服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网
查看: 6462|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接]
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its 6 ]/ A' r; t# D, @architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider r2 ]& u& }( Q; j( iBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" 1 p( u, Z$ f/ f9 J8 i1 L( e/ Icity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. : }# b Z7 j; V# T* p+ y8 V) EAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,- Z/ ]+ |! n/ H: c7 I 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of 7 s; @. T% i6 j- V0 X/ MManchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within% ~- m1 e {$ o9 x8 u/ V; F' J' @ S hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among 0 O4 S8 h4 I! a( S" [each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera % f9 C; a" A6 c! _9 V2 h' Yand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is5 w& T4 s1 L9 [: J# ^ harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are 5 c) A# [7 V, R: r6 }4 F( Cdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 0 a# P8 G* L4 _' u6 e- n1 S: vforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I ; U _( `5 Y3 @& ^was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 4 r2 Y4 o2 i) b; G, i# aimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,7 J1 r% c7 q3 s' B$ \$ ?- @ and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong ( f3 \! I- |( l% Q- u. t. Mhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment. y$ U/ ]7 K* n) J; Y& i of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that- @" x+ Q- Z# g6 d: E9 l0 Z. n/ T no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are( R+ J9 h) l$ v only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 8 y- `& k8 L+ j _) Asort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government , l1 V3 h% j b& P/ ^* G: gwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move( h$ ]5 O. U. j; c0 N) I to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is ! T( Z( y9 u0 X# x3 w' G"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, % h' D, x: t. M/ C. p3 dthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are % w' Z& }* M. Z) K$ }9 c; N3 Z5 qstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to }& Q' a- s$ a8 k5 L- J" b "progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make 6 Y+ ^# r/ Z. v' P8 L0 I" g6 x. i0 K& gmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was8 r% [2 d5 l c2 N0 u3 Z a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a ( F' F6 z5 h: t* `parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across7 `7 k* S# O. U* e2 W1 F! B& } the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural; [- f' t5 k+ \, _ importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for 3 P" s$ y9 D qdevelopment.

Hutongs, F+ E& ]* \% T. J5 P: ^& b in the old days were residential area where people actually lived" ?6 X1 P. }& G1 w) n) j1 R0 E there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions+ e- u6 {1 v, s in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not & R' V6 U! c6 ?+ n% Bhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you" m' E2 {: J* s8 V4 o7 y) B* M: X s will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.4 X5 t, a. f5 A/ A, ~ Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date* \5 l: \2 T+ d to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used : g6 H' k$ b6 o+ d. S Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses. A( X& q7 Q: E: p& t0 Z support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically ' C* v1 N1 ~! _0 yunfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to , W8 b% u N) q( vlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, " C# T( t' p8 j: C; Vhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the / A* ]: n( C7 ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the% z# J1 J# I) h; `7 _/ L9 s project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be 1 T- Z; h8 l/ T8 x, {renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong 2 x( V( a" A8 Q2 SMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how8 q, v l8 p6 H/ v, C people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 6 z" z' ^1 p# I! e, v8 qtorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished5 j- U. V* o; X! X8 i- U, h memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".4 E) p6 [* u' B Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are $ o! h3 `) |; @4 y1 g7 a2 [6 m7 F( qaligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 6 a9 }9 Y* z; N2 d! `3 Snon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image- b0 @/ u/ o9 t- q( \2 r3 F; b of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 3 B6 I2 ~( | I; L# lHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those ' B( ]! ^* v" N1 {9 z- w$ M' Opeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they. o m: W L& r. `. _ may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some6 V$ D9 n2 ]$ i. @: e5 r& Y of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before & i0 G" l- I6 u( P4 h: d$ L"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all 6 R; ^; D# [; B. k5 rpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise7 q# a% F: P! ]. T% a8 u! c) ^0 X apartments are the way to go? No. & F8 o! n% g8 u0 Z% N 4 @$ A( I5 a3 t% N 5 m& v' D" t: s$ L- S

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the6 V+ D4 u f+ x' \, \8 R2 ^ situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this( \! D0 k- e! `1 ?" Y) v1 |1 E R 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make f$ m/ X C# q) F! |no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ; I E: A& E# q7 Kfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant # F& F) v* r4 T& N5 d7 sresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless, l3 j- i! d+ z2 v7 u Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ' _$ Y* T8 ?$ z2 ^3 W4 ]8 Vunlikely to happen too. Sad!
发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2026-1-16 00:28 , Processed in 0.119662 second(s), 18 queries .

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部