UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
0 ^3 V+ m, U/ w# o/ Jarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider- u% i {. H# ?) S, B+ W
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
3 h3 r: ?8 y0 Ycity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.1 D# E( H. e2 F( I4 }9 s- l1 I
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
5 p0 [: }6 T- ? B3 i9 o# Y3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ x" @( V. }: }0 p8 W! x
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within0 F e7 z3 X8 j1 ]9 e' O
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among% W! |" U2 D9 k+ F2 F: e; i
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
1 Z0 S, S: F4 V, s6 @and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is
/ S6 i: |9 t0 x7 kharmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are, K# F! N$ O5 ]" I1 [
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
/ i! G0 q5 K+ v, V3 Qforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I3 o/ N( \& C$ y! L5 t z2 e8 F4 S' U- ~" W
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great9 W' K" j$ w( y9 \% y
impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
! h4 k7 b6 y+ D6 |and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong' G5 f; B# K. w/ ~$ F
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
- D8 a7 l& K. y+ i/ }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
2 E. m9 d5 v0 j$ D% k4 Nno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
. Z; x! j, s: C' R: X3 t0 W. yonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
+ w8 v o: s) ]! r0 P' k9 a2 O) `sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government. F3 I7 N+ n& D# s8 x4 e
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move$ n7 ?* L( d- I3 ]/ d
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is8 h$ S$ m6 j* e# p: S
"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,& w. b- L/ j* G) I1 g
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are
1 O. j9 Y& i/ G. vstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to4 K. I* v1 c D& f/ ]) ?
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make# d4 J( f7 O5 { x+ a n- L
money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was5 S+ I* m8 q4 {# f) _5 K5 y+ n
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
) l2 H, R% F) E8 ~! h* Wparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across4 x, M, M* Z2 T% D I* `
the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural( N! }# Y* {7 `0 I2 Y8 x( @0 ~3 n
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for; l/ y1 P! n7 L
development.
Hutongs- q1 Y1 v7 O1 Q
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
. b) A5 ]5 Q: X4 Mthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
: d% P% U- t4 P2 Y& O0 b0 ^in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not: q9 e$ L4 V. B
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you0 C9 b8 ^: {" `8 y6 k
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.: |" O1 w8 B1 D6 |2 ]
Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date
7 v4 m2 y$ T5 j, v% Bto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
1 C' X6 i1 G, O4 H! R0 \to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- S6 l$ N' I; B2 {
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically
* x+ U( }2 j+ [7 @unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
( B# |% i9 T+ v' G5 a* Blive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
% K0 C/ @2 p% phutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the. U; y# p+ W! { W/ e/ C
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the' S8 q* d$ s `
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be$ h( Q! K0 y7 R
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong5 |! C+ }6 G w! Y+ t' x
Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how. m. L3 U7 h6 k
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be5 w I1 b. _& L) B! V
torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
; G5 y4 w) y4 A# Q) ]+ L4 L+ rmemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".3 `0 J+ J2 w6 o; Y& d
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are0 w" ^* U7 ~2 S; J8 v
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
% D7 d6 Z. M# C, H. T/ c3 P8 Qnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image1 H3 j) M9 p5 S
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these/ N o' S8 G0 Z8 x+ b3 w
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those6 m0 M& x- R; K* L
people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
) V' x+ c7 I0 a0 A8 f; ?* R5 l' Dmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some- n* `% ]8 g- X6 C" ?: d3 z' p% i
of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before \& ?' P6 ], @" ~+ ?
"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
) ^6 b7 I1 q9 tpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
8 y6 O" M0 H3 U% m# |apartments are the way to go? No.8 g. `- e9 O8 Y' n# ]' c* X
7 o) ]% D2 Y* G) Z4 M; }
+ V5 f8 R/ Z$ ]8 i2 B, X! F. o( z
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
x3 O9 H" x3 L8 G( ?situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
. q1 a( W7 f# N: m" S0 E'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make' R& O, L1 U* v* u9 ~5 [
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 D3 T( D. f) X; c
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant+ {- ?) g2 f8 w W/ _$ n
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless1 ~0 E5 [& I5 Q, j) L4 w
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
/ b9 K. s. T1 e( T3 `0 J& aunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|