服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6318|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its4 J0 x& S, ]8 Z+ j architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider; N e% W( p4 K/ P/ K9 @ Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"# @3 [& S7 d- n9 ^ city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.* y8 k: d* {7 b According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,' J4 ~, ~$ T8 Y 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ O) ^: S5 h3 e# T Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 7 R0 A6 l- m9 O$ g2 z7 [hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among. J- E* Y4 Z& {+ a* h each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 6 a9 C6 M/ \7 z: W2 [! t; Z4 @and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is & J' t1 X) h) e! g8 q9 nharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are ; _0 z: x$ q; g0 u) O1 W' b9 E: Vdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and ; H1 p, V0 s: N% A; tforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I . v( p; N. D0 U: ~2 d( z, ~was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great $ d) u- F" O. o: l8 m* aimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,% S( G! a( Z( l$ N! p$ R+ M and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong: p2 E/ s( @' k3 T( q5 `3 `0 N( `0 H7 Y has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment9 K; M4 r" e; { u1 `. d. B of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that3 m' O: P$ T' ?! Y6 o" p+ U9 d no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 4 ?, a1 F% r6 O! |only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a7 K) N( h% t6 \" I sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government / [; r7 L& |. d xwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 2 p6 w# F$ Q: F& u" r* W( p0 Sto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is& u6 p2 D: W- G6 x- A. Y "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, ) v4 g; B% f' @1 B! t, [3 athis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are( k- P7 I5 d/ ? still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to/ `! {% P [" m# u9 C "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make , O( S @% Z/ \$ Q; x; qmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 4 U& W! e* ^" ^4 h2 f8 ?6 ma beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a6 _9 I: m: O% H5 c8 ]' X! S parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across5 F- U% S$ s' k$ \' i3 K& o the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural) ^8 ~8 @$ b S- D- `$ ? importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for# ?, [: _9 i* |2 @* l development.

Hutongs0 ?% H; i0 o/ W( v2 [1 f# P' L in the old days were residential area where people actually lived ) }8 t( P' a( Xthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions2 W! T' v0 ]( J" K+ r# S( i in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 2 P: w# }& N3 jhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( ~3 @) k, _& U3 \$ I will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. # ~, `$ @% |- l! H; [" OFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date' \2 N. R" ^* H: F1 [& B( `3 d& \; C) r( g to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used 2 M) R# Y. l: }# D$ Lto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses & Y9 |' n9 N7 H2 ]; Fsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically( h& z$ S$ m5 y: }( |9 k unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to $ a" T, I9 i& i$ h; e9 wlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,4 }# {4 K! o0 b' }) c% O! a hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 8 t: Y/ w5 U A7 R# k Bbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the 4 `: T- _0 ` |project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be# |3 L. `6 p9 r! Y& L7 } renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong " G/ i0 O z( D& k' V! r1 ZMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how+ Z+ w( B: S d6 T0 ` people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be + V. \) V2 G+ t0 X# xtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished5 _$ ^" Q+ g, f) i$ e# Z5 Z; K memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". * l% u! s$ J, y" K( g* t7 I) _Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are j/ m4 L& K) D& ` aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, w: W6 d- C) `8 E non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 A6 h; M1 x9 ~" W" zof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these0 E% r1 p- H+ M; G' z3 A2 V1 Y/ W Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those5 f, [9 Y( F9 ~4 T people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they7 F* f7 I+ X2 C. ?. b: x4 A may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some/ D1 @- U% I8 { of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before9 }- t, _4 b' b$ W0 O k7 v8 ]6 O "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 0 \' h. d' ]# F K! Q4 F, h+ }people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise& C2 E+ ]' t1 ^+ l3 F6 X5 h$ d0 C) j apartments are the way to go? No. : F* \6 I, l1 M) [ I* ]+ ^* A) e 4 Z% A; r/ b6 F/ w8 w" f! a! }) O - O% t& F& N5 m: E4 G

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the , h7 q8 ]8 b& rsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this @5 `" ^* k; C4 n* C! W4 H* A% n 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make, u Q, D2 X3 h4 Z) l. V8 E% K- p+ g no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so * T. l2 s# }+ L# W8 {fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant6 V( a) m3 S! R resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless9 r5 I: P" u% C4 |+ J7 ~# q Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is # _ U' ~6 O- Z# |unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-26 04:18 , Processed in 0.114101 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部