服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6309|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its- f8 Y! R# L! x9 v architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider5 i0 ?; r8 J1 x. K0 `' N Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"* t; V+ R& V9 u3 Y7 A4 e' o; S$ \: | city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. & _& x4 c: n9 I9 b; m) Y2 O4 M [According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, $ d' r- u& N' ?: q7 d3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of6 x6 A8 L: ]. z; U) s Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 9 `7 \& {" X) m4 D9 P ^hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among ( V" y' ^$ {8 @: D# {' veach other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera . j- Y. X, E+ p0 K/ {and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is 1 h' B' R! e$ f) F1 aharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are- h. F" x5 m# ?' y0 x" E/ e8 G descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and' g! S8 }) k+ e6 M9 u forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I/ Y% F1 L; |9 M0 X was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great: f* l8 [" o! M) A8 ?& ^" A/ y impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, - D0 }3 ~, \* eand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong 0 }% _* U3 K4 |) {9 hhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment% K7 V$ G- n3 } T- O- o* m of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that d( P+ L5 h& `% M& w4 l4 }9 Vno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are 5 H4 F T- [0 g# @. D4 i, |only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a ' P% h) ^ t# n, {4 z1 nsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government $ S/ N ^- E* I6 h! mwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move - h5 R i7 g- D3 B+ I" r) Eto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 0 O0 y- f4 Y3 a"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,/ `' Y$ f- F' I- c& N this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are ) I! y7 s q- o/ u( {* r! ?; m- gstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 8 t* h! c+ K a2 |9 n# }"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make ' \$ q: M) J2 Z4 z7 H* f- Kmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was6 _' y" h) R: @( g! _' H9 \7 v a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a + F" U- ?6 y) p8 J' Oparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across) ~" t. I7 k/ N- U the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! c! O2 J; d# i' n! y! I- \, vimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for ; N" I: Q5 e1 }4 C* v2 e, r& V5 odevelopment.

Hutongs ' j3 Y5 y2 W# d t3 {. g( O1 D- Win the old days were residential area where people actually lived! ^; g. h$ W6 m! d) j- [- O there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions ) j) E3 R- k. y- j! U r- ]; R) Sin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not5 @' p7 b! t" D& u+ D4 o have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you X) E: X. H+ l! Z) J will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. : `5 l. u3 I; y, d4 @Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date# R+ Q/ Q, N1 d% k. X* C to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used8 X) J) `/ e* ~ x+ ? to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses : a3 O d/ b2 h/ Y5 N! G8 _support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically2 {/ s+ C, f) A0 C- h9 L% ?) O unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to1 U+ B. P4 u, c$ v8 [ live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,9 A* N' `) B* Y7 H9 r$ R! R hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the 8 x4 A' t7 S* t( S9 n1 Y& q) Xbalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the2 K7 M$ B/ b' l* c1 ~2 g project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be9 M, e" N! o! M) D$ { renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong! o) V& D6 |0 ^9 } Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how. h; g& m1 k& ~1 s1 | people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be ' U; i9 Z8 C' |7 Y9 g: E* Qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished L" h4 V9 h0 l) s% \# }memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". - R' i9 Z( Q* ?Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are+ b2 h% ?: i4 m% u& \. N0 X aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially' o+ v. e n2 o3 q non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image6 S3 |, `. |" @ of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these $ W8 r# Q3 G& Q: o* j$ a/ XHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those . y+ L# D9 |0 h! J" I/ Tpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they' ]; o4 s# N9 p" ^" x8 H. N may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some & k2 M, L U. `9 S1 u( `of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before ' ^4 \" Q* @8 w& G* l"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all + A# J0 m( M% U3 x { `) }+ Hpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise& o! S1 A) d& w! J& p! S apartments are the way to go? No. k4 j3 ?8 j* v, J! z! K + Y1 C3 q8 _* _6 r ; c: e1 @4 t- {+ i* g7 i; H0 Z% ~- X

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the 3 Y, c6 \1 E9 B% t2 ]situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this : Y7 s' z+ @- U' M5 n! K'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make + W* [) h5 H$ _% Qno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so - t+ M; Y: ^7 @& Y9 S7 K' cfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant * Y8 i* p( J8 z3 o, Dresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless! J8 a4 ~0 K7 q# q Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is' N/ n. h: b7 ]: ^9 y+ H! y unlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-12-23 00:07 , Processed in 0.119851 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部