服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6341|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its, K% F4 m. i( G. X# Z architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider# Y. }0 L% g% d, s0 I7 O9 A Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" * m4 T q+ n2 h) U/ ~! x( Acity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 4 d$ B" p: e- [ MAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, X; ~$ H% t0 I2 Q/ T3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ( Y* B7 l1 k( ]+ R4 ^Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within + `1 K5 m; v* t! O& G, F) ?hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 Q8 e4 x( f( l% e: W# S# } each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera' W6 z) d% G7 O1 D9 i% P and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is * b8 h' q+ P! [: {% Tharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are. q0 {- _: F, {% v [ descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ; ?5 }" @7 v+ A. kforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 5 W+ |+ j' I6 Z% \2 Kwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great, {3 O0 g8 F! J% S4 T impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 5 v) S- O$ p' Qand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 3 A0 u( q0 t9 b- R' Q3 thas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ! y8 _! ]4 `# y' V" G: M1 qof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 3 n. M& Q7 i9 ] f( Y# Ano hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are : K1 a% u/ v% M# U8 Zonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a $ @! m9 J* V( c0 w8 tsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government6 d' S; \' F _! Q$ g+ G: K want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move l9 c5 u, g$ e/ Y to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is . M, d, ?' o1 B* S4 ^"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,. n8 r$ w) ~ j4 G+ j8 Y- \ this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are . j1 Z& x u' Rstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to9 K5 c3 Y" g7 S/ i "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ! `+ \5 {+ _) n9 i+ Smoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was8 E& L- D0 N% x5 N- I+ E5 [ a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a $ j! }) g* }8 f0 i5 sparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 2 j7 ?( U3 F% Y5 y( Y, R% pthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural5 T9 N+ G# h4 o; f8 f, z2 K/ Z importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 9 R! ~/ A( F9 [3 q" ydevelopment.

Hutongs# w7 D1 W+ }: Q! R" v# ] E8 r in the old days were residential area where people actually lived M l2 i. A" ~6 X there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions + x: j* G- M3 k7 qin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not+ D' H+ b& m% x, Z$ z have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you- r4 b* M* H. d# P9 F will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.! ^$ M! k. F5 c* Y4 ^ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date & J- b. v: X% {* W3 G2 Nto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 W5 H9 d/ V y' {% c4 U3 I3 |9 F; g to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses: X# G8 l9 m: i8 D5 S/ P6 B support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 5 j/ N- n4 H4 C% j+ r9 _unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 0 c. R ^0 i$ t( G" O8 L4 p+ Hlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,2 C; _9 p* }7 n' M hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 0 B( @9 H- S- @balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the - g: `# T5 j' F4 j4 o; J/ u: pproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be X$ n/ F. m! e8 | renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / J, _1 y) w" n& q' UMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how7 Y6 _2 Z7 j: _4 R* M& \% Z0 _5 w4 q people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 G" D h6 @% I, e4 z% |torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished . V0 v3 P! I2 t( `! R! n M( fmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".0 p% |9 x Z" e6 b9 {: l7 F4 C- N Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are. P" k( P2 O+ H6 z aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 7 A. r! W8 ~- R% _/ wnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image: N. X8 V0 G- g of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these% N: ]( C. L5 ^3 c1 z& P$ p7 n Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ) @ b3 u6 @: d; |% o, A& qpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) w% ]" G6 A( p0 c5 ` may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some" k; ?* U6 R$ x+ l& a of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before1 P" A2 _3 }( \ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 3 ~% V. c2 W4 B& Xpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 2 R0 U! G6 f1 q/ @* `apartments are the way to go? No. 8 c. i& R5 S9 V0 D5 Z * v. J1 p4 [5 { a% |/ z8 {& N- d) U

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the# a: E1 J2 o' j situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this % q: B3 [2 H9 u- _# |* {8 F, T3 d'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make & C- y" z! Z: n0 p; Ino money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so4 l1 q+ P% h2 c" d- y: Z% h fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant; r* u* B$ I+ t) |4 v resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: O" P% B e, S- E0 a5 d Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 H' K; G! @( r7 \! ?2 q; _- X unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-30 13:00 , Processed in 0.133445 second(s), 17 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部