服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6213|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 2 \ g* x& w" q8 E: G0 M+ i( A, Iarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 1 K& z" {* ?8 L5 Z9 [! T' [5 W& CBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" # ^6 x% |8 t5 V- fcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. , S3 X+ W$ s& sAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ! T0 P4 J' L- d6 @3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of & Y& Z I( r; i9 t$ qManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within . |" J( W7 O% J, {$ g" @; R! Shutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among: ~: v0 z" V' M+ U each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera6 ]' O' ]% I' _- N$ H/ J/ ?; p& | and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is' E$ t+ o7 x0 C- }4 ^1 H) ]/ t harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are : }( X- {) b1 {7 F, |0 ^descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ' @* L% D/ ] f3 jforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I P5 \9 w6 x3 K- A: I+ Twas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great3 D; ~8 ]# {% ?2 v1 E2 c: H: r impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,2 ]. }- e1 \7 t0 x( a" _- H4 Z and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong O; V% D" K6 Z5 Q% f4 q has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment. f& z8 f/ v$ h( _ of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 2 Y( o( R5 k% ~9 T" Q" A8 Kno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are8 R, Y# o7 _$ _: [ only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a6 _3 N% }. B9 {0 @9 J7 m sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government . I M/ W$ v4 W5 |+ ~8 A7 b. Nwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move$ c; I, S; o* c to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is! N& ]; I% s; B! _" n" k "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, " A& R- N* d8 e7 Z! W+ V: Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are+ L6 I+ c2 R7 _ c8 z still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 2 {8 W. ^4 C4 {"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make " V" j1 ^% f0 c( Q2 vmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 9 M' {. \. q, Z7 x- |- da beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a) u. y6 ]$ b, Y+ e% R4 g parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across5 ]& z+ a5 ^6 W the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural / J9 W9 k6 ^0 [& W2 n! `8 {! uimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for + d2 c- n: N7 L: O: V* Mdevelopment.

Hutongs& f6 u! H1 p' U0 [0 x# t in the old days were residential area where people actually lived' n6 i. z! d7 H there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions % j% S0 k" m0 Uin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 2 R- _5 R- }. ahave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you $ h8 f+ W; V* n) B7 e/ jwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs./ T" V% e) H3 u4 c2 b Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date ( A* Y9 i; }) {" P4 y: Y: c. [to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used( V9 l$ s4 E0 x8 w, R to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses $ C8 @7 h9 A0 I" Asupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically% J& c5 k; |! B' N5 | unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to+ n6 Z, p, L/ G0 {4 e# a live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, 4 L1 t2 k, C" \! whutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the4 R; ` z6 m- e, }7 |- _ balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the / n6 Y0 c; Y5 U9 V2 N1 ~3 Rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be3 X; q' O. V" e& t& `. n renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong# ?7 w4 m* `9 e- [( ~ Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% g% V( `& T1 y2 ]3 ? people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be) [9 a5 u% d9 } torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished7 q+ K! P2 a: ~0 I memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 q; Y$ t I& o; ]: P Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ; p+ u/ _% D9 ]" f0 H; V$ |aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially2 k: I9 x: }6 f' g8 [& `( _ non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image % A& A+ @, Q3 A3 e& {# O O( nof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these " S. X$ U+ e# ?Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those 1 Z% X% S: g' C5 e9 I `people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they4 o: Z; A8 X+ o: C2 K may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some7 ^7 e! L& c8 T5 [8 j of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before 2 T8 U# y1 b4 n+ G9 R"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all % s) P$ Y4 p' U( Z% t. Vpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise * v! q, S: h8 t7 A0 F3 Z, e- Qapartments are the way to go? No.7 D6 e; P2 }3 t- Z! B: a 9 {" c2 c& {6 a' e6 ?% k* l& T 7 [* D0 q3 I1 M# B

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the ^2 o, H& q- ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this / O, Z& k/ u0 Y4 \, b) ]. W. w'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make/ I4 u+ e" `8 r- {1 B2 C: h no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so) _% z# L: [2 H1 h/ S; K7 g! p fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant3 L( |& R( @1 B resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless: {5 ^" {, ]( r- ~6 } Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' A/ ~+ M0 E& ~/ ^7 _9 _: ~5 wunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-11-22 19:11 , Processed in 0.121006 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部