UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
) [0 _' U; \$ X. Jarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider1 d7 [% |0 s0 x: A
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"! R+ k3 b% Q; p7 h @
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.5 O8 a$ s1 o) U: X2 ^+ Q- E5 S8 P9 I
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,! d D) {# E& ^* o' ^0 Z3 g" }
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
& M" o. o2 F2 K- Y/ f5 e7 _2 DManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
! }: m2 z# k; N7 Ehutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 k, g" P' w* Z+ F7 N W
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
7 ~+ ?% M& ^8 }* B7 H. w: X6 ~and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
0 V0 @2 O3 z* h8 ~harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
; s! o# I3 x- e( Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and4 N1 h. l P* D2 f* b a
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I5 t. {0 z; Z' g6 e, j/ k
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great0 R2 f7 U) q2 V; [
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& t6 S- ] m2 p" I3 f; L1 J5 q; y
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' S7 r$ H# |& G8 u0 V$ M
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment2 s9 ^% o" n7 z, R% B
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
1 ]% z8 g! P# W% q) t( Ano hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 t! P1 o) O N( Q8 w
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
$ @. H" Q, O) X, k5 ^; zsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
9 B$ _9 _' Z& }& T- q! {& v* swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move$ a4 i% e e+ o. P
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& z! E( o) o, [4 Q% [
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
; s O& f0 i6 U6 O. qthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are: x: ~7 O6 q8 f
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
: y2 U9 ]$ P) N5 P K, ]$ |"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
- u6 Z% `0 l# H% I3 Hmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was4 W7 h! w/ e. A; ]9 W& g0 T
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a4 U1 k9 g1 n+ n) \5 N# ~2 v
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across- e2 [+ e& m- f
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
- Z E c: m$ ^/ c* Aimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
6 {' X8 `7 c* a5 H; q( z; Idevelopment.
Hutongs9 C) o: k) O: ]( J+ M, {
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived8 V, |2 l( o% _5 M N% |+ T* e" ]
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& u6 |5 ~4 V3 z9 r
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
6 q9 D. [) m8 K: N+ p7 hhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' B; V! G0 z, L, X2 n0 h
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.5 Q' H, b. ?2 `# J
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date; q) E7 ~( v" V, M0 Z
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
! W1 I5 O9 V, r e/ oto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
) l; t- n+ X3 usupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 i. l/ P; T; J% u
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to( k: o) g. F- f1 d2 s
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
' N9 Z: m5 K+ x) }( [6 dhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
- _; ~- B1 Z5 a+ W6 y7 T) tbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the Y( t. t8 @% I) N5 L
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ M2 M: m8 M- p( I( _$ `
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
/ X. J+ {9 e( p/ ?+ bMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
$ n5 y. a r$ X( ?people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be% u7 g$ {7 d% G: f" h1 }& H
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
9 ~' o; I5 i6 `7 x: gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
% |, U0 L& w/ I1 z& WNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
, ?" |2 a% m0 R( E; _$ Kaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
- r/ d$ A& Z% |* [$ h3 x6 pnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
+ O4 t0 U+ q1 h% Hof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these" \0 C5 p4 j2 G
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
0 x2 m: K8 ^* Y; V5 B: s& opeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they3 ]$ r! a! e: K0 U# i$ S) C) f
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
" u4 z# w' A& S2 `( Iof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
. ^. V: |! b/ j"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all8 n- k5 f5 ~$ i- B- |
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
, Y% v. @$ q* N3 s" h: O8 ?apartments are the way to go? No.2 J& j7 O& M6 ]
8 w7 K7 L, G8 ~1 `1 p6 B, I% }
" T( q' b/ G. v7 L( A3 i3 D1 u
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the m8 ^7 `0 `- S d% F
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
' I Y% ~: F3 w7 z'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
/ c' ?7 v" Q Q8 E5 Uno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
- e0 B0 O8 M# J: J+ j2 Jfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
6 W! B. d0 X Z r) G1 Fresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless. F3 M8 |% v. G9 b
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
, W" ], w6 O0 j: V5 |4 aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|