A Hutong Discussion

jhf0551

The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:

Me:

As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its architecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider 9 j5 Z2 {3 Z1 t/ k9 W+ LBeijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian" city. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture. According to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty, 3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.

Within 5 @2 ~: B* g D: ~8 t" {7 Vhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera 6 R" X# [) |1 W6 g' x5 d1 jand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and forms of culture emerged in hutong.

I % Q$ r, A. S* g+ W) j: Lwas born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great 0 ?, l: j9 M0 s$ z0 ?2 w2 Limpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished, 4 l5 D U, ^' |, M1 s9 T# Jand we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong has a history of more than 400 years!

Since 1999, the demolishment of hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that no hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are % q7 y7 Z5 s% A" v) [/ w- uonly enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a . M$ {- ^2 M ?8 {8 Lsort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government * C: v2 v& C8 M. c4 `8 ~$ cwant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move & [4 b& W2 t- F* n6 O8 tto the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is "modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact, this movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.

Kimchee:

I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to # K0 e- A( g; H& N"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make , O; s0 K' k2 _8 S5 V6 Xmoney for big business... including the very town I live in. There was ) R4 p, R% z6 |% xa beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a 2 e2 `6 e5 z0 U$ e' }; s, tparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across the street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.

Ashura:

While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural ! B2 c6 X, H5 `$ V, o* m# O' Jimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for development.

Hutongs . Z: u" Z9 m6 i N) \in the old days were residential area where people actually lived 4 z/ N/ i5 j" H7 o3 s0 zthere. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions in hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not 9 v7 {# P- k7 N8 M) y/ W( {. xhave plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs. , O% a0 v# {. G8 Z/ a- lFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date e* A/ }+ R' @6 [to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used # N6 m/ {2 S' @to hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically 0 f# ~ R3 Y# d3 M' e. _unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to 4 f- m: f1 B) F9 [( n8 hlive in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose, hutong is only a tourist attraction.

The best way to find the balance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the / z% c6 C0 U+ p# W& B) rproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be # _+ y! X- H: d2 C D3 b! brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong , w" {- D3 c( R% {( O+ [Museum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how " m- ?. e, x4 m8 n# wpeople lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be 8 \* } ^) f/ w) M9 a' Itorn down or transformed into something else.

TwinkieDP:

I'm sorry that your cherished memories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress". Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially 1 e& h# T1 @/ t8 onon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image 5 E0 d0 p; l, Y- ?7 [& g( V" Uof the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these 4 f$ m3 F1 d% {! HHutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those people who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they 4 c0 W( M( a( J2 j( Q0 Nmay appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before * P1 w8 Y( l) S5 W"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all people needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise apartments are the way to go? No.

Howard Fu:

I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs.
But the situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this 'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so ! @- H* t8 j# {4 N B+ ]fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant . B& c+ Z( G3 k6 y3 j$ Lresistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless - ?" t1 H4 F* N0 f& O2 V0 eBeijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is unlikely to happen too. Sad!

桉草

Excuse me. May I use ur discussion in my dissertation about Beijing Conservation?
Thx a lot!!