UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its2 R0 B- {; V0 I Q- c0 _- W
architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 c' I8 i' [7 U5 g
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
, p9 b/ @2 A8 jcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.$ X7 R6 t3 q7 T! u3 V
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
1 c, i8 a. {/ d( u" j3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of5 {0 [; v' B1 n8 q6 W* F% O( |5 V. _
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within% x' W7 D/ A. r! ~( N7 }
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among
% c4 h K5 o- y/ @0 B1 ]: Qeach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
& t+ f+ u3 s. r% s4 l2 eand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is$ `9 c7 R% C9 K* A
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
- Q( k3 q. B4 p" I' k6 B# Hdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, E! g/ C% a' r% C
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
+ z s" p/ Q! Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great) D1 b I9 V( I/ d, a) w7 S1 A
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
1 k" w; d( w: W: l9 L1 Hand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, p; e8 W/ i. A6 J9 \ X
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment* `# a7 c/ }8 H
of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
- ~( x, h) R, w$ {9 b0 Y4 Uno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are# k+ F" q; _7 m" b8 a+ J5 h
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
. w6 t5 c% r( x$ vsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government2 v* Y, ~" K0 j% T* ~5 H
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
1 D9 j9 B: {: T, X% Qto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
7 k9 M C5 d4 s' Z* X9 B"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,5 `9 p4 r q) V
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
+ M+ r) U( Z9 ^; C a( estill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
8 c3 K% C% v. ^7 a- G: ["progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
5 E: e! u1 s' B' [2 W0 Hmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was, U7 R$ ~) `, X: V8 p, i
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
( @/ e! n) X& y, Mparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
! R7 f0 }3 {/ h5 ]8 q$ V. j) hthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
: \$ j8 l; i% L$ ?8 wimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for8 m& R0 A. [6 D9 k$ p1 L* Q) \
development.
Hutongs) H7 G8 D# e D+ m: D) n, s: ]
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived2 V# @( W8 W; o7 E
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
: W( l+ \& B8 w* a9 z: ?in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not
, l7 g1 ]0 M: Chave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you
4 i' G! c4 R" ^5 v3 b8 G. |will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
- H |. B# L, p# t1 b* iFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
6 i1 O% c; o' e9 k Z3 S& q9 jto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used% t& |2 D0 }$ ?
to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses7 e2 _3 z0 J; o9 b# q
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically; r: H' [# S) V* V2 C: q/ a
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
, ]0 z. a0 J: J6 T. ]" B- blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
$ d+ S+ h2 F8 {! ] y' G5 yhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
0 B: E1 G S, @& r+ r3 Xbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
( l' e0 l+ P" ]+ B$ Dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be* l' r5 a' O, R, t
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
' N( q9 j/ {' V+ N+ d6 |Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how
' ~- x6 C! Q! L2 s7 i4 M- q- l& hpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be! @, b/ C$ A/ r* f- h
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished- Y; [7 s! o5 X" W* o# Z
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".- t: e3 W( {" b* Q1 Z' O& q
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are1 j2 ~# ] q7 B5 U8 ?) z Y1 D4 I O
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially& X; Z- w. S/ E2 e( N" H
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image5 C8 e! z: o. l/ V p5 M
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these
# }& |2 z [2 x( Y! D! g$ CHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
8 Q+ {9 o0 w) U7 Upeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
1 z: V2 F! E& i# umay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
. q% p* s F7 Q6 {. aof the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
) x }' e% F% v. z"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all% B& S8 O+ J$ |
people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
0 E4 V, F: Y5 f# z; p1 a2 ~apartments are the way to go? No.
1 w2 H \! e' {' Z# j2 v e * q- t2 }- `2 D
& `( D' ?4 @1 U
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
$ p) E1 H2 ?, g1 dsituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
/ W0 o& P1 k9 f0 K& \+ z+ J'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
- d2 n: R3 e1 m3 @# Q8 Lno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
, _6 s$ ~% P+ u" f3 @$ [7 ]$ Xfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant
]0 k: g6 @' e z3 Qresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless( Y0 V s, X& O
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
$ [7 }' Y7 f2 f, j; O. V; Sunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|