' N2 `) {7 i7 NAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, + Z: Q' s4 |' ?3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of " \, X9 J( x9 [ j! I3 u* v4 _Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 6 }( Y# d9 w! M. n# |0 ^hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 5 h+ M! j; m5 V* Veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera : A# @6 \2 U' P8 n7 p3 iand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is5 Z% ]* p( w, S t harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : X: m& P3 S jdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and : V; B3 u" }9 s) c2 z3 L& ^forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ( R- Z. R, X" e, q; j! P! C. Z, ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great- a. v7 T8 E; P. o impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, T5 F# p1 U0 x- w6 qand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong # w8 D) Z z% o. vhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment! A0 F' Z' I9 t. C/ D5 D! U+ m of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that: S9 C/ G. ^7 c5 q2 N no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' w4 a# G% j) v' q k0 o only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ?6 ~8 z" B7 H6 I5 _ sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 3 X1 W8 x- }" |( Z9 {7 g3 ?& }want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move6 H+ V, T& r$ w* U to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 7 w) u) u: `/ b5 `! ?"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, " s8 R& `( m; ?this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are * D6 o/ Q* o4 E3 z# ^6 [still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to9 u$ N9 h9 N O% R9 T% R, a- [ "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ) O* v: V1 Z+ qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was+ V4 z- \1 Q7 X1 K& I a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a( N/ P% m L) n3 Y: _ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across . `2 I7 k2 w: j$ s) O5 S2 \the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural 1 w' @' o7 U) h q, |! gimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) o6 x- V3 C6 F development.

Hutongs' q: G- j8 Y' W in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 3 e1 D* R8 p& Y/ F- d6 j O8 Mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 5 s/ f# t# I( f. g( f. l8 u7 Ein hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not$ I! H% y. O* D8 a8 l, K4 w have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you B0 S5 s/ F" Q3 g4 P" V# }* _ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. + F* @1 h, [ |3 w' y9 x( BFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date $ i1 }4 P2 ^& ~% ]to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 q7 o, \9 J) U! } to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 8 |* P; {6 g$ V2 ~9 T6 m: d0 Vsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically7 A4 g: ]' F% R& m8 p/ s$ e: E unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 u3 ?$ h! }9 L. \0 L, Z1 U' _ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 5 P" _2 r7 l7 {. J& c$ |. I- Z# chutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 5 u9 G! S3 N& o9 X! B/ lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the: k& M$ j; p" S$ a* ?, f project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 1 ?9 j6 }0 r$ j1 i: h0 u6 [renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong& E7 i* H2 y# I: F# J6 h( a% F Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how $ F% f n) {! ?, b" mpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be/ }# ?- S% X6 N$ w+ t$ }, ] torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished Z* n" h# ?7 Jmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".' B/ O$ G( `! J, `( o Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are % Y/ b! ^8 G6 B+ [aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially" C/ y: l3 d2 F* t- G; c non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- X/ M9 U0 J7 r* O of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( W% i4 f" a1 n% T: J7 t# X5 ]( q Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those + y8 b5 g' ~/ T0 ]people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they5 Y: m5 ~6 z F% |+ T3 g may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some* v' I, P( O4 B( W& K& I+ i of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 X; u1 W8 Q( H' x4 b "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 5 O1 w0 R. Y( Gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise % b- X% K. {+ q& Eapartments are the way to go? No. : ~7 X# u+ D& A8 q7 \ 5 x- I% F; _7 e - Z( |, p7 S, @# e9 |; }( M& `

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the , _' e6 G5 n; [% Qsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 4 U1 t2 U& I+ O& V% ?2 w- U ^'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make4 m2 ?* B. C7 G, r no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 1 n$ r+ I6 |2 O/ A3 u1 ^fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ J! M# ^& J" T8 a0 A& C( d resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless6 I* y& b$ A1 [$ j2 p8 ^ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is$ g4 _+ x3 r' }+ [4 V unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-17 19:28 , Processed in 1.495636 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部