UID5538
帖子
阅读权限80
在线时间 小时
精华
威望
日志
相册
注册时间2006-2-27
最后登录1970-1-1
|
The following is a hutong discussion promoted by me on a Chinese history oriented forum:
Me:
As Beijing has been the capital of China for more than 800 years, its
3 D* _' a# N ~% {0 G$ Q. x2 Zarchitecture style is supreme throughout China. Please do not consider6 |4 Y9 d/ ], {
Beijing as just an "Imperial City". It in fact, is a more "civilian"
6 ~2 n4 T9 n. t- ?* K9 Ccity. Hutong or alley way is the kernel of Beijing's culture.
/ \4 W: x: z! B) u+ zAccording to some books, there were 1,200 hutongs in Yuan Dynasty,
% u" T/ J+ [+ Z% v) Z3,600 hutongs in Ming Dynasty, and over 6,000 hutongs at the end of# ~$ X/ r% x1 [8 P& i2 v5 E! s& M8 C
Manchu Qing Dynasty. Most of the hutongs are well preserved until 1999.
Within
2 _/ O# F8 \( a5 P Xhutongs, the citizens maintain a good neighborhood relationship among, d6 g2 J8 u. U/ t% T$ |; I" r
each other. Senior citizens play Chinese chess or listen to Peking Opera
- K, Y) A; U: q: I- fand Pingju. Children play outside. The atmosphere in hutong is* p7 K8 T9 r ^% ]
harmonious. The architectural styles of hutong are diverse, but all are- H$ K/ h. s8 ^" I- m" }
descended from traditional Chinese culture. Many great events and, }( r% I& C. L" F9 ]0 }5 {
forms of culture emerged in hutong.
I* p, K) Q' G, Z3 p8 A
was born in Beijing hutong. My childhood leaves me a great
& s& [: w- Z4 [! }! w% Yimpression. In 1990, the hutong where my home stood was demolished,
1 O3 C- t: x0 B( x& S9 Y# X! U, i# ~and we have to move into residential skyscrapers. You know, this hutong, I) s% T2 `5 j
has a history of more than 400 years!
Since 1999, the demolishment
8 W' X( d) B$ Y- U& u/ ]! Lof hutong has been a common thing in Beijing. There has been said that
% v+ f+ a: O' X# T5 y$ E3 L. ~7 A6 j# Bno hutongs will stand after 2008. Many people from outside Beijing are h' y, L( v+ S
only enthusiastic in "enjoying" skyscrapers, they consider hutong as a
1 R+ l# @0 e8 c4 @1 s( ^sort of under modernized structure. They, along with the government
- H$ L/ I* X+ l' Y* D) z* y& Swant to demolish them and replace them with meaningless skyscrapers. In 2004, more than 10,000 households in hutongs were forced to move
. i' A' L7 ]6 T( C/ @to the suburbs. The official reason of "Hutong Demolish Movement" is
/ n$ M F" F3 c3 E"modernization", or "preparing for the Olympic Games", but in fact,
& G F. A2 c1 X: B. t) kthis movement has nothing to do with the modernization and Olympics: citizens in hutong are, O7 G# x& j6 T5 }( q, t- f' ~
still living in compact apartment cells, Olympic Games will still be held in Beijing if four-combinations still stand.
Kimchee:
I think it's ashame how historical sights are destroyed due to
1 _# E$ x) q& g/ p% B"progress." But, it unfortunately happens all over the world to make
) ?" l- t5 @' G4 x1 ~money for big business... including the very town I live in. There was
& G3 v+ \ o$ }, n8 r+ ja beautiful Methodist Church that was demolished to make way for a
7 s: \5 }4 ?) f j. l8 `: k0 dparking lot... it was built in the early 1700's. The graveyard across
2 f0 d* n, w! J4 r# N$ e8 q# h# lthe street is still there, but I thought it was a crime to do this.
Ashura:
While I do agree and support the perservation of properties of cultural
. Z0 w4 W9 h* ?' \7 Z! n/ A& [! Jimportance , I also support that some hutongs have to be torn down for9 J% S) q& R2 W* p, g% w0 }! j1 @
development.
