服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6568|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 3 K Y0 Q1 f- C, s' d! Sarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider. g, h) J, N) C5 ?$ S Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 7 l3 p* \6 x" D2 M) u' l; W3 W4 Fcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. 2 v4 ] P: w# f4 FAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,9 }$ j. D$ s4 M3 q- R9 ?) T, ^4 { 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ( x0 ~; d( H9 ~2 G* Z/ RManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within ; T) N( U* f: U; Y9 L; j* P4 }hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 4 I" x. d2 ?6 reach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera " A4 L2 W7 {( I! J. O6 sand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is & X, o5 O" u3 W& _# b" {: V! b! fharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are , o& f+ K# G9 Ndescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and - F& K: K, u6 @1 z6 y; G1 ]: F' aforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % F0 |: O8 b6 ^" {8 M9 ^was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great + K) \6 |. k! u1 M" G B( @impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,& j/ ?; E! }# D: D- K% f and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong3 ~8 y6 P7 B9 C/ I( C( d! I% t has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment. Q* d" G: D- E/ L of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that- Z# y! q# {/ x6 ` no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ [7 L$ V+ e3 \, y only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 8 H; `8 m1 ]1 ?- l( L6 Msort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government, n$ Z8 }! t. G/ ?3 I5 Z want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move ) C6 u3 r: d* Mto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ' T/ J. k( D& u: p. d"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,3 ?+ I- ]+ T3 L* s' d this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are 6 \9 X' b, O4 Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to , ~2 {/ [' \# T4 ]* v+ @"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make& H2 `5 Z. S3 Q money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was% U2 e& k/ y9 I2 R5 R; V: l a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 6 e- l1 d$ K+ M, {. g) H( jparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across % t: J/ Z0 v [the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural H9 g( c2 D% _importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for) C* m6 f3 z* B6 t$ I* z& H* E development.

Hutongs 4 l4 X7 n* `2 b5 Z+ s& j- Ein the old days were residential area where people actually lived, p4 i3 u" s% F! q+ M there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 N' m, U' I8 ?3 S% H in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not ) [1 f, @, Q' k$ ^- U4 xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you l2 Y7 Z/ h( }" o' l) X8 Owill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. / h3 w! h: q. d0 P |1 y: B+ \2 yFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date+ \& ^1 A% d) N7 c+ g! D to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 2 w9 @7 f7 y8 i1 e2 kto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 5 H# K, k4 m' t. U: v" N1 Q" Lsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically/ `& J. G" z9 @- k% | unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to& E9 l a4 P7 |- u live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,' B9 j/ s" P8 v7 c2 P" k hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the9 H. f1 L7 p1 D M balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the% u' u& \3 I8 D! n1 k project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ \) n9 n- s6 j7 L5 F renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 0 z( \4 u: n: w- |. v" T1 pMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how + l% f! l0 t" f% G! ^5 U. Fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 7 m. G8 v+ a. V9 i$ B) ctorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished $ m' Z- `6 {% S- Y% p9 r3 vmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".3 r* A" s3 I1 l5 O$ f Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are0 G& t$ K3 A0 C- D! F1 _6 q k, L aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially * O5 s1 _' u! V6 ]5 cnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 |- x6 z0 d8 Sof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these4 m" z; L" j% U8 q, L; q Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those" S+ l+ o B7 s9 X people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 4 X; k' }& m/ u; ymay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some + n" u# L% B7 t: Tof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( v1 m3 q6 f) [" E5 H9 {6 `% o"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all! m" k( W Y; c O! U. V people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 9 F* A( i# [5 k' ^9 Tapartments are the way to go? No.4 `5 M7 \8 V h2 n4 L! _% m$ ~$ E) a ! b3 {6 m8 w* E6 H% S 7 Q4 \$ I) w M4 U" j7 b L

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the # d7 m2 P3 ?' @& m3 _8 \situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& X! T: U9 z2 [( y, G& o 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 8 D" C3 @$ p# r8 d( g5 Q$ gno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so1 p1 _$ p/ ^7 o0 b3 y" G fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant : I$ j) Z3 ] u& S- W4 Bresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless ; z+ J, [7 n0 i$ gBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- g" n- a! R+ c9 c. E unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-26 20:52 , Processed in 0.126649 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部