服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6325|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its5 f4 o7 U- A; _7 {; _% z architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 6 C8 Q! s. T ~8 S) [Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 6 U4 R( o5 A% s, G5 y( Ecity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 n: ~7 u' [+ b2 Q/ g8 o& t According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 5 F. f Z5 h: c0 }( A: d( N$ ^$ I! r3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of % m/ F% }# }* b! z X0 L' ~9 v% sManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within . m0 V; d& D# {& Uhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among, O$ ]9 U# C! _* ?$ U4 h3 Y$ ~5 w each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 [# `7 R2 F+ | and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is( p8 d, n$ v8 g harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : O) z0 O8 b6 udescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and8 E+ {, ]8 K8 a forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I8 }3 k. K: m/ K was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great : R1 M$ z; B0 `, H. k$ [: wimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, . e7 v( Z; n- h. yand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong " Q' i% I+ y& ^) P, l5 shas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ! V* _+ _! v3 d3 D/ \; tof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that7 r% g4 }( q' [5 y2 i' u no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are% x. s/ Q+ ?; Y9 D) r7 t! q" r only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a; z# p/ {! f* [' G C) F sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government& R% |& L6 U/ H want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 1 @1 N* y" I: s1 m/ ~7 I4 f; o% Nto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 1 h, H. |( `. ~0 h( q$ u"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,$ Y' e6 `, ^! z4 @8 Q this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are S! `4 D0 g% U! Jstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ( w, `: [5 o b4 ]1 Y$ P"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make - `; ?+ X* Y& F' v& kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 1 x# J! x- V9 L+ v% \a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a* c" M0 g4 t8 A parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across: P% Y8 i9 T( f1 M. M+ o J the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! I8 P/ x2 x2 c" |4 {$ M, uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for7 e3 b# {0 U, K3 Z. { development.

Hutongs " G+ t+ H7 a4 Y) _- ^in the old days were residential area where people actually lived : P, }9 i- h: J' kthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 Z4 Y# p- e- |" a9 B8 Z1 t in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 5 {4 p/ T! f/ g! N8 Hhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you& b8 I5 q: s+ q: O* t, s will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.$ s! ~! |& q2 g* B# p! C) Z Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date$ y% P; o! t2 O4 B3 f! c" R to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used " F+ |! G# l' S# C. zto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses! H. y+ J" T+ S/ |; c( \ support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically * }: v% \: c" M2 Z) J3 Qunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ) G5 W! z, ]. Z8 Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, ( w X# ? B2 Y/ M/ mhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the , [4 m; K: w2 Z' R7 ~$ t* }balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the. g$ B2 q+ c! l) \' q project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be) v- [" |/ h$ I" E4 d renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 8 A- B$ N* {7 k& U' RMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how , G0 O9 d& t* C& W) D, @people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 1 y5 J# x% L, k; _6 C* htorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ! S Y0 x- v# S! G3 J% ?0 y( b, z1 y) dmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ! F+ l" l: ~0 [Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are) U" @! @, r7 _. K8 y6 ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially9 j0 B/ _# c7 s/ k% I non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image - x) v4 s1 U( _% N7 L3 o2 yof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these( H" `' f4 S* o Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those' W' N8 b1 }5 V, t people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they # @. k' D( ^9 s) d; Imay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some( @4 |4 e* C' j7 L of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before, E" p* T- T# W' ?8 z3 _ "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all , }2 {$ W( l W, C) Ppeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise V+ M! z9 ~; ]- J apartments are the way to go? No. 5 ]- M1 \/ G9 L7 e6 ^ / w, P+ s a: p6 e ! k/ c" b1 \( H3 Y7 C

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the1 ~4 D% E; n8 u% V situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this . J7 v7 t# S4 e* I* ?'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make # H S% j/ ] q4 |% c9 [" x9 ano money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so 6 K) R0 N$ T% ~fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant( G" j6 k% @( n) N* @( j! J9 ? resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless- |" A0 i% a! M& U. j; h5 f+ a Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is* E. Y0 p5 W, i0 A$ M unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-27 11:37 , Processed in 0.117379 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部