UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
% W5 h- h& w, harchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
- ^3 W, z6 H' m8 L' z! jBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
4 U& `6 J% m3 ^" W6 R8 n2 ocity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.9 P7 L$ k9 b: z' H% j) z
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
; t) i3 D: e# `6 P u* M- T( Y2 B5 p3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
: f! I; I, |$ @+ T' ~& r, {2 Z7 t! w( }Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
K3 V3 \5 K. `* H0 Rhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among5 z8 I0 `1 ]/ t) b( S; d. s; H
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
9 }* g% p8 L6 K, A8 B$ E% {and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
3 d, f1 U+ z$ T R1 f( y; w2 hharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are% R- W( b/ o+ `- Z: I3 u
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and- V, Z3 X, R; x0 V$ c
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
% n4 ^; q8 V$ y" Y9 Jwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
% l3 N; P! W7 K6 Nimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
2 a7 t; j D% dand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong. ~7 g* F* D i4 M% z' J+ Q
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment: n' Y9 |# c" r; b9 d( t+ }% z
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that8 ]9 q* @' W W0 l2 i* S
no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are1 X! y. [* Y/ q' E; Y
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a1 ]: u0 P; i1 y5 r$ v
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
k. ? R/ }4 jwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
( N3 c+ d$ B- C: D4 G4 w: [* `to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is p+ D& B3 I* J9 [
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
' j) B# Y0 @* k* X4 Cthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
, E/ Q1 j B0 Bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to. d! f$ v' N: M" h' v* |
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
3 J1 O/ o" P' m* m! amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
4 J: e* ~; L+ f$ [7 Ia beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a& @3 g/ \2 C: d3 W9 S# T. j( H
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across; A- u& Q, i* i( C2 v
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
- r$ U/ q, w' b7 w3 |8 r. oimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 A% G7 t9 ], Q- j# w' S' T) r
development.
Hutongs
. s+ F! R! u& Z" S0 N# h3 kin the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 |: ]0 v8 O/ C1 x, n' q" r& n- e
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
+ I2 }0 Q! O" F) E9 m' din hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 C: Z1 c: L* G, F9 ?6 m
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you' T p4 u" b! F7 k4 @
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.# n; S. J. O# [( r% ?3 D! s. _% s
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date* {- D& K* ^# U. q/ R" k0 a+ B& \8 w, |
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used7 V) ]5 j( t/ d4 W
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
4 D' |, w8 r6 O7 m. b' fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
, T" @- }' I! dunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to. }9 k, G' C" F: ~
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,: j( m) Q" y) s/ ?) ]* r
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the) R" ~/ P: P# `/ c
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the( ^( T9 S6 S O
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be2 C' Q2 |" e7 v* n; v% @
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong! Y* v+ g. U/ c. p/ L6 p0 k/ H
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
& u7 D: p4 B7 e& Hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
4 L1 @9 P$ B* q2 ltorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
" V" C5 d4 w6 u8 b imemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".
/ O! q9 O' F4 w; [/ o7 q* t: DNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are; W4 u0 b# |0 c
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially3 u3 r) [. R0 G$ J& w- V
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
" ^; f Q: W# Eof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
; C- ?' {; J( Q+ [# }9 v6 QHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
; }# h: I, r/ E1 n3 \8 wpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
5 D6 B6 D& s# v' zmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
8 K/ y( \3 [& G( Q0 f' }* qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before; _. @+ o3 o1 s9 C
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all4 z' ? p2 j$ n; u
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
6 p# g$ |, v& W" a, h1 ~+ o- rapartments are the way to go? No.6 N) z( U `& m( {: F( s% u. V
- y6 `; P+ Y, I/ c 5 O; `& p) f) r
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the5 ?( N0 c2 g" k- e1 M& ?! d
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this& d! {5 @8 |; O- ~
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
) P! b7 H) m" T3 qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
/ j3 I+ @ |6 t" p& z/ Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
+ Y5 L' Q. e8 q6 Q, ^3 v* t# p: ?, z: @resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless r! L- q' _$ Q, C
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
" e8 M6 Q6 G t& b ^unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|