服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6286|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its9 m7 t( N- v/ }4 s, A architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider . M6 T; ?' H* Y' SBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # P4 a$ U5 m- h- b2 acity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ( P& _; V! [7 g: TAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 1 p/ Q* ~1 n& `3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of ) E7 |, [' P: V+ e3 o$ y5 {. ^8 S; HManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within $ w3 K9 F# D2 D/ p; phutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among t/ [; D A$ P# m7 ^- @each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera5 O4 E1 v) r/ ^8 v$ ?! ~* q! S and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is K/ y# P8 `. R6 kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are6 s: V6 ?0 S& f, A descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and- N5 I' i* |6 a forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I' Q7 F/ F2 _: m! t7 J was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great # c) U% t+ [% |" i9 i; Iimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, * r, ]+ L! J& }( v3 {' {- K' {/ sand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong : D. x: P6 }, s" y; G, ehas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 7 s! d X" Q- `- _+ j, c; Eof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that : @2 E* t# Q+ P8 X* W! o0 Ono hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are ; t7 x* q1 z5 K2 D9 Gonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a. E9 d4 m% I8 z5 ? sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government . v" e# S. {( L# v" `& Swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move4 ?- e" j# f! d3 a/ t+ Y1 k to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 3 m$ e0 i* `* w" \2 h6 F( B d6 V"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, 7 B/ q! J6 ?' w, g0 _this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ! j+ @( \! E: lstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to ; s, n. {( t3 z2 c"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ! Z; R8 a0 h U2 h' vmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 6 m( Y% f6 G1 A/ L+ Y! B" Ta beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a $ J5 T; ]- m& Q% eparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 6 n. r; Z. e; X" n4 G Hthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural" V' g, ?: ~) Z8 |0 k5 f importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for6 S% ?) n; k3 W! T; _ development.

Hutongs . B0 E7 o0 M, O( i# R. sin the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 l) T8 `$ a# p: o! \3 c there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions * {& }9 p2 H5 G# Oin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 9 v" m: P7 u+ C' Ohave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you & a' O0 g u- a* \8 F/ P( pwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.- ~0 b' G" Z, H, D0 Z2 y' { Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date# q- g0 `: w4 J9 U; q to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used H8 O7 v5 R. j* h to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses : O& R1 ?3 {1 r( H; Psupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically4 u+ x* K& s2 w+ s' }# T7 `; B% a unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 4 D. f. F1 a) Z' c3 }live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, Z) L& ~. e6 V; P% }2 z# j& w5 chutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the+ i% _) r' q" a balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the + D$ l/ L9 m0 c0 o8 [* U$ _# V: lproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 3 A" ^* a0 s& Q! g, s/ j0 drenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong9 D3 p3 {$ J3 q" i5 E Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how ' U; H; P# b6 Fpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be : y5 J4 N3 b) ] Jtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished9 [1 \# z7 J; C2 E memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- q7 H+ L: M2 t8 P- L9 W Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are' A# @' b4 ]/ B2 h) u9 w2 n6 Q aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially/ m) m9 R9 H* l8 y; E non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image* B. O# t5 ~# B7 w8 X of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; W' n j1 g& ` Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 f/ c B+ l0 [! _4 q |( Q people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they) Z" [3 O* s+ D- O9 A( E6 y may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some3 K" X. J: {8 W4 e of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before0 l8 N2 { [5 Q; Q "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all+ ?, `( I, u2 X( t: C; a1 N: D people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise % S* K6 o* ^, q/ Capartments are the way to go? No.: ]8 S$ P- i) L+ ~ # [; S: p0 e. p7 ~$ A7 g , B1 v; {* z4 f6 h2 W6 `1 X

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the* M& O5 y! b: X W5 o situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 3 h* c! |+ ~' p* x& u! t'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make( p' w$ v9 j% ]( A+ j1 J7 @ no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so , c7 ~* `9 d4 Jfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant, o' w2 X0 U- C( M6 m resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: A1 \- `2 A5 c2 {6 e Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is + c. U' f1 n. }5 @; ]unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-14 02:47 , Processed in 0.205913 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部