UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
6 ]6 F7 h p) f; B1 I. Barchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
9 ], f& V: L" k `3 {8 YBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
) |/ r6 l2 w- d7 Ucity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.7 B! t5 w4 P; {, t! D
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
2 t# H- p+ ?* w+ `. L5 Z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of
. L* a g7 ?2 ^' _" m+ c" gManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within N3 V. ]" X& R7 u' j! k7 p
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
) v3 Y" m! b O/ i! k' Ieach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera: z" g8 _4 P* ?* W1 a
and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
3 p( a$ g" l2 f7 vharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are0 f. y9 v$ Y; Y( M( Y1 V* B# ]) |
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' _2 I2 p' X0 R+ O4 e: O
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
9 y* _% N0 z- @1 e, @was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great D! k5 M+ M0 @$ W" F
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,) @) G/ ]$ ~2 h5 ]; J, C" h) y7 l
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong! q/ @% M8 J+ l M, r" h0 I! ]
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment; F; N, E. P( v4 G
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
7 _4 @" ?& D' _" l9 Y$ Pno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( M6 J/ ?# ~! `9 P2 m& ]5 A
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a& l" e z, m M' f# A, W
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government4 n- F4 q0 U# U! Z
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
2 a3 _4 `% @2 E' Rto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is3 u) W( S% z/ F+ C2 t2 ]# _% m% t
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
" G& m& q, P4 V1 Tthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are4 S+ C6 p3 ?: A' w
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to. Y, C8 e; r, [, k* [( h) G
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
( l. x. n) X0 Bmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was: F, U% @3 F+ S; ?5 y
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
- @3 C1 s, k$ Q5 vparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across; W% N! O* y$ {/ E9 c8 n" W4 \
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural4 @* U, P0 t R3 K3 ]
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
9 g+ Q, n" J c7 c p7 Zdevelopment.
Hutongs
Q: \7 r7 V( i" W& I$ Vin the old days were residential area where people actually lived
" [) T& ?' G3 j" [: {8 uthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions9 E$ U3 C- I9 ~9 o! Z( I! ]; c
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not; A5 }) b7 |5 Q! m
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
( M: f' i7 M$ B& b Q0 ?will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.7 b7 a' F, J7 n; A
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date- a% @/ S. r- z5 q4 u; G5 K- G. \, D; i; S
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
+ C2 |. C2 m% D# d9 Fto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
# d+ ?/ W3 ~; O. Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically3 Q# n$ @& r s( d. k5 ?4 R8 x
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
! q) |# v7 q8 Z, F9 s" clive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
. d7 [% Z6 C, Xhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the5 F& y& g" W ^. X* e8 E3 \$ ~
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
. U$ m; _# |0 A) Cproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
$ E3 W* S, o% k, B* k& N; Y) frenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
1 Y( e/ ^- W W( @Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
. h& J) f& ]" Q% \people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be8 h0 F8 H9 K/ V: v
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
; g6 F& |+ |+ I3 }5 U. Y; U- Rmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".; P, T" r, k- g4 K
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are% \0 N! u; k% |( I+ u
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
2 h; }* j. ^! B' x2 Enon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
) `. S, ]' q. I; [' v+ X: t, }of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
: C4 [5 ? [5 s+ R. g4 l# cHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
0 b- h J" H( M# }1 f" Jpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they2 i" K1 o, z5 Z* D
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
% W' e7 |7 ]+ W5 k9 Vof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
- \ O5 N6 ], m"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
2 V* w! Q9 I# z! y% qpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
$ n5 N- n9 \ n$ T6 j, a/ zapartments are the way to go? No.
" N0 H" o1 o$ L. l i # I3 M9 _4 g$ f1 c( G
$ [. N6 r; j: m* H
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
2 W9 P0 |8 O: D2 R0 o/ tsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this5 Z. S+ ~, @! T# C2 }. i5 q
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
5 a5 O. c+ t- _$ }no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
' J7 k4 l3 F4 R5 f3 l( hfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant$ j5 _: G9 U2 X+ {& f8 W
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless
( }2 U2 G1 o% l R3 _( tBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
) R D% w9 D) J U+ wunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|