UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
4 |) N( h+ r1 o: f- uarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider
( b0 v8 Y' `- b! a- QBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
" Q# B- o7 N8 c; v# y$ F8 qcity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.; s$ ]4 E3 T4 l) G$ `$ s
According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,8 x( j; G; N# E D
3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of- [; P* o+ M- |) p
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within5 P, b/ X- k6 W. ] _# q
hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among2 }% W- h- J- b! G1 h; M
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
4 K+ c( r6 K# d- X3 J" o1 [8 ?8 Band Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is: l1 S; `0 U) y( o6 E% N' q( C
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are
, M& W2 ?! q6 T: Tdescended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and
" L6 R, Y8 Y. X- }$ q; N0 r& gforms of culture emerged in hutong.
I
. T; W p6 Z4 Uwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
4 e3 Y( R; _; \. ~6 i5 C4 yimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
) S$ V( s/ Q$ j. `and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong1 \7 k7 L ?( p3 u
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
7 D# ^+ I4 a+ K& B& s: Kof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
% T% J1 x+ f& w- |* Yno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are
6 Z% z. j" P! i0 D T$ ]! e! X+ qonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a( v7 \+ ^2 R/ i( l0 B, K8 [
sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government, h' k1 _) ]2 a. B8 t. S
want to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move! Q+ }: ^, H) u6 i1 y
to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
, e6 F* o7 q! b H"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,- O N) ~6 g+ j G; z( k7 d
this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are' u$ F# Q8 J# Q+ W2 A
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to$ B7 N7 {$ i* ?& l
"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
* l |6 k' G( y( A+ N. I- amoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was$ e5 i$ h; G: M+ [3 A
a beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a+ v+ _- S6 x3 O% Y3 w( _4 i3 m
parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
& w/ r( j) k/ v% h/ ^( athe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural0 g2 ~8 ?7 S/ J. Q
importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for, q+ b, o8 I" d
development.
Hutongs
' j0 o: ^4 U3 ]# K( u/ {in the old days were residential area where people actually lived
9 V" h- N) j7 q( fthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
) k% R6 A$ h: M' t- g/ E, iin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not! s* ]- ?5 |- {9 g: `# z
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you; ]% |1 z" s* U& `/ l3 r: S
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
" _7 b' y9 `: X$ o' q$ YFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date4 U6 t6 N- U5 j% H6 V
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
O5 ]" s1 O' I2 m7 }to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses; ~4 {0 {1 v8 M
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically J% O# G7 W7 U3 Z; w K$ }# w- D6 y
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to
2 r j9 T! J1 ]: n' h2 X0 Glive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
) F6 ~/ `3 L" ?hutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the( }& h# }* e3 T' w# Y& O
balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the, P. A# T( h' L. i4 y7 G' q
project into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be- H% f- P! q6 q# i% N* E# l
renovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
( }, l! p' B. L- D" UMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how* C2 l3 }% L8 u
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
7 v8 H4 H( @+ A6 L8 Dtorn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished7 z( U/ F; y c7 p4 M, m ~% c
memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"./ g: Z4 h. P6 I6 K
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are
& G( N9 i X. [; w9 K2 a) ealigned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially, U% {" ~- A2 n/ \0 w# f& e
non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image
: k! C! e; k) k' x7 h- dof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these) U$ r1 K. J2 g8 d4 ?: D" d. j
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
3 c' P) q* z3 h1 y! M9 v( Fpeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they
" t7 V% B3 M4 ?: ?9 a8 X$ z/ Bmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
5 c5 \$ l" ` z( A1 |of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
. Z. @2 y9 Q6 z! z; }) A"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
. A C7 Y2 A# N, epeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise
}- q) M! V7 W" uapartments are the way to go? No.
% G+ B M& {3 A; \% r
( t, Y0 ?: l: I! t! N' z1 j9 ~ 7 Q" X3 e, L5 J/ W6 r3 J
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the
; s& W: u% j) Osituation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this; p- ^: j* B! l7 `9 f
'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make
" u! G, z4 I- B& Y* V; mno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so
8 J9 R) E# ^) A. o( m% Lfast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant( f) ~, X/ ^7 X6 @. A
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless; G) `0 ~+ F* w% K9 x- q
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is
! N5 I4 [4 W2 Z" W9 Z3 |1 S! x. Iunlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|