UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
; b3 `5 C# p. f; tarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider3 l4 K9 S5 g( }: C$ R. @* l, s6 o
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"+ n' {7 ^ s9 L* g% j
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.. a. g& y1 `9 K0 Y
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,. L4 U4 R1 `- S! j7 Z* t
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
, \. g$ t% f9 B" x2 L- N% x' ?! AManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
0 S( ]/ h3 T/ U7 Xhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among8 H6 A- h: j+ @+ X+ H
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
* ]; O( e. j, E! a7 K7 Gand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is0 G# d0 T' F2 M1 c- {" f$ z
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are9 A5 F9 y) |) v! y
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
8 S3 f- l. {% A7 \& mforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I% M! s* E9 |- Q$ f, N
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
0 k: {/ A7 x# T! T, O$ Y+ g/ iimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) O+ O; p" n |: q9 G5 J" X" E X
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
9 N; U1 {2 y- rhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
2 I% m8 z; E! s7 eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that0 X2 o ?" E) V8 f$ m( x
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are7 Z; R3 y( V9 v, {4 t4 d D( i" n' c& I
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. R+ E. l- S0 W2 q* i0 u2 W
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government% A1 K6 Z" q4 D9 L# f6 E
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move& F6 N7 o, U% \4 w4 ~
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is" A: |4 \% r. U2 X0 v1 j) H% y& y j. o
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 r6 B8 R8 i8 z. U2 g1 m- T
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are# ~: n1 K' |6 S1 B' j
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
" ?* ~8 t2 H; z$ _( g6 c"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
6 |. F$ Z# d+ W# xmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was' R( Y2 a0 B8 q+ c
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a% m8 z3 ]1 j/ o
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across( k& u# F$ ~3 j3 B6 z6 t9 C+ z6 g
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
% U' K4 o: d' R+ m& z. } Y, u. X' limportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
8 d3 s8 ~& Q3 x! i) ~development.
Hutongs6 y' z% E4 [! Q+ _" Q4 W
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
% @' X* H# K! z! jthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
0 O* i( M E; A: R9 ^in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
. h5 ]- u( v! z5 t4 I/ u# j& G% Z4 phave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you: R$ E" O; ^9 E. h! C( e
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.+ U l: F, j0 `( L5 E& J5 T! \$ K
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
* {2 F% P" O. _- Q9 Y: ito support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
( ^6 {- t" V* Nto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
, W6 _4 O! {1 ]( K, Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
2 p& @/ w! w8 H) `unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to8 Y" Z8 D% r# P
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: Q3 v+ S6 Y) K- C0 k
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
- u% `0 l( U5 Z \! J5 Dbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
# V# G9 q+ X0 h! g) M# d; gproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
: o _. |* M e9 L% krenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong' j" n. J L$ y I# m% R. V
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how) {% {1 b% \' y$ U& e1 k& x
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
. R7 M. \/ F: t( l6 @8 Xtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished8 W% K4 z1 z5 Z: `9 E0 j2 n( p
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".! L5 b+ K! t. @5 V, W
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' F1 @6 |% y/ b: E
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially1 R" e- B1 J/ o: g+ p
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image# d% H' I1 j- g9 v
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ U- F1 D9 V. `& e! Z1 t: {8 ?) y
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
L# ]) L" [0 i0 i. E9 g# q! Speople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
# p ~- X& X# h d3 j4 imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
/ m3 r1 [! t5 y" l8 vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before8 Q+ \3 t! r* R/ l/ x. T
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
8 i$ w8 o% P+ p3 v2 h1 jpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
8 d' c# A& e3 z. x% gapartments are the way to go? No.1 _/ F4 i* j4 g( \* _* x% z
+ q5 ?7 P9 C8 D
! _5 n8 r- w& y9 w1 a0 |
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
( a& n5 `9 { usituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
& ]5 G$ H7 p. R @4 {'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make# a/ M, [ Z, F
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
/ t. [8 V2 D8 n/ efast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
( J6 D6 g# R e# B9 a J( uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
; \- s( N; y" F: N, N# YBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is, u/ G% W- Z6 {2 \, t; t9 D8 S
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|