服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6344|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its) |4 F, |: m) [4 q( u% m$ U+ P- {& e architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 5 |$ l) _ U& r, @; s: ^8 `Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# l/ M7 X* n4 J' C city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 2 F5 L T; L% U& `- {! ZAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ' X$ C+ `- o. Z3 W3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of7 b- v9 F3 D1 d3 A/ X& p/ o+ o! \ Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 3 q' n Y3 G% Q+ dhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among u8 J' |$ D$ ^; c. B7 r1 veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera & g* Q$ [4 w) |8 ]5 ]5 Eand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is , M9 D2 T4 u( ?; G1 f8 {" O4 Y- T$ E/ ?6 _harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are / ]% S0 }! n# n$ x' H/ }descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' V* T [0 f! i8 Y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ! W4 o9 Z. V H5 h V& zwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great& _8 @- Y$ q9 Z7 R1 R: A impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 9 q/ z6 v8 P ?9 Q; B) dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ) ~8 A6 Z& B' w& Uhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment m4 U) I' Q$ h: k of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that , e' B( U' g2 M. s. s( p* g8 y, yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are' V5 F8 t" w2 B" y. j0 B2 D only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ( z7 b+ Y% G/ R' Q+ Esort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government 2 o: q/ N9 d8 n+ o4 q, \; vwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ' t* L% q$ X$ i6 R) K; hto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 9 a9 y+ m! o) M"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 E2 z8 A7 I0 x& X7 ^) P this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are $ l! U! ^, P0 C: s8 ?; N" f: Cstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% a. U- J" y1 a& g "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ( V9 @8 m% d( ?2 E9 A, Kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was# y" k' A* ]; j2 ~/ l9 @ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: E( |$ c0 {* y9 h5 s5 n3 ^ parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 5 B$ Q. e3 Y3 l, ~: n2 N# vthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural- y. i, h3 D/ r: \3 X' u importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for D1 V% H) ?3 N) K: C( vdevelopment.

Hutongs 7 X6 a- w4 m3 S- P& ?) Ein the old days were residential area where people actually lived 7 i! |) D, P, Kthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 b, I' ~4 @! P" R9 o% r in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 2 R( R9 R8 j1 i! V' S0 r! fhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ) B5 D9 W8 ?- W5 Lwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. - Z& E* y4 q1 q5 [' a) E' ^( oFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date/ v. Y1 I! y9 U' z9 h) [# Z to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used. b) X, b" J" l/ v! u5 ] to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses* c1 J, m5 u/ u" {5 x u' U support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically0 g0 u9 l7 o" K unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to+ C' r$ h6 j% y% s: Z live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 R" E O0 n; i1 j hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the/ N0 w k! C9 D! u6 _* L balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the* ^. @6 l9 E$ _7 D' x( j& F5 [9 V# e project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 7 c& W% c# M6 e' f, G$ W1 D& Drenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong, ^. s* }2 E4 e8 x3 d& U Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how % y3 O/ y) Y z8 \people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be* L1 }' Z, ~: A# x( V, ~5 v) p* S torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished' @: Y9 n2 R) l( x+ m q( A memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".! Z" Z- Y8 l( J- X! b2 m) n Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ; e- V+ w! \6 u! y2 haligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially4 o2 B0 Q# W8 ^# a- n non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image % K% e, b9 m) ]9 D9 [- Q5 bof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( X8 h' D# G( V7 m/ J/ F Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those d! o0 T( a' a: q5 M' ] people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ( |' N8 ?3 b0 ^) z0 smay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some# Z; G! _( j% b/ H$ K of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 4 W/ M" [& P) |/ m* o) R" V"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all $ t/ R0 j! f2 E" |people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise + {" j" H2 _# c& d. ^$ papartments are the way to go? No. i/ B/ a) w5 D2 H L4 r' o 0 Q! P! n, y1 @, S2 l ( g4 y: c6 v# _1 x7 c) P

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the7 _: Q, D$ ~, w7 ?7 i( } situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this# W1 {2 u/ [2 k9 A# V) U: Q. | 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 8 L$ R# T* p7 J/ cno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so1 } N7 \' p' O- K' L3 w fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant ) U+ e$ R( X5 U& P$ ~" y' Qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 9 U& G h, {+ r" C$ s, O% nBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is - T1 T; s8 g: Z9 y+ i3 j& ~unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-31 09:35 , Processed in 0.131336 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部