服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6837|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its % W5 h- h& w, harchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider - ^3 W, z6 H' m8 L' z! jBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 4 U& `6 J% m3 ^" W6 R8 n2 ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 P7 L$ k9 b: z' H% j) z According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ; t) i3 D: e# `6 P u* M- T( Y2 B5 p3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of : f! I; I, |$ @+ T' ~& r, {2 Z7 t! w( }Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within K3 V3 \5 K. `* H0 Rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 z8 I0 `1 ]/ t) b( S; d. s; H each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 9 }* g% p8 L6 K, A8 B$ E% {and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 3 d, f1 U+ z$ T R1 f( y; w2 hharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% R- W( b/ o+ `- Z: I3 u descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and- V, Z3 X, R; x0 V$ c forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % n4 ^; q8 V$ y" Y9 Jwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great % l3 N; P! W7 K6 Nimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 2 a7 t; j D% dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. ~7 g* F* D i4 M% z' J+ Q has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment: n' Y9 |# c" r; b9 d( t+ }% z of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 ]9 q* @' W W0 l2 i* S no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 X! y. [* Y/ q' E; Y only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 ]: u0 P; i1 y5 r$ v sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government k. ? R/ }4 jwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ( N3 c+ d$ B- C: D4 G4 w: [* `to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is p+ D& B3 I* J9 [ "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ' j) B# Y0 @* k* X4 Cthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are , E/ Q1 j B0 Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to. d! f$ v' N: M" h' v* | "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 3 J1 O/ o" P' m* m! amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 4 J: e* ~; L+ f$ [7 Ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& @3 g/ \2 C: d3 W9 S# T. j( H parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across; A- u& Q, i* i( C2 v the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural - r$ U/ q, w' b7 w3 |8 r. oimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 A% G7 t9 ], Q- j# w' S' T) r development.

Hutongs . s+ F! R! u& Z" S0 N# h3 kin the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 |: ]0 v8 O/ C1 x, n' q" r& n- e there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + I2 }0 Q! O" F) E9 m' din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 C: Z1 c: L* G, F9 ?6 m have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' T p4 u" b! F7 k4 @ will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.# n; S. J. O# [( r% ?3 D! s. _% s Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date* {- D& K* ^# U. q/ R" k0 a+ B& \8 w, | to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 V) ]5 j( t/ d4 W to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 4 D' |, w8 r6 O7 m. b' fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically , T" @- }' I! dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to. }9 k, G' C" F: ~ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: j( m) Q" y) s/ ?) ]* r hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the) R" ~/ P: P# `/ c balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the( ^( T9 S6 S O project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 C' Q2 |" e7 v* n; v% @ renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong! Y* v+ g. U/ c. p/ L6 p0 k/ H Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how & u7 D: p4 B7 e& Hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 4 L1 @9 P$ B* q2 ltorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished " V" C5 d4 w6 u8 b imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". / O! q9 O' F4 w; [/ o7 q* t: DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are; W4 u0 b# |0 c aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 u3 r) [. R0 G$ J& w- V non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image " ^; f Q: W# Eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ; C- ?' {; J( Q+ [# }9 v6 QHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ; }# h: I, r/ E1 n3 \8 wpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 5 D6 B6 D& s# v' zmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 8 K/ y( \3 [& G( Q0 f' }* qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; _. @+ o3 o1 s9 C "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all4 z' ? p2 j$ n; u people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 6 p# g$ |, v& W" a, h1 ~+ o- rapartments are the way to go? No.6 N) z( U `& m( {: F( s% u. V - y6 `; P+ Y, I/ c 5 O; `& p) f) r

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the5 ?( N0 c2 g" k- e1 M& ?! d situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& d! {5 @8 |; O- ~ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make ) P! b7 H) m" T3 qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so / j3 I+ @ |6 t" p& z/ Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant + Y5 L' Q. e8 q6 Q, ^3 v* t# p: ?, z: @resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless r! L- q' _$ Q, C Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is " e8 M6 Q6 G t& b ^unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-25 12:47 , Processed in 0.114163 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部