|繁體中文 切换到宽版

服务器里的北京 - 老北京网

 找回密码
 注册老北京网

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 6171|回复: 1

A Hutong Discussion

[复制链接] 放大 缩小 原始字体
发表于 2007-4-24 05:08:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its' s2 s4 P! M/ K: U architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider4 g/ P R9 t8 K, N5 n Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" f- v9 J3 w+ P" |city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.* |* O G3 M6 c. g& k c7 y. } According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,4 h# T: Q4 a9 T6 Y0 X 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of+ d V: L5 _/ } Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within" \8 W, v* D5 E- v) c' | hutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among& W' A8 V9 y( ]9 [3 q! d each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera! B0 l' k: {, E- ~ and Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is |# J. z1 ]3 w' S harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are' s1 Z7 Q% x4 H% S/ b descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and 8 v6 X) L& V1 R! l. Dforms of culture emerged in hutong.

I 6 P( E( n6 [; Swas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great+ R; y6 e1 u A7 E% p impression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,' \( X+ [$ R6 i, B/ I- \% t: s4 H5 I and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong * x; d$ |5 @! @6 {% D, F: |- [3 vhas a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment 5 X! w, B) x. H0 }of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that 5 ]: E1 R* j4 y2 W$ \no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are R+ }5 i2 g, l! i only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a 4 a( w7 ]' }! Y: R, bsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government : G% O+ h1 n+ `6 H! Fwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move 2 B: H3 M! K" p8 Z) D3 b0 zto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is 7 w p% A* [1 r% C, E! X% w"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,) [7 ]) R* k2 w this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are & o( P5 K4 M/ w |2 I* m/ lstill living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to 5 D* I& j) e- b"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make- V; C' X7 I, _9 F( A. b3 T money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was 4 V2 Z# y' }& A/ S; Pa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a# ~. j" ~, _* y0 r6 `# n parking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across 0 b" @* {3 K3 k# [* C, `the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural8 x3 `% G' t& e% n importance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for3 d( ^: r7 H8 f$ N7 ~ development.

Hutongs 8 M2 ^" c' G# W9 nin the old days were residential area where people actually lived 9 o. x6 y7 U: X4 g2 |. `# Y% o; Vthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions- x' `( A8 u! W' r' G/ F( m7 z6 @ in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not + Q" m/ J$ x# {$ {: j! R( shave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you2 Y9 |" I) ?. u& m8 K0 _( j will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. I5 ?0 N' B* {4 t Furthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date : a# x- X5 x3 u7 Oto support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used # C' N5 b) k' o) M# U/ Oto hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses6 }- i4 F, ^: Z0 a# r8 T support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically. I+ e$ U4 C3 l) O# S unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to% L+ y7 ?; V* ^: Q$ {8 a! h live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, " Z& j; W& @4 W" i1 d' F' U6 dhutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the # @! n! r2 w5 m" p% M- W' Ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the * [* I( n- e( ^: a9 Y' [, dproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be % X+ Y" d4 b2 O( \) Hrenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong4 X V0 u9 N) ]6 z7 L Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how % f+ N$ R$ ]7 U L: [: A! i+ Zpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be F( A4 x! c; f% E, ktorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished ) M- l3 A6 T- l/ D9 umemories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress".8 p- ]& O' b) t) e6 x: K. [) `! P Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are ( V, E* g7 n! B- Faligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially+ a+ g0 Q% j$ O8 C) I( e" p non-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image * y/ O U" h% x5 w; n+ K6 aof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 0 K- G1 a; e% a& E; u5 NHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those7 c6 `" J1 L% ~) W people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they% x9 h9 H3 n% C8 r# D may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some' w& m8 L2 J9 }! H K0 J1 _% L of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before( V: U" [9 \0 i2 v7 R8 O- ? "modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all ' p+ K) s9 J' B6 fpeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise2 h' S% U- Y' {. m; I3 V apartments are the way to go? No. 4 y9 t( B# w. i+ b3 v2 n q 2 ` K/ p. A8 b* ?! Q 8 r) p; u2 Y+ o

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the- z ?5 n T# ]2 i/ t/ f j situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this! V" i. m/ n' d/ F3 T0 ?! q 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make % e( f8 R. Q& }8 z# ?; Kno money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so6 _2 p" V. U! o: _0 l& D1 N fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant 1 M, e% \! f1 H4 E5 Tresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless 4 P4 |8 Z1 v; D+ f( e9 } z O& lBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is ) P& K+ W0 t0 x! ~' tunlikely to happen too. Sad!
回复

举报

发表于 2007-5-22 20:37:00 | 显示全部楼层
Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册老北京网

本版积分规则

上个主题 下个主题 快速回复 返回列表 官方QQ群

2000.11.1,老北京网自创办之日起,已经运行了 | 老北京网

GMT+8, 2025-10-23 21:19 , Processed in 1.979107 second(s), 7 queries , MemCache On.

道义 良知 责任 担当

CopyRight © 2000-2022 oldbeijing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部