Hutongs8 P. U% |3 }5 k9 B* ]1 p
in the old days were residential area where people actually lived# }; }, B3 t/ S2 m
there. The same cannot be said for today because the living conditions
! }/ ^' H2 K4 `* m2 q/ Sin hutongs are not up to standard. The houses within the hutongs do not4 J4 G; |* A/ U. o' s
have plumbing and electricity, and if you want to install that, you) t4 k" e( Q f& V
will have to pay a high cost in building a system just for the hutongs.
O2 f' T4 J/ ^. w! Y3 G2 NFurthermore, the style of the houses, four combination, is out of date) d0 N* w, S4 I* a
to support the mobile population in modern day Beijing. The houses used
6 t6 M/ J& a) ^* Ato hold a whole family within them, while modern apartments and houses- l6 w: s3 ~/ D- R( t) R& z+ p/ L
support a nucleus family. That said, the hutongs are economically8 q4 |, @. L4 t7 N; _% w
unfeasible for ordinary people. I for one, do not see the reason to$ v6 A! H* r7 N
live in a hutong with the traditional houses. Losing its main purpose,
- X- N" ?, T. v9 K2 nhutong is only a tourist attraction.
The best way to find the
; N( X# m* y) ubalance between development and cultural perservation is to confine the
5 d+ _1 t$ Z5 F: Jproject into a district. Within this district, the hutongs should be
, F) C' M% X3 Z5 @- u4 U) brenovated to show the old face of Beijing. They should build a Hutong
4 d6 r( l( X+ [' P" T3 B& S5 rMuseum and allow people to actually walk into the houses to see how1 l2 I8 s8 ~6 X7 z
people lived in them. The hutongs outside of the district should be
$ x, f$ B. R- `6 g0 \1 ~5 l }# J% U; ^torn down or transformed into something else.
TwinkieDP:
I'm sorry that your cherished
7 y/ _' X$ }) i5 x: m Ememories of Old Beijing is being destroyed in the Path of "progress"." _( W# Y. O& G: H
Nothing against preservation of Hutongs, but I think my feelings are- Y& t' A4 U3 h3 g8 i
aligned with Ashura's. When people outside of China (especially
& W( _+ e k/ E- ^8 hnon-Chinese) think about the Cultural treasures of Beijing, the image6 A. K5 A8 c! m/ {" D( n G2 m& ]4 [
of the Hutongs is hardly brought up. I've seen pictures of these$ C7 m9 b* m v7 T
Hutongs, and I'm sure these peaceful neighborhoods mean a lot to those
$ k8 N6 v1 U* D! apeople who have lived their for generations, but to the outsider they6 w1 w+ Q: q0 c9 l" r
may appear to be outdated and substandard living quarters. I agree some
! F( ^' m E# q' {" [, F. r" ~of the cultural aspects showing how ordinary people lived before
7 q& U; e8 j1 D$ v( e% M K8 ], P"modernization" should be preserved, but living standards for all
. W0 l# q: d1 O: E/ ypeople needs to continually improve. Am I saying that high-rise5 c. e4 d6 R% p5 r' B
apartments are the way to go? No.' P. @( X; l( Y# }' R( X2 i. w
' M: s5 C. A$ B4 z8 w- f
$ L6 B- h5 ^# w
Howard Fu:
I have great sympathy for you and Beijing's old Hutongs. But the9 n% p1 T/ k- f0 ~+ V
situation is sad. There are big economy interest behind this
, t4 }( N: A2 g3 w# n'progress'. Real estate businessmen and government officials would make+ v1 I9 A8 L' J7 x1 t: X2 k
no money if they leave all the hutongs there. And they are moving so- o1 J1 F3 b# \9 c/ _% p. x* J
fast, there will be no hutong left after 2008 before any significant3 ]6 e: V9 @$ L
resistant opinion formed. This 'progress' is unlikely to stop unless6 N9 g* s! E' B
Beijing's estate market have a sudden dive before 2008 which is v2 }! N5 k: _! o! _$ f t
unlikely to happen too. Sad!
|
|