服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6733|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its / i+ G+ v: j# H6 _architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider8 x8 M. c' A# N- z1 H7 q7 F Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"/ m! b" b$ \4 R ? city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. ] b; g4 N/ N0 { According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, ; P5 H3 p$ q" Q! `1 {3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- b! S) o- w% Q7 u Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 2 h+ j9 O5 W: |4 r- t) g6 U- Chutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among7 V \; j. o$ P3 c0 S each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera; L9 E. W6 b2 y+ ?1 v; ^! z* y and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 6 J- W) o) `/ D$ Z: T# y; oharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are , A. x& W2 M8 W! ?& ]9 m( E' T6 adescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and2 V# ^4 S' I5 b9 O& ]4 y forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 9 S& S! L; d. y+ {was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great - p+ O$ y3 T4 Y0 M5 Oimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, ( @! `8 S H! R% Z$ Eand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong- ]: C: t" L) q. H6 F ~3 s. h* Q has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment ; x: s7 B% d7 E+ b. v- T2 K+ U& bof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that5 n9 a, J8 W6 c& X0 m; m) t5 k no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are + n8 P: r8 x4 w3 z- ponly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ; w( o1 w- d- x( b. isort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government1 N3 M `- z% |; ` want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & z) h/ P% f* K8 u2 M* J$ n8 ^) }to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is # e, B) T- M( j& a N8 n"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, q. W' P1 g* C4 _8 Z- S this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are $ R9 B) }) A5 w2 {5 I% kstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to% r1 e7 _) o( V! U- c "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 4 e Y) v& X0 O! n8 ^money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was - f' K9 y% S# B8 [5 Va beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 5 E! Q4 _( F9 f! y! ^parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 8 ?$ x2 H+ }2 \) P+ othe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural0 \4 w7 Y8 X* f0 W! J' b importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 0 Z% ]4 L- [$ K, v; H; Udevelopment.

Hutongs 1 L9 z7 z" P# Z3 J) A8 y G9 ^# e; xin the old days were residential area where people actually lived F H7 M% ?) D( T" M% Wthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions 1 z D/ t' x8 p8 c. xin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 4 h# P4 x& D( k" h% i# Yhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you( y& t2 M& L6 E" g7 [: i, v% h will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. & E4 J: X0 A1 s$ A# j& h7 L- qFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date. K3 R5 u/ X* j2 p to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used( l( L+ O' y# x2 o+ H3 K to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses 6 `5 d8 ^, K: R" rsupport a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 7 Q9 U ]2 _" }, Qunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to6 f' Q4 @' L' g& K, C, E' |8 b live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,- Z7 e0 Z& g! w7 Y5 l hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 0 j' a5 I4 D {( d: J/ X% Fbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the # Z0 I. a2 ~1 T( aproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be ' R) r" A- n! Frenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong / w @& \% X2 c9 n7 I( `Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how% h9 f. Q$ |4 U- }8 I people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be & d+ O/ P% k: V) m, v6 [torn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished 6 T( J2 E% i9 q3 q( Y9 Gmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". ! A" G+ |& B* \/ \8 n% y* m5 HNothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are! ~1 u9 z6 b) b5 u aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially $ o) B* K) h) g. V4 E8 Vnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image" k! f `9 Q2 G5 I3 P6 Y1 O5 l* b6 _ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these! w4 J. [3 e3 P2 _: N Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those$ G$ ^0 s- u6 g( [$ T2 H people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they+ E5 o3 w: H9 X1 r( q4 M may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some 5 y- l) o! x7 S- k7 W& cof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ( q6 }3 v+ x' {+ K"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all& ` k: M8 l$ X1 v% p1 G people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise 6 b+ B* t! J; j( i: ?% {# dapartments are the way to go? No.& R- w/ x2 x* G+ L. S ( _0 P% D/ H0 O$ Z4 M4 l; X 6 I4 z" c }# q

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the e# _% Y6 h/ |- r$ K) Z6 x. M situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this9 ?$ ` o" ?( f9 U# D 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make 9 r. r. ], z9 f% }, `- zno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so5 g: R }- D, S fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant9 b) c+ J/ @1 H* F( p! i# }% t+ o resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless$ g& q" a, s Y* d0 a2 J Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is- W3 F. r5 n5 N# t4 Y5 Q6 Y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-2-14 12:57 , Processed in 0.135959 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部