UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its; T. E( E5 z3 I% d8 Y; Q5 f
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider w: n4 [5 w, l7 Y9 g
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" v0 [( a$ _/ |, }! d$ a
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.2 L) G1 Z D0 X* }1 L1 r
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,/ c- Z) k) ]+ n: j
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of6 k1 i- q( [) F. b
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within9 M) o2 H( L4 @/ k
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
9 C& ]8 [" q" K( Reach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera. ~* r/ ^( ^' p* a2 o5 _+ A
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
6 X; J( R% s; Z& wharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
! r8 ~! _8 N- F0 d8 P0 q% f, _descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
K4 K* g" P9 N. {1 V- P+ _forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
3 ]0 u* K( C. v; o- ~1 V" ^was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
! S# T7 j# I, i) N) [impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
& q6 w) o, }2 q0 T; `) ^6 }" pand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong
8 q) I* d1 m+ d) d- A3 F& p* Dhas a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment3 W8 o0 q9 H, C h# _& Y
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
4 I/ [* G$ n1 R# {) Q1 p: P7 fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are/ A- N# p" W5 O2 S
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a$ v. L# u# Q, J, x- h
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
( E/ q e; ^; [9 @) x1 ^5 Bwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move2 @2 h, b# y: R' S$ G
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is% j' z" a" a; N- {
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- F$ i# w6 e. Y
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
9 J* p, T6 m i/ bstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to) n; n0 p( U, o' \0 H( O
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
+ f7 V3 p3 N' B" [9 T/ Z8 Rmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was& V' o7 |, \7 ]% N. h3 w. d
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a: [8 p [- X. @2 |( O* W
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
" M& g- U) c5 [! c8 y/ p5 v( Nthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
! V$ C9 `) _* I+ L3 limportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
2 r" L" E5 @* }! p/ D/ l: o+ ~7 K. Udevelopment.
Hutongs/ \5 \- j+ }- J5 \7 s
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived8 v# f- J1 c6 x/ d
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
8 j0 U$ g) J3 {5 K1 Iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
# \ x' V9 I8 s1 Zhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you, p) R' v- C7 O! O5 N
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.8 _: L( m, o1 Q6 S* o
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
( O5 ]7 a: P& e) c) E1 U- a7 L6 Vto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used* n) d1 X. G% b0 v8 @9 P5 e$ x
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses4 s4 L! t1 O( W' q K9 \
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically: H4 S3 S* i8 H8 u
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
0 T7 u; C8 w0 C j6 o8 C8 Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 f5 i. P% t: L6 m2 V% c
hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
! `- r) V* [% l7 ^* Lbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
1 E' |5 M; S+ l- U% Y5 hproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be/ f0 B" O1 Y m$ C0 n
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
6 R% |: I' x' J0 T" x) {7 sMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how; o% Q& K' y4 `7 T5 H9 T( O0 ^8 @: I2 [
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
' a) k. u$ v. G/ d3 l- g" x' rtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished' D, m; j# L! C% D! F% p S/ Z; M
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 I' H% `4 k5 b& x2 a; a
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
* r6 a$ H4 Y8 `7 ]8 l7 n0 u9 i& z4 laligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
- c0 t' ~5 x' I* X+ C. x. knon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
/ }) ]3 O+ k8 w6 jof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these2 C# R3 X4 H- S9 r8 M* Y' s
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those8 @: b3 }; x& U
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
* b5 _$ J6 O! A2 r) |may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
- j. b; Z3 c; a/ S7 h9 F6 U8 Rof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before( `, d( }. i4 s6 s: u/ w. ~4 p
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
! @* q& H8 l9 e2 g" P" J- gpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
' h/ V( B! v c0 b. |0 p. L8 gapartments are the way to go? No.
# a2 l# B! W9 e' I1 M$ Z) ]. K4 ]5 F 4 y( X6 q0 c* P9 x5 o0 z# `7 `
6 t% c7 a9 K3 E! X, c/ b2 U1 X" f
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
, G8 Q. b; s [8 asituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this0 K- g8 B9 j. |& R5 ^5 R0 O
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make/ T7 g6 h' \# Q4 Z6 T, J
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so% p' f# v" n) w
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
8 e; L5 Y F6 d3 V9 D! _4 Gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
" ^+ z" }4 l) K" t" M t/ H- |3 IBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
( h/ N$ j3 f Xunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|