UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
) S$ q" C8 m! Earchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
$ a, Q/ S4 b KBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian") x1 a) m+ r+ _$ Y$ k. p% `
city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.4 y* \$ l) T- q, U
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,. ` x, a( r8 u* f) p+ O) g5 C
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of6 `9 a H3 Q5 I& X, Q
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
" Y* _' w2 S. K5 ^hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
5 H3 P& k* Z' a9 e' j% D7 peach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
3 q+ |% \- u& v. N/ b* \and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
5 s% j# s$ N4 d+ u2 B* `harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are1 D1 Q8 M b: N' C! W
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and/ c2 I7 u& b; }
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
9 B$ F; z- j+ G. Q) F; L' k8 Nwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
`* f3 h/ x( \( y- aimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, t5 n) E2 R/ F+ l# S+ F
and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong4 j) V- U9 F1 V7 W
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
4 D2 p" S: a$ J6 uof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
! `& p7 }7 {5 c5 G$ fno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
! u: b7 @7 V) Sonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
1 ?! r5 J: _" \0 _4 n% u5 ]sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government Y# X8 `" k, U+ ]' d
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
0 U! m$ ?6 L# R+ I0 O' p/ e5 E- ato the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
: j( Y0 _- K1 d0 l' Z"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,, J" u; H7 X2 J* Y0 Z5 P
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are$ h# h. g( x4 E7 P5 u5 P( B
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to1 H8 u" P3 j4 G, p& A1 @! S* w
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make# u1 V5 Y( I5 Z/ Q* ^. O3 W
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was* _/ R# z& k: m
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# B9 r5 ]! E3 T* C; d% Y9 Z: ?# i
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
4 ~0 i+ q. s* u) Rthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
4 m& u: G |& _importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for
8 _" _' F4 t9 W* J+ X4 C0 U4 ?development.
Hutongs
, M, X! O1 Q' Tin the old days were residential area where people actually lived' F1 g# j4 U% M. O) G7 f
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions& ]; a2 ^7 U/ N1 _# o/ `2 q5 E
in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
) _1 Q, Y$ B" p1 d8 j$ K- W! Jhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
1 m1 W1 C% q) n5 M- B& l2 h8 ^" e/ Zwill have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
$ \6 k# Z% D2 R8 M* N2 x; JFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
5 J9 R) t$ t' Y: A2 ^to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used! J7 R3 g, h, E2 @( w. `
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses
4 n- i0 c3 [; V; {support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically' F: m0 Z. {3 e* r/ H$ f0 c
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
0 h; |5 t6 B0 w2 p1 z; Q N+ `live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
5 ~: w* M' N+ A, v5 Shutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the+ B& F) n% `, O. Q* k
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the( K" p4 S$ {7 v
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
9 y% T' a4 a# J+ yrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
1 R: Y- |% ^* S( {* Z! \% A. rMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how0 h2 C- H8 p, n- T# V( e% ]
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
2 i0 z+ \6 `5 K# ~2 d) }torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
. J9 \% l# ^- e0 \: U& B, Ymemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".6 V0 h& S6 }4 w/ y6 T/ r# ]
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
! Q b! U7 \; [1 [1 I- m% d3 Valigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially! Y8 K; v( b8 z+ R) @: N
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 Z4 x" E; R5 z' S1 b
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these; U, Y6 _4 b5 b) u$ C
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
8 F( @& y9 ?9 j5 h" i5 Xpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they$ P6 a; Z3 I; n" j, k, E* L8 S" {
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
: L8 [. H4 `& z4 J8 w# Qof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 I3 T, |% e9 L9 [) M0 ^0 B; R, |"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all# d/ \$ f0 b4 S5 b5 u
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise9 Z/ U0 |" q5 F
apartments are the way to go? No.! k* j: S4 e! l6 m% S( Q
. L2 H) ^! I# v, \ 0 y7 `3 G! l! V8 l1 y; ^& N
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the/ q, b" g! |# A* t/ S9 l
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
& ~& w7 x2 l1 Y7 F1 O'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make. ^3 b& I$ l& y; x. Z
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so7 M+ }3 i# @* F% n
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
W+ ?$ ]1 r& y. [- ?- W2 M" a3 gresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless6 q" w" r! l, W- \3 h j' `) E5 k
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is2 \6 l" I: M* Y0 a
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|