UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
1 v+ k- I9 d# j- b/ D. b" Parchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- |% H; O6 @4 s4 `! `
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"+ X) l Q, c$ ^& [
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.2 Z, J" c0 [# D% v
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
) q3 \' H5 a7 {- o& n( w2 j3 S, U3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ d# `6 o6 J7 \) `. v
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within% `7 n3 P, c/ a9 m
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
' U# l5 F6 w K+ Y qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera" T7 Q. [8 P3 A ?
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is7 T. s S2 t9 c0 _- a+ u; k6 m7 A
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are4 Q; N. N7 c( L3 _% P
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
9 c5 J1 r- w5 s& \forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
2 h2 ?3 I1 s, \( j, K: H' d9 Twas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
b1 W8 ~ I2 x3 o# pimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 D& d: C2 J% T, s4 n/ ]3 m) A! Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong+ [8 B5 z+ D7 {; K. J
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
; \" G4 s( z$ j! j8 Pof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that3 w( e* _7 @2 T. B4 f
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
+ a7 @- N' J' Z b1 p/ gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a' A/ a/ L# T1 v8 n; z; `
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government u+ h F+ H( M; X) ~- {# v
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move/ l: V- [6 C: E( A" P
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
! K0 Y" ~5 v5 ], _9 K2 J"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 o* B$ k! U4 T D
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
4 v( W; P! X" {; \+ ?! L! L4 jstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
% o' K% h4 b2 S2 X1 C/ ~"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make* A3 w# D# G2 R% o6 n5 S
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
. u' ~! |1 w/ F7 p3 k% H% Ea beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a$ h% D1 H1 c* e2 j) Q. d
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across" c* K! ]% L5 O" X
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural* ]" [( Y) |! o. W; ~
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for [$ }% H5 a/ K7 a8 g
development.
Hutongs) R) `- J- {' G( a8 n
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
) s4 }3 o$ \" r6 D ethere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions/ {2 c5 U4 Z5 t
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
5 u6 l" `! r! t4 N# Xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you. l0 @1 X' u% n# T/ ?+ E% \ \
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.9 M8 | e& R) `: H
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
* L$ K/ ]5 y% A/ w0 a% M" \to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used2 a; C+ U! x& m, P* I/ E
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
( K" a: e: [: w# isupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically/ q7 f- t& G9 l- x. K" R0 ]
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
: x% w( M4 Z. y* k* A! Klive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 n; q: G5 f: a% X, t5 p
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
# k- ]) i* r0 c, @- X4 |! Wbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the: u% \: e; \8 u: K7 v9 P( N! I
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
e9 w" a0 U) Q6 \2 nrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
0 H& j, M* `5 q. Y. Z% q6 G+ EMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
+ i! h7 w' K5 @% U1 Epeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be& c) |1 ?" I( \6 e; z
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished% b6 W2 I' N1 T4 @ r3 x
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
. S' s$ t; R8 I$ sNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are/ a( H; o6 z: H% W8 u; C2 {( k
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
* `0 F6 H4 V% M( y* f2 Z* B% {& xnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
1 [% q2 B! q/ `of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
8 Y, |3 w5 G8 ^4 E5 i' IHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
" O+ G I# F. ]% Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they9 \& y* e" C+ Q( K$ K
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
- J: b, M4 \8 m% xof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before8 w; a+ S2 ~) T1 ^4 A+ m% d
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
$ {- e6 U( ?( s- F6 _% Z) [people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise7 w9 ^( B: \7 A! V1 z
apartments are the way to go? No.
9 y4 w- W" x2 f" a v 3 ^" S8 J9 s: ?2 u; b3 P8 v7 S
4 E+ {/ \9 e) E! E3 p
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the# K5 Y, V! L' b2 v. g9 J
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
) H" z2 W( X; | M0 Q'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
: w$ e. \& |% b7 C6 qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
: G, ?1 y3 _" {) t( Ufast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
4 J, u3 V$ ^$ `2 t( x" Z! Aresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; `1 R% Q0 ~; l6 Q3 ]( YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is# ?. J0 R6 f6 [, |
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|