服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6367|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its1 o) b5 z/ v# o9 d1 S* g8 z% O architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 4 V: w0 m$ \& |+ I5 K% `) vBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian", w4 H$ J( o" Q5 |% Z city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.% v) v8 S7 `+ m# ]5 H According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,! D" Y! G1 l7 l8 y; _ 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of% |) Q( M% x# W* W Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 9 n$ H E$ y1 D% |* f* ^) d6 v* a. rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ' c6 u8 \! [) y" F2 D* y6 q; geach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 2 }0 K7 R' w2 y7 _$ Z6 C1 x. Z0 Wand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 8 T6 [1 Y/ a& p7 ]+ Bharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : r; Z$ H3 a: E J/ F1 \: A; i0 gdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, j8 Z$ M4 `$ N. p; v forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ^# L8 V5 r' v) m l was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great i% d3 b6 e( l: Q, J3 X) o5 wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 0 r, H* f! _4 K* W$ w' Aand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong& a+ {8 Z' d0 k) |' f- K has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% p: |) s/ b0 j% N of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that. g7 N2 p3 J1 Y* J( H no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 6 x1 x; b% r- B Q% |) zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 0 [, B$ L7 q# [4 p& J7 isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government ' e! v+ n, A, Z* j4 lwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move- o0 m; C8 Z } to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 o3 E3 `, d% ]0 l "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 3 y. H; \% ~! ?1 Q- t# M2 uthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are! j: d- F0 q. k! @1 m6 A& a4 X still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ( a ~" r+ v" A4 [$ ^: Y* c7 E"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make! L1 v& W& c7 C money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 7 k* \7 V/ q* o3 [' R; Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a5 m; C0 C3 L& |) X& X parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across$ J* D8 e4 d& r1 G) d$ Z+ M. } the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural1 e: w2 J O. f- A& S. Z importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ; r& O' B, o& g% m" u* R- idevelopment.

Hutongs4 F; L/ k0 |1 f6 C' G* W in the old days were residential area where people actually lived $ L- ]9 K& v8 Y+ S, p: ~, g3 Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions3 d6 s/ M: \1 i8 P$ W. d in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not( Y$ ?1 Q# K; Z; d9 {' ]) k have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you ' O4 F4 K6 ~' o% K1 I- c% D7 m2 mwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. # J& R5 G/ d. A p+ T9 iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date |( d( O$ D5 T. g7 R! C# N to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used- | K" c* F: e3 Z4 j to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses6 y T2 ~1 W. D6 w" j: N support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically / f# x" q5 T0 p9 B/ w: m# w4 o; runfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to2 {5 k6 g& q, ]$ Q; ^1 n live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & J' h$ f: y; K' {0 [! bhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the* I ~ {4 d1 X balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the - _: K$ k8 J0 o2 {9 ?9 _project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 j, W1 X. Y* w renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 1 ]. b4 @" |* P% ^/ t% _Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ( F) [8 w" u$ ?5 a, wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 3 V- l+ y7 G) h' g, z7 gtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished , H: ] o3 G6 b) U- omemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".2 t2 e% g: X$ H Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are& Q* d$ D0 ~9 L1 s aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 9 d, d; K: W' P0 T3 w5 K! Nnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image " s, {' e% N, w3 O- r% n4 K+ }of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% i* ]0 x& M0 v: `& |+ N) U Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those , I! H O3 ^* f+ K; z1 Cpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they/ O! O& S/ S# ~& b, H6 M- [ may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some y( \# a4 u0 I, } of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 5 n( K% K- }5 b* [( H"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 7 u, P) S4 v2 k% npeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise + ~! I. i! z: fapartments are the way to go? No.& v1 D# ^/ @! F+ g5 v; z6 X ( t( R3 r: r" S , _1 T* s5 [+ \' A9 G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the% U' i% U; v2 I; ~4 Q6 P situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this, O1 l# F' B: p! ` 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, i+ c! M5 t8 ]# }) F no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ' U5 a( p- [1 h7 pfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant/ e) U0 J* X! j1 Y2 a$ U! g3 k, m resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ! q. e% P7 Z. i ]5 F3 TBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ; H0 D, F6 |+ M7 b! ^0 j' m! I* Eunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-4 05:15 , Processed in 0.122415 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部