服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6327|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 7 e) Q+ V' |; Parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 i6 l. x' _/ s4 _. c0 u0 m# m7 \Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"9 K5 b& ^. t5 G" @8 y2 M city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 4 R; G- z+ ?4 h$ vAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,* b" v- U# f b2 W1 x; n 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ; x4 _* z7 |5 c' H4 k" XManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 7 K( z, b9 D/ s+ Y W/ w0 |$ K ehutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among1 ~5 |& ]; I1 A9 L: K each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ }8 E1 I" K- z# A3 R and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 9 T V# s0 N# ]5 l8 N+ S2 q; xharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ' a! B- E9 }4 ~# @( Z5 pdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and " }) g z( V$ j3 K5 |forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I - Q3 { F+ s8 Q, j _was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 H" Q. g3 p/ `5 e! Qimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,' C5 m; s& [9 F# H( \5 c# h and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong& ~# o' \1 o# Y2 z" s6 F, l4 w has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% {& p! \; p- K: _+ R7 Q! U of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 6 `3 i. G5 H, H- k3 \. V& o: i3 dno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ! ^" p5 a) H5 t! `% konly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a+ p; F5 |6 `9 N. Q* A- w4 u sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ) z4 M8 `; L# m) B* Xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move, Z$ A4 P b% O& t& ^# v to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is2 j# Z3 N/ {& @+ y( _$ Q& k6 Q, i. D "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ' {, \" O1 ]" _+ jthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ' C( }, H; Q. g% bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # Z: O7 n1 E* K' X( f0 y$ Z% D1 M! m% R"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make6 `" N' W; }( H: s- S6 _ money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was) l" u% }6 l% b a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a/ [) O) f8 D8 v3 o parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across' v% Y1 W- v F" g4 ]) z the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural7 d1 B$ k3 n5 D! U importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for% v4 |# k+ U8 O' v" n# Z6 R development.

Hutongs/ U. l& `6 @' H7 m0 X in the old days were residential area where people actually lived& ?1 C% ^; S6 m1 ^5 Q there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions6 d4 i9 h1 Y# u in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not \4 E: l6 G8 Q* s have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you2 H5 \% R- l6 F/ ?: V; E will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. X3 c6 H; J, Y- w4 j' rFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date + c! X+ r7 S' @- `) jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used / O) ]) [+ P$ L" K ?8 Rto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses : T7 W2 O. K3 n' h, j% k4 V7 bsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically $ N* O7 l: \5 [5 K! r5 Hunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to d9 h) C) @" N" ?, Z+ {, D live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,1 Y+ x* u2 w/ S1 ~ hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the . v0 W( a1 y% U: Q2 y/ E+ xbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the; M1 i% N9 P/ u6 O# w" {$ J project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be; t U" k# Z% k8 U; M renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong1 ^! i d }" C& E Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how " ^: S+ j& l- u. D# e; e/ ipeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be n9 }1 H; H2 f6 A" S torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ) f' M- p* v6 |# }) _ umemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". 5 {8 v5 s( e7 v# }+ r) jNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are : C! G2 j8 `$ U+ r" I# ialigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially # A: }4 W0 i# ^, g3 ~non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image " H$ q$ s+ X) @ ]2 Rof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these* j' ]2 l; F+ E# P( L$ Q; d! m5 v Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those " P+ \+ b; f" |# E$ hpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they ' h. D! v5 {; j0 _* [0 E2 p# imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some# k( y5 v* o% U+ E, f+ x4 I of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before- q+ | L, w. X" W7 s. e/ I: \ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all + x' k; }. y5 |/ ~( p# Ipeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise$ x# Y. q9 a1 x- V apartments are the way to go? No.1 I# ?' \/ H! E; D. N g* l* U" R1 Z. H3 D 7 R' m8 k, k, B% r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 2 p4 h @1 \4 B$ a& U0 o+ Esituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 Y6 O& Y, Q: A6 q 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make. v. f9 B) V; p1 b3 S u1 { no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so m" E% G4 o# \6 vfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant . b7 k% Y1 P+ e) ?% M; xresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless6 s" w8 @$ S' A8 w7 {5 [ Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is% l" ~# Z' K( H8 y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-28 00:06 , Processed in 0.116242 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部