服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6336|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its # H2 E% C0 W4 \architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider2 j3 K& R6 u( T4 ^! \, o7 j6 T5 C Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # X& H% Y0 S; b/ h; Rcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( A# t6 ]* I; M' o, {% \0 M: S% q1 y {According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,0 C P+ v. s( Q- Z+ z( l- f3 u 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ) s, p" y1 C1 v, HManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within8 F. h/ I c% C! X6 T& @8 E hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 3 L- S. K" @/ A1 r/ ]each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera/ p$ N; @7 k4 x& R, z and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ s5 r3 \3 n$ P$ S) a( K harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ! _4 r6 ^( b* c3 G& `( Wdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and" Q6 A: w( y8 v, m* z/ \$ q forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 1 R1 p6 ~+ Y1 z/ M9 Ywas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 0 Y1 `7 L- [& ~7 rimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,9 O+ j1 d$ Z4 U$ e" n: A and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 4 L( o& {* p$ _: Ghas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment) Q$ |# [ c$ p7 @- \! l1 U" m: a1 } of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that- e2 Q4 x2 z# P no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are- N. s# y8 Z# A7 K: ^3 O only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a # C! g: X$ O) h& s4 Ysort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government . p) Q. ]2 z+ d, O g- G: u X1 cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move $ j! D$ Q, Z2 f% _to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is + I8 h* k4 w, p7 w6 p- t"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 S1 }# {7 t2 h this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are1 h. H, ?$ l5 v$ i2 L! b5 x still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to * d1 V, u, M4 S: }; G" Y"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ( o6 I1 x/ G! C, N' @1 R8 Nmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, O2 |! ^3 M, P2 [2 v+ _9 N8 n a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 4 E* a: X! g7 kparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across k0 A5 f9 N/ u2 Q6 ]the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural + j" S9 }7 ^" Cimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for - a" F9 D, K7 ^& f* ?1 F9 `3 Ldevelopment.

Hutongs9 e% } F. U$ f5 L w in the old days were residential area where people actually lived& F$ V. Y x+ N1 h7 I there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 a5 q. ?6 }+ _ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not; X4 F) y3 r- M4 `' b% o5 c6 v have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you - p0 Z* M* B# s ?$ S0 swill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. 4 r8 D7 d" ^/ e1 iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date9 n( w, Y1 D5 J/ s2 o2 i to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 3 \; g1 m& v. [% Q6 k3 hto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses# _5 f! u( Z; ~3 r support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 9 F: R G. q- v; T5 O6 iunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to ) I2 x% i. o' l: W/ Vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, & P, }6 z) K% P/ Jhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the : S. g( B. s1 l8 f3 H5 Dbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the" @4 u2 a- O- \- p. p5 \! t project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 2 b' z. l' u* V0 @renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong o# b. X% {# d/ v$ k Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how e0 {# L5 m7 V( Q/ y$ Q people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 9 ?% X2 P( m& wtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished6 r$ V1 d+ k$ y# O- r# X memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".+ p! W/ ]4 E5 b Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are Z9 {( K1 J; a, w j- L aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! h; `1 o+ u% E$ ^, R" {3 P5 S8 m non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image8 k- ~9 s& O% ]! W of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these ( L% q( f/ `8 P3 LHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those / l0 v8 s. |7 x& p6 V" P9 lpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they( Z0 e6 B- J; z% o% h- C/ t1 [. Z% d may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 0 p0 o: l7 R' U, q: q% z% F( }of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before4 L8 E2 g+ ]1 G7 Q6 r "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 1 T) R' H8 O5 q8 @people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise/ R! v" x$ r2 y" I2 }0 ` apartments are the way to go? No.9 e+ Z- ]( [$ ?; ~5 A4 f8 I 3 y9 J% E! L/ Q! s1 W 8 R0 P) v) y3 X4 K

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the7 L. g: r- d$ `$ w# u1 B situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this! x; {+ R5 S& M( b; [ 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make/ k" I, ^& f5 u5 C9 f; K' e# @( | no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so) l1 Y2 w# K5 j' C' t; T) D% w fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 0 a4 q+ F8 Z k6 p% j& B. n3 P6 Uresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 7 ?4 b1 I0 B& Z) UBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is6 A; o- P0 ~" ` \ unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-29 12:44 , Processed in 0.182862 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部