UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its& f3 X5 e( c6 ~* x" S! r" e
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider5 {* p' C4 T4 H# o
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
$ F7 I$ E' A! ]# ~city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
0 F8 E; @- M# S4 v' A, U% vAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, E R2 n9 c: B& S
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
8 ~+ ]' [4 [% R- }8 vManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within4 N& N* L% D! b% H- `5 Y' z
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among+ t- h) e% j9 z
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
/ b9 j( f: l9 F* @5 xand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is, E# e' K+ \& s" e
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
$ z* q, }* o8 w2 D* `5 I2 p$ h8 N# y) ?$ Kdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
( G7 K1 I ?0 N1 x. ]. j) cforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I8 v) ]9 o# u7 E! |" V/ ^
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
% u& K0 b* w! s! {# Q. Z3 A& [impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,$ }& K8 P( F; w
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong* Z: C) [/ ]" }' I' _
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
5 i- x- r8 k9 P3 F9 J( t% c. tof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
9 O+ F& L4 O' Q" Mno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are) F% [( I; X, y4 r) r1 t
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a0 z8 \! {1 ]6 x! A3 C/ I3 t( u
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
, L9 o2 ~8 f3 Uwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
+ C% H, q5 m$ ~4 q. _( Oto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
$ d% E; Y, S3 L* Q$ ["modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
6 I6 _4 |0 V, r A0 a( uthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are& I0 O4 ^4 w" J
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ w( Q% K3 Y$ X7 K
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make8 ~" C4 f4 |8 b1 x
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
3 O: j7 F n8 g! N4 `: Ca beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a/ O. T2 o$ |8 J3 w: m7 x
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
: S6 W% M4 G( I" H3 p; W. ]: I7 S5 uthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
) u9 g' s, W) bimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
, v6 \5 |9 o$ X8 odevelopment.
Hutongs$ Q8 C* P6 g- ~' Q+ Z8 R( M
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
7 y, Q# M, j+ Z- h1 S* Z% m# k& ]there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
S& t& ]3 Q/ O; L, Sin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
- J6 P9 t6 a- \7 q, vhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you$ m' h4 {* M- d& o% C: i6 _: x
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
# s, m0 ^( s3 n+ C% z% a; u5 P2 LFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
; y0 i* g- M5 Uto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used0 Q' c. N9 ]" y0 K
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses% Z8 K2 p& [. l
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
4 }: i) f8 L l* T. ?; T0 Vunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
7 m2 q% W0 Y; R$ Plive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,! k* k! i6 H6 L( s# r
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the* ]# A( L1 ?: P9 u* `
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the6 r! L9 k, t; t. Y" n
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
: n2 u* ?6 Y9 _5 K8 [renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong$ d7 W) `, g$ V/ Y) ?" [, p# Z; }
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) L8 W, H* A# s' d# v
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
% T, d5 C# d' P% ^6 ttorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
: `0 D: H7 h* D8 t4 X, I" Lmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".. ~$ p$ ^# y2 O
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
" F, w* c4 Z- y L! A/ waligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially8 F- T) K+ z. j. A+ l
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" D) A B% q/ A" A W0 E
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
5 A! @8 u3 F Q) c1 ~( e/ [) D% j3 SHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
$ b7 a1 l2 Y2 K f8 J) x @people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they; U5 m, X- ]8 a4 j- K' P# c& c9 @
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some- w3 v1 {& c) e
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
% f! Y8 \( q- T2 }"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all) l, w5 e" L3 T" c3 X" W
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise* o9 F$ i* r) q
apartments are the way to go? No.
. {" ~& L- j; q6 h9 [9 h
+ y+ r) n/ E% |: O
: Z2 y4 u+ Q7 X" t( B
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
. M7 |1 v6 w! O0 K, Qsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
; q/ E4 L- u$ C2 e& }'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make6 O. j% M' ?6 C6 A, X F. J3 M7 Y
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
4 x9 O* _5 P2 U6 U) C2 W7 s+ u: pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant% b4 { a! X; ~3 S0 I" |( n
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless8 g2 O5 }# \! `/ Q5 F. N4 e1 y# x1 e9 n
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is4 i6 a4 e& e) c) s& ]: Z0 h: \
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